Literature DB >> 21532472

Computerized decision support system improves fluid resuscitation following severe burns: an original study.

José Salinas1, Kevin K Chung, Elizabeth A Mann, Leopoldo C Cancio, George C Kramer, Maria L Serio-Melvin, Evan M Renz, Charles E Wade, Steven E Wolf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Several formulas have been developed to guide resuscitation in severely burned patients during the initial 48 hrs after injury. These approaches require manual titration of fluid that may result in human error during this process and lead to suboptimal outcomes. The goal of this study was to analyze the efficacy of a computerized open-loop decision support system for burn resuscitation compared to historical controls.
DESIGN: Fluid infusion rates and urinary output from 39 severely burned patients with >20% total body surface area burns were recorded upon admission (Model group). A fluid-response model based on these data was developed and incorporated into a computerized open-loop algorithm and computer decision support system. The computer decision support system was used to resuscitate 32 subsequent patients with severe burns (computer decision support system group) and compared with the Model group.
SETTING: Burn intensive care unit of a metropolitan Level 1 Trauma center. PATIENTS: Acute burn patients with >20% total body surface area requiring active fluid resuscitation during the initial 24 to 48 hours after burn.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We found no significant difference between the Model and computer decision support system groups in age, total body surface area, or injury mechanism. Total crystalloid volume during the first 48 hrs post burn, total crystalloid intensive care unit volume, and initial 24-hr crystalloid intensive care unit volume were all lower in the computer decision support system group. Infused volume per kilogram body weight (mL/kg) and per percentage burn (mL/kg/total body surface area) were also lower for the computer decision support system group. The number of patients who met hourly urinary output goals was higher in the computer decision support system group.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a computer decision support system for burn resuscitation in the intensive care unit resulted in improved fluid management of severely burned patients. All measures of crystalloid fluid volume were reduced while patients were maintained within urinary output targets a higher percentage of the time. The addition of computer decision support system technology improved patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21532472     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821cb790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  21 in total

Review 1.  New technologies in global burn care - a review of recent advances.

Authors:  Laura Kearney; Eamon C Francis; Anthony Jp Clover
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2018-08-20

2.  Acute burn resuscitation and fluid creep: it is time for colloid rehabilitation.

Authors:  B S Atiyeh; S A Dibo; A E Ibrahim; E R Zgheib
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2012-06-30

3.  Lessons for surgeons in the final moments of Air France Flight 447.

Authors:  Aneel Bhangu; Sonia Bhangu; James Stevenson; Douglas M Bowley
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Inhalation Injury in the Burned Patient.

Authors:  Guillermo Foncerrada; Derek M Culnan; Karel D Capek; Sagrario González-Trejo; Janos Cambiaso-Daniel; Lee C Woodson; David N Herndon; Celeste C Finnerty; Jong O Lee
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 5.  Volume Resuscitation in Patients With High-Voltage Electrical Injuries.

Authors:  Derek M Culnan; Kelley Farner; Genevieve H Bitz; Karel D Capek; Yiji Tu; Carlos Jimenez; William C Lineaweaver
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.539

6.  New management strategy for fluid resuscitation: quantifying volume in the first 48 hours after burn injury.

Authors:  Katrina B Mitchell; Elie Khalil; Ann Brennan; Huibo Shao; Angela Rabbitts; Nicole E Leahy; Roger W Yurt; James J Gallagher
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.845

Review 7.  Acute kidney injury in the ICU: from injury to recovery: reports from the 5th Paris International Conference.

Authors:  Rinaldo Bellomo; Claudio Ronco; Ravindra L Mehta; Pierre Asfar; Julie Boisramé-Helms; Michael Darmon; Jean-Luc Diehl; Jacques Duranteau; Eric A J Hoste; Joannes-Boyau Olivier; Matthieu Legrand; Nicolas Lerolle; Manu L N G Malbrain; Johan Mårtensson; Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Didier Payen; Sophie Perinel; Esther Peters; Peter Pickkers; Eric Rondeau; Miet Schetz; Christophe Vinsonneau; Julia Wendon; Ling Zhang; Pierre-François Laterre
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 6.925

8.  Randomized trial of automated, electronic monitoring to facilitate early detection of sepsis in the intensive care unit*.

Authors:  Michael H Hooper; Lisa Weavind; Arthur P Wheeler; Jason B Martin; Supriya Srinivasa Gowda; Matthew W Semler; Rachel M Hayes; Daniel W Albert; Norment B Deane; Hui Nian; Janos L Mathe; Andras Nadas; Janos Sztipanovits; Anne Miller; Gordon R Bernard; Todd W Rice
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Inaccuracy of Urine Output Measurements due to Urinary Retention in Catheterized Patients in the Burn ICU.

Authors:  George C Kramer; Evan Luxon; Jordan Wolf; Daniel R Burnett; Devyani Nanduri; Bruce C Friedman
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 1.845

Review 10.  Burn resuscitation.

Authors:  Frederick W Endorf; David J Dries
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.