G Curtis Roegner1, Joseph A Needoba, António M Baptista. 1. NOAA Fisheries, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Point Adams Research Station, Hammond, Oregon, United States of America. curtis.roegner@noaa.gov
Abstract
Low dissolved oxygen (DO) is a common feature of many estuarine and shallow-water environments, and is often attributed to anthropogenic nutrient enrichment from terrestrial-fluvial pathways. However, recent events in the U.S. Pacific Northwest have highlighted that wind-forced upwelling can cause naturally occurring low DO water to move onto the continental shelf, leading to mortalities of benthic fish and invertebrates. Coastal estuaries in the Pacific Northwest are strongly linked to ocean forcings, and here we report observations on the spatial and temporal patterns of oxygen concentration in the Columbia River estuary. Hydrographic measurements were made from transect (spatial survey) or anchor station (temporal survey) deployments over a variety of wind stresses and tidal states during the upwelling seasons of 2006 through 2008. During this period, biologically stressful levels of dissolved oxygen were observed to enter the Columbia River estuary from oceanic sources, with minimum values close to the hypoxic threshold of 2.0 mg L(-1). Riverine water was consistently normoxic. Upwelling wind stress controlled the timing and magnitude of low DO events, while tidal-modulated estuarine circulation patterns influenced the spatial extent and duration of exposure to low DO water. Strong upwelling during neap tides produced the largest impact on the estuary. The observed oxygen concentrations likely had deleterious behavioral and physiological consequences for migrating juvenile salmon and benthic crabs. Based on a wind-forced supply mechanism, low DO events are probably common to the Columbia River and other regional estuaries and if conditions on the shelf deteriorate further, as observations and models predict, Pacific Northwest estuarine habitats could experience a decrease in environmental quality.
Low dissolved oxygen (DO) is a common feature of many estuarine and shallow-water environments, and is often attributed to anthropogenic nutrient enrichment from terrestrial-fluvial pathways. However, recent events in the U.S. Pacific Northwest have highlighted that wind-forced upwelling can cause naturally occurring low DOwater to move onto the continental shelf, leading to mortalities of benthic fish and invertebrates. Coastal estuaries in the Pacific Northwest are strongly linked to ocean forcings, and here we report observations on the spatial and temporal patterns of oxygen concentration in the Columbia River estuary. Hydrographic measurements were made from transect (spatial survey) or anchor station (temporal survey) deployments over a variety of wind stresses and tidal states during the upwelling seasons of 2006 through 2008. During this period, biologically stressful levels of dissolved oxygen were observed to enter the Columbia River estuary from oceanic sources, with minimum values close to the hypoxic threshold of 2.0 mg L(-1). Riverine water was consistently normoxic. Upwelling wind stress controlled the timing and magnitude of low DO events, while tidal-modulated estuarine circulation patterns influenced the spatial extent and duration of exposure to low DOwater. Strong upwelling during neap tides produced the largest impact on the estuary. The observed oxygen concentrations likely had deleterious behavioral and physiological consequences for migrating juvenile salmon and benthic crabs. Based on a wind-forced supply mechanism, low DO events are probably common to the Columbia River and other regional estuaries and if conditions on the shelf deteriorate further, as observations and models predict, Pacific Northwest estuarine habitats could experience a decrease in environmental quality.
Low dissolved oxygen (DO) in aquatic and marine systems is an established and growing
concern worldwide [1]. Many recent papers have reported increases in the
occurrence and extent of areas affected by low DO events [2], and the deleterious effects of
low DO are well-documented on scales ranging from individual organisms to entire
ecosystems [3].
Oxygen-depleted conditions in estuarine and shallow marine areas are often
attributed to anthropogenic nutrient enrichment delivered by terrestrial-fluvial
pathways [4].
Subsequent phytoplankton production and eventual decomposition by heterotrophic
bacterial consumption can reduce dissolved oxygen in bottom waters. However, low DO
conditions also occur naturally in subsurface waters of the worlds' oceans
[5], [6], and
wind-forced upwelling can propel this water onto continental shelves and into
shallow water bays and estuarine systems [7], [8].Oxygen is a non-conservative tracer, as its concentration is affected by many
factors, including photosynthesis and respiration, and exchange rates between
surface waters and the atmosphere or bottom waters and the benthos. Dissolved oxygen
levels can vary from supersaturated to anoxic (0% saturation), often over
short (semidiurnal) temporal and narrow (meter) spatial scales (e.g., [9], [10]).
Supersaturated conditions are usually caused by photosynthetic production during
daylight. The critical concentration delimiting hypoxia is often defined at <2.0
mg L−1 (1.4 mL L−1; ∼30% atmospheric
saturation) [2],
[4]. While
mass mortalities are a major consequence of hypoxic conditions, for many organisms
the negative effects of low DO occur well above the 2.0 mg L−1
threshold [11]–[13]. Such sublethal effects
include stress-related reductions in growth and reproduction, motility, feeding
rates, and altered predator-prey relationships [11], [14], [15]. Bricker et al. [16] define
“biological stress” as oxygen concentrations between 2.0 and 5.0 mg
L−1. Breitburg et al. [3] define hypoxia
“mechanistically as oxygen concentrations that are sufficiently reduced that
they affect the growth, reproduction, or survival of exposed animals, or result in
avoidance behaviors.” It has become clear that sublethal effects must be
considered when assessing the impacts of low DO events on ecosystems.The oceanography of Northeast Pacific coastal waters is strongly influenced by
wind-forced upwelling dynamics [17], [18]. During upwelling, equatorward winds draw nutrient-rich,
and often reduced DO, subsurface water into the photic zone, where phytoplankton
growth is stimulated. Oceanographic observations have routinely detected reduced DO
levels in deep water year-round, but also in shallower shelf waters during active
upwelling [7],
[19]–[21]. On occasion, these upwelled waters are severely hypoxic.
Recently, hypoxia and mass mortalities of benthic invertebrates and fish were
observed on the Oregon shelf, and these phenomena were attributed to both upwelling
dynamics (the decay of phytoplankton blooms at depth) and changes in the character
of subsurface circulation patterns [20]–[23]. However, low DO events in coastal areas of the Pacific
Northwest are not new. Over forty years ago, Pearson and Holt [24] measured hypoxia (<1.5 mg
L−1) in the nearshore ocean and within Grays Harbor,
Washington, and Haertal et al. [25] documented near-hypoxic concentrations (2.2 mg
L−1) in high salinity water in the Columbia River estuary. Both
groups of researchers attributed these low DO events to upwelling dynamics.Previous work in the Columbia estuary has established links between wind stress,
estuarine salinity, and chlorophyll concentration [25], [26], and a strong wind-forced
ocean-estuary connection has been found for many coastal estuaries in the Pacific
Northwest. In Oregon these include Coos Bay [27], [28], Alsea Bay [29], Yaquina Bay
[30],
[31], and
Tillamook Bay [32], and in Washington studies have been made in Willapa Bay
[19], [28], [33], [34] and Grays Harbor
[24], [28], [33]. Other work
has revealed the influence of Columbia River outflows in delivering high
concentrations of phytoplankton [26], [35] and nutrients [36], [37] to the estuary and nearshore
ocean. These terrestrial-fluvial sources of organic matter and nutrients constitute
a leading mechanism for generating oxygenstress in estuarine and coastal sites on a
worldwide basis [2].
However, DO levels in the Columbia estuary have not been routinely assessed, and it
is not clear whether stressful low oxygen conditions continue to exist in the
system, and, if so, from whence they are derived. In this context, note that the
Columbia estuary is a critical migration and rearing habitat for endangered juvenile
and adult anadromous Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.),
ecologically relevant forage fishes (smelt, anchova, herring), and the economically
important Dungeness crab (Cancer magister). It is not known whether
low DO events in the Columbia estuary are a problem for these organisms.Here we convey the results of field studies designed to determine the source,
forcing, and resultant spatial and temporal patterns of oxygen concentration in the
Columbia estuary. Specifically, wemeasured the variation in oxygen concentrations in relation to salinity to
determine end-member advection versus in situ sources or sinks;evaluated the effects of upwelling wind and tidal forcings on patterns of
estuarineoxygen concentration;determined the vertical and horizontal spatial extent of low DO intrusions;
andestimated interannual variation in the number of seasonal upwelling events
and the cumulative impact of low DO events among the years
2006–2008.We then discuss possible consequences of these DO observations on migrating juvenile
salmon and the life stages of Dungeness crab based on information found in the
literature.
Methods
Water quality measurements
From 2006 through 2008, hydrographic measurements were made from transect
(spatial survey) or anchor station (temporal survey) cruises (Figure 1). Transects
included:
Figure 1
Columbia River estuary sample stations.
Circles show transect stations; triangles indicate anchor stations. The
inset identifies the regional location.
Columbia River estuary sample stations.
Circles show transect stations; triangles indicate anchor stations. The
inset identifies the regional location.South Channel, composed of 16 stations along a 27 km transect of the
Columbia River South Channel (shipping lane) extending from Buoy 10
(river kilometer (rkm) 0) to Tongue Point (rkm 27);North Channel, with 9 stations on a 14 km transect from Buoy 10 to the
Astoria-Melger Bridge (rkm 14); andMouth Line, composed of 8 stations on a 3.5 km north-south transect
aligned near the mouth of the Columbia River between Clatsop Spit, OR,
and Baker Bay, WA, at about rkm 5.Observations along these three transects were made at various stages of the tide
and spring/neap cycle (Table
1). Anchor stations for temporal studies were located at ∼20 m
depth at station NC14, and at ∼15 m depth near stations NC07, NC10, and SC09
(Figure 1).
Table 1
Physical metrics and O2-S regression statistics during the
anchor station (AS) and survey cruises in the Columbia River estuary
during 2006–2008.
Cruise
CruiseID
Date
DOY
Type
LI
S/N
CWS
Smax
O2min
Regression
m
r2
n
FR26
A
22Aug06
234
Survey
0.06
S
-0.20
32.7
4.8
-0.12
0.82
534
FR27
B
09Sep06
251
AS
1.00
S
-0.22
31.9
3.7
-0.11
0.42
722
FR28
C
13Sep06
256
Survey
0.73
N
-0.26
31.8
4.0
-0.11
0.61
1399
FR29
D
21Sep06
264
Survey
0.04
S
0.13
31.5
6.2
<0.01
0.02
1096
FR30
E
15Oct06
289
Survey
0.37
N
0.00
31.8
6.6
<0.01
0.03
1024
FR33
F
08May07
128
Survey
0.78
S
-0.01
31.7
6.8
-0.08
0.51
663
FR34
G
15May07
135
Survey
0.09
S
-0.33
32.8
4.3
-0.14
0.69
470
FR37
H
31May07
151
Survey
0.97
S
-0.33
32.0
4.8
-0.07
0.34
345
FR38
I
20Aug07
232
Survey
0.35
N
0.12
30.3
7.4
<0.01
0.02
1598
FR39
J
21Aug07
233
AS
0.44
N
0.07
29.7
7.6
-0.01
0.04
1411
FR40
K
22Aug07
234
AS
0.63
N
0.04
28.2
7.1
-0.03
0.34
345
FR41
L
27Aug07
239
Survey
0.98
S
-0.28
32.2
4.8
-0.08
0.67
1609
FR42
M
28Aug07
240
AS
1.00
S
-0.28
31.0
4.6
-0.11
0.79
1641
FR43
N
29Aug07
241
AS
0.99
S
-0.27
32.6
3.6
-0.09
0.53
1870
Barnes1
O
10Jul08
191
AS
0.32
N
-0.72
32.9
2.2
-0.19
0.92
223
Barnes2
P
13Jul08
194
AS
0.61
N
-0.61
33.2
2.1
-0.24
0.94
154
Barnes4
Q
18Jul08
199
AS
0.96
S
-0.26
32.3
2.6
-0.16
0.90
397
Barnes5
R
20Jul08
201
AS
1
S
-0.23
31.3
3.3
-0.14
0.91
411
DOY: day of year. LI: lunar index. S/N: spring/neap cycle. CWS: 4-d
cumulative wind stress (N m−2; where negative
denotes upwelling, positive is downwelling, and low wind stress
ranges from 0.03 to -0.03 N m−2). Smax:
maximum observed salinity (psu). O2min: minimum observed
oxygen concentration (mg L−1). m: slope of
O2min-Smax regression line. r2:
variation explained. n: number of observations. All regression
equations were significant (P<0.001).
DOY: day of year. LI: lunar index. S/N: spring/neap cycle. CWS: 4-d
cumulative wind stress (N m−2; where negative
denotes upwelling, positive is downwelling, and low wind stress
ranges from 0.03 to -0.03 N m−2). Smax:
maximum observed salinity (psu). O2min: minimum observed
oxygen concentration (mg L−1). m: slope of
O2min-Smax regression line. r2:
variation explained. n: number of observations. All regression
equations were significant (P<0.001).At each station, vertical profiles were made either with a Sea Bird Electronics
(SBE) 19 plus Conductivity-Temperature-Depth (CTD) probe (2006 and 2007) or with
a SBE 9/11 CTD (2008), each equipped with a SBE 43 dissolved oxygen sensor. Data
were recorded at 2 Hz and binned into 0.5 m depth intervals (typically yielding
>5 measurements per bin), and Surfer 8® (Golden Software) was used to
interpolate salinity and oxygen profiles either spatially (transects) or
temporally (anchor stations). Note that spatial interpolations were semisynoptic
views biased by the speed of the research vessel. At anchor stations during 2006
and 2007, CTD casts were made at approximately 0.5 h intervals, while sampling
periods were more irregular during 2008. The CTD data were used to compile
oxygen-salinity (O2-S) scatterplots and to determine maximum salinity
(Smax) and minimum oxygen (O2min) values.Since the effects of low DO on migrating salmonids was of particular concern, we
used literature values to categorize concentrations determined to cause
biological stress in salmon [11], [14], [38],
[39].
Five categories of oxygen concentration were assigned:hypoxic or severe biological stress (0 to 2 mg L−1);moderate biological stress (>2 to 4 mg L−1);mild biological stress (>4 to 6 mg L−1);normoxic (>6 to ∼9 mg L−1); andsupersaturated (>9 or 10 mg L−1).Categories 1–3 are regarded here as low DO conditions. Note that oxygen
saturation levels varied by date (based primarily on oxygen solubility in
relation to temperature), and 100% saturated levels were approximately 9
mg L−1 in summer-autumn 2006 and 2007, and 10 mg
L−1 in May 2007. Oxygen saturation was not determined
during 2008.
Time series measurements of wind and tide
Variation in wind forcing affecting estuarine hydrology was assessed with time
series of coastal wind stress. Wind velocity data was measured at the Columbia
River Bar buoy (Station 46029; 46.12°N, 124.51°W; http://ndbc.noaa.gov), except during April–June 2007, when
buoy loss necessitated use of data from Station 46041 (47.34°N
124.75°W). Wind vectors were converted to mean daily alongshore wind stress
(τN, N m−2) from hourly observations.
Positive (northward) wind stress induces downwelling and negative (southward)
wind stress drives upwelling along the Pacific Northwest coast. To provide an
index of the strength of wind forcing in the days prior to hydrographic
sampling, we calculated time series of the 4-d cumulative mean daily wind stress
(CWS). This value was based on the 1–3 d lag of the best fit
cross-correlations found between wind stress and maximum daily salinity in the
estuary [26].Water level data was acquired from Tongue Point NOAA tide station (123.7°N,
46.2°W). Tides are a mixed semidiurnal type in the Columbia estuary. The
ebb-to-flood stage of tide (SOT) during sample times was designated by assigning
0 to low water and 1.0 to high water, and partitioning the time intervals
between lows and highs. Periods of flooding water were assigned positive values
and periods of ebbing water were assigned negative values (e.g., 0.5 corresponds
to mid-flood tide while -0.5 is mid-ebb tide). These data were used to identify
semidiurnal tidal conditions during transect and anchor station sampling. The
spring/neap (S/N) cycle was also set to range from 0 to 1.0, where neap periods
ranged from 0.25 to 0.75 and spring periods from <0.25 to 0 and >0.75 to
1.0. The S/N cycle strongly influences circulation patterns and water column
structure in the Columbia estuary [26], [40].
Analysis
For each survey date, we used linear regression of oxygen-salinity
(O2-S) scatterplots to evaluate the source of oxygen to the estuary,
where negative slopes indicate higher oxygen concentrations in the river
end-member than the ocean end-member, and positive slopes indicate the converse
[26],
[27],
[37].
Data from all types of transects or time series measurements were combined for
each sample date.To test for the influence of forcing functions on the distribution of estuarinewater properties, we regressed daily wind (CWS) and tidal (S/N) indices with
maximum daily salinity (Smax) and minimum daily oxygen
(O2min) values. We also plotted the slope of individual
O2-S regressions (derived above) by CWS to examine the effect of
wind stress on the estuarineoxygen gradient.The spatial scale of exposure to low DO was estimated by integrating
depth-distance contour plots of DO isopleths generated from transect surveys. We
used the Mouth Line transect for cross-channel and the South Channel transect
for along-channel determinations (Figure 1). Cross-channel transects were made at various stages of
the tide and highlight tidal-scale variation of water quality parameters. For
the along-channel transects, we concentrated on samples made near slack high
water to evaluate the spatial extent of low DO events. We determined area
(vertical × horizontal, m2) and percent of area surveyed (total
area depended on transect length) for each of the DO categories described above.
Dates of the surveys are given in Table 1 along with associated tidal, wind, and hydrographic
data.As a measure of the impact of low DO events at the benthic layer, we determined
the length of exposure (h) of each DO category in bottom water using time series
data from anchor station studies, which we expressed as the percent of the
observation period. Due to strong differences in water column stratification
between spring and neap tides, we also noted the maximum vertical extent of
biologically stressful water during each measurement period.For evaluation of interannual variation during 2006–2008, we estimated the
number of low DO events and the duration (d) of low DO conditions in the
estuary. The period 30 March–26 November (day of year 90 through 300) was
chosen to encompass the typical upwelling period in the Pacific Northwest. The
number of upwelling events each year was visually assessed from time series of
northward wind stress, where an event is defined as a period of at least three
continuous days of τN < −0.03 N m−2
[26]. To
estimate the number of days experiencing low DO in the estuary, we applied the
regression equation O2min = 6.47× (CWS)
+6.0 (derived above) to the CWS time series to yield the daily minimum
O2 level. We then summed the number of days for each oxygen
category described above. This simple model assumes the linear relation between
DO and the strength of upwelling winds would hold for values outside those
measured in the field.
Results
Of the 18 cruises made from 2006 through 2008, nine occurred during spring tide and
upwelling conditions, two during spring tide and downwelling or low wind stress,
three during neap tide and upwelling, and four during neap tide and downwelling
(Table 1).O2-S scatterplots were used to examine DO levels in ocean, estuarine, and
river water masses during 2006–2008 (Figures 2–
4).
DO in the estuary was heterogeneous in space and time, due to both advection from
ocean and river end-members, and also from in situ production. During the survey
dates, DO ranged from supersaturated (11.7 mg L−1; 132%
saturation) to near hypoxic (2.1 mg L−1; ∼30%
saturation). Slopes of O2-S regressions varied among sample dates from
strongly negative to near zero (Table
1). The river end-member was always normoxic (>6.0 mg
L−1) and usually >90% saturated. In contrast, water
imported during flood tide varied widely in both oxygen concentration and maximum
salinity, with higher salinity water generally being reduced in DO. Supersaturated
conditions occurred in estuarinewater (3–20 psu) associated with high
chlorophyll concentrations, particularly blooms of the “red water”
ciliate Myrionecta rubra (see below).
Figure 2
Time series of physical drivers and O2-S scatterplots during
29 July through 6 November 2006.
A. Tidal (left axis) and spring-neap (right axis) cycles. Circles denote
cruise dates. B. Bars: Low-pass filtered mean daily northward wind stress
(τN, N m−2). Gray shaded sections denote
upwelling events defined as ≥3 consecutive days of τN <
−0.03 (dotted line). Triangles and letters indicate the timing of
hydrographic cruises. C. O2-S scatterplots for designated
cruises. Oxygen values are expressed as both concentration (mg
L−1) and as percent saturation. Red horizontal line is
the 6 mg L−1 criterion. Grey horizontal line is the
100% saturation level. Black dashed vertical line denotes upwelled
water at 31 psu. Regression statistics are in Table 1.
Figure 3
Time series of physical drivers and O2-S scatterplots 30 April
through 7 September 2007.
A. Tidal and spring-neap cycles. Circles denote cruise dates. B. Bars:
Low-pass filtered mean daily northward wind stress (τN, N
m−2). Gray shaded sections denote upwelling events
defined as ≥3 days of consecutive τN < −0.03
(dotted line). Triangles and letters indicate the timing of hydrographic
cruises. C. O2-S scatterplots for designated cruises. Oxygen
values are expressed as both concentration (mg L−1) and as
percent saturation. Red horizontal line is the 6 mg L−1
criterion. Black dashed vertical line denotes upwelled water at 31 psu.
Regression statistics are in Table 1.
Figure 4
Time series of physical drivers and O2-S scatterplots 29 June
through 29 July 2008.
A. Tidal and spring-neap cycles. Circles denote cruise dates. B. Bars:
Low-pass filtered mean daily northward wind stress (τN, N
m−2). Gray shaded sections denote upwelling events
defined as ≥3 days of consecutive τN < −0.03
(dotted line). Triangles and letters indicate the timing of hydrographic
cruises. C. O2-S scatterplots for designated cruises. Oxygen
values are expressed as both concentration (mg L−1) and as
percent saturation. Red horizontal line is the 6 mg L−1
criterion. Black dashed vertical line denotes upwelled water at 31 psu.
Regression statistics are in Table 1.
Time series of physical drivers and O2-S scatterplots during
29 July through 6 November 2006.
A. Tidal (left axis) and spring-neap (right axis) cycles. Circles denote
cruise dates. B. Bars: Low-pass filtered mean daily northward wind stress
(τN, N m−2). Gray shaded sections denote
upwelling events defined as ≥3 consecutive days of τN <
−0.03 (dotted line). Triangles and letters indicate the timing of
hydrographic cruises. C. O2-S scatterplots for designated
cruises. Oxygen values are expressed as both concentration (mg
L−1) and as percent saturation. Red horizontal line is
the 6 mg L−1 criterion. Grey horizontal line is the
100% saturation level. Black dashed vertical line denotes upwelled
water at 31 psu. Regression statistics are in Table 1.
Time series of physical drivers and O2-S scatterplots 30 April
through 7 September 2007.
A. Tidal and spring-neap cycles. Circles denote cruise dates. B. Bars:
Low-pass filtered mean daily northward wind stress (τN, N
m−2). Gray shaded sections denote upwelling events
defined as ≥3 days of consecutive τN < −0.03
(dotted line). Triangles and letters indicate the timing of hydrographic
cruises. C. O2-S scatterplots for designated cruises. Oxygen
values are expressed as both concentration (mg L−1) and as
percent saturation. Red horizontal line is the 6 mg L−1
criterion. Black dashed vertical line denotes upwelled water at 31 psu.
Regression statistics are in Table 1.
Time series of physical drivers and O2-S scatterplots 29 June
through 29 July 2008.
A. Tidal and spring-neap cycles. Circles denote cruise dates. B. Bars:
Low-pass filtered mean daily northward wind stress (τN, N
m−2). Gray shaded sections denote upwelling events
defined as ≥3 days of consecutive τN < −0.03
(dotted line). Triangles and letters indicate the timing of hydrographic
cruises. C. O2-S scatterplots for designated cruises. Oxygen
values are expressed as both concentration (mg L−1) and as
percent saturation. Red horizontal line is the 6 mg L−1
criterion. Black dashed vertical line denotes upwelled water at 31 psu.
Regression statistics are in Table 1.In 2006 we made observations during late August through mid-October (Figure 2). Cruises A, B, and D
were made during spring tides, C was transitional, and E was conducted during a neap
tide. Cruises A–C occurred during a long period of upwelling; all
O2-S regressions had negative slopes with moderate to weakly
stressful DO levels in the ocean end-member. Cruises D and E occurred during
downwelling conditions, regression equations had slopes near zero, and no low DO
conditions were detected (concentrations at all salinities were normoxic). In 2007,
we sampled in May and August (Figure
3). In May, Cruise F sampling occurred during the transition from
downwelling to upwelling conditions (low wind stress), while Cruises G and H were
conducted during upwelling. While all three O2-S regressions had negative
slopes, only the cruises during upwelling had stressful (albeit weakly stressful) DO
levels. In August we sampled during neap and spring tides. Neap tide samples
(I–K) occurred during downwelling, and DO levels were supersaturated or
normoxic across the salinity range. Spring tide cruises (L–N) occurred during
upwelling, slopes were negative, and reduced DO levels were found in the ocean
end-member. In 2008, we sampled both neap and spring tides during a protracted
upwelling period (Figure 4). All
O2-S regression lines were negative with levels approaching the
hypoxic threshold. Thus, upwelling conditions brought various levels of
oxygen-depleted water to the estuary, while during downwelling conditions estuarine,
waters in the estuary were consistently normoxic or supersaturated.Alongshore wind stress was a main driver for variation in salt and oxygen
concentrations imported into the estuary. Smax was negatively related to
the 4-d cumulative wind stress CWS (P = 0.014;
r2 = −0.48; Figure 5A), while O2min was positively
related to CWS (P<0.001;
r2 = 0.81; Figure 5B). O2min was also negatively
related to Smax (P<0.001;
r2 = −0.51; Figure not shown). These results
corroborate that during upwelling favorable periods, low DO levels occurred with
high salinity water (usually >29 psu); during downwelling periods DO
concentrations were usually normoxic (Figures 2–
4). Additionally, the
O2min-Smax regression slopes were positively related to
CWS (P<0.001; r2 = 0.77; Figure 5C), indicating an
increasing input of high salinity, low DOwater with increasing upwelling wind
stress (Table 1; Figure 5C). Conversely, slopes
were weakly negative or near zero during downwelling. Neither Smax nor
O2min were significantly related to the spring-neap index
(P = 0.67 and 0.24, respectively). The
oxygen concentration of ocean water advected into the Columbia estuary thus varied
in relation to the direction and intensity of the alongshore winds.
Figure 5
Scatter plots and regression statistics.
A. Maximum salinity (Smax) by cumulative northward 4-d wind stress
(CWS); B. Minimum oxygen concentration (O2min) by cumulative 4-d
wind stress; C. Regression coefficients from
O2min-Smax regression by cumulative 4-d wind
stress. Black = 2006; blue = 2007;
red = 2008.
Scatter plots and regression statistics.
A. Maximum salinity (Smax) by cumulative northward 4-d wind stress
(CWS); B. Minimumoxygen concentration (O2min) by cumulative 4-d
wind stress; C. Regression coefficients from
O2min-Smax regression by cumulative 4-d wind
stress. Black = 2006; blue = 2007;
red = 2008.To evaluate the vertical and horizontal spatial extent of low DOwater in the
Columbia estuary, we integrated depth-distance contour plots of DO isopleths
generated from transect surveys. Cross-channel transects at the Mouth Line showed
that large percentages of the water column were affected by low DOwater (Table 2). During Cruise A,
66.3% of the water column had reduced oxygen concentrations, including
16.3% of the transect at moderate biological stress levels (Figure 6A). Note the ventilation
of low DOwater to the surface. Two measurements of the Mouth Line transect were
made during Cruise C, the first near low tide and the second near mid-flood (Figure 6B and C). During low tide,
10.1% of the water column was supersaturated at the surface, with small pools
of low DOwater at depth. By the subsequent transect (mid-flood), low DOwater had
filled the channel from the bottom to 5–6 m below the surface (42.3% of
the area) while the supersaturated zone increased in intensity but decreased in
area. Cruises D and E occurred during downwelling conditions, when oxygen
concentrations were normoxic or supersaturated even at salinities >31 psu (Figure 6D and E).
Table 2
Interpolated area and percent of water column composed of each DO
category during cross- and along channel surveys of the Columbia River
estuary.
Cruise ID
Rep
Tide
Mouth Line transects
Percent of water column
Area of O2 category
(103 m2)
>2–4
>4–6
>6–10
>10
Σ <6
>2–4
>4–6
>6–10
>10
A
1
-0.90
1.0
3.0
2.0
0.0
4.0
16.3
50.0
33.7
0.0
C
1
0.00
0.0
0.2
4.9
0.6
0.2
0.0
2.8
87.1
10.1
2
0.50
0.0
2.4
3.1
0.2
2.4
0.0
42.3
54.3
3.3
D
1
0.90
0.0
0.0
5.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
E
1
-0.33
0.0
0.0
5.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
F
1
-0.33
0.0
0.0
4.0
2.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
61.8
38.2
2
0.33
0.0
0.0
3.9
1.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
68.5
31.5
G
1
0.67
0.0
2.5
3.1
0.0
2.5
0.0
44.5
55.5
0.0
2
0.33
0.0
2.6
4.0
0.0
2.6
0.0
40.0
60.0
0.0
J
1
-0.50
0.0
0.0
8.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
2
0.29
0.0
0.0
8.4
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
91.9
8.1
N
1
-0.14
0.0
0.0
7.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
2
0.50
0.0
4.4
4.2
0.0
4.4
0.0
51.5
48.5
0.0
3
-0.83
0.0
3.4
5.5
0.0
3.4
0.0
38.3
61.7
0.0
South channel transects
A
1
NA
32.1
154.0
229.9
0.0
186.1
7.7
37.0
55.3
0.0
B
1
0.0
96.9
225.0
0.0
96.9
0.0
30.1
69.9
0.0
D
1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
E
1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
H
1
0.0
14.7
286.6
0.0
14.7
0.0
4.9
95.1
0.0
I
1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
L
1
0.0
44.6
262.5
0.0
44.6
0.0
14.5
85.5
0.0
Replicate (Rep) cross-channel observations were made at various stages of
the tide. Along-channel transects were made within 1-2 h of slack high
water.
Figure 6
Across-channel transects of vertical water column salinity and dissolved
oxygen concentration during Autumn 2006.
Salinity, top panels. Oxygen concentration, bottom panels. Plots A–C
occurred during upwelling conditions, and plots D and E during downwelling
conditions. Plots A, D, and E occurred near high water, while Plots B and C
occurred on the same date but different stages of the tide. Salinity
isopleths are 2 psu. Oxygen isopleths are 1 mg L−1,
Supersaturated = blue;
normoxic = white; stressed = red.
Bottom contours are shown in black. Triangles designate location of
measurements.
Across-channel transects of vertical water column salinity and dissolved
oxygen concentration during Autumn 2006.
Salinity, top panels. Oxygen concentration, bottom panels. Plots A–C
occurred during upwelling conditions, and plots D and E during downwelling
conditions. Plots A, D, and E occurred near high water, while Plots B and C
occurred on the same date but different stages of the tide. Salinity
isopleths are 2 psu. Oxygen isopleths are 1 mg L−1,
Supersaturated = blue;
normoxic = white; stressed = red.
Bottom contours are shown in black. Triangles designate location of
measurements.Replicate (Rep) cross-channel observations were made at various stages of
the tide. Along-channel transects were made within 1-2 h of slack high
water.Two cruises in May 2007 were made a week apart, the first during low wind stress
(Cruise F) and the second during strong upwelling conditions (Cruise G). Two
measurements of the Mouth Line transect were made during each date (Figure 7). The entire water column
was normoxic or supersaturated during low wind stress conditions (Figures 7A and B), while
40–45% of the water column (to 5 m) was under mild biological stress
during upwelling (Figures 7C and
D). Similarly, two cruises in August 2007 were made one week apart, the
first during low wind stress (Cruise J) and the second during strong upwelling
conditions (Cruise N), and similar results were found (Table 2). The three measurements of the Mouth
Line transect that were made during Cruise N show the flushing of low DOwater from
the lower estuary during ebb tide (Table 2).
Figure 7
Across-channel transects of vertical water column salinity and dissolved
oxygen concentration during May 2007.
Salinity, top panels. Oxygen concentration, bottom panels. Plots A and B
depict downwelling and C and D show upwelling conditions. For each date, two
transects were made as indicated in the header. Isopleth and fill
designations are as in Figure
6.
Across-channel transects of vertical water column salinity and dissolved
oxygen concentration during May 2007.
Salinity, top panels. Oxygen concentration, bottom panels. Plots A and B
depict downwelling and C and D show upwelling conditions. For each date, two
transects were made as indicated in the header. Isopleth and fill
designations are as in Figure
6.In the along-channel dimension, we sampled the South Channel transect on four dates
during upwelling (Cruises A, C, H, L) and three dates during downwelling or low wind
stress (Cruises D, E, I). Examples contrasting up- and downwelling conditions are
shown for four surveys (A, C, D, E) in 2006 (Figure 8). These examples portray the typical
salt wedge estuarine circulation observed in the Columbia estuary [26]. Biologically
stressful DO levels were found only during upwelling periods, with up to 45%
of the water column affected (Table
2). Low DO in bottom waters penetrated up to 25 km in the South Channel
(Figure 8C). Thus, a large
area of the estuarinewater column could be affected by low DO events (up to
186×103 m2 in the x-z dimension). The lowest DO values were
invariably located in the highest salinity waters close to the estuary mouth.
Figure 8
Along-channel channel transects of vertical water column salinity and
dissolved oxygen concentration during Autumn 2006.
Salinity, top panels. Oxygen concentration, bottom panels. Cruises shown in
Plots A and C occurred during upwelling, while cruises in Plots B and D
occurred during downwelling conditions. Isopleth and fill designations are
as in Figure 6.
Along-channel channel transects of vertical water column salinity and
dissolved oxygen concentration during Autumn 2006.
Salinity, top panels. Oxygen concentration, bottom panels. Cruises shown in
Plots A and C occurred during upwelling, while cruises in Plots B and D
occurred during downwelling conditions. Isopleth and fill designations are
as in Figure 6.Nine anchor station studies were conducted to investigate the tidal-scale temporal
evolution of low DO events (Table
3): Cruise B occurred near NC14 in August 2006; two pairs of observations
from NC14 and NC08 were conducted under neap tide (Cruises J and K) and spring tide
(Cruises M and N) conditions in August 2007; four stations near SC09 (Cruises
O–Q) or NC10 (Cruise R) were observed under contrasting spring/neap tidal
patterns under strong upwelling during July 2008 (Figure 1; Table 1).
Table 3
Percent of time bottom waters were at various dissolved oxygen categories
(mg L−1) during anchor station studies.
Cruise ID
Station
Study length
DO category
>2–4
>4–6
>6–10
B
NC07
4.7
17.0
53.2
29.8
J
NC07
8.4
0.0
0.0
100.0
K
NC14
9.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
M
NC14
7.6
0.0
55.3
44.7
N
NC07
7.8
17.9
61.5
20.5
O
SC09
7.9
100.0
0.0
0.0
P
SC09
4.5
100.0
0.0
0.0
Q
SC09
4.9
46.9
13.9
39.2
R
NC10
7.0
11.4
15.0
73.6
Study length in hours.
Study length in hours.In 2006 and 2007, spring tide sampling occurred during ebb-to-flood tide periods,
when flooding water entered the estuary as a salt wedge. At NC14 near the estuary
mouth, oxygen concentrations decreased from normoxic to <4.0 mg
L−1 in a one hour period as ocean water intruded into the
estuary (Figure 9A). Bottom
oxygen conditions remained <6 mg L−1 for over 6.25 h (Table 3). Sampling the
subsequent day at NC08, near the Astoria-Megler Bridge, revealed that low DOwater
was transported over 14 km upstream, where weakly stressful conditions at the bottom
persisted for 3.9 h (Figure 9B,
Table 3). At both
stations, low DO conditions penetrated into the water column to within 5–8 m
of the surface (60–70% of the water column), and Smax and
O2min occurred near high water. Similarly rapid onsets of stressful
conditions were observed for other spring tide measurements. In contrast, during
neap tides the water column was intensely stratified, and its structure varied
little during the observation periods. However these neap tide samples (Cruises J
and K) occurred during downwelling conditions, and no low DOwater was detected
(Figures 9C and D, Table 3).
Figure 9
Anchor station time series of vertical water column salinity and
dissolved oxygen concentration during August 2007.
Salinity, top panels. Oxygen concentration, bottom panels. Plots A and B show
upwelling during spring tides, which contrasts with Plots C and D that show
downwelling during neap tides. Isopleth and fill designations are as in
Figure 6.
Anchor station time series of vertical water column salinity and
dissolved oxygen concentration during August 2007.
Salinity, top panels. Oxygen concentration, bottom panels. Plots A and B show
upwelling during spring tides, which contrasts with Plots C and D that show
downwelling during neap tides. Isopleth and fill designations are as in
Figure 6.In contrast, during 2008 there was a prolonged upwelling event during which we
sampled both neap and spring tidal conditions. Moderately stressful to nearly
hypoxic water was present in high salinity water during all four dates (Figure 10). During spring tides on
18 and 20 July, the water column structure again followed a salt wedge pattern as
described above. Exposure to low DO occurred only when salinity exceeded 25–29
psu. At high tide, low DOwater penetrated to within 2 m of the surface on 20 July
and outcropped during 18 July (Figures
10A and B). Exposure to low DO conditions at the estuary benthic layer
ranged from 26.4 to 60.8% of the measurement period (Table 3). In contrast, during the neap period of
high stratification, moderately stressful to nearly hypoxic water was present in
bottom water throughout the measurement periods (100% exposure), which were
for 8 hours on 10 July and 4.5 h on 13 July (Figures 10C and D, Table 3). Mildly to moderately stressful levels
were present within 5–6 m of the surface at high water, and encompassed 56.8
and 59.1%, respectively, of the space-time periods measured. These data show
low DOwater was associated with high salinity water, was maximal in vertical extent
around high tide, and persisted or was advected in accordance with semidiurnal tidal
patterns.
Figure 10
Anchor station time series of vertical water column salinity and
dissolved oxygen concentration during July 2008.
Salinity, top panels. Oxygen concentration, bottom panels. The plots contrast
spring tides (A and B) from neap tides (C and D) during a strong upwelling
event. Isopleth and fill designations are as in Figure 6.
Anchor station time series of vertical water column salinity and
dissolved oxygen concentration during July 2008.
Salinity, top panels. Oxygen concentration, bottom panels. The plots contrast
spring tides (A and B) from neap tides (C and D) during a strong upwelling
event. Isopleth and fill designations are as in Figure 6.The annual number of upwelling events and the number of days per year estimated to
have reduced DO in the estuary varied among years (Table 4). Based on the 4-d cumulative wind stress
time series, there ranged an almost two-fold difference (6 and 11) in the number of
low DO events between 2006 and 2008. The total number of days estimated to have DO
<6 mg L−1 ranged from 103 to 152 (49 to 72% of the
periods evaluated). Based on wind stress intensity, periods of severe low were rare,
while periods of moderate DOstress ranged from 13 to 23% of the upwelling
period. There was no relation between the number of low DO events and total number
of days with stressful conditions, since the duration of the wind events varied.
Thus, based on wind stress records, low DO events are likely to be common in the
Columbia estuary.
Table 4
Number of upwelling events estimated from the wind stress time series,
and the predicted duration of each DO category (mg L−1)
computed for the typical upwelling season (day of year 90 to 300).
Year
Events
DOCategory
Days
% Time
2006
6
0 to 2
4
1.9
>2 to 4
48
22.9
>4 to 6
100
47.6
0 to 6
152
72.4
2007
9
0 to 2
1
0.5
>2 to 4
27
12.9
>4 to 6
75
35.7
0 to 6
103
49.0
2008
11
0 to 2
8
3.8
>2 to 4
31
14.8
>4 to 6
95
45.2
0 to 6
134
63.8
Predictions were based on the regression equation
O2min = 6.47× CWS +6.0.
Predictions were based on the regression equation
O2min = 6.47× CWS +6.0.
Discussion
Origins of low DO water
Low DO occurs naturally in subsurface waters of the California Current System,
but the origin of this source water can be from either the north or south of the
Columbia estuary depending on the influence of large-scale climatic factors on
the North Pacific Gyre [41]. Waters upwelled on the shelf appear to come
primarily from the northward-flowing California Current Undercurrent at depths
of 150–300 m. Feely et al. [42] found water from a depth of 150 m was upwelled to the
surface from about 40 km offshore to the nearshore zone during strong upwelling.
In addition to being oxygen-depleted, this water was also undersaturated with
respect to aragonite and was therefore acidic to calcified organisms. In
contrast, Wheeler et al. [20] and Grantham et al. [22] concluded the hypoxic
mortalities that occurred on the Oregon shelf in 2002 were due to a combination
of low DO source waters plus the oxidation of organic matter originating from
the decline of a large diatom bloom that sank and was respired in the benthic
bottom layer. In that case, the source waters were determined to be from an
anomalous southward transport of subarctic water which was unusually high in
nitrate and low in DO [20], [43]. Kaplan et al. [44] found interannual variation
in the timing and intensity of upwelling led to variation in the source of
upwelled water off Central California between 2006 and 2007. It appears both
physical advection and biological processes affect the character of water
intruding on the shelf, which then becomes the source water for upwelling, and
several recent studies have documented low DOwater on the Oregon shelf in
proximity to estuarine systems [7], [19]–[22], [45]. Processes that supply
oxygen-depleted water to the nearshore zone, whether the mechanism be variation
in along-shelf advection, wind-induced changes in upwelling intensity, in situ
depletion due to heterotrophic respiration, or some combination of these
factors, would all contribute to a nearshore pool of low DO source water that
can be advected into Pacific Northwest estuaries.
Wind forcing
We sampled the distribution of DO in the Columbia estuary on 18 cruises that
spanned a range of both salinities and of upwelling- and downwelling-favorable
wind stresses. The results clearly show that low DOwater was invariably
associated with the ocean end-member, while the river end-member was
consistently normoxic. Further, low DO events occurred during upwelling wind
events, and when downwelling winds predominated, the water of maximum salinity
was generally normoxic. Based on O2min, the intensity of low DO
events was positively related to the strength of upwelling winds, indicating
greater upwelling results in lower DO in the estuary. Transitions between up-
and downwelling conditions, and the delivery of low DOwater to the estuary,
varied rapidly over the course of a few days. Our findings confirm the origin of
low DOwater in the Columbia estuary was upwelled subsurface water advected into
the estuary from the ocean, and corroborate findings from the 1950s and 1960s as
reported by Pearson and Holt [24] and Haertal et al. [25].
Tidal forcing
The distribution, duration, and extent of low DO events varied temporally on
semidiurnal tidal and spring/neap tidal scales which, along with streamflow,
determine estuarine circulation patterns in the CRE. The density structure of
the estuary modulates from a mainly vertically mixed, horizontally stratified
(salt wedge) system during spring tides to a highly stratified state during neap
tides [26],
[40]. During
spring tides, the estuary was well flushed on semidiurnal time scales, and high
salinity, low DOwater that intruded during flood tides was replaced by normoxic
river water during the subsequent ebb flow (Figures 6B,7A). Exposure times of biologically stressful
levels of oxygen to organisms during these periods were limited to a maximum of
about 6 h near the estuary mouth and 4 h upstream near station NC14 (Table 2); however, the
vertical extent of low DO was greatest during spring tides and could even
outcrop to the surface (Figures
6A and 10A).
During neap tides, estuarine waters were highly stratified, flushing was
reduced, and high salinity bottom water had increased residence in the estuary
(Table 3). For
example, during the strong upwelling event in July 2008 (Figure 9), the neap tide series caused a much
longer exposure of low DO to benthic organisms than during the following spring
tide series when flushing was increased (100% exposure versus 36%
for neap versus spring tide sampling periods of similar length). Stressful
conditions at the benthic layer were maximized when strong upwelling occurred
around neap tides. In contrast, the greatest vertical affect was found during
spring tides at sections near the mouth of the estuary, when the entire water
column could be rendered stressful. Together, time series and transect data
indicated that large expanses of the water column and benthic layer were exposed
to low DOwater.
Autochthonous oxygen production in the CRE
Despite the highly advective nature of the Columbia estuary [40], biological activity by
phototrophic organisms was a source of oxygen within the estuary. Surface waters
were frequently supersaturated in water of mesohaline salinity (Figures 2–4, Cruises C–E,
I–L). This indicates an autochthonous estuarine source of oxygen. During
summer and early autumn, the chlorophyll signal in the Columbia estuary is
usually dominated by the highly motile mixotrophic ciliate Myrionecta
rubra, which forms dense “red water” blooms [26], [46]. The
distribution of M. rubra was spatially coincident with high
oxygen concentrations during August and September [26] and usually occurred at
salinities between 3 and 20 psu. The highest vertical oxygen gradients
(−1.3 mg L−1 m−1) were found in shallow
water during autumn, when low DOocean water intruded under this
estuarine-produced supersaturated surface waters (Figure 6C). However, the biological impact of
biota was also found during May 2006, when 38% of the water column was
supersaturated along the Mouth Line transect (Figure 7A–B). This production was
likely due to riverine diatoms [25]. Wheeler et al. [20] found supersaturated
surface conditions within 10 km of the Oregon coast during July 2002, but this
occurred in salinities >33 psu and is indicative of production by coastal
phytoplankton. At present, it is not well determined how oxygen production by
phytoplankton may alleviate low DO in upwelled water; however the same upwelled
water that is low in DO is high in nitrate and therefore is stimulatory for
phytoplankton growth. The normoxic oxygen levels observed in the ocean
end-member during downwelling conditions may in part be due to oxygen production
by coastal phytoplankton and the subsequent transport of those water masses to
the estuary [19].
Potential effects of low DO on salmon and crab
Each year during the upwelling season, around 100 million juvenile Pacific salmon
migrate through the Columbia estuary to the ocean. There are no field
measurements to discern the impacts of low DO on these salmon; however,
information from the literature suggests there are effects and interactions that
would reduce fitness and/or increase predation. These include avoidance behavior
and subsequent habitat constriction, impaired swimming ability, and reduced
feeding and growth [14]. Studies have demonstrated that salmon are relatively
intolerant to low DO and usually exhibit avoidance behaviors when exposed to
reduced oxygen levels. A review by Davis [11] concluded the average
minimum incipient response threshold for salmonids in freshwater was 6.0 mg
L−1, while the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
[14] rated 3.0 mg L−1 as the limit to
avoid acute mortality. Whitmore et al. [47] found juvenile Chinook
(O. tshawytscha) and coho (O. kisutch)
salmon avoided water <4.5 and 6.0 mg L−1, respectively, and
both species preferred concentrations >9.0 mg L−1. Birtwell
and Kruzynski [48] found that juvenile Chinook salmon avoided low DO
bottom water in the highly stratified Somass River estuary, BC, Canada, and, by
this avoidance behavior, the salmon became isolated in unsuitably warm and
polluted surface areas with reduced prey resources. In laboratory experiments,
these authors found surface-oriented Chinook salmon were induced to descend into
salinewater when oxygen concentrations in the surface layer were decreased from
9 to between 7 and 8 mg L−1. It should be noted that returning
adult salmon also avoid water with oxygen concentrations below about 3.5 mg
L−1
[49], [50]. Many
other fish and invertebrate species undergo vertical and horizontal habitat
displacements to avoid intruding low DO bottom water (e.g., [9], [51], [52]).Migrating salmon have been shown to exhibit a subsurface preference [53]–[55], and a
vertical range restriction could have profound impacts on salmon migrating
through the Columbia estuary. This is due to the high densities of piscivorous
birds such as Caspian terns (Hydroprogne caspia) that nest and
roost on East Sand Island in the lower estuary [56]. Price and Schreck [57] and Kennedy
et al. [58]
suggest avoidance of high salinity water due to stress or maladaptation of
osmoregulation may concentrate migrating fish to low salinity surface layers,
where they maybe more vulnerable to predation by shallow-feeding plunge-divers.
An avoidance response to low DO in intruding ocean water could similarly
increase predation rates on salmon by these birds. DO levels during our study
were commonly <6.0 mg L−1 within 5 m of the surface and low
DOwater occasionally outcropped at the surface at levels that likely induced a
behavioral response by salmon. Moreover, low DO progressively reduces swimming
speed in juvenile salmon (by approximately 20% at 4.0 mg
L−1
[59]–[61], with the consequence that
escape responses to diving birds such as double-crested cormorants
(Phalacrocorax auritus) or predatory fishes could be
impeded. Note that the two bird species mentioned here are estimated to consume
millions of migrating salmon annually [62], [63]. We speculate periods of
shoaling low DOwater in the Columbia estuary may lead to increased predation
rates by birds on salmon as well as on other small pelagic fishes.Salmon likely suffer additional non-lethal effects to low DO exposure.
Summarizing a series of growth experiments with juvenile Chinook and coho salmon
in freshwater, the U.S. EPA [14] reported exponential
decreases in median growth from a minimal effect at 7.0 mg L−1
to a decrease of 42±7.1% at 3.0 mg L−1. Growth
reductions for salmon exposed to DO levels below 4.0 mg L−1
were considered to be severe. The critical criterion for growth of saltwater
organisms was determined to be 4.8 mg L−1
[38].
The mechanism for growth reductions with increasing oxygenstress appears to be
a combination of enhanced metabolic demand and decreased feeding. Moreover,
stress has been found to increase predation rates on juvenile salmonids [64], [65], which
suggests that salmon metabolically weakened or stressed by low DO events may be
more susceptible to predators. Low DO in surface waters on the shelf may also
affect salmon once they migrate from the estuary [e.g., 46]. Thus,
while DO levels in the Columbia estuary are unlikely to be directly lethal to
salmonids, behavioral and physiological responses to low DO that reduce
performance and increase stress may increase predation risk and/or decrease
fitness of migrating fish. More research is required to elucidate behavioral and
sublethal effects of low DO on salmon.Pacific Northwest estuaries such as the Columbia are also important nursery areas
for Dungeness crabs [66], and benthic fauna with limited mobility are often
considered more susceptible to low DO events than mobile nekton. Shelf anoxia in
2002 led to widespread mortality of benthic organisms, including Dungeness crab
[22],
but crabs are also affected by non-lethal oxygen concentrations. Bernatis et al.
[67]
determined Dungeness crabs to be relatively intolerant of DO levels
<47% saturation (which is more tolerant than most crustaceans, [11]), and Stone
and O'Clair [68] similarly found adult crabs in Barkley Sound avoided
water <50% saturation. Crabs reduce their food intake in hypoxia, and
while they may forage in low DO areas, they tend to move to areas of higher DO
concentration for digestion (which consumes oxygen). One point of concern
regards the cumulative effects of low DO and salinity on Dungeness crab biology
in the Columbia estuary. Cancer magister is a weak
osmoregulator and becomes inactive at reduced salinities [69]. Sugerman et al. [70] found
crabs reduce pumping water over the gills to curtail ionic loss at 23 psu, and
cease pumping at 16 psu. Curtis et al. [71] found crabs reduced both
overall feeding activity and the quantity of food ingested at mesohaline
salinities. Salinity levels in the Columbia estuary commonly fall below 16 psu
during ebbing tides (e.g., Figures
7, 10), at which
time crabs are probably quiescent. If activity during subsequent flood tide is
also limited due to low DO, then the time available for crab foraging could be
reduced, as was found for blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) by
Seitz et al. [72]. Further uncertainties include the effects of low DO
on settlement and survival of C. magister megalopae (the
recruiting larval form), which usually enter Pacific Northwest estuaries from
April through November [73]. For megalopae of the Atlantic rock crab (C.
irroratus), the median lethal concentration (LC50)
values during 240 min tests ranged from 1.2 mg L−1 at 10°C
to 3.3 mg L−1 at 30°C [74], which suggests larval crab
could be affected by DO values we recorded in the Columbia estuary. It is not
known if low DO affects metamorphic success of larval Dungeness crab.
Potential effects of climate change
Although low DO in the coastal Pacific Northwest is not a new phenomenon [24], [25], long-term
trends indicate the frequency and severity of low DO events may be increasing
due to climatic alterations in atmospheric forcings and changes in ocean
circulation patterns [23], [75]. The depth of the oxygen minimum zone in the
California Current System has been shoaling [23], [75]–[77], and this
is the source water for coastal upwelling on the Pacific Northwest continental
shelf. Modeling predicts further declines in DO are likely to occur, based on
increased isolation of bottom waters by strengthened thermal stratification and
reduced vertical mixing [78]. However, the most recent review of coastal estuaries
in the Pacific Northwest failed to identify low DO as problematic [79], and the
impact of low DO on organisms in the Columbia estuary and other PNW estuaries
has not been ascertained. Based on a wind-forced supply mechanism, low DO events
in the Columbia estuary appear to be common at present (Table 4), and along with increased
acidification of this subsurface water [42], [80], shelf and estuarine
habitats could be experiencing declines in environmental quality.
Summary
1. Low DOwater was advected into the Columbia River estuary from the ocean
end-member; the riverine end-member was always normoxic.2. Oxygen depleted water in the estuary was associated with upwelling wind
events, and low DO was not detected during periods of downwelling or low wind
stress.3. Spring-neap tidal stratification largely determined levels of exposure to low
DOwater, with greater vertical extent during spring tides and greater
horizontal and benthic impacts during neap tides.4. Hypoxic oxygen concentrations were not measured during our sampling; however,
DO levels were sufficiently low to affect the behavior of migrating juvenile
salmon and benthic crabs (according to literature values).
Authors: Brian A Grantham; Francis Chan; Karina J Nielsen; David S Fox; John A Barth; Adriana Huyer; Jane Lubchenco; Bruce A Menge Journal: Nature Date: 2004-06-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Richard A Feely; Christopher L Sabine; J Martin Hernandez-Ayon; Debby Ianson; Burke Hales Journal: Science Date: 2008-05-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Maria W Smith; Lisa Zeigler Allen; Andrew E Allen; Lydie Herfort; Holly M Simon Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2013-05-30 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Maria W Smith; Richard E Davis; Nicholas D Youngblut; Tuomas Kärnä; Lydie Herfort; Rachel J Whitaker; William W Metcalf; Bradley M Tebo; António M Baptista; Holly M Simon Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 5.640