Literature DB >> 21531660

Redefining low lead levels.

Ivo Iavicoli, Edward J Calabrese.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21531660      PMCID: PMC3094436          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1103489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


× No keyword cloud information.
In the January 2011 issue of EHP, Giddabasappa et al. (2011) reported that gestational lead exposure (GLE) of C57BL/6 mice produced selective nonmonotonic increases in the numbers of rods and cone bipolar cells (BCs) in the adult retina. Interestingly, this increase was characterized by an inverted U-shaped dose–response curve. Moreover, findings of this study showed that GLE increases and prolongs proliferation of retinal progenitor cells (RPCs) without decreasing apoptosis. Consequently, this phenomenon produced an adult retina with normal lamination and a selectively increased number of rods and BCs. These results should be considered to define a more adequate risk assessment at low levels of lead exposure. In fact, other published articles have indicated that lead induced a biphasic dose–response relationship (Calabrese and Baldwin 2003). In experiments in Swiss mice using low-level lead exposures similar to and lower than those used by Giddabasappa et al. (2011), we observed an increase in the number of red blood cells, in female gestational parameters, and in Th1 cytokine levels (Iavicoli et al. 2003, 2004, 2006a, 2006b). For this reason, it would be interesting if Giddabasappa et al. could verify this increase in the number of neurons in the rod-signaling pathway at even lower blood lead levels (< 10 μg/dL). The findings of our studies were also implicated over several generations. In any case, we agree with Giddabasappa et al. (2011) that their findings, as ours, raise complex issue for toxicologists, pediatricians, public health regulators, and risk assessors who need to incorporate the occurrence of such U-shaped dose responses in the hazard and risk assessment process. In this context, these findings could be explained by the hormesis phenomenon, which is a dose–response relationship characterized by low-dose stimulation and high-dose inhibition (Calabrese 2008, 2009).
  8 in total

1.  Effects of low doses of dietary lead on red blood cell production in male and female mice.

Authors:  I Iavicoli; G Carelli; E J Stanek; N Castellino; E J Calabrese
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2003-02-03       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 2.  Inorganics and hormesis.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese; Linda A Baldwin
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.635

3.  Effects of low doses of dietary lead on puberty onset in female mice.

Authors:  I Iavicoli; G Carelli; E J Stanek; N Castellino; E J Calabrese
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 4.  Hormesis: why it is important to toxicology and toxicologists.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 5.  Getting the dose-response wrong: why hormesis became marginalized and the threshold model accepted.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  Below background levels of blood lead impact cytokine levels in male and female mice.

Authors:  I Iavicoli; G Carelli; E J Stanek; N Castellino; E J Calabrese
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  Low doses of dietary lead are associated with a profound reduction in the time to the onset of puberty in female mice.

Authors:  I Iavicoli; G Carelli; E J Stanek; N Castellino; Z Li; E J Calabrese
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 3.143

8.  Low-level gestational lead exposure increases retinal progenitor cell proliferation and rod photoreceptor and bipolar cell neurogenesis in mice.

Authors:  Anand Giddabasappa; W Ryan Hamilton; Shawntay Chaney; Weimin Xiao; Jerry E Johnson; Shradha Mukherjee; Donald A Fox
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.