Literature DB >> 21529801

Selective non-operative management of penetrating abdominal injury in Great Britain and Ireland: survey of practice.

J O Jansen1, K Inaba, S B Rizoli, K D Boffard, D Demetriades.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The selective non-operative management of penetrating abdominal injury is gaining increasing acceptance. In Great Britain and Ireland, the management of trauma remains the responsibility of general surgeons. This study appraises the acceptance and utilisation of selective non-operative management strategies by British and Irish general surgeons, compared with trauma surgeons in the United States of America.
METHODS: Electronic questionnaire survey of British and Irish consultant general surgeons and trauma surgeons in the United States of America.
RESULTS: 139 British and Irish general surgeons and 75 US trauma surgeons completed the survey. 84.3% of British and Irish general surgeons and 94.4% of US trauma surgeons practise selective non-operative management of abdominal stab wounds, and 14.0% and 74.3% practise selective non-operative management of abdominal gunshot wounds. The management of those British and Irish surgeons who do practise selective non-operative management is broadly similar to that of US trauma surgeons, with the exception of the use of laparoscopy to examine the left hemidiaphragm following thoracoabdominal injuries, which is employed by fewer British and Irish general surgeons than US trauma surgeons.
CONCLUSIONS: The selective non-operative management of abdominal stab wounds is generally accepted by British and Irish general surgeons. In contrast, few British and Irish surgeons are comfortable with non-operatively managing patients with abdominal gunshot wounds, reflecting both the rarity of this type of injury, and surgeons' training and experience. This proportion is unlikely to change until the management of torso trauma is recognised as a specialty, and services are concentrated in regional centres.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21529801     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  6 in total

1.  The predictive value of physical examination in the decision of laparotomy in penetrating anterior abdominal stab injury.

Authors:  Metin Yucel; Gurhan Bas; Adnan Ozpek; Fatih Basak; Abdullah Sisik; Aylin Acar; Buket Altun Ozdemir; Sema Yuksekdag; Orhan Alimoglu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

2.  Management of haemodynamically stable patients with penetrating abdominal stab injuries: review of practice at an Australian major trauma centre.

Authors:  J Kevric; G M O'Reilly; R A Gocentas; O Hasip; C Pilgrim; B Mitra
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Evolution-based algorithm for the management of penetrating abdominal stab injury.

Authors:  O Alimoglu; M Yucel; I E Subasi; A Sisik; F Basak; M Caliskan
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Selective non-operative management of penetrating liver injuries at a UK tertiary referral centre.

Authors:  P MacGoey; A Navarro; I J Beckingham; I C Cameron; A J Brooks
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Selective non-operative management for penetrating abdominal injury in a Dutch trauma centre.

Authors:  Ojf Van Waes; Emm Van Lieshout; Dj Van Silfhout; J A Halm; Mme Wijffels; Mg Van Vledder; Hp De Graaff; Mhj Verhofstad
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Peritoneal Breach as an Indication for Exploratory Laparotomy in Penetrating Abdominal Stab Injury: Operative Findings in Haemodynamically Stable Patients.

Authors:  Jasmina Kevric; Victor Aguirre; Kate Martin; Dinesh Varma; Mark Fitzgerald; Charles Pilgrim
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 1.112

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.