| Literature DB >> 21528788 |
Nitaya Indrawattana1, Tanaporn Nibaddhasobon, Nitat Sookrung, Manas Chongsa-Nguan, Anchalee Tungtrongchitr, Sou-Ichi Makino, Witawat Tungyong, Wanpen Chaicumpa.
Abstract
Listeria monocytogenes causes listeriosis characterized by septicaemia, encephalitis, and abortion or stillbirth. Regular monitoring of its prevalence in food and characterization of its phenotypes and genotypes are necessary for disease surveillance and tracing the epidemic outbreaks. In this study, the prevalence of L. monocytogenes in raw meats marketed in Bangkok was 15.4%. The bacteria isolated from meat were serotyped and genotyped using enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction (ERIC-PCR). Their virulence-associated genes, antimicrobial susceptibility, and ability to invade intestinal epithelial cells were studied. All 22 L. monocytogenes strains isolated from 104 raw meat samples carried virulence-associated genes, such as actA, flaA, hlyA, lap, inlA, inlB, and prfA. These were serotype 4b, suggesting their pathogenic and epidemic potential. These isolates could be classified into six ERIC-PCR groups: A-E The majority (59.1%) of the isolates belonged to Group A, and three isolates were Group D which was closely related to the Group A. Two isolates each were Group C and E, and one isolate each was group B and F. Although the isolates belonged to the same serotype and genotype and were all equipped with the virulence-associated genes, they showed a different cell invasion capability and antibiotic susceptibility. All the isolates were susceptible to ampicillin, amikacin, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, imipenem, penicillin G, sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim, and tetracycline. However, one isolate showed only intermediate susceptibility to tetracycline. The data provide the first molecular insight into the L. monocytogenes isolates in Thailand and elucidate a potential risk of people contracting listeriosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21528788 PMCID: PMC3075055 DOI: 10.3329/jhpn.v29i1.7565
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Popul Nutr ISSN: 1606-0997 Impact factor: 2.000
Oligonucleotide primer sequences for amplification of virulence-associated genes of L. monocytogenes isolates
| Target gene | Primer sequence | Size of PCR product (bp) | Reference no. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forward | 5′-CGCGGATGAATTCGATAG-3′ | 316 | ||
| Reverse | 5′-GTCATACCCGGGAAATCAATG-3′ | |||
| Forward | 5′-GCTTTCAGCTGGGCATAAC-3′ | 458 | ||
| Reverse | 5′-ATTCATTTAGTTCCGCCTGT-3′ | |||
| Forward | 5′-CATGGGAGAGTAACCCAACC-3′ | 433 | ||
| Reverse | 5′-GCGGTAACCCCTTTGTCATA-3′ | |||
| Forward | 5′-AACGGGATAAAACCAAAACCA-3′ | 469 | ||
| Reverse | 5′-TGCGATGCCACTTGAATATC-3′ | |||
| Forward | 5′-ACAAGCTGCACCTGTTGCAG-3′ | 131 | ||
| Reverse | 5′-TGACAGCGTGTGTAGTAGCA-3′ | |||
| Forward | 5′-CGCCGCGGAAATTAAAAAAAGA-3′ | 839 | ||
| Reverse | 5′-ACGAAGGAACCGGGCTGCTAG-3′ | |||
| Forward | 5′-AGCTCTTAGCTCCATGAGTT-3′ | 450 | ||
| Reverse | 5′-ACATTGTAGCTAAGGCGACT-3′ | |||
PCR=Polymerase chain reaction
Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in meat samples from supermarkets and open markets in Bangkok
| Meat | Supermarkets (n=49) | Open markets (n=55) | p value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of positive /total number tested (% of prevalence) | No. of isolates | No. of positive /total number tested (% of prevalence) | No. of isolates | ||
| Chicken (n=48) | 0/12 (0)a | 0 | 5/36 (13.9) b | 8 | 0.00001 |
| Pork (n=30) | 7/19 (36.8)b | 9 | 1/11 (9.1) c | 1 | 0.00666 |
| Beef (n=26) | 3/18 (16.7)d | 4 | 0/8 (0)a | 0 | 0.00468 |
| Total samples (104) | 10/49 (20.4)b | 13 | 6/55 (10.9)d | 9 | 0.00000 |
Twenty-two L. monocytogenes isolates were recovered from meat, i.e. 8 chicken (no. 1-8) and 1 pork (no. 22) were from supermarkets; 4 beef (no. 9-12) and 9 pork (no. 13-21) were from open markets. Percentages of prevalence of L. monocytogenes in the same type of meat collected from supermarkets and open markets and among different types of meat were compared. Entries with different superscripts (a, b, c, and d) are statistically different at p values of <0.05
Fig. 1.PCR amplicons of 7 virulence-associated genes of L. monocytogenes isolates from Bangkok after agarose electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining
Numbers and prevalence of L. monocytogenes and Listeria spp. isolates from meat samples in Bangkok classified by presence of virulence-associated genes that could be amplified from their genomic DNA by PCR and their ability to form biofilm
| Bacterial species (no.) | Virulence-associated gene(s) | Ability to form Biofilm | Supermarkets | Open markets | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | M | S | No. of positive isolates (% of prevalence) | No. of positive isolates (% of prevalence) | ||
| 3 | 19 | 14 (16.7) | 8 (9.5) | |||
| 6 | 1 | 4 (4.8) | 3 (3.5) | |||
| ( | 17 | 15 | 1 | 12 (14.3) | 21 ( | |
| ( | actA, flaA, hlyA | 5 | 1 | 3 (3.6) | 3 (3.6) | |
| ( | 7 | 3 | 1 | 7 (8.3) | 4 (4.8) | |
| ( | 2 | 1 | 3 (3.6) | 0 (0) | ||
| ( | 1 | 1 | 1 (2.2) | 1 (2.2) | ||
| Total number of isolates (84) | 41 | 41 | 2 | 44 (52.5) | 40 (47.5) | |
*All isolates were haemolytic;
**Non-haemolytic; biofilm formation;
***Number of isolate(s) with indicated ability of biofilm formation; M=Moderate; PCR=Polymerase chain reaction; S=Strong; W=Weak
Fig. 2.ERIC-PCR DNA fingerprints of 22 L. monocytogenes isolates from Bangkok which could be assigned to 6 groups: A-F
Fig. 3.Bar graphs showing invasion indices of L. monocytogenes isolates which were positive for all 7 virulence-associated genes and had different ERIC-PCR DNA banding patterns. They were 3 representatives of group A and all isolates of groups B-F respectively.
Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of 22 L. monocytogenes isolates
| Meat sample | Isolate no. | ERIC-PCR group | Degree of sensitivity to antimicrobial agent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMP | AK | CTX | CAZ | CRO | C | GN | IPM | PG | Te | SXT | |||
| Chicken | 1 | A | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| 2 | A | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | |
| 3 | F | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | |
| 4 | C | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | |
| 5 | C | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | |
| 6 | D | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | |
| 7 | D | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | |
| 8 | B | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | |
| Beef | 9 | A | S | S | I | S | R | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| 10 | A | S | S | R | I | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | |
| 11 | A | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | |
| 12 | E | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | |
| Pork | 13 | A | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| 14 | A | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | |
| 15 | E | S | S | R | I | I | S | S | S | S | S | S | |
| 16 | A | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | I | S | |
| 17 | D | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | |
| 18 | A | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | |
| 19 | A | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | |
| 20 | A | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | |
| 21 | A | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | |
| 22 | A | S | S | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | |
AMP=Ampicillin; AK=Amikacin; C=Chloramphenicol; CAZ=Ceftazidime; CRO=Ceftriaxone; CTX=Cefotaxime; ERIC-PCR=Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus–polymerase chain reaction; GN=Gentamicin; I=Intermediate sensitivity (moderately sensitive); IPM=Imipenem; PG=Penicillin; R=Resistant; S=Highly sensitive; SXT=Sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim; Te=Tetracycline