| Literature DB >> 21533112 |
David J Lloyd1, Joan Helmering, Stephen A Kaufman, James Turk, Matt Silva, Sergio Vasquez, David Weinstein, Brad Johnston, Clarence Hale, Murielle M Véniant.
Abstract
Precise quantification of atherosclerotic plaque in preclinical models of atherosclerosis requires the volumetric assessment of the lesion(s) while maintaining in situ architecture. Here we use micro-computed tomography (microCT) to detect ex vivo aortic plaque established in three dyslipidemic mouse models of atherosclerosis. All three models lack the low-density lipoprotein receptor (Ldlr(-/-)), each differing in plaque severity, allowing the evaluation of different plaque volumes using microCT technology. From clearly identified lesions in the thoracic aorta from each model, we were able to determine plaque volume (0.04-3.1 mm(3)), intimal surface area (0.5-30 mm(2)), and maximum plaque (intimal-medial) thickness (0.1-0.7 mm). Further, quantification of aortic volume allowed calculation of vessel occlusion by the plaque. To validate microCT for future preclinical studies, we compared microCT data to intimal surface area (by using en face methodology). Both plaque surface area and plaque volume were in excellent correlation between microCT assessment and en face surface area (r(2) = 0.99, p<0.0001 and r(2) = 0.95, p<0.0001, respectively). MicroCT also identified internal characteristics of the lipid core and fibrous cap, which were confirmed pathologically as Stary type III-V lesions. These data validate the use of microCT technology to provide a more exact empirical measure of ex vivo plaque volume throughout the entire intact aorta in situ for the quantification of atherosclerosis in preclinical models.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21533112 PMCID: PMC3078927 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018800
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Aortic and lesion dimensional characteristics of Ldlr-1KO mice fed atherogenic diet (AD) and Ldlr-2KO and -3KO mice as determined by microCT and en face.
| Ldlr-1KO-AD | Mean +/− SEM | Ldlr-2KO | Mean +/− SEM | Ldlr-3KO | Mean +/− SEM | |||||||||||
| Aorta No. | 4 | 5 | 7 | 17 | 18 | 6941 | 6928 | 6930 | 6962 | 6927 | 6943 | 6944c | 6945 | |||
| microCT | ||||||||||||||||
| Total Aorta Volume (mm3) | 11.7 | 10.2 | 11.1 | 10.6 | 11.2 | 11.1±0.3 | 7.2 | 6.2 | 7.42 | 8.2 | 7.3±0.4 | 8.5 | 8.3 | 23.6 | 12.3 | 13.2±3.6 |
| Total Plaque Volume (mm3) | 2.5 | 3.1 | 3 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.7±0.2 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1±0.0 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.6±0.1 |
| Plaque volume (mm3)/Aorta volume (mm3) | 0.21 | 0.30 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.25±0.02 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01±0.00 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.05±0.01 |
| Total Aorta Surface Area (mm2) | 63.1 | 50.9 | 53.5 | 52.2 | 52.4 | 54.4±2.2 | 33.2 | 28.1 | 29.7 | 36.8 | 32±1.9 | 34.3 | 35.3 | 70.7 | 45.4 | 46.4±8.5 |
| Total Attached Plaque Surface Area (mm2) | 22.2 | 21.7 | 30 | 19.2 | 19.6 | 22.54±2.0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.4±0.2 | 4.2 | 5.3 | 7.9 | 8.3 | 6.4±1.0 |
| Plaque area (mm2)/Aorta area (mm2) | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.56 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.42±0.04 | 0.02 | 0 | 0 | 0.03 | 0.01±0.01 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.14±0.01 |
| Maximum Plaque Thickness (mm) | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5±0.1 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1±0.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3±0.1 |
| Average % Occlusion | 24.6 | 34.1 | 35.7 | 26.1 | 23.4 | 28.8±2.5 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Total Plaque Surface Area (mm2) | 14.9 | 13.5 | 16.8 | 12.4 | 11.6 | 13.8±0.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.4±0.1 | 2.6 | 3.7 | 8.4 | 5.5 | 5.1±1.3 |
Aortas scanned from aortic valve to illiac bifurcation.
Aortas scanned from aortic valve to 1 cm down descending aorta.
Aorta with aneurysm.
Only data from Ldlr-2KO and -3KO were analysed using a T-Test, as they were generated similarly (1 cm of descending aorta).
Data from all three strains (Ldlr-1KO-AD, -2KO and -3KO) were analyzed using ANOVA, as these readouts of plaque were standardized to aorta dimension.
* P<0.05;
** P<0.01 vs. Ldlr-2KO aortas using a T-Test.
∧∧∧P<0.0001 vs. Ldlr-1KO AD aortas,
P<0.05 vs. Ldlr-2KO aortas using ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test.
Figure 1Coronal microCT image of the aortic arch.
A microCT section of 10 µm is shown for an Ldlr-3KO aorta (top 2 images) and an Ldlr-2KO aorta (bottom two images). The descending aorta (Ao) and brachiocephalic (Br), left common carotid (Ca) and left subclavian (Su) arteries are clearly seen. Aortic lesion is evident within the luminal space of the aorta and can be distinguished from the aortic wall by the difference in gray scale values of the CT data between the aortic wall and the lesion and is demarcated in pink after segmentation (arrows; images on left).
Figure 2Three-dimensional renderings of atherosclerotic plaque.
The microCT images are rendered to generate a 3D representation of the aortic arch and attached plaque. A rotating movie (Movie S1) allows the viewing of the plaque from any aspect. Coronal and oblique aspects obtained from the movies are shown for both Ldlr-2KO (left images) and -3KO mice (right images). The distance of the surface of the plaque from the aorta luminal wall is indicated using a color spectrum scale (0–340 µm) shown on the left-hand side of each image. Both coronal and oblique sections illustrate differences in the amount of atherosclerosis detected by microCT between the two strains. The same aortas were excised from the carcass and assessed by en face methods (see Materials and Methods) to allow comparison of the aortic arch plaque by using the two techniques.
Figure 3Plaque Detection by microCT in Ldlr-1KO atherogenic diet-fed mice; correlation of en face with microCT.
A single frame of a 5-panel movie (Movie S2) of an Ldlr-1KO fed an atherogenic diet. (A) Aortic arch and descending aorta (gray) showing location of the plaque (yellow). Cross section of aorta is show by the black line to indicate the section of interest in subsequent panels. (B) Both upper and lower graphs represent sections along the aorta (proximal to distal) along the x–axis and plaque dimensions along the y–axis. Upper graph shows average aorta radius (red), maximum plaque thickness (blue) and average plaque thickness (yellow) at each section is shown continuously along the aorta. Lower graphs show percent plaque coverage (green) and percent occlusion of the plaque within the aorta. The vertical line in both graphs indicates position in relation to section in panel A. (C) MicroCT image of the section indicated in panels A and B shows a cross section of the aorta with accumulation of plaque. The plaque which is detected by the imaging has been demarcated in pink (right image). (D, E) Correlation of lesional readouts using microCT and en face. En face plaque surface area data derived from aortas of Ldlr-1KO-fed atherogenic diet (AD) (green squares), -2KO (red circles), and -3KO (blue triangles) mice were compared with plaque surface area (D) or plaque volume (E) derived by microCT methodology. Linear regression and correlation coefficients were calculated for each data set comparison.
Figure 4Histological examination of aortas pre-selected by microCT and Sudanophilia.
(A) MicroCT cross-section of an aorta from an Ldlr-1KO mouse revealed a lesion (demarcated in pink) occluding 69% of the aorta with variable internal density. (B) Verhoeff-Van Gieson stained section of the raised lesion outlined by the white rectangle in 4A contained a Type V fibroatheroma (Figure 4B) with a core of extracellular lipid rimmed by foam cells (corresponding to the dark center observed by microCT) and overlain by a fibrous cap (FC) that is better defined by birefringence on polarization of the same lesion stained with picrosirius red (C). Bar in C represents 100 microns.