Literature DB >> 21531651

Adherence and effectiveness of rehabilitation in acute ankle sprain.

Y Guillodo1, A Le Goff, A Saraux.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate adherence to and effectiveness of rehabilitation after acute ankle sprain.
METHOD: Patients with acute ankle sprain attending four emergency departments were recruited between February and July 2009. After the initial examination (classification of the severity of the sprain), each patient received an Aircast(®) ankle brace and the same, standardized rehabilitation program. Between two and three months later; the patient was contacted by phone (always by the same investigator) in order to find out whether he/she had performed the prescribed rehabilitation, establish whether the physiotherapist had complied with the prescribed rehabilitation programme and assess subjective recovery. If a patient failed to respond to three phone calls, he/she was excluded from the study.
RESULTS: Of the 245 patients initially included, 111 (67 men and 44 women; 17 mild sprains, 67 moderate sprains and 27 severe sprains) answered the "phone questionnaire". In terms of treatment adherence by the patient, 92 patients (82.9%) performed their rehabilitation (beginning an average of 13.8 days after the injury). In terms of prescription compliance by the physiotherapist, 88 patients (95.6%) received massage, 71 (77.2%) underwent physiotherapy, 83 (90.2%) performed weight training and 87 (94.5%) received proprioceptive training. Eighty-two patients said that they had received manipulative therapy that was not part of the prescribed programme. Impact on recovery: 61 patients (55%) considered that their injury had healed (10 mild, 42 medium and nine severe sprains), whereas 50 had not healed (seven mild, 25 medium and 18 severe sprains). There was no statistically significant association between recovery and compliance with rehabilitation. However, the application of massage (p=0.004) and proprioceptive training (p=0.017) were significantly associated with recovery, while physiotherapy, weight training and manipulative therapy were not.
CONCLUSION: In acute ankle sprain, adherence with rehabilitation is good and the treating physiotherapists comply with the prescription. However, there was no statistically significant link between rehabilitation compliance and subjective recovery at 3 months. Revaluation of these patients at one year may be necessary for estimating the impact of rehabilitation on ankle function and the rate of injury recurrence.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21531651     DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2011.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Phys Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1877-0657


  5 in total

1.  Joint stability characteristics of the ankle complex in female athletes with histories of lateral ankle sprain, part II: clinical experience using arthrometric measurement.

Authors:  John E Kovaleski; Robert J Heitman; Larry R Gurchiek; J M Hollis; Wei Liu; Albert W Pearsall
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Telerehabilitation of acute musculoskeletal multi-disorders: prospective, single-arm, interventional study.

Authors:  Fabíola Costa; Dora Janela; Maria Molinos; Jorge Lains; Gerard E Francisco; Virgílio Bento; Fernando Dias Correia
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  A pilot randomised control trial of the efficacy of stability-based training with visualisation for people with chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  L Forsyth; J Bonacci; C Childs
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  Prognostic factors for recovery following acute lateral ankle ligament sprain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jacqueline Yewande Thompson; Christopher Byrne; Mark A Williams; David J Keene; Micheal Maia Schlussel; Sarah E Lamb
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Methods for assessment of patient adherence to removable orthoses used after surgery or trauma to the appendicular skeleton: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gareth Davies; Daniel Yeomans; Zoe Tolkien; Irene A Kreis; Shelley Potter; Matthew D Gardiner; Abhilash Jain; James Henderson; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.