Literature DB >> 21531354

Determination of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus strains recovered from southeastern Turkey.

Fahriye Eksi1, Efgan Dogan Gayyurhan, Aysen Bayram, Tekin Karsligil.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study, we determined the susceptibility patterns of Staphylococcus aureus strains to various antimicrobials and prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance (ICR) in these isolates.
METHODS: Two hundred and one S aureus strains, isolated from various clinical samples, were included in the study. Antibiotic susceptibilities were studied by disc diffusion method on the basis of the guidelines by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. The disc diffusion induction test (D test) was applied to determine ICR resistance among erythromycin-resistant S aureus isolates.
RESULTS: Of the 201 S aureus strains, 101 (50.2%) were resistant to methicillin. All strains were susceptible to vancomycin, teicoplanin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, and linezolid. It was found that 54 (53.4%) methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) strains were erythromycin resistant, and 40 (39.6%) of them showed constitutive clindamycin resistance. ICR was detected in seven (6.9%) MRSA strains. It was found that 13 (13.0%) methicillin-susceptible S aureus (MSSA) strains were erythromycin resistant. Constitutive clindamycin resistance was seen in one (1.0%) MSSA strain, and ICR was detected in 10 (10.0%) cases.
CONCLUSION: There was a high rate of methicillin resistance among S aureus strains in our hospital. However, no statistically significant difference of ICR was observed between MRSA and MSSA strains (p=0.434) or between inpatients and outpatients (p=0.804). It was concluded that ICR should be routinely evaluated in each S aureus case to avoid therapy failure among patients.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21531354     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmii.2011.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Immunol Infect        ISSN: 1684-1182            Impact factor:   4.399


  14 in total

1.  The prevalence of inducible and constitutive clindamycin resistance among the nasal isolates of staphylococci.

Authors:  Baragundi Mahesh C; Kulkarni Ramakant B; Sataraddi Jagadeesh V
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-08-01

2.  Novel Structure of Enterococcus faecium-Originated ermB-Positive Tn1546-Like Element in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Tsai-Wen Wan; Wei-Chun Hung; Jui-Chang Tsai; Yu-Tzu Lin; Hao Lee; Po-Ren Hsueh; Tai-Fen Lee; Lee-Jene Teng
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Inducible Clindamycin Resistance among Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from Sub Himalayan Region of India.

Authors:  Kiran K Mokta; Santwana Verma; Divya Chauhan; Sunite A Ganju; Digvijay Singh; Anil Kanga; Anita Kumari; Vinod Mehta
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-08-01

4.  Antibiotic resistance profile and molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated in hospitals in Kabul, Afghanistan.

Authors:  Frédéric Laurent; Céline Dupieux; Haji Mohammad Naimi; Camille André; Michèle Bes; Anne Tristan; Claude-Alexandre Gustave; François Vandenesch; Qand Agha Nazari
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Determination of antimicrobial resistance profile and inducible clindamycin resistance of coagulase negative staphylococci in pediatric patients: the first report from Iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Aghazadeh; Reza Ghotaslou; Mohammad Ahangarzadeh Rezaee; Mohammad Hassan Moshafi; Zoya Hojabri; Fereshteh Saffari
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.764

6.  Inducible clindamycin resistance and nasal carriage rates of Staphylococcus aureus among healthcare workers and community members.

Authors:  Alaa M Mahmoud; Hanaa S Albadawy; Samira M Bolis; Naser E Bilal; Abdalla O Ahmed; Mutasim E Ibrahim
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.927

7.  The Rate of Inducible MLSB Resistance in the Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci Isolated From Clinical Samples.

Authors:  Türkan Toka Özer
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 2.352

8.  Inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates recovered from Mashhad, Iran.

Authors:  N Seifi; N Kahani; E Askari; S Mahdipour; Nasab M Naderi
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2012-06

9.  Determination of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Staphylococcus aureus strains recovered from patients at two main health facilities in Kabul, Afghanistan.

Authors:  Haji Mohammad Naimi; Hamidullah Rasekh; Ahmad Zia Noori; Mohammad Aman Bahaduri
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Frequency of inducible clindamycin resistance among gram-positive cocci in a tertiary hospital, Tehran, Iran.

Authors:  Hiva Saffar; Afsaneh Rajabiani; Alireza Abdollahi; Shirin Habibi; Zohreh Baseri
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.