STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: There are no established clinical procedures for bonding zirconia to tooth structure using resin cements. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of metal primers, resin cements, and aging on bonding to zirconia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Zirconia was treated with commercial primers developed for bonding to metal alloys (Metaltite, Metal Primer II, Alloy Primer or Totalbond). Non-primed specimens were considered as controls. One-hundred disk-shaped specimens (19 × 4 mm) were cemented to composite resin substrates using Panavia or RelyX Unicem (n=5). Microtensile bond strength specimens were tested after 48 hours and 5 months (150 days), and failure modes were classified as type 1 (between ceramic/cement), 2 (between composite resin/cement) or 3 (mixed). Data were analyzed by 3-way ANOVA and Multiple Comparison Tukey test (α=.05). RESULTS: The interactions primer/luting system (P=.016) and luting system/storage time (P=.004) were statistically significant. The use of Alloy Primer significantly improved the bond strength of RelyX Unicem (P<.001), while for Panavia, none of the primers increased the bond strength compared to the control group. At 48 hours, Panavia had statistically higher bond strength (P=.004) than Unicem (13.9 ± 4.4 MPa and 10.2 ± 6.6 MPa, respectively). However, both luting systems presented decreasing, statistically similar, values after aging (Panavia: 3.6 ± 2.2 MPa; Unicem: 6.1 ± 5.3 MPa). At 48 hours, Alloy Primer/Unicem had the lowest incidence of type 1 failure (8%). After aging, all the groups showed a predominance of type 1 failures. CONCLUSIONS: The use of Alloy Primer improved bond strength between RelyX Unicem and zirconia. Though the initial values obtained with Panavia were significantly higher than RelyX Unicem, after aging, both luting agents presented statistically similar performances.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: There are no established clinical procedures for bonding zirconia to tooth structure using resin cements. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of metal primers, resin cements, and aging on bonding to zirconia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Zirconia was treated with commercial primers developed for bonding to metal alloys (Metaltite, Metal Primer II, Alloy Primer or Totalbond). Non-primed specimens were considered as controls. One-hundred disk-shaped specimens (19 × 4 mm) were cemented to composite resin substrates using Panavia or RelyX Unicem (n=5). Microtensile bond strength specimens were tested after 48 hours and 5 months (150 days), and failure modes were classified as type 1 (between ceramic/cement), 2 (between composite resin/cement) or 3 (mixed). Data were analyzed by 3-way ANOVA and Multiple Comparison Tukey test (α=.05). RESULTS: The interactions primer/luting system (P=.016) and luting system/storage time (P=.004) were statistically significant. The use of Alloy Primer significantly improved the bond strength of RelyX Unicem (P<.001), while for Panavia, none of the primers increased the bond strength compared to the control group. At 48 hours, Panavia had statistically higher bond strength (P=.004) than Unicem (13.9 ± 4.4 MPa and 10.2 ± 6.6 MPa, respectively). However, both luting systems presented decreasing, statistically similar, values after aging (Panavia: 3.6 ± 2.2 MPa; Unicem: 6.1 ± 5.3 MPa). At 48 hours, Alloy Primer/Unicem had the lowest incidence of type 1 failure (8%). After aging, all the groups showed a predominance of type 1 failures. CONCLUSIONS: The use of Alloy Primer improved bond strength between RelyX Unicem and zirconia. Though the initial values obtained with Panavia were significantly higher than RelyX Unicem, after aging, both luting agents presented statistically similar performances.
Authors: Yusuf Z Akpinar; Abdullah Kepceoglu; Tevfik Yavuz; Muhammed A Aslan; Zulfikar Demirtag; Hamdi S Kılıc; Aslihan Usumez Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2015-05-10 Impact factor: 3.161