Literature DB >> 21528099

Both Sides of the Coin: Randomization from the Perspectives of Physician-Investigators and Patient-Subjects.

Tsiao Yi Yap1, Kathleen A Kassimatis, Eric Kodish.   

Abstract

Randomization is the "gold standard" design for clinical research trials, and is accepted as the best way to reduce bias. Although some controversy remains over this matter, we believe equipoise is the fundamental ethical requirement for conducting a randomized clinical trial. Despite much attention to the ethics of randomization, the moral psychology of this study design has not been explored. This paper analyzes the ethical tensions that arise from conducting these studies, and examines the moral psychology of this design from the perspectives of physician-investigators and patient-subjects. We conclude with a discussion of the practical implications of this analysis.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21528099      PMCID: PMC3082146          DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2010.491764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethics Behav        ISSN: 1050-8422


  24 in total

1.  The therapeutic orientation to clinical trials.

Authors:  Franklin G Miller; Donald L Rosenstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Rehabilitating equipoise.

Authors:  Paul B Miller; Charles Weijer
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2003-06

3.  Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-11-04       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Medical uncertainty. An interview with Renée C. Fox.

Authors:  R C Fox
Journal:  Second Opin       Date:  1987-11

5.  Secrecy and integrity in clinical trials.

Authors:  Robert J Wells
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Rigor in monitoring clinical trials is ethical.

Authors:  Steven Piantadosi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  "Ethics and clinical research" revisited. A tribute to Henry K. Beecher.

Authors:  J Katz
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.683

8.  Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  E J Robinson; C E P Kerr; A J Stevens; R J Lilford; D A Braunholtz; S J Edwards; S R Beck; M G Rowley
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Robinson; Cicely Kerr; Andrew Stevens; Richard Lilford; David Braunholtz; Sarah Edwards
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Communication of randomization in childhood leukemia trials.

Authors:  Eric Kodish; Michelle Eder; Robert B Noll; Kathleen Ruccione; Beverly Lange; Anne Angiolillo; Rebecca Pentz; Stephen Zyzanski; Laura A Siminoff; Dennis Drotar
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  Do pediatric hematology/oncology (PHO) fellows receive communication training?

Authors:  Wilson File; Carma L Bylund; Jennifer Kesselheim; David Leonard; Patrick Leavey
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.167

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.