Literature DB >> 21530271

Osteoporosis affects component positioning in computer navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Dae-Hee Lee1, Debabrata Padhy, Soon-Hyuck Lee, Kyung-Wook Nha, Ji-Hun Park, Seung-Beom Han.   

Abstract

Although computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has many advantages, undetected tracker pin movement can result in poor lower limb alignment and component position. Osteoporosis may be an underlying cause of tracker pin movement. The present prospective case-control study compared 6-month radiographic outcomes in 44 osteoporotic and 56 non-osteoporotic knees undergoing navigation TKAs. Osteoporotic knees were defined as those having a T-score of -2.5 or less either in the femoral neck or lumbar spine or both. At postoperative 6 months' follow-up, the average coronal tibial component position was greater valgus in osteoporotic group than in nonosteoporotic group (non-osteoporotic=varus 0.7°±1.8°; osteoporotic=valgus 1.2°±3.4°; p=0.041). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that being in the osteoporotic group was a predictor of tibial coronal component position (β=0.321, p=0.039). In addition, preoperative lumbar spine bone mineral density was found to be a predictor of coronal and sagittal alignments of the tibial component (β=0.406, p=0.015, β=-0.463, p=0.007). The present study found that osteoporosis affected tibial component position in computer-assisted navigation TKA. Clinicians should be particularly aware of the possibility of undetectable tracker pin movement during navigation TKA in osteoporotic knees.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21530271     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  8 in total

Review 1.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Accuracy of tibial cuts with patient-specific instrumentation is not influenced by the surgeon's level of experience.

Authors:  Alexander Antoniadis; Roland S Camenzind; Michael O Schär; Dario Bergadano; Näder Helmy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Prevalence and treatment rate of osteoporosis in patients undergoing total knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pei-Lun Xiao; Chi-Jen Hsu; Yong-Guang Ma; Ding Liu; Rong Peng; Xiang-He Xu; Hua-Ding Lu
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 4.  Osteoporosis and orthopedic surgery: effect of bone health on total joint arthroplasty outcome.

Authors:  Linda A Russell
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  Articular surface mounted navigated total knee arthroplasty improves the reliability of component alignment.

Authors:  N D Clement; D MacDonald; A G Burgess; C R Howie
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Prevalence and Risk Factors of Osteoporosis in Chinese Postmenopausal Women Awaiting Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yuzhang Tao; Siying Tang; Xiao Huang; Hongwei Wang; Aiguo Zhou; Jian Zhang
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.458

7.  Prevalence and Treatment of Osteoporosis Prior to Elective Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  James T Bernatz; Andrew E Brooks; Benjamin P Nguyen; Edward D Shin; Neil C Binkley; Paul A Anderson; Brian F Grogan
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-12-07

8.  The use of imageless navigation to quantify cutting error in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ran Schwarzkopf; Morteza Meftah; Scott E Marwin; Michelle A Zabat; Jeffrey M Muir; Iain R Lamb
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-12-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.