STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of increasing the intensity and/or duration of exposure on light-induced changes in the timing of the circadian clock of humans. DESIGN: Multifactorial randomized controlled trial, between and within subject design SETTING: General Clinical Research Center (GCRC) of an academic medical center PARTICIPANTS: 56 healthy young subjects (20-40 years of age) INTERVENTIONS:Research subjects were admitted for 2 independent stays of 4 nights/3 days for treatment with bright or dim-light (randomized order) at a time known to induce phase delays in circadian timing. The intensity and duration of the bright light were determined by random assignment to one of 9 treatment conditions (duration of 1, 2, or 3 hours at 2000, 4000, or 8000 lux). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Treatment-induced changes in the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) and dim light melatonin offset (DLMOff) were measured from blood samples collected every 20-30 min throughout baseline and post-treatment nights. Comparison by multi-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) of light-induced changes in the time of the circadian melatonin rhythm for the 9 conditions revealed that changing the duration of the light exposure from 1 to 3 h increased the magnitude of light-induced delays. In contrast, increasing from moderate (2,000 lux) to high (8,000 lux) intensity light did not alter the magnitude of phase delays of the circadian melatonin rhythm. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the present study suggest that for phototherapy of circadian rhythm sleep disorders in humans, a longer period of moderate intensity light may be more effective than a shorter exposure period of high intensity light.
RCT Entities:
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of increasing the intensity and/or duration of exposure on light-induced changes in the timing of the circadian clock of humans. DESIGN: Multifactorial randomized controlled trial, between and within subject design SETTING: General Clinical Research Center (GCRC) of an academic medical center PARTICIPANTS: 56 healthy young subjects (20-40 years of age) INTERVENTIONS: Research subjects were admitted for 2 independent stays of 4 nights/3 days for treatment with bright or dim-light (randomized order) at a time known to induce phase delays in circadian timing. The intensity and duration of the bright light were determined by random assignment to one of 9 treatment conditions (duration of 1, 2, or 3 hours at 2000, 4000, or 8000 lux). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Treatment-induced changes in the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) and dim light melatonin offset (DLMOff) were measured from blood samples collected every 20-30 min throughout baseline and post-treatment nights. Comparison by multi-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) of light-induced changes in the time of the circadian melatonin rhythm for the 9 conditions revealed that changing the duration of the light exposure from 1 to 3 h increased the magnitude of light-induced delays. In contrast, increasing from moderate (2,000 lux) to high (8,000 lux) intensity light did not alter the magnitude of phase delays of the circadian melatonin rhythm. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the present study suggest that for phototherapy of circadian rhythm sleep disorders in humans, a longer period of moderate intensity light may be more effective than a shorter exposure period of high intensity light.
Authors: Robert L Sack; Dennis Auckley; R Robert Auger; Mary A Carskadon; Kenneth P Wright; Michael V Vitiello; Irina V Zhdanova Journal: Sleep Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Tina M Burke; Rachel R Markwald; Evan D Chinoy; Jesse A Snider; Sara C Bessman; Christopher M Jung; Kenneth P Wright Journal: Sleep Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: J L Anderson; M A St Hilaire; R R Auger; C A Glod; S J Crow; A N Rivera; S M Fuentes Salgado; S J Pullen; T K Kaufman; A J Selby; D J Wolfe Journal: Chronobiol Int Date: 2016-08-05 Impact factor: 2.877
Authors: Anne-Marie Chang; Nayantara Santhi; Melissa St Hilaire; Claude Gronfier; Dayna S Bradstreet; Jeanne F Duffy; Steven W Lockley; Richard E Kronauer; Charles A Czeisler Journal: J Physiol Date: 2012-04-23 Impact factor: 5.182