OBJECTIVE: The authors hypothesized that the depression treatment preferences of elderly home care patients would vary by their experience of depression and that preferences for active treatment would be associated with current depression and with antidepressant treatment. METHODS: The authors conducted cross-sectional secondary analyses of data from the TRIAD study (Training in the Assessment of Depression) of 256 randomly selected elderly patients newly admitted to home care. The study assessed preference for active treatments (medication or psychotherapy) and nonactive or complementary approaches (such as religious activities or doing nothing). Nondepressed patients were asked to choose as if they had serious depression. Two separate indicators of depression experience were used: a current diagnosis of major or minor depression and current or previous antidepressant treatment. RESULTS: Of the 256 patients, 16% (N=41) met criteria for major or minor depression. Forty-seven percent of the sample (N=121) preferred an active treatment as their first choice, and others preferred nonactive or complementary approaches. Logistic regression indicated that current antidepressant use, previous psychotherapy experience, white or Hispanic race-ethnicity (versus black), greater impairment in instrumental activities of daily living, and less personal stigma about depression were independently associated with preference for an active treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly home care patients had a variety of treatment preferences, ranging from active treatments, to religious or spiritual activities, to no treatment. Several factors were associated with a preference for active treatment, including treatment experience, physical impairment, race-ethnicity, and attitudes and beliefs. An understanding of patient preferences may help engage older depressed home care patients in treatment.
OBJECTIVE: The authors hypothesized that the depression treatment preferences of elderly home care patients would vary by their experience of depression and that preferences for active treatment would be associated with current depression and with antidepressant treatment. METHODS: The authors conducted cross-sectional secondary analyses of data from the TRIAD study (Training in the Assessment of Depression) of 256 randomly selected elderly patients newly admitted to home care. The study assessed preference for active treatments (medication or psychotherapy) and nonactive or complementary approaches (such as religious activities or doing nothing). Nondepressed patients were asked to choose as if they had serious depression. Two separate indicators of depression experience were used: a current diagnosis of major or minor depression and current or previous antidepressant treatment. RESULTS: Of the 256 patients, 16% (N=41) met criteria for major or minor depression. Forty-seven percent of the sample (N=121) preferred an active treatment as their first choice, and others preferred nonactive or complementary approaches. Logistic regression indicated that current antidepressant use, previous psychotherapy experience, white or Hispanic race-ethnicity (versus black), greater impairment in instrumental activities of daily living, and less personal stigma about depression were independently associated with preference for an active treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly home care patients had a variety of treatment preferences, ranging from active treatments, to religious or spiritual activities, to no treatment. Several factors were associated with a preference for active treatment, including treatment experience, physical impairment, race-ethnicity, and attitudes and beliefs. An understanding of patient preferences may help engage older depressed home care patients in treatment.
Authors: J A Sirey; M L Bruce; G S Alexopoulos; D A Perlick; P Raue; S J Friedman; B S Meyers Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Lisa A Cooper; Junius J Gonzales; Joseph J Gallo; Kathryn M Rost; Lisa S Meredith; Lisa V Rubenstein; Nae-Yuh Wang; Daniel E Ford Journal: Med Care Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Dennis S Charney; Charles F Reynolds; Lydia Lewis; Barry D Lebowitz; Trey Sunderland; George S Alexopoulos; Dan G Blazer; Ira R Katz; Barnett S Meyers; Patricia A Arean; Soo Borson; Charlotte Brown; Martha L Bruce; Christopher M Callahan; Mary E Charlson; Yeates Conwell; Bruce N Cuthbert; D P Devanand; Mary Jo Gibson; Gary L Gottlieb; K Ranga Krishnan; Sally K Laden; Constantine G Lyketsos; Benoit H Mulsant; George Niederehe; Jason T Olin; David W Oslin; Jane Pearson; Trudy Persky; Bruce G Pollock; Susan Raetzman; Mildred Reynolds; Carl Salzman; Richard Schulz; Thomas L Schwenk; Edward Scolnick; Jurgen Unutzer; Myrna M Weissman; Robert C Young Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2003-07
Authors: Paul A Fishman; Michael J Goodman; Mark C Hornbrook; Richard T Meenan; Donald J Bachman; Maureen C O'Keeffe Rosetti Journal: Med Care Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Martha L Bruce; Gail J McAvay; Patrick J Raue; Ellen L Brown; Barnett S Meyers; Denis J Keohane; David R Jagoda; Carol Weber Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Brenna N Renn; Patricia A Areán; Patrick J Raue; Eugene Aisenberg; Emily C Friedman; Zoran Popović Journal: Res Soc Work Pract Date: 2020-10-13
Authors: Aaron R Lyon; Sean A Munson; Brenna N Renn; David C Atkins; Michael D Pullmann; Emily Friedman; Patricia A Areán Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2019-10-09
Authors: Sean A Munson; Emily C Friedman; Katie Osterhage; Ryan Allred; Michael D Pullmann; Patricia A Areán; Aaron R Lyon Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-06-14 Impact factor: 7.076
Authors: Annette Eidam; Anja Roth; André Lacroix; Sabine Goisser; Hanna M Seidling; Walter E Haefeli; Jürgen M Bauer Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2020-03-04 Impact factor: 2.711