| Literature DB >> 21531711 |
Elizabeth A Clark1, Nicola Walker, Donna C Ford, Ian A Cooper, Petra C F Oyston, K Ravi Acharya.
Abstract
Resistance to antibiotics is a problem not only in terms of healthcare but also biodefense. Engineering of resistance into aEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21531711 PMCID: PMC3129183 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M111.225730
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biol Chem ISSN: 0021-9258 Impact factor: 5.157
FIGURE 1.Chymotrypsin inhibition assay data. Chymotrypsin activity was assayed subsequent to incubation with varying concentrations of ecotin. 1.4 nm chymotrypsin was incubated with no ecotin (lines), 0.5 nm ecotin (■), 2.5 nm ecotin (▴), or 3.5 nm ecotin (×) prior to assaying. The A256 of the N-benzoyl-l-tyrosine ethyl ester hydrolysis reaction mixture was measured at various time intervals over the 180-s time course. The reaction rate is related to change in A256 and is indicative of chymotrypsin activity.
FIGURE 2.Structure of the ecotin-chymotrypsin complex. Chymotrypsin molecules are colored green and are designated C1–C4. Ecotin molecules are colored pink, yellow, red, and blue and are designated E1–E4. A, there are two tetramers in the asymmetric unit, orientated as shown. B, shown is a schematic of molecules in the asymmetric unit. This figure was prepared using PyMOL.
Crystallographic data for the ecotin-chymotrypsin complex
Numbers in parentheses are for the upper resolution shell (2.84–2.74 Å), where appropriate.
| Cell dimensions | |
| Space group (monoclinic) (monoclinic) | |
| Resolution range (Å) | 50.0–2.74 |
| Completeness (%) | 97.5 (96.9) |
| No. of reflections | 273,325 |
| No. of unique reflections | 42,247 |
| Redundancy (%) | 3.2 (3.2) |
| 13.3 (5.5) | |
| 7.6 (21.3) | |
| 24.4 | |
| 31.4 | |
| Wilson | 54.6 |
| Chymotrypsin C1 main chain/side chain | 30.2/30.0 |
| Chymotrypsin C2 main chain/side chain | 34.0/34.1 |
| Chymotrypsin C3 main chain/side chain | 34.6/34.8 |
| Chymotrypsin C4 main chain/side chai | 33.2/33.2 |
| Ecotin E1 main chain/side chain | 38.8/39.3 |
| Ecotin E2 main chain/side chain | 42.5/42.5 |
| Ecotin E3 main chain/side chain | 35.8/36.2 |
| Ecotin E4 main chain/side chain | 44.0/44.5 |
| Bonds (Å) | 0.008 |
| Angles | 1.084° |
merge = ΣΣ|I(hkl − 〈I(hkl)〉|/ΣΣ(hkl), where 〈I〉 is the averaged intensity of the i observations of reflection hkl.
cryst = Σ‖F| − |F‖/Σ|F|, where F and F are the observed and calculated structure factors, respectively.
free is equal to Rcryst for a random set of reflections (5.1%) not used in refinement (18).
Details of interfaces within the asymmetric unit
Buried surface areas and solvation free energy gains were calculated using PISA (21). Hydrogen bonding interactions were identified with the program HBPLUS (33). Contact distances were calculated using the program CONTACT (17), and the maximum allowed contact distances for van der Waals contacts are as follows: C–C, 4.1 Å; C–N, 3.8 Å; C–O, 3.7 Å; O–O, 3.3 Å; O–N, 3.4 Å; N–N, 3.4 Å; C–S, 4.1 Å; O–S, 3.7 Å; and N–S, 3.8 Å.
| Interface | Total buried surface area | Solvation free energy gain upon complex formation | No. of hydrogen bonds | No.of van der Waals contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1/E2 dimer | 3142 | −12.6 | 20 | 174 |
| E3/E4 dimer | 2982 | −12.1 | 18 | 161 |
| Average | 3062 | −12.4 | ||
| E1/C1 | 1924 | −14.3 | 11 | 102 |
| E2/C2 | 1945 | −13.0 | 9 | 126 |
| E3/C3 | 1923 | −16.7 | 11 | 109 |
| E4/C4 | 1917 | −16.2 | 10 | 112 |
| Average | 1927 | −15.1 | ||
| E1/C2 | 1051 | −3.3 | 4 | 64 |
| E2/C1 | 1064 | −2.2 | 4 | 56 |
| E3/C4 | 1109 | −0.7 | 7 | 69 |
| E4/C3 | 1077 | −0.9 | 6 | 65 |
| Average | 1076 | −1.8 | ||
FIGURE 3.Ecotin binding loop at the chymotrypsin interface. A, residues of the ecotin Gln-105–Pro-114 binding loop are represented as sticks and are colored pink. Oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur atoms are colored red, blue, and yellow, respectively. The ecotin Cys-113 side chain has been omitted for clarity. A surface representation of chymotrypsin is shown, and residues that make direct contacts with ecotin are colored green. The side chain of Met-110 can be seen extending into the chymotrypsin substrate-binding pocket. B, hydrogen bonding of ecotin Met-110 and Ala-112 is represented by dashed lines, and contacting chymotrypsin residues are shown as green sticks. This figure was prepared using PyMOL.
FIGURE 4.Interactions at the secondary ecotin-chymotrypsin interface (E3/C4). Ecotin is colored pink, and chymotrypsin is colored green. Interfacing residues from each protein are shown as sticks, and oxygen and nitrogen atoms are colored red and blue, respectively. Atoms that are within hydrogen bonding distance are connected by black dashed lines, and van der Waals interactions are indicated by orange dashed lines. A, hydrogen bonding and van der Waals interactions between residues on the Thr-89–Asp-96 loop and residues of the chymotrypsin C-terminal α-helix are shown. The potential hydrogen bond between Lys-93 and Gly-94 shown is not observed in the other three copies of the interface. B, the potential hydrogen bonds made by Arg-135 side chain atoms are not observed in two of the four copies of the interface. There is a potential hydrogen bond between Arg-139 and chymotrypsin Ser-92 instead. The position of the sulfate ion (Sul) is shown, and its hydrogen bonding interactions with surrounding residues are indicated. The side chains of ecotin Arg-139 and chymotrypsin Tyr-94 have been omitted for clarity. This figure was prepared using PyMOL.
FIGURE 5.Alignment of amino acid sequences of Alignment was carried out using the ClustalW sequence alignment program (34).