Literature DB >> 21528419

[Was the expert medical opinion rendered by B. von Gudden regarding King Ludwig II of Bavaria correct?].

H Häfner1, F Sommer.   

Abstract

Even today the deaths of King Ludwig II of Bavaria and the Munich-based psychiatrist Bernhard von Gudden on 13 June 1886 remain something of a mystery. In his psychiatric expertise von Gudden had rated Ludwig as insane and incapable of governing. Ludwig was placed under tutelage, deposed and interned under the supervision of guards. After the catastrophe witnesses and the press were silenced by strict censorship under threat of heavy penalties. Even today obstacles to free information still exist, aiding and abetting the birth of legends and the preservation of leading traditional views. We report on the results of a 5-year research project conducted at the Heidelberg Academy of Sciences and Humanities and based on information derived from private and public archives in Germany and abroad. Reference is made to comparable analyses. Neither von Gudden's expertise nor Ludwig's behaviour provide reliable cues to his alleged insanity. The reasons and motives behind the king's deposition are discussed. Apart from von Gudden's tragic death, this was not a singular case of a psychiatric expertise commissioned in the monarchist culture of the nineteenth and the early twentieth century.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21528419     DOI: 10.1007/s00115-011-3301-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nervenarzt        ISSN: 0028-2804            Impact factor:   1.214


  3 in total

1.  ["...so that he himself must use all his energy to control the hallucinations...". King Otto of Bavaria and Munich psychiatry around 1900].

Authors:  Wolfgang Burgmair; Matthias M Weber
Journal:  Sudhoffs Arch       Date:  2002

2.  [Ludwig II of Bavaria - the "fairy tale king": his last years from a psychiatric point of view].

Authors:  D V Zerssen
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  [Ludwig II of Bavaria: schizotypal personality disorder and frontotemporal dementia?].

Authors:  R Hacker; M Seitz; H Förstl
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.628

  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  [The advantage of a modern operational approach to the diagnosis of mental disorders. The case of the Bavarian King Ludwig II--an example from biographical research].

Authors:  D von Zerssen
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 2.  [The report on Ludwig II by Gudden and his colleagues in relation to the state of knowledge at that time].

Authors:  Hanns Hippius; Reinhard Steinberg
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 3.  [Bernhard von Gudden's psychiatric assessment and the deposition of King Ludwig II of Bavaria in 1886 : Comments on the article by R. Steinberg in Der Nervenarzt 01/2019].

Authors:  H Häfner
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.214

4.  Johann Bernhard Aloys von Gudden and the Mad King of Bavaria.

Authors:  Kalyan B Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.383

Review 5.  Was King Ludwig II of Bavaria misdiagnosed by Gudden and his colleagues?

Authors:  Reinhard Steinberg; Peter Falkai
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 5.270

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.