INTRODUCTION: To probe the interplay between radiotracer stability and somatostatin receptor affinity, Tyr(3)-octreotate and six variations of its peptide sequence, for which the Re-cyclized products were previously reported, were radiolabeled with (99m)Tc and investigated for their in vitro stability. METHODS: Radiolabeling of the peptides was effected by ligand exchange from (99m)Tc-glucoheptonate, and the desired products were purified by radio-RP-HPLC. The in vitro stability in phosphate buffered saline, mouse serum and cysteine solutions at physiological temperature and pH for all seven (99m)Tc-cyclized peptides was determined by radio-RP-HPLC and radio-TLC. Normal CF-1 mouse biodistribution studies were performed for three of the (99m)Tc-cyclized peptides. RESULTS: Based on the fully characterized Re-cyclized peptide analogues, four (99m)Tc-coordination motifs were proposed for the (99m)Tc-cyclized peptides. Technetium-99m-cyclized Tyr(3)-octreotate derivatives with N(2)S(2) metal coordination modes and large metal ring sizes were susceptible to oxidation and loss of (99m)Tc in the form of (99m)TcO(4)(-), as evidenced by their instability in the various solutions under physiological conditions (15-58% intact at 24 h). As anticipated, the addition of a third cysteine to the sequence stabilized the (99m)Tc metal coordination, and peptides with NS(3) coordination modes remained >85% intact out to 24 h. No significant differences were observed in the biodistribution studies performed with three peptides of varying stabilities. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in stability were not sufficient to outweigh the low somatostatin receptor affinity for the peptides in this study. Further improvements in the peptide sequence and/or metal coordination are needed to result in a radiodiagnostic/radiotherapeutic pair for targeting the somatostatin receptor.
INTRODUCTION: To probe the interplay between radiotracer stability and somatostatin receptor affinity, Tyr(3)-octreotate and six variations of its peptide sequence, for which the Re-cyclized products were previously reported, were radiolabeled with (99m)Tc and investigated for their in vitro stability. METHODS: Radiolabeling of the peptides was effected by ligand exchange from (99m)Tc-glucoheptonate, and the desired products were purified by radio-RP-HPLC. The in vitro stability in phosphate buffered saline, mouse serum and cysteine solutions at physiological temperature and pH for all seven (99m)Tc-cyclized peptides was determined by radio-RP-HPLC and radio-TLC. Normal CF-1 mouse biodistribution studies were performed for three of the (99m)Tc-cyclized peptides. RESULTS: Based on the fully characterized Re-cyclized peptide analogues, four (99m)Tc-coordination motifs were proposed for the (99m)Tc-cyclized peptides. Technetium-99m-cyclized Tyr(3)-octreotate derivatives with N(2)S(2) metal coordination modes and large metal ring sizes were susceptible to oxidation and loss of (99m)Tc in the form of (99m)TcO(4)(-), as evidenced by their instability in the various solutions under physiological conditions (15-58% intact at 24 h). As anticipated, the addition of a third cysteine to the sequence stabilized the (99m)Tcmetal coordination, and peptides with NS(3) coordination modes remained >85% intact out to 24 h. No significant differences were observed in the biodistribution studies performed with three peptides of varying stabilities. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in stability were not sufficient to outweigh the low somatostatin receptor affinity for the peptides in this study. Further improvements in the peptide sequence and/or metal coordination are needed to result in a radiodiagnostic/radiotherapeutic pair for targeting the somatostatin receptor.
Authors: Shorouk F Dannoon; Heather M Bigott-Hennkens; Lixin Ma; Fabio Gallazzi; Michael R Lewis; Silvia S Jurisson Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: D J Kwekkeboom; W H Bakker; P P Kooij; M W Konijnenberg; A Srinivasan; J L Erion; M A Schmidt; J L Bugaj; M de Jong; E P Krenning Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Date: 2001-09
Authors: Mihaela Ginj; Jianhua Chen; Martin A Walter; Veronique Eltschinger; Jean Claude Reubi; Helmut R Maecke Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: M de Jong; W A Breeman; B F Bernard; W H Bakker; M Schaar; A van Gameren; J E Bugaj; J Erion; M Schmidt; A Srinivasan; E P Krenning Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2001-06-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Heather M Bigott-Hennkens; Sulochana Junnotula; Lixin Ma; Fabio Gallazzi; Michael R Lewis; Silvia S Jurisson Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2008-02-13 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Grace Cui; Walter J Akers; Michael J Scott; Michael Nassif; John S Allen; Anne H Schmieder; Krishna S Paranandi; Akinobu Itoh; Dmitry D Beyder; Samuel Achilefu; Gregory A Ewald; Gregory M Lanza Journal: Theranostics Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Andrea J North; John A Karas; Michelle T Ma; Philip J Blower; Uwe Ackermann; Jonathan M White; Paul S Donnelly Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 5.165