| Literature DB >> 21531003 |
Nathalie Guedj1, Frédéric Bretagnol, Pierre-Emmanuel Rautou, Lydia Deschamps, Dominique Cazals-Hatem, Pierre Bedossa, Yves Panis, Anne Couvelard.
Abstract
The ability to predict response after chemoradiotherapy in rectal adenocarcinoma may allow selecting patients to whom less invasive surgical treatment could be proposed. Tumor hypoxia has been implicated in the mechanisms of resistance to chemoradiotherapy in several malignancies. The aim was to identify morphological criteria and molecular markers of hypoxia associated with chemoradiotherapy response. Clinicopathologic data from 61 patients (35 male, 60.5 ± 10 years) undergoing rectal cancer resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were collected. Pretreatment biopsies, available for 40 patients, were immunostained for hypoxia markers (carbonic anhydrase 9, glucose transporter 1, chemokine receptor 4) and microvascular density determination. Mean tumor size was 2.7 ± 1.6 cm. Twenty-one patients (34%) were considered as responders, that is, having significant or complete primary tumor regression without lymph node metastasis. Compared to other patients, responders had significantly more often flat tumors with or without ulceration (57% versus 18%, P = .01) and less vascular and/or neural invasions (9% versus 65%, P < .0001) or tumor necrosis (9% versus 41%, P < .01), respectively. Regarding pretreatment biopsies, carbonic anhydrase 9 expression was significantly lower in responders (7% versus 46%, P = .012). This study showed that tumor necrosis as an overexpression of carbonic anhydrase 9 was an effective molecular marker of postchemoradiotherapy response. This might suggest a key role of hypoxia in resistance mechanisms of chemoradiotherapy in rectal adenocarcinoma. This study highlighted the importance of predictive criteria to chemoradiotherapy response in proposing to selected patients an alternative treatment (eg, local resection) to more radical surgery.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21531003 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.01.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Pathol ISSN: 0046-8177 Impact factor: 3.466