BACKGROUND: The Scleroderma Lung Study (SLS) was a 1-year, randomized, controlled trial of oral cyclophosphamide for scleroderma-related pulmonary alveolitis. It concluded that oral cyclophosphamide slowed the decline in the forced vital capacity (% predicted) and had a beneficial effect on dyspnea, skin changes, and several quality of life measures of systemic sclerosis. We now report an in-depth assessment of the toxicity of cyclophosphamide during the year of therapy and the year after therapy was completed, during which time the investigators were still masked to the treatment assignment. METHODS: One-year, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of oral cyclophosphamide versus placebo with 1-year masked follow-up. Adverse events (AEs) were tabulated, described, and compared using descriptive statistics (eg, mean and median) and t, Wilcoxon rank sum, chi-squared, or Fisher's exact tests as appropriate. RESULTS: During year 1, treatment-related overall AEs occurred more frequently in cyclophosphamide (CYC)-treated patients (overall AEs for CYC=154 events vs placebo=60 events; P=0.002), and especially for mild to moderate leukopenia (CYC=19 subjects vs placebo=0 subjects; P < .0001). For cancer, we followed patients beyond 2 years. There were no differences in the occurrence of cancer (CYC=4 subjects vs placebo=2 subjects), serious related AEs (CYC=8 events vs placebo=13 events), or deaths (CYC=6 subjects vs placebo=6 subjects). CONCLUSION: Over 2 years, cyclophosphamide was associated with more AEs than placebo, including overall AEs and relative leukopenia. There were no differences in other AEs, including serious AEs, cancers, or deaths.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The Scleroderma Lung Study (SLS) was a 1-year, randomized, controlled trial of oral cyclophosphamide for scleroderma-related pulmonary alveolitis. It concluded that oral cyclophosphamide slowed the decline in the forced vital capacity (% predicted) and had a beneficial effect on dyspnea, skin changes, and several quality of life measures of systemic sclerosis. We now report an in-depth assessment of the toxicity of cyclophosphamide during the year of therapy and the year after therapy was completed, during which time the investigators were still masked to the treatment assignment. METHODS: One-year, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of oral cyclophosphamide versus placebo with 1-year masked follow-up. Adverse events (AEs) were tabulated, described, and compared using descriptive statistics (eg, mean and median) and t, Wilcoxon rank sum, chi-squared, or Fisher's exact tests as appropriate. RESULTS: During year 1, treatment-related overall AEs occurred more frequently in cyclophosphamide (CYC)-treated patients (overall AEs for CYC=154 events vs placebo=60 events; P=0.002), and especially for mild to moderate leukopenia (CYC=19 subjects vs placebo=0 subjects; P < .0001). For cancer, we followed patients beyond 2 years. There were no differences in the occurrence of cancer (CYC=4 subjects vs placebo=2 subjects), serious related AEs (CYC=8 events vs placebo=13 events), or deaths (CYC=6 subjects vs placebo=6 subjects). CONCLUSION: Over 2 years, cyclophosphamide was associated with more AEs than placebo, including overall AEs and relative leukopenia. There were no differences in other AEs, including serious AEs, cancers, or deaths.
Authors: Donald P Tashkin; Michael D Roth; Philip J Clements; Daniel E Furst; Dinesh Khanna; Eric C Kleerup; Jonathan Goldin; Edgar Arriola; Elizabeth R Volkmann; Suzanne Kafaja; Richard Silver; Virginia Steen; Charlie Strange; Robert Wise; Fredrick Wigley; Maureen Mayes; David J Riley; Sabiha Hussain; Shervin Assassi; Vivien M Hsu; Bela Patel; Kristine Phillips; Fernando Martinez; Jeffrey Golden; M Kari Connolly; John Varga; Jane Dematte; Monique E Hinchcliff; Aryeh Fischer; Jeffrey Swigris; Richard Meehan; Arthur Theodore; Robert Simms; Suncica Volkov; Dean E Schraufnagel; Mary Beth Scholand; Tracy Frech; Jerry A Molitor; Kristin Highland; Charles A Read; Marvin J Fritzler; Grace Hyun J Kim; Chi-Hong Tseng; Robert M Elashoff Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 30.700