Literature DB >> 21527623

The thermal index: its strengths, weaknesses, and proposed improvements.

Timothy A Bigelow1, Charles C Church, Kurt Sandstrom, John G Abbott, Marvin C Ziskin, Peter D Edmonds, Bruce Herman, Kai E Thomenius, Tat Jin Teo.   

Abstract

The thermal index (TI) has been used as a relative indicator of thermal risk during diagnostic ultrasound examinations for many years. It is useful in providing feedback to the clinician or sonographer, allowing assessment of relative, potential risks to the patient of an adverse effect due to a thermal mechanism. Recently, several shortcomings of the TI formulations in quantifying the risk to the patient have been identified by members of the basic scientific community, and possible improvements to address these shortcomings have been proposed. For this reason, the Output Standards Subcommittee of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine convened a subcommittee to review the strengths of the TI formulations as well as their weaknesses and proposed improvements. This article summarizes the findings of this subcommittee. After a careful review of the literature and an assessment of the cost of updating the TI formulations while maximizing the quality of patient care, the Output Standards Subcommittee makes the following recommendations: (1) some inconsistencies in the current TI formulations should be resolved, and the break point distance should be redefined to take focusing into consideration; (2) an entirely new indicator of thermal risk that incorporates the time dependence not be implemented at this time but be included in continuing efforts toward standards or consensus documents; (3) the exponential dependence of risk on temperature not be incorporated into a new definition of the TI formulations at this time but be included in continuing efforts toward standards or consensus documents; (4) the TI formulations not be altered to include nonlinear propagation at this time but be included in continuing efforts toward standards or consensus documents; and (5) a new indicator for risk from thermal mechanisms should be developed, distinct from the traditional TI formulations, for new imaging modalities such as acoustic radiation force impulse imaging, which have more complicated pulsing sequences than traditional imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21527623     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2011.30.5.714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  17 in total

1.  Simultaneous Axial Multifocal Imaging Using a Single Acoustical Transmission: A Practical Implementation.

Authors:  Asaf Ilovitsh; Tali Ilovitsh; Josquin Foiret; Douglas N Stephens; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Enhanced therapeutic anti-inflammatory effect of betamethasone on topical administration with low-frequency, low-intensity (20 kHz, 100 mW/cm(2)) ultrasound exposure on carrageenan-induced arthritis in a mouse model.

Authors:  Gadi Cohen; Hiba Natsheh; Youhan Sunny; Christopher R Bawiec; Elka Touitou; Melissa A Lerman; Philip Lazarovici; Peter A Lewin
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Correction for Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circular Sources.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  880 kHz ultrasound treatment for drug delivery to the vitreous humor.

Authors:  Ricardo Lamy; Elliot Chan; On-Tat Lee; Audrey Phone; Vasant A Salgaonkar; Chris J Diederich; Jay M Stewart
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Association of Prenatal Ultrasonography and Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  N Paul Rosman; Rachel Vassar; Gheorghe Doros; James DeRosa; Allison Froman; Audrey DiMauro; Sherry Santiago; Jodi Abbott
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 16.193

6.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part II: Validation for ARFI and Pulsed Doppler Waveforms.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Aoife M Ivory; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part I: Theory and Impact on Diagnostic Safety Indexes.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Detecting hepatic steatosis using ultrasound-induced thermal strain imaging: an ex vivo animal study.

Authors:  Ahmed M Mahmoud; Xuan Ding; Debaditya Dutta; Vijay P Singh; Kang Kim
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Conditionally Increased Acoustic Pressures in Nonfetal Diagnostic Ultrasound Examinations Without Contrast Agents: A Preliminary Assessment.

Authors:  Kathryn R Nightingale; Charles C Church; Gerald Harris; Keith A Wear; Michael R Bailey; Paul L Carson; Hui Jiang; Kurt L Sandstrom; Thomas L Szabo; Marvin C Ziskin
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Characterizing the Acoustic Output of an Ultrasonic Propulsion Device for Urinary Stones.

Authors:  Bryan W Cunitz; Barbrina Dunmire; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.