Literature DB >> 2152844

The rate of bone mineral loss in normal men and the effects of calcium and cholecalciferol supplementation.

E S Orwoll1, S K Oviatt, M R McClung, L J Deftos, G Sexton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of bone loss in normal men, and to examine the effects of dietary calcium and cholecalciferol supplementation on bone loss in men.
DESIGN: Double-blinded, placebo-controlled 3-year trial of supplementation with calcium (1000 mg/d) and cholecalciferol (25 micrograms/d).
SETTING: Clinical research center at a university medical facility.
SUBJECTS: Normal men 30 to 87 years old, recruited from the Portland community.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Radial bone mineral content (assessed by single-photon absorptiometry) fell by 1.0%/y (95% CI, -1.3% to 0.7%) at a proximal radial site and 1.0%/y (95% CI, -1.4% to -0.6%) at a distal radial site. Vertebral bone mineral content (assessed by dual-energy quantitative computed tomography) declined by 2.3%/y (95% CI, -2.8% to -1.8%). In these healthy men with a high basal dietary calcium intake (1159 mg/d), calcium and cholecalciferol supplementation did not affect bone loss at any site.
CONCLUSIONS: Normal men experience a substantial bone loss at both axial and appendicular sites that is not prevented by calcium and vitamin D supplementation in a well-nourished population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2152844     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-112-1-29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  30 in total

1.  Osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  D C Anderson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-08-29

Review 2.  Male osteoporosis: new trends in diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Hosam K Kamel
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Adverse events associated with hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ravi J Kumar; Al Barqawi; E David Crawford
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

4.  Assessment of determinants for osteoporosis in elderly men.

Authors:  S Scholtissen; F Guillemin; O Bruyère; J Collette; B Dousset; C Kemmer; S Culot; D Crémer; H Dejardin; G Hubermont; D Lefebvre; V Pascal-Vigneron; G Weryha; J Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Can healthy, older, nonosteoporotic men benefit from calcium supplementation?

Authors:  Chin Lee
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 6.  Calcium insufficiency and fracture risk.

Authors:  B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla; Shreyasee Amin; Eric Orwoll
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 19.871

8.  Sexual differences in bone markers and bone mineral density of normal Chinese.

Authors:  K S Tsai; W H Pan; S H Hsu; W C Cheng; C K Chen; P U Chieng; R S Yang; S T Twu
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Dissimilarity of femur aging in men and women from a Nationwide Survey in Korea (KNHANES IV).

Authors:  Kyoung Min Kim; Jung Soo Lim; Kwang Joon Kim; Han Seok Choi; Yumie Rhee; Han Jin Oh; Hoon Choi; Woong Hwan Choi; Jung Gu Kim; Sung-Kil Lim
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 10.  Effect of calcium supplementation on hip fractures.

Authors:  I R Reid; M J Bolland; A Grey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.