INTRODUCTION: Diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas which constitute 15% of all childhood brain tumors are inoperable and response to radiation and chemotherapy has not improved long-term survival. Due to lack of newer effective therapies, mean survival after diagnosis has remained less than 12 months. Trials investigating chemotherapy and/or radiation have proven disappointing. As biopsy of these tumors are rarely performed due to the high eloquence of the brain stem, information about the pathology and biology remains elusive hindering development of novel biologic agents. Poor access of most chemotherapeutic agents to these tumors due to the blood-brain barrier continues to undermine therapeutic efficacy. Thus, to date, we remain at a virtual standstill in our attempts to improve the prognosis of children with these tumors. METHODS: An extensive review of the literature was performed concerning children with diffuse brain stem gliomas including clinical trials, evolving molecular biology, and newer therapeutic endeavors. CONCLUSION: A pivotal approach in improving the prognosis of these tumors should include the initiation of biopsy and encouraging families to consider autopsy to study the molecular biology. This will help in redefining this tumor by its molecular signature and profiling targeted therapy. Continued advances should be pursued in neuroimaging technology including identifying surrogate markers of early disease progression. Defining strategies to enhance local delivery of drugs into tumors with the help of newer surgical techniques are important. Exhaustive research in all these aspects as a multidisciplinary approach could provide hope to children with these fatal tumors.
INTRODUCTION: Diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas which constitute 15% of all childhood brain tumors are inoperable and response to radiation and chemotherapy has not improved long-term survival. Due to lack of newer effective therapies, mean survival after diagnosis has remained less than 12 months. Trials investigating chemotherapy and/or radiation have proven disappointing. As biopsy of these tumors are rarely performed due to the high eloquence of the brain stem, information about the pathology and biology remains elusive hindering development of novel biologic agents. Poor access of most chemotherapeutic agents to these tumors due to the blood-brain barrier continues to undermine therapeutic efficacy. Thus, to date, we remain at a virtual standstill in our attempts to improve the prognosis of children with these tumors. METHODS: An extensive review of the literature was performed concerning children with diffuse brain stem gliomas including clinical trials, evolving molecular biology, and newer therapeutic endeavors. CONCLUSION: A pivotal approach in improving the prognosis of these tumors should include the initiation of biopsy and encouraging families to consider autopsy to study the molecular biology. This will help in redefining this tumor by its molecular signature and profiling targeted therapy. Continued advances should be pursued in neuroimaging technology including identifying surrogate markers of early disease progression. Defining strategies to enhance local delivery of drugs into tumors with the help of newer surgical techniques are important. Exhaustive research in all these aspects as a multidisciplinary approach could provide hope to children with these fatal tumors.
Authors: Sridharan Gururangan; Susan N Chi; Tina Young Poussaint; Arzu Onar-Thomas; Richard J Gilbertson; Sridhar Vajapeyam; Henry S Friedman; Roger J Packer; Brian N Rood; James M Boyett; Larry E Kun Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: C R Freeman; J Krischer; R A Sanford; M E Cohen; P C Burger; L Kun; E C Halperin; I Crocker; M Wharam Journal: Cancer Date: 1991-08-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Antony Michalski; Eric Bouffet; Roger E Taylor; Darren Hargrave; David Walker; Susan Picton; Kathryn Robinson; Barry Pizer; Sylwia Bujkiewicz Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2010-03-19 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: P G Fisher; S N Breiter; B S Carson; M D Wharam; J A Williams; J D Weingart; D R Foer; P T Goldthwaite; T Tihan; P C Burger Journal: Cancer Date: 2000-10-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: K J Helton; N S Phillips; R B Khan; F A Boop; R A Sanford; P Zou; C S Li; J W Langston; R J Ogg Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Halldora K Thorarinsdottir; Mariarita Santi; Robert McCarter; Elisabeth J Rushing; Robert Cornelison; Alessandra Jales; Tobey J MacDonald Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-06-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Stephanie Puget; Kevin Beccaria; Thomas Blauwblomme; Thomas Roujeau; Syril James; Jacques Grill; Michel Zerah; Pascale Varlet; Christian Sainte-Rose Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Amanda R King; Christopher D Corso; Evan M Chen; Eric Song; Paul Bongiorni; Zhe Chen; Ranjini K Sundaram; Ranjit S Bindra; W Mark Saltzman Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Richard C E Anderson; Benjamin Kennedy; Candix L Yanes; James Garvin; Michael Needle; Peter Canoll; Neil A Feldstein; Jeffrey N Bruce Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2012-12-14 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Kamran A Ahmed; Nadia N Laack; Laurence J Eckel; Nicholas M Orme; Nicholas M Wetjen Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.339