Literature DB >> 21533244

Proteomic-based identification of CD4-interacting proteins in human primary macrophages.

Rui André Saraiva Raposo1, Benjamin Thomas, Gabriela Ridlova, William James.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human macrophages (Mφ) express low levels of CD4 glycoprotein, which is constitutively recycled, and 40-50% of its localization is intracellular at steady-state. Although CD4-interacting proteins in lymphoid cells are well characterised, little is known about the CD4 protein interaction-network in human Mφ, which notably lack LCK, a Src family protein tyrosine kinase believed to stabilise CD4 at the surface of T cells. As CD4 is the main cellular receptor used by HIV-1, knowledge of its molecular interactions is important for the understanding of viral infection strategies. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: We performed large-scale anti-CD4 immunoprecipitations in human primary Mφ followed by high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis to elucidate the protein interaction-network involved in induced CD4 internalization and degradation. Proteomic analysis of CD4 co-immunoisolates in resting Mφ showed CD4 association with a range of proteins found in the cellular cortex, membrane rafts and components of clathrin-adaptor proteins, whereas in induced internalization and degradation CD4 is associated with components of specific signal transduction, transport and the proteasome.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first time that the anti-CD4 co-immunoprecipitation sub-proteome has been analysed in human primary Mφ. Our data have identified important Mφ cell surface CD4-interacting proteins, as well as regulatory proteins involved in internalization and degradation. The data give valuable insights into the molecular pathways involved in the regulation of CD4 expression in Mφ and provide candidates/targets for further biochemical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21533244      PMCID: PMC3076427          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based identification of the components of purified protein complexes has become one of the most powerful and routinely used technologies for high-throughput detection of protein interactions [1], [2]. The study of protein interactions by MS for identification of components of protein complexes gives powerful insights into protein function, binding partners and cellular pathways [3], [4]. In most studies, proteins in a given complex are identified via MS analysis of in-gel tryptic digests of electrophoretically separated proteins of particular sub-cellular fractions (membranes, nuclei, intracellular compartments) or in co-immunoprecipitated complexes [5], [6], [7], [8]. CD4 is the main cellular receptor used by human immunodeficiency viruses HIV-1, HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus [9], [10], [11]. It is a type I transmembrane glycoprotein of 55 kDa expressed on the surface of Regulatory and Helper subsets of T lymphocytes and interacts with MHC class-II carrying cells [12]. CD4 increases the avidity of the low affinity interactions between the peptide-MHC complex on antigen presenting cells and the T cell receptor on the lymphocyte, and its association with the intracellular protein tyrosine kinase LCK modulates signal transduction [13]. In humans and rats CD4 is also expressed on cells of the monocyte/Mφ lineage, although its function on these cells is poorly understood, and the protein expression levels are 10- to 20-fold less than in T cells [14], [15]. In lymphoid cells expressing LCK, 90% of CD4 is restricted to the cell surface and undergoes limited internalization [16]. Endocytosis of CD4 can occur, through clathrin-coated pits, when the cytoplasmic domain becomes serine phosphorylated, leading to its dissociation from LCK [17], [18], [19]. In myeloid cells, such as Mφ, which do not express LCK, CD4 is constitutively internalized and 40–50% is intracellular at steady-state [16]. The pathways by which CD4 is removed from the cell surface and the protein-network involved are poorly defined. Cell surface CD4 levels can be down-regulated by exposure to gangliosides [20], soluble HIV-1 gp120 [21], phorbol esters [17], [22] and during HIV-1 infection [23], [24]. Moreover, down-regulation of viral receptors is a common mechanism used by most retroviruses to avoid superinfection (multiple rounds of infection) and to promote viral release. HIV-1 Nef protein accelerates CD4 internalization and degradation in the lysosomes [25], and at the late stages of HIV-1 infection, CD4 can be targeted for proteasomal degradation by HIV-1 Vpu [26], [27], [28]. Most reports to date have analysed CD4 interaction complexes in lymphoid cell lines, revealing some of the well-known associating proteins, such as LCK, CD45, transferrin receptor (CD71), CD98, myosins, vimentin, tubulins, actins, annexin II and lymphocyte phosphatase associated phosphoprotein (LPAP) [29], [30], [31], [32]. However, little is known about how CD4 antigen is arranged at the surface of Mφ, which notably lack LCK expression. In common with other laboratories we found that the kinetics of HIV-1 replication was modulated by the simultaneous presence of Mφ and T cells in different ratios and activation states [33], [34], [35]. Data from our laboratory reported that HIV-1 viral production was typically slower in infected cultures in which Mφ were co-cultured with activated T cells. More recently, we extended these observations and showed that activated T cells produce soluble factors that selectively induce the internalization and degradation of CD4 in primary Mφ, thus critically affecting HIV-1 entry in a process sensitive to the vacuolar ATPase inhibitor bafilomycin A1, and the proteasomal inhibitor, MG132 (Saraiva Raposo et al., manuscript under revision). In this report we perform high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis of CD4 co-immunoisolates in human primary Mφ, in order to characterise the CD4 containing complexes in steady-state and at different stages of CD4 internalization and degradation. The experimental strategy is shown in Fig. 1.
Figure 1

Strategy for the identification of CD4-complexes in human primary Mφ.

CD14+ monocytes were isolated from human blood by magnetic cell sorting (MACS) and cultured for 7 days in the presence of M-CSF. One hundred million day 7 fully differentiated Mφ were left untreated (Condition 1, blue), treated with conditioned media from activated T cells (Induced CD4 internalization and degradation, Condition 2 red) or treated with conditioned media from activated T cells in the presence of the proteasomal inhibitor MG132 and the inhibitor of vacuolar ATPases bafilomycin (BafA1) (Induced CD4 internalization but blocked degradation, Condition 3 green). Eighteen hours later, cells were detached from tissue culture plates, lysed and large-scale anti-CD4 immunoprecipitations (IP) using monoclonal antibody against CD4 (clone QS4120) or isotype control IP were carried out. IP products were loaded onto SDS-PAGE pre-cast gels and electrophoresis were run. Protein gels were coomassie stained, gel lanes were cut into 10 equal pieces and trypsin-digested. Proteins were identified by LC-MS/MS.

Strategy for the identification of CD4-complexes in human primary Mφ.

CD14+ monocytes were isolated from human blood by magnetic cell sorting (MACS) and cultured for 7 days in the presence of M-CSF. One hundred million day 7 fully differentiated Mφ were left untreated (Condition 1, blue), treated with conditioned media from activated T cells (Induced CD4 internalization and degradation, Condition 2 red) or treated with conditioned media from activated T cells in the presence of the proteasomal inhibitor MG132 and the inhibitor of vacuolar ATPases bafilomycin (BafA1) (Induced CD4 internalization but blocked degradation, Condition 3 green). Eighteen hours later, cells were detached from tissue culture plates, lysed and large-scale anti-CD4 immunoprecipitations (IP) using monoclonal antibody against CD4 (clone QS4120) or isotype control IP were carried out. IP products were loaded onto SDS-PAGE pre-cast gels and electrophoresis were run. Protein gels were coomassie stained, gel lanes were cut into 10 equal pieces and trypsin-digested. Proteins were identified by LC-MS/MS.

Results

Conditioned media from activated T cells induces CD4 internalization and degradation in Mφ

In order to effectively demonstrate the induction of CD4 internalization and degradation, we detected the expression of CD4 in Mφ before and after treatment with conditioned media from activated T cells by flow cytometry. Eighteen hours post-treatment the expression of CD4 levels at the surface of Mφ was barely detectable (Fig. 2A), and the percentage of Mφ expressing surface CD4 was significantly reduced by 4-fold (Fig. 2B). In addition, total CD4 expression (surface + intracellular) was diminished by 2-fold (Fig. 2C). Altogether, these data suggest the internalization and degradation of CD4 after treatment with conditioned supernatants from activated T cells.
Figure 2

CD4 is internalized and degraded after treatment with conditioned media from activated T cells.

Mφ were treated with conditioned media from activated T cells for 18 hours or left untreated, followed by flow cytometry staining with directly conjugated mAb to CD4. A Black histogram represents the appropriate isotype control. Histograms show the intensity of the signal on the X-axis with a log10-scale and the percentage of maximum expression on the Y-axis. Representative staining of more than five donors tested (n>5). B Bars represent the mean percentage of Mφ expressing surface CD4 with SD error bars from ten independent donors (n = 10). C Total CD4 expression levels (surface + intracellular) were determined by dividing the geometrical MFI of the antibody staining over the MFI of the isotype control. Bars represent the mean values of five independent donors (n = 5) with SD error bars. In B and C, black bar corresponds to untreated Mφ and white bar corresponds to conditioned media treated Mφ (T cell Sup).

CD4 is internalized and degraded after treatment with conditioned media from activated T cells.

Mφ were treated with conditioned media from activated T cells for 18 hours or left untreated, followed by flow cytometry staining with directly conjugated mAb to CD4. A Black histogram represents the appropriate isotype control. Histograms show the intensity of the signal on the X-axis with a log10-scale and the percentage of maximum expression on the Y-axis. Representative staining of more than five donors tested (n>5). B Bars represent the mean percentage of Mφ expressing surface CD4 with SD error bars from ten independent donors (n = 10). C Total CD4 expression levels (surface + intracellular) were determined by dividing the geometrical MFI of the antibody staining over the MFI of the isotype control. Bars represent the mean values of five independent donors (n = 5) with SD error bars. In B and C, black bar corresponds to untreated Mφ and white bar corresponds to conditioned media treated Mφ (T cell Sup).

Anti-CD4 co-immunoprecipitation sub-proteome in control Mφ

We performed large-scale CD4 immunoprecipitations in normal resting primary human Mφ, followed by LC-MS/MS. A representative gel of the resolved proteins after CD4 co-immunoisolation is shown in Fig. 3. In control resting Mφ (condition 1), several cell surface proteins associated with CD4 were identified, including CD9, a tetraspanin-family member involved in cell adhesion, cell motility and IL-16 signalling [36], [37], [38], [39]; CD163, involved in the clearance and endocytosis of hemoglobin/haptoglobin complexes [40], [41]; integrin subunit beta (CD18), involved in cell surface adhesion and reported to interact with integrins alpha-M and alpha-X [42]; protein S100, a calcium binding protein known to be involved in phagocyte migration and infiltration at sites of wounding [43]; chemokine receptor 1 (CCR-1), a G protein-coupled receptor [44]; adaptor protein 2 (AP-2), a known adaptor protein which functions in protein transport via transport vesicles in different membrane trafficking pathways [25], [45], and HLA class I, involved in antigen presentation [46]. CD4 was also found to be associated with cytoskeleton and actin-modulating proteins, such as gelsolin, tropomyosins and dynein. An unknown and uncharacterised protein, TPP1 was also identified. A summary list of interacting proteins is shown in table 1.
Figure 3

Representative protein gels of anti-CD4 immunoprecipitations in Mφ.

Mφ were left untreated (Condition 1, blue), treated with conditioned media from activated T cells (Condition 2, red) or treated with conditioned media from activated T cells in the presence of 5 µM of MG132 and 100 nM of BafA1 (Condition 3, green). Eighteen hours later, cells were lysed and anti-CD4 immunoprecipitations were carried out. The final immunoisolates were resuspended in Laemmli sample buffer under reducing and denaturing conditions, before loading onto a SDS-PAGE pre-cast gel. Isotype control IgG immunoprecipitations were also performed to show non-specific background binding proteins.

Table 1

Uniquely identified proteins in anti-CD4 co-immunoprecipitations in control Mφ (Condition 1).

PROTEIN NAMEGENEMOLECULAR WEIGHTLOCALIZATIONFUNCTION/STRUCTUREUNIPROT ACCESSIONPROBABILITYUNIQUE PEPTIDES
Gelsolin, isoform 2GSN80,641CytoskeletonActin-modulating proteinP06396114
Tropomyosin alpha-3 chain, isoform 2TPM329,033CytoskeletonActin-modulating proteinP0675316
Integrin beta 2ITGB284,782MembraneCell adhesionP0510715
Golgi autoantigen (Golgin), subfamily A2GOLGA2113,086Golgicis-Golgi structureQ0837914
Tropomyosin alpha 4 chain, isoform 1TPM428,522CytoskeletonActin-modulating proteinP6793614
Putative uncharacterized protein TPP1TPP160,369UnknownUnknownB5MDC114
Coatomer, subunit gammaCOPG97,718CytoplasmProtein transportQ9Y67813
Cytoplasmic dynein 1, heavy chain 1DYNC1H1532,408MicrotubulesMotor proteinQ1420413
Hematopoietic lineage cell-specific proteinHCLS153,984MembraneAntigen receptor signallingP1431713
AP-2 complex subunit beta, isoform 1AP2B1104,553MembraneProtein transportP6301013
Protein S100-A9S100A913,242MembraneChemotaxisP0670213
Actin-related protein 2/3 complex, subunit 1BARPC1B40,950CytoplasmActin bindingO1514312
Actin-related protein 2/3 complex, subunit 4ARPC419,667CytoplasmActin bindingP5999812
F-actin capping protein, subunit betaCAPZB37,482CytoplasmActin bindingB4DWA612
Scavenger receptor (M130) cysteine-richCD163125,437MembraneScavenger-receptor activityQ86VB712
HLA class I histocompatibility antigenHLA-C36,798MembraneAntigen presentationQ299600.99982
Protein S100-A8S100A810,835MembraneChemotaxisP0510912
Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 2RAC221,429CytoplasmGTP bindingP1515312
Tropomyosin 1 alpha chain, isoform 2TPM132,678CytoskeletonActin-modulating proteinQ9Y4270.99962
C-C chemokine receptor type 1CCR141,173MembraneG-protein coupled receptor proteinP322460.98882
CD9 antigenCD925,416MembraneSignallingP219260.99522

Protein and gene names, molecular weight in Daltons, cellular localization, function/structure, Uniprot accession number, protein identification probability from iProphet and unique number of identified peptides for each individual protein are shown.

Representative protein gels of anti-CD4 immunoprecipitations in Mφ.

Mφ were left untreated (Condition 1, blue), treated with conditioned media from activated T cells (Condition 2, red) or treated with conditioned media from activated T cells in the presence of 5 µM of MG132 and 100 nM of BafA1 (Condition 3, green). Eighteen hours later, cells were lysed and anti-CD4 immunoprecipitations were carried out. The final immunoisolates were resuspended in Laemmli sample buffer under reducing and denaturing conditions, before loading onto a SDS-PAGE pre-cast gel. Isotype control IgG immunoprecipitations were also performed to show non-specific background binding proteins. Protein and gene names, molecular weight in Daltons, cellular localization, function/structure, Uniprot accession number, protein identification probability from iProphet and unique number of identified peptides for each individual protein are shown.

Anti-CD4 co-immunoprecipitation sub-proteome in induced internalization and degradation

Internalization and degradation of CD4 in Mφ was induced by conditioned media from activated T cells (condition 2) and interacting proteins were identified by CD4 co-immunoprecipitation followed by LC-MS/MS. A representative gel of the resolved proteins after CD4 co-immunoisolation is shown in Fig. 3. Proteins identified included Cdc42, a small GTPase family protein involved in signal transduction and endocytosis [47], [48]; proteins associated with late endocytic trafficking, such as LAMP1, a component of the lysosomal membrane [49], [50]; RhoB, known to be associated with the late endosome membrane; adaptor protein 1 (AP-1), a subunit of clathrin-associated adaptor protein complex 1 [45], [51], [52]; Sec23B, a component of coating protein II (COPII) involved in the transport of vesicles from the Golgi apparatus to the endoplasmic reticulum, and Rab10/Rab11B, important components of vesicle recycling and protein turn-over [45], [53]. Several cytoplasmic and cytoskeleton-related proteins were also identified, including fascin, myosin and tensin. Annexin A2, a calcium regulated membrane binding protein and flotillin-1, a scaffolding protein associated with caveolar membranes [54] were also identified with more than 5 unique peptides. A complete list of the uniquely identified proteins is shown in table 2.
Table 2

Uniquely identified proteins in anti-CD4 co-immunoprecipitations in induced CD4 internalization and degradation in Mφ (Condition 2).

PROTEIN NAMEGENEMOLECULAR WEIGHTLOCALIZATIONFUNCTION/STRUCTUREUNIPROT ACCESSIONPROBABILITYUNIQUE PEPTIDES
Actin, cytoplasmic 2ACTG141,793CytoskeletonActin bindingP632610.999311
Annexin A2, isoform 1ANXA238,604MembraneCalcium bindingP0735519
Alpha actinin 4ACTN4104,854CytoplasmTransportO4370716
Flotillin 1FLOT147,355MembraneProtein transportO759550.997756
Protein transport protein, Sec23BSEC23B86,479COPII VesicleProtein transportQ1543715
Integrin betaITGB278,345MembraneCell adhesionA8MYE60.998253
FascinFSCN154,530CytoplasmActin bindingQ1665812
Myosin-Va, isoform 1MYO5A215,405CytoplasmActin bindingQ9Y4I112
Tensin 3, isoform 1TNS3155,266CytoplasmProtein bindingQ68CZ20.99552
Cytosolic non-specific dipeptidase, isoform 2CNDP243,833CytoplasmProteolysisQ96KP412
Reticulon 4, isoform 2RTN440,318MembraneProtein bindingQ9NQC312
Ras-related protein, Rab-10RAB1022,541MembraneProtein transportP610260.997752
Ribonuclease inhibitorRNH149,973CytoplasmProtein bindingP1348912
Cell division control protein 42, Isoform 1CDC4221,311Cytoplasm/MembraneGTP bindingP609530.99552
AP-1 complex subunit beta 1, Isoform AAP1B1104,637Clathrin Coated PitsEndocytosisQ105670.99552
Lysosome associated membrane glycoprotein 1LAMP144,882LysosomeProtein degradationP112790.99552
Ras-related protein, Rab-11BRAB11B24,489MembraneProtein transportQ159070.99652
Rho-related GTP-binding protein, RhoBRHOB22,123MembraneProtein transportP627450.98762

Protein and gene names, molecular weight in Daltons, cellular localization, function/structure, Uniprot accession number, protein identification probability from iProphet and unique number of identified peptides for each individual protein are shown.

Protein and gene names, molecular weight in Daltons, cellular localization, function/structure, Uniprot accession number, protein identification probability from iProphet and unique number of identified peptides for each individual protein are shown.

Anti-CD4 co-immunoprecipitation sub-proteome in induced internalization and blocked degradation

In condition 3, internalization of CD4 in Mφ was induced by the same conditioned media from activated T cells, as described for condition 2, and cellular degradation was blocked using the proteasome inhibitor MG132 and the vacuolar ATPase inhibitor bafilomycin A1. CD4-interacting proteins were identified by co-immunoprecipitations followed by LC-MS/MS. A representative gel of the resolved proteins after CD4 co-immunoisolation is shown in Fig. 3. CD4 was associated with a large number of proteins related to protein degradation, in particular the proteasome. Proteasome-related proteins such as the 26S regulatory subunit 6B, ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzymes E1 and E3 ubiquitin protein ligase subunit Itch [55], [56], [57], [58] were identified. Proteins associated with antigenic presentation and intracellular protein trafficking were also identified, such as MHC-I molecules (HLA-A and HLA-B), ERp29 and ERp1 (endoplasmic reticulum chaperones) [59]. Although identified with one unique peptide, but with high iProphet probability scores, we also detected 7 proteins, including components of vacuolar proton-transporting ATPases, such as V-type proton ATPase subunits D and G1. A complete list of the uniquely identified proteins is shown in table 3.
Table 3

Uniquely identified proteins in anti-CD4 co-immunoprecipitations in induced CD4 internalization and blocked degradation in Mφ (Condition 3).

PROTEIN NAMEGENEMOLECULAR WEIGHTLOCALIZATIONFUNCTION/STRUCTUREUNIPROT ACCESSIONPROBABILITYUNIQUE PEPTIDES
Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1/2HSPA1B70,052CytoplasmChaperone, protein foldingP08107119
Coronin 1CCORO1C49,379CytoskeletonSignal transductionB4DMH313
Heme oxygenase 1HMOX132,819ERMetal-bindingP0960113
Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G, isoform 2GNAI238,473MembraneGTP Binding, signal TransductionP0489913
Annexin IVANXA436,085CytoplasmCalcium bindingQ6LES212
Annexin VIANXA675,277CytoplasmCalcium bindingA6NN800.78732
Endoplasmic reticulum protein, ERp29ERP2928,993ER lumenIntracellular protein transportP3004012
Guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit beta 4GNB437,567CytoplasmTransmembrane signallingQ9HAV00.99892
HLA class I histocompatibility antigenHLA-A40,892MembraneAntigen processing and presentationP1619012
Hypoxia up-regulated protein 1HYOU1111,335ER lumenChaperone, protein foldingQ9Y4L112
E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase Itchy, isoform 1ITCH102,803CytoplasmProtein ubiquitinationQ96J0212
Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein RHNRNPR70,943CytoplasmmRNA processingO433900.99312
Ras-related protein Rab-1ARAB1A22,678MembraneProtein transportP628200.98982
Endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidase 1, isoform 2ERAP1107,841ER lumenAntigen processing and presentationQ9NZ0812
Ras-related protein, Rab-1BRAB1B22,171MembraneProtein transportQ9H0U40.98982
26S protease regulatory subunit 6BPSMC447,366Proteasome ComplexProtein degradationP436860.99712
Proteasome activator complex, subunit 1PSME128,723Proteasome ComplexProtein degradationQ063230.99712
Proteasome subunit alpha type 4PSMA429,484Proteasome ComplexProtein degradationP257890.99712
Ubiquitin-like modifier-activating enzyme 1UBA1117,849CytosolUbiquitin conjugation pathwayP223140.99712
Antigen peptide transporter 1TAP187,218ER lumenProtein transportQ035180.99711
HLA class I histocompatibility antigenHLA-B40,481MembraneAntigen processing and presentationP304810.99711
Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptorPTPN667,561CytoplasmSignal transductionP293500.97781
Ras-related protein, Rab-14RAB1423,897MembraneProtein transportP611060.99711
Transmembrane emp24 domain-containing proteinTMED1024,976Golgi apparatus membraneVesicular protein traffickingP497550.99711
V-type proton ATPase subunit DATP6V1D28,263VacuoleProton-transporting ATPaseQ9Y5K80.99711
V-type proton ATPase subunit G1ATP6V1G113,758VacuoleProton-transporting ATPaseO753480.99691

Protein and gene names, molecular weight in Daltons, cellular localization, function/structure, Uniprot accession number, protein identification probability from iProphet and unique number of identified peptides for each individual protein are shown.

Protein and gene names, molecular weight in Daltons, cellular localization, function/structure, Uniprot accession number, protein identification probability from iProphet and unique number of identified peptides for each individual protein are shown. Table 4 lists the proteins commonly identified in all three conditions.
Table 4

Proteins commonly identified in all conditions.

PROTEIN NAMEGENEMOLECULAR WEIGHTLOCALIZATIONFUNCTION/STRUCTUREUNIPROT ACCESSIONPROBABILITYUNIQUE PEPTIDES
Myosin 9, isoform 1MYH9226,532CytoplasmActin bindingP355791126
Ras GTPase-activating-like proteinIQGAP1189,252MembraneRas GTPase activator activityP469400.9995440
Major vault proteinMVP99,327CytoplasmProtein transportQ14764135
Filamin A, isoform 2FLNA280,018CytoskeletonProtein bindingP21333134
VimentinVIM53,652CytosolActin bindingP08670128
Plastin 2LCP170,289CytoplasmActin bindingP13796122
Clathrin heavy chain 1CLTC191,615Clathrin coated pitProtein transportQ00610120
Protein transport protein, Sec16ASEC16A233,517ER/GolgiProtein transportO150270.9947819
EndoplasminHSP90B192,469CytosolERAD protein catabolismP146250.9999813
Alpha actinin 1ACTN1103,058CytoskeletonActin bindingP12814111
Talin 1TLN1269,767CytoskeletonActin bindingQ9Y4900.999611
MoesinMSN67,820CytoskeletonCell adhesionP26038110
DnaJ subfamily C member 10DNAJC1091,080ER lumenProtein foldingQ8IXB10.99779
CD4 antigenCD451,111MembraneReceptor activityP017300.999429
Protein transport protein, Sec24CSEC24C118,325COPII vesicleER/Golgi transportP539920.951858
Annexin A5ANXA535,937CytoplasmCalcium bindingP087580.99887
Profilin 1PFN115,054CytoskeletonActin bindingP077370.999547
Protein disulfide isomeraseP4HB57,116MembraneProtein disulfide isomeraseP072370.997356
V-type proton ATPase, subunit BATP6V1B256,501CytosolProton-transporting ATPaseP212810.998836
CalreticulinCALR48,142CytosolCalcium bindingP277970.99845
Cathepsin BCTSB37,822LysosomeDegradation/turn-over of proteinsP078580.997875
Coronin 1ACORO1A51,026CytoskeletonActin bindingP311460.997485
Cofilin 1CFL118,502CytoskeletonActin bindingP235280.99874
F-actin-capping protein, subunit alpha 2CAPZA232,949CytoskeletonActin bindingP477550.99664
Protein transport protein, Sec24ASEC24A119,749COPII VesicleER/Golgi transportO954860.999034
Myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigenMNDA45,836CytoplasmTranscription regulationP412180.998064
Transferrin receptor protein 1TFRC84,871MembraneTransferrin receptor activityP027860.99674
14-3-3 protein zeta/deltaYWHAZ27,745CytosolSignal transductionP631040.999133
Integrin alpha MCD11b127,179MembraneCell adhesionP112150.997473
Protein-glutamine gamma-glutamyltransferase 2TGM277,329MembraneCell adhesionP219800.998083
Lymphocyte-specific protein 1LSP137,192MembraneSignal transductionP332410.999033
Macrophage-capping proteinCAPG38,518CytosolActin bindingP401210.997583
Ras-related protein, Rap-1bRAP1B20,825MembraneGTPase activityP612240.997433
IgE Fc receptor subunit gammaFCER1G9,667MembraneReceptor activityP302730.997732
Protein S100-A11S100A1111,740CytosolCalcium bindingP319490.998832

Protein and gene names, molecular weight in daltons, cellular localization, function/structure, Uniprot accession number, protein identification probability from iProphet and unique number of identified peptides for each individual protein are shown.

Protein and gene names, molecular weight in daltons, cellular localization, function/structure, Uniprot accession number, protein identification probability from iProphet and unique number of identified peptides for each individual protein are shown.

Western Blotting analysis of CD4 co-immunoprecipitates in Mφ

Mass spectrometry identifications of CD9, E3 ubiquitin ligase Itch and clathrin heavy chain in CD4 co-immunoisolates were confirmed by western blot analysis. As anticipated, CD4 was identified in all Mφ sample conditions, but at reduced levels in condition 2. Clathrin heavy chain 1 was co-immunoisolated with CD4 in all three conditions and the E3 ubiquitin ligase subunit Itch was only co-immunoisolated with CD4 when cellular degradation was blocked. CD9 antigen was only co-immunoisolated with CD4 in the control Mφ. CCR5, reported to interact with CD4 at the surface of Mφ and T cells [60], was not identified by mass spectrometry in any of the conditions described above and was not detected by western blot analysis of CD4 co-immunoisolates (Fig. 4).
Figure 4

Western blot analysis of CD4 co-immunoprecipitates in Mφ.

A total of 1×107 Mφ were left untreated (Condition 1, blue), treated for 18 hours with supernatants from activated T cells (Condition 2, red), treated for 18 hours with supernatants from activated T cells in the presence of 5 µM MG132 and 100 nM BafA1 (Condition 3, green), lysed and anti-CD4 immunoprecipitation reactions were carried out. Isotype control immunoprecipitations were also performed to show background protein binding. Immunoisolates were resuspended in Laemmli sample buffer under reducing and denaturing conditions and resolved on a SDS-PAGE gel. Membranes were incubated with antibodies against CD4, clathrin heavy chain (HC) 1, E3 Ubiquitin (Ub) ligase Itch, CD9 and CCR5. Primary antibodies were detected and scanned using the quantitative western blotting imaging Odyssey System. A representative blot of three different blood donors is shown (n = 3).

Western blot analysis of CD4 co-immunoprecipitates in Mφ.

A total of 1×107 Mφ were left untreated (Condition 1, blue), treated for 18 hours with supernatants from activated T cells (Condition 2, red), treated for 18 hours with supernatants from activated T cells in the presence of 5 µM MG132 and 100 nM BafA1 (Condition 3, green), lysed and anti-CD4 immunoprecipitation reactions were carried out. Isotype control immunoprecipitations were also performed to show background protein binding. Immunoisolates were resuspended in Laemmli sample buffer under reducing and denaturing conditions and resolved on a SDS-PAGE gel. Membranes were incubated with antibodies against CD4, clathrin heavy chain (HC) 1, E3 Ubiquitin (Ub) ligase Itch, CD9 and CCR5. Primary antibodies were detected and scanned using the quantitative western blotting imaging Odyssey System. A representative blot of three different blood donors is shown (n = 3).

GO annotations

Uniquely identified protein identifications in all three conditions were exported to ProteinCenter and GO annotations were carried out. In induced CD4 internalization and degradation (condition 2) there is an over-representation of proteins associated with the endosome, vacuole and Golgi, when compared to control Mφ (condition 1). Moreover, when cellular degradation is blocked (condition 3) the over-represented CD4-associated proteins are related to the proteasome, endoplasmic reticulum, organelle lumen, mitochondrion and cytosol (Fig. 5A). Proteins related to DNA and nucleotide-binding are over-represented in condition 3 and metal binding proteins are over-represented in condition 2. No proteins with structural molecular activities were uniquely identified in condition 3, in contrast to control or condition 2, where 30% and 15%, respectively, of the uniquely identified proteins fall into this category (Fig. 5B). Proteins related to cell organization and biogenesis, cell differentiation, development and transport are greatly over-represented in condition 2 over condition 3. In control Mφ, proteins related to response to stimulus and defence response are over-represented over the other two. Cell motility-related proteins cluster with CD4 in control Mφ and in condition 2 (Fig. 5C).
Figure 5

Gene Ontology (GO) annotations of the uniquely identified proteins in anti-CD4 immunoprecipitations in Mφ.

Protein identifications from the three different conditions were exported from the in-house developed Central Proteomics Facilities data analysis pipeline (CPFP) and uploaded to ProteinCenter software. A illustrates the percentage of protein identifications versus protein cellular localizations (GO cellular annotations); B illustrates the percentage of protein identifications versus protein molecular functions (GO molecular annotations) and C illustrates the percentage of protein identifications versus protein biological functions (GO biological annotations). Blue bars represent the percentage of unique proteins identified in condition 1 (Resting macrophages); Red bars represent the percentage of unique proteins identified in condition 2 (Induced CD4 internalization and degradation); Green bars represent the percentage of unique proteins identified in condition 3 (Induced CD4 internalization and blocked degradation).

Gene Ontology (GO) annotations of the uniquely identified proteins in anti-CD4 immunoprecipitations in Mφ.

Protein identifications from the three different conditions were exported from the in-house developed Central Proteomics Facilities data analysis pipeline (CPFP) and uploaded to ProteinCenter software. A illustrates the percentage of protein identifications versus protein cellular localizations (GO cellular annotations); B illustrates the percentage of protein identifications versus protein molecular functions (GO molecular annotations) and C illustrates the percentage of protein identifications versus protein biological functions (GO biological annotations). Blue bars represent the percentage of unique proteins identified in condition 1 (Resting macrophages); Red bars represent the percentage of unique proteins identified in condition 2 (Induced CD4 internalization and degradation); Green bars represent the percentage of unique proteins identified in condition 3 (Induced CD4 internalization and blocked degradation).

Discussion

Mass spectrometry analysis of CD4 co-immunoisolates, supplemented with GO annotations provided useful information on the clustering of CD4 molecules in resting Mφ and elucidated the protein-network involved in the internalization and degradation. CD4 in resting Mφ showed association with a range of molecules found in the cellular cortex and membrane rafts. Consistent with earlier reports [19], [25], [61], we also observed CD4 association, and confirmed by western blotting, with components of clathrin-mediated endocytosis, such as clathrin heavy chain 1 and the adaptor protein AP-2, clearly suggesting that in resting Mφ CD4 undergoes constitutive internalization and recycling [16], [18], [62]. AP-2 has been reported to be involved in the initial formation of clathrin coated pits at the plasma membrane, and it is an important mediator of receptor internalization and clathrin assembly [63]. We observed CD4 association with the tetraspanin protein CD9, and as both CD4 and CD9 are able to bind IL-16 in mast cells [36], [64], this association might in fact be physiologically relevant in Mφ. In addition to CD4, HIV-1 requires CXCR4 or CCR5 to enter target cells. Xiao et al., reported a constitutive cell surface association between CD4 and CCR5 [60] and showed that the presence of gp120, leads to the clustering of CD4 and CCR5. However, they stated that it was difficult to co-immunoisolate CD4 and CCR5 in human primary Mφ and CD4+ T cells in the absence of gp120, arguing that the levels of both receptors were very low and the techniques used were not sensitive enough. Employing high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis on a large sample of primary Mφ, a more sensitive technique than the one used by Xiao et al., we did not detect CCR5 molecules in CD4 co-immunoisolates. Although a constitutive CD4-CCR5 interaction in the absence of gp120 might still exist, our results do not support this notion. Many reports to date have shown that in CD4+ T cells LCK binds directly to the cytoplasmic tail of CD4 [13], [16], [18], providing stability at the cell surface. As we did not identify any Src family protein kinases in CD4 co-immunoisolates in Mφ, it seems unlikely that this kinase family plays a similarly prominent role in the regulation of CD4 in Mφ, as it does in T cells. This could also explain the faster turn-over of CD4 in Mφ compared to T cells. Data from our laboratory showed that upon treatment with conditioned media from activated T cells, CD4 expression in Mφ is down-regulated due to induced internalization and degradation (Saraiva Raposo et al., manuscript under revision). Under this condition, CD4 was associated with specific components of signal transduction and transport pathways, including plasma membrane-associated small GTPases, such as Cdc42, Ras-related proteins and RhoB. The small GTPases of the Ras superfamily are well known to have roles in endocytosis [65], [66]. RhoB regulates endosomal trafficking, in co-operation with mDia1 and Src kinase [67], and Cdc42, which has also been connected to cell migration and cell polarity, has also been linked to the regulation of endocytosis [68]. We observed an interaction between CD4 and LAMP1, suggesting the intervention of lysosomes in the down-regulation of CD4. This observation correlates with the effect induced by the phorbol ester PMA in the induction of CD4 internalization and degradation [69]. Overall, the over-representation of endosome-related proteins in this condition, clearly clusters CD4 with the endocytic pathways. When Mφ are treated with conditioned media from activated T cells in the presence of MG132 and bafilomycin A1, CD4 can still be internalized, but it is not degraded (Saraiva Raposo et al. manuscript under revision). Under this condition, CD4 was associated with several components of the proteasome, such as regulatory and activating subunits involved in the cascade of protein ubiquitination, suggesting the involvement of the proteasomal pathway. We identified the member of the E3 ubiquitin (Ub) ligase family, Itch/AIP4 to be associated with CD4 and confirmed it by western blot. Itch is a member of the HECT domain-containing E3 Ub ligases and has been implicated in the post-translational modification with Ub of CXCR4, followed by desensitization at the cell surface by engagement to its cognate ligand SDF-1α [70]. In the early stages of HIV-1 infection, the viral protein HIV-1 Nef, reported to accelerate CD4 down-regulation, avoiding viral superinfection and promoting efficient viral spread and optimal viral particle production [25], also alters the intracellular trafficking of MHC-I and MHC-II molecules [71]. HIV-1 Nef-dependent reduction of surface MHC-I protects HIV-infected primary T cells from recognition and killing by HIV-specific cytotoxic T cells in vitro [72]. Schaefer et al. reported that HIV-1 Nef targets MHC-I molecules and CD4 for degradation in the lysosomes, by showing co-localization of CD4 and a subset of HLA-A2 proteins in late endosomes and multi-vesicular bodies (MVB) [73]. We showed an interaction between CD4 and components of MHC-I (HLA-A and HLA-B). Although, our system is an HIV-1 Nef-independent system, both induced pathways seem to have some degree of similarity. Overall in resting macrophages CD4 shows association with a range of proteins found in the cellular cortex, clathrin coated pits and membrane rafts. In induced internalization the spectrum of proteins clustered with the receptor changes and CD4 becomes associated with components of signal transduction and transport. Finally, under conditions where protein degradation pathways are chemically blocked, CD4 associates with components of the proteasome and ubiquitin-modifying proteins. This is the first co-immunoisolation LC-MS/MS-based identification of CD4 complexes in human primary Mφ elucidating CD4-interacting proteins and the protein-network involved in its induced internalization and degradation. Due to its importance in the context of HIV-1 infection, revealing the CD4 “interactome” can lead to the discovery of important proteins in the pathogenesis of the virus. In conclusion, our mass spectrometry data contribute to a better understanding of the fate of CD4 molecules in resting Mφ and in induced internalization and degradation.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

Adult human blood was obtained from anonymous donors through the UK National Blood Service and tested negative for HIV-1, hepatitis B/C, and syphilis. Local IRB approval was sought for this work from Oxford University's Central University Research Ethics Committee (CUREC), and we were informed that specific ethical approval was unnecessary for this study, in accordance with their guidelines on the use of human blood (http://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/curec/resrchapp/faqethapp.shtml): “CUREC does not require an ethics form for laboratory research using buffy coats. However there are occasions when the National Blood Service donating the buffy coats may require ethical approval from the University. In this instance a checklist completion will suffice. Applicants should answer Question C (8) as a ‘NO’. A covering note should be sent to the Secretary of the MSD IDREC with the checklist explaining that the research uses buffy coats and the NBS requires University ethical approval.” Although not required by NBS, we completed a checklist as indicated and received exemption from MSD IREC.

Cells and reagents

PBMC were isolated using Ficoll-Plaque Plus (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Europe) density gradient centrifugation from heparinized buffy-coats. Monocytes were isolated by CD14-positive selection using anti-CD14 magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec, UK), according to the manufacturer's instructions and seeded in complete medium (RPMI 10% FCS (PAA), 2 mM L-glutamine (PAA), 100 U/mL penicillin (PAA) and 100 µg/mL streptomycin (PAA)), supplemented with 50 ng/mL recombinant M-CSF (R&D Systems) for 7 days. MG132 and bafilomycin A1 (BafA1) (Sigma, UK) were resuspended in DMSO (Sigma, UK) and used at final non-toxic concentrations of 5 µM and 100 nM, respectively. CD4+ T Helper cells were isolated from the CD14-negative population of PBMC, by negative selection (Miltenyi Biotec, UK), according to the manufacturer's protocol and activated using anti-biotin MACSiBead particles and biotinylated antibodies against human anti-CD2, CD3 and CD28 (Miltenyi Biotec, UK) in complete medium for 3 days. Cell-free supernatants were collected after 3 days stimulation, filtered (0.45 µm pore-size) and stored until used. Typically, day 7 fully differentiated Mφ were treated with neat T cell supernatants, in the absent or presence of MG132 and BafA1 for 18 hours, prior to CD4 co-immunoisolation.

Flow cytometry

CD4 expression levels were detected by direct immunofluorescence. Mφ in staining buffer (10 µg/mL human IgG (Sigma UK), 1% FCS and 0.01% NaN3) were incubated with 5 µg/mL anti-CD4 specific mAb (clone RPA-T4, Becton Dickinson) or matched isotype control (IgG1κ, Becton Dickinson) on ice for 30–45 min. For intracellular staining, cells were first fixed, then permeabilized with 0.2% saponin (Sigma, UK) and stained. The percentage of positive cells and the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) were analyzed by FACS Calibur (Becton Dickinson) with 15,000–20,000-gated events collected. The data was processed using FlowJo (version 7.2.4). Protein expression levels were determined by dividing the geometrical MFI of the Ab staining over the MFI of the isotype control.

Western blotting

Adherent Mφ were washed free of media, detached using ice cold 10 mM EDTA/PBS and cell pellets were lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 1% (v/v) n-Dodecyl β-D-maltoside (Sigma), 1× protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche), phosphatase inhibitor cocktail 2 (Sigma)). n-Dodecyl β-D-maltoside is a water-soluble non-ionic detergent, shown to be a rather gentle detergent able to preserve protein activity and structure better than many commonly used agents, such as Triton X-100, NP-40, CHAPs and octyl-β-glucoside [74], [75], [76], [77]. Lysates were centrifuged for 10 min at 4°C, 13,000×g to separate insoluble material and cleared lysate was resuspended in 1× Laemmli sample buffer (Invitrogen, UK) under reducing conditions and heated for 10 min at 90°C. Lysates were electrophoresed through SDS–PAGE gels and proteins were electroblotted to PVDF transfer membranes. Blocked membranes were incubated with one of the following primary antibodies diluted in 3% (w/v) BSA (Sigma) in 1× PBS-T (1× PBS, 0.1% (v/v) Tween-20) for 2 hours at room temperature or over-night at 4°C: rabbit polyclonal antibody anti-CD4 (clone H-370), rabbit polyclonal antibody anti-CD9 (clone H-110), rabbit polyclonal antibody anti-clathrin heavy chain 1 (clone H-300), rabbit polyclonal antibody anti-E3 Ubiquitin ligase (clone H-110) (all from Santa Cruz) and mouse monoclonal antibody anti-CCR5 (clone CTC5, R&D Systems). Primary antibodies were detected using the matching LI-COR secondary antibodies and membranes were scanned using the quantitative western blotting imaging system Odyssey (LI-COR).

Immunoisolation analysis

Anti-CD4 immunoisolation reactions consisted of 10 µL of protein G–Sepharose bead slurry (4B Fast Flow, Sigma, UK) per 1×107 lysed cells and 5–10 µg mouse monoclonal antibody anti-CD4 (clone QS4120, Santa Cruz) was incubated for 2 hours at room temperature to allow binding of the antibody to the beads. Beads were gently spun, cell lysate was added to the mixture of beads/antibody and the reactions were incubated by inversion for 3 hours at 4°C. The immunoisolates were collected by centrifugation for 5 min at 4°C, and washed three times for 5 min with lysis buffer. The final immunoisolates were resuspended in Laemmli sample buffer under reducing conditions and heated for 10 min at 90°C, before loading them onto a gel. Isotype control immunoprecipitations were also performed to identify background binding proteins.

Mass spectrometry and protein identification

Anti-CD4 or isotype control immunoisolated pellets were reduced in NuPAGE sample reducing agent (Invitrogen, UK), separated on a NuPAGE Novex 4–12% Bis-Tris gel (Invitrogen, UK) and coomassie stained. Gel lanes were excised, cut into 10 equal portions and in-gel digested with trypsin [78]. Briefly, gel bands were diced into cubes and destained in 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate in 50∶50 water/acetonitrile. Proteins were reduced with 10 mM DTT and alkylated with 55 mM iodoacetamide. Gel bands were then incubated with 3 µg of trypsin (Promega, UK) in 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate over-night at 37°C. Peptides were extracted and desalted using home-made C18 tips. Mass spectrometry data were acquired on an Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo) fitted with a nanospray source (Proxeon, Denmark) coupled to a U3000 nano HPLC system (Dionex, UK). The samples were loaded onto a 15 cm long, 100 micron ID, home-packed column manufactured by packing a Picotip emitter (New Objective, USA) with ProntoSIL C18 phase; 120 angstrom pore, 3 micron bead, C18 (Bischoff Chromatography, Germany). HPLC was run in a direct injection configuration. One hundred and twenty minute gradients were used to resolve the peptides. The Orbitrap was run in a data dependent acquisition mode in which the Orbitrap resolution was set at 60,000 and the top 5 multiply charged precursors were selected for MS/MS fragmentation. Samples were typically injected three times in order to increase the number and confidence of identifications. RAW data files were converted to mzXML format using ReAdW (version 4.2.1) and submitted to the in-house developed Central Proteomics Facilities Pipeline (CPFP) [79]. The CPFP is based on the Trans Proteomic Pipeline tools (version 4.2.1) [80] and implements automatic identification of MS/MS spectra using multiple search engines to maximise coverage of a sample. mzXML files were converted to suitable peaklist formats for submission to Mascot (Matrix Science), X!Tandem with k-score plugin [81] and OMSSA [82]. Searches are performed automatically and executed on a compute cluster, using Sun GridEngine, and the resulting peptide identifications from each search engine are validated with PeptideProphet [83]. iProphet is used to combine peptide hits from each three search engines and refines identification probabilities. ProteinProphet infers protein identifications from the resulting combined peptide list and performs grouping of ambiguous hits [84]. Protein identifications were exported from the CPFP and uploaded to ProteinCenter (Proxeon, Denmark) for filtering, annotation, classification, and interpretation. Searches were performed against a concatenated target/decoy human IPI database providing an empirical false discovery rate (FDR) and criteria for protein identification included 1% FDR and two or more unique peptides identified for each individual protein. Proteins that were identified in the isotype control immunoprecipitations were filtered out of the final interpretation. Uniquely identified proteins were only identified in the condition tested and commonly identified proteins were identified in all conditions tested.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed by paired t-test using GraphPad Prism (version 5.01). Stars indicate the p-value: **p = 0.01-0.001; ***p<0.001. Significance refers to difference from the controls, unless otherwise indicated. N refers to the number of blood donors tested.
  84 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of proteins and proteomes by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  M Mann; R C Hendrickson; A Pandey
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  Lateral membrane protein associations of CD4 in lymphoid cells detected by cross-linking and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Oliver K Bernhard; Margaret M Sheil; Anthony L Cunningham
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Functional association of CD9 with the Fc gamma receptors in macrophages.

Authors:  K Kaji; S Takeshita; K Miyake; T Takai; A Kudo
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 4.  The CD4 antigen: physiological ligand and HIV receptor.

Authors:  Q J Sattentau; R A Weiss
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-03-11       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  CD4 glycoprotein degradation induced by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpu protein requires the function of proteasomes and the ubiquitin-conjugating pathway.

Authors:  U Schubert; L C Antón; I Bacík; J H Cox; S Bour; J R Bennink; M Orlowski; K Strebel; J W Yewdell
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 6.  Endocytosis and signalling: intertwining molecular networks.

Authors:  Alexander Sorkin; Mark von Zastrow
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 94.444

7.  A uniform proteomics MS/MS analysis platform utilizing open XML file formats.

Authors:  Andrew Keller; Jimmy Eng; Ning Zhang; Xiao-jun Li; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 11.429

8.  Endocytosis of E-cadherin regulated by Rac and Cdc42 small G proteins through IQGAP1 and actin filaments.

Authors:  Genkichi Izumi; Toshiaki Sakisaka; Takeshi Baba; Shintaro Tanaka; Koji Morimoto; Yoshimi Takai
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2004-07-19       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Structure and functional expression of the human macrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha/RANTES receptor.

Authors:  J L Gao; D B Kuhns; H L Tiffany; D McDermott; X Li; U Francke; P M Murphy
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1993-05-01       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Phorbol ester-induced downregulation of CD4 is a multistep process involving dissociation from p56lck, increased association with clathrin-coated pits, and altered endosomal sorting.

Authors:  A Pelchen-Matthews; I J Parsons; M Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  7 in total

1.  Isolation of the protein and RNA content of active sites of transcription from mammalian cells.

Authors:  Svitlana Melnik; Maïwen Caudron-Herger; Lilija Brant; Ian M Carr; Karsten Rippe; Peter R Cook; Argyris Papantonis
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Analysis of Pelagia noctiluca proteome Reveals a Red Fluorescent Protein, a Zinc Metalloproteinase and a Peroxiredoxin.

Authors:  Bárbara Frazão; Alexandre Campos; Hugo Osório; Benjamin Thomas; Sérgio Leandro; Alexandre Teixeira; Vitor Vasconcelos; Agostinho Antunes
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.371

3.  Pathogenic Leptospira interrogans exoproteins are primarily involved in heterotrophic processes.

Authors:  Azad Eshghi; Elisa Pappalardo; Svenja Hester; Benjamin Thomas; Gabriela Pretre; Mathieu Picardeau
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Protein kinase C and NF-κB-dependent CD4 downregulation in macrophages induced by T cell-derived soluble factors: consequences for HIV-1 infection.

Authors:  Rui André Saraiva Raposo; David C Trudgian; Benjamin Thomas; Bonnie van Wilgenburg; Sally A Cowley; William James
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Mast cell surfaceome characterization reveals CD98 heavy chain is critical for optimal cell function.

Authors:  Siddhartha S Saha; Nyssa B Samanas; Irina Miralda; Nicholas J Shubin; Kerri Niino; Gauri Bhise; Manasa Acharya; Albert J Seo; Nathan Camp; Gail H Deutsch; Richard G James; Adrian M Piliponsky
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 10.793

6.  Molecular crosstalk between cancer cells and tumor microenvironment components suggests potential targets for new therapeutic approaches in mobile tongue cancer.

Authors:  Dan Dayan; Tuula Salo; Sirpa Salo; Pia Nyberg; Sini Nurmenniemi; Daniela Elena Costea; Marilena Vered
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  Production of full-length soluble Plasmodium falciparum RH5 protein vaccine using a Drosophila melanogaster Schneider 2 stable cell line system.

Authors:  Kathryn A Hjerrild; Jing Jin; Katherine E Wright; Rebecca E Brown; Jennifer M Marshall; Geneviève M Labbé; Sarah E Silk; Catherine J Cherry; Stine B Clemmensen; Thomas Jørgensen; Joseph J Illingworth; Daniel G W Alanine; Kathryn H Milne; Rebecca Ashfield; Willem A de Jongh; Alexander D Douglas; Matthew K Higgins; Simon J Draper
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.