BACKGROUND: Information about longer-term functional outcomes following lower extremity amputation for peripheral vascular disease and diabetes remains limited. This study examined factors associated with mobility success during the first year following amputation. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 87 amputees experiencing a first major unilateral amputation surgery. Seventy-five (86%) participants completed 12-month follow-up interview. RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects (37%) achieved mobility success, defined as returning to or exceeding a baseline level of mobility on the locomotor capability index (LCI-5). Forty-three subjects (57%) were satisfied with their mobility. Individuals who were 65 years of age and older (risk difference [RD] = -0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.75, -0.29), reported a current alcohol use disorder (RD = -0.37; 95% CI: -0.48, -0.26), had a history of hypertension (RD = -0.23; 95% CI: -0.43, -0.03) or treatment for anxiety or depression (RD = -0.39; 95% CI: -0.50, -0.28) were less likely to achieve mobility success. Mobility success was associated with mobility satisfaction (RD = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.53) and satisfaction with life (RD = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.50). Although higher absolute mobility at 12 months was also associated with mobility satisfaction and overall life satisfaction, 50% of individuals who achieved success with low to moderate 12-month mobility function reported they were satisfied with their mobility. CONCLUSION: Defining success after amputation in relation to an individual's specific mobility prior to the development of limb impairment which led to amputation provides a useful, patient-centered measure that takes other aspects of health, function, and impairment into account. Published by Mosby, Inc.
BACKGROUND: Information about longer-term functional outcomes following lower extremity amputation for peripheral vascular disease and diabetes remains limited. This study examined factors associated with mobility success during the first year following amputation. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 87 amputees experiencing a first major unilateral amputation surgery. Seventy-five (86%) participants completed 12-month follow-up interview. RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects (37%) achieved mobility success, defined as returning to or exceeding a baseline level of mobility on the locomotor capability index (LCI-5). Forty-three subjects (57%) were satisfied with their mobility. Individuals who were 65 years of age and older (risk difference [RD] = -0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.75, -0.29), reported a current alcohol use disorder (RD = -0.37; 95% CI: -0.48, -0.26), had a history of hypertension (RD = -0.23; 95% CI: -0.43, -0.03) or treatment for anxiety or depression (RD = -0.39; 95% CI: -0.50, -0.28) were less likely to achieve mobility success. Mobility success was associated with mobility satisfaction (RD = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.53) and satisfaction with life (RD = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.50). Although higher absolute mobility at 12 months was also associated with mobility satisfaction and overall life satisfaction, 50% of individuals who achieved success with low to moderate 12-month mobility function reported they were satisfied with their mobility. CONCLUSION: Defining success after amputation in relation to an individual's specific mobility prior to the development of limb impairment which led to amputation provides a useful, patient-centered measure that takes other aspects of health, function, and impairment into account. Published by Mosby, Inc.
Authors: Bjoern D Suckow; Philip P Goodney; Brian W Nolan; Ravi K Veeraswamy; Patricia Gallagher; Jack L Cronenwett; Larry W Kraiss Journal: Ann Vasc Surg Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 1.466
Authors: Alexander T Hawkins; Anthony J Pallangyo; Ayesiga M Herman; Maria J Schaumeier; Ann D Smith; Nathanael D Hevelone; David M Crandell; Louis L Nguyen Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2015-10-21 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Brian J Hafner; Ignacio A Gaunaurd; Sara J Morgan; Dagmar Amtmann; Rana Salem; Robert S Gailey Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Matthew J Miller; Paul F Cook; Paul W Kline; Chelsey B Anderson; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley; Cory L Christiansen Journal: PM R Date: 2019-04-17 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Jibby E Kurichi; Diane Cowper Ripley; Dawei Xie; Pui L Kwong; Barbara E Bates; Margaret G Stineman Journal: PM R Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Noah G Oliver; John S Steinberg; Kelly Powers; Karen K Evans; Paul J Kim; Christopher E Attinger Journal: J Diabetes Res Date: 2015-01-27 Impact factor: 4.011
Authors: Ll Montesinos-Magraner; D Issa-Benítez; E Pagès-Bolíbar; M Meléndez-Plumed; M A González-Viejo; C Castellano-Tejedor Journal: Rehabil Res Pract Date: 2016-04-18