Literature DB >> 21531519

Investigation of the role of computed tomography as an adjunct to autopsy in the evaluation of stillbirth.

Keelin O'Donoghue1, Kevin N O'Regan, Carmel P Sheridan, Owen J O'Connor, Jodie Benson, Sebastian McWilliams, Niamh Moore, Mary J Murphy, Raj Chopra, John R Higgins, Michael M Maher.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The number of parents agreeing to autopsy following stillbirth is declining, which has undermined clinicians' ability to assess causes of intrauterine death and can impact counselling regarding recurrence. Post-mortem radiological imaging is a potential alternative method of investigating perinatal loss. The aim of this study was to assess the role of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) in the investigation of stillbirth. STUDY
DESIGN: Following ethical approval and written consent, parents were offered MDCT of the stillborn infant. MDCT was performed with 3D reconstruction, and images were analysed for image quality, anthropomorphic measurements and pathologic findings. Body part and organ-specific measurements were performed; including head, chest and abdominal circumferences, and muscle and liver mass was also measured. Findings were correlated with obstetric history, post-mortem skeletal survey (plain radiography), and formal autopsy.
RESULTS: Fourteen third-trimester stillborn infants were scanned. Image quality was moderate to excellent for most body structures. CT was better than plain radiography for imaging skeletal structures and large solid organs and demonstrated a range of pathologies including renal vein thrombosis, mesenteric calcification and skeletal hyperostosis that were not seen on plain radiographs. MDCT did not overlook autopsy findings and provided some additional information.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms the feasibility of MDCT in the investigation of third trimester stillbirth. MDCT image quality is acceptable and the examination can demonstrate a range of anatomic and pathologic findings. Initially, its value may be as an important adjunct to conventional autopsy.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21531519     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of diagnostic performance for perinatal and paediatric post-mortem imaging: CT versus MRI.

Authors:  Owen J Arthurs; Anna Guy; Sudhin Thayyil; Angie Wade; Rod Jones; Wendy Norman; Rosemary Scott; Nicola J Robertson; Thomas S Jacques; W K 'Kling' Chong; Roxanna Gunny; Dawn Saunders; Oystein E Olsen; Catherine M Owens; Amaka C Offiah; Lyn S Chitty; Andrew M Taylor; Neil J Sebire
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Normal pediatric postmortem CT appearances.

Authors:  Willemijn M Klein; Dennis G H Bosboom; Desiree H J L M Koopmanschap; Rutger A J Nievelstein; Peter G J Nikkels; Rick R van Rijn
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-04-01

3.  Routine perinatal and paediatric post-mortem radiography: detection rates and implications for practice.

Authors:  Owen J Arthurs; Alistair D Calder; Liina Kiho; Andrew M Taylor; Neil J Sebire
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-11-08

Review 4.  ESPR postmortem imaging task force: where we begin.

Authors:  Owen J Arthurs; Rick R van Rijn; Elspeth H Whitby; Karl Johnson; Elka Miller; Martin Stenzel; Andrew Watt; Ajay Taranath; David H Perry
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-07-13

Review 5.  Indications, advantages and limitations of perinatal postmortem imaging in clinical practice.

Authors:  Owen J Arthurs; Andrew M Taylor; Neil J Sebire
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-02

6.  Current status of paediatric post-mortem imaging: an ESPR questionnaire-based survey.

Authors:  Owen J Arthurs; Rick R van Rijn; Neil J Sebire
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-11-26

Review 7.  Post-mortem MRI as an alternative to non-forensic autopsy in foetuses and children: from research into clinical practice.

Authors:  S Addison; O J Arthurs; S Thayyil
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.039

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.