Literature DB >> 21527445

No association of paraoxonase-1 Q192R genotypes with platelet response to clopidogrel and risk of stent thrombosis after coronary stenting.

Dirk Sibbing1, Werner Koch, Steffen Massberg, Robert A Byrne, Julinda Mehilli, Stefanie Schulz, Katharina Mayer, Isabell Bernlochner, Albert Schömig, Adnan Kastrati.   

Abstract

AIMS: In clopidogrel-treated patients undergoing coronary stenting, high on-treatment platelet reactivity was linked to a higher risk of stent thrombosis (ST). Platelet response to clopidogrel is significantly influenced by genetic factors. Recently published findings showed a highly significant impact of a common polymorphism (Q192R) within the paraoxonase-1 (PON1) gene on clopidogrel treatment efficacy but no influence of the CYP2C19*2 genetic variant as previously demonstrated. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the PON1 Q192R genotype in parallel to that of CYP2C19*2 on the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel and the risk of ST in clopidogrel-treated patients. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 1524 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, ADP-induced platelet aggregation was assessed in relation to PON1 Q192R and CYP2C19*2 genotypes. The clinical impact of genetic variants was investigated by comparing genotype frequencies of both genetic variants in a registry of 127 cases with early ST vs. an early ST-free control cohort (n = 1439). For PON1 Q192R genotypes, platelet aggregation values were similar across all genotype groups (P = 0.65). For CYP2C19*2 genotypes, significantly higher aggregation values were found in CYP2C19 wt/*2 and *2/*2 patients when compared with wt/wt allele carriers (P < 0.0001). Comparing genotype frequencies between ST cases and controls, no differences were observed for PON1 Q192R genotype distributions (P = 0.23), whereas the genotype distribution differed for CYP2C19*2 genotypes (P = 0.019).
CONCLUSION: The PON1 Q192R genotype did not influence platelet response to clopidogrel or the risk of ST in clopidogrel-treated patients, whereas the CYP2C19*2 genotype impacted on both antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel and risk of coronary ST.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21527445     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  45 in total

Review 1.  Genetics of platelet inhibitor treatment.

Authors:  Dietmar Trenk; Willibald Hochholzer
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Paraoxonase 1 (PON1) gene variants are not associated with clopidogrel response.

Authors:  J P Lewis; A S Fisch; K Ryan; J R O'Connell; Q Gibson; B D Mitchell; H Shen; K Tanner; R B Horenstein; R Pakzy; U S Tantry; K P Bliden; P A Gurbel; A R Shuldiner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 3.  The pharmacogenetic control of antiplatelet response: candidate genes and CYP2C19.

Authors:  Yao Yang; Joshua P Lewis; Jean-Sébastien Hulot; Stuart A Scott
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.481

4.  Paraoxonase-1 and clopidogrel efficacy.

Authors:  Patrick M Dansette; Julien Rosi; Gildas Bertho; Daniel Mansuy
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Variability of platelet response to clopidogrel is not related to adverse cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Szymon Olędzki; Zdzisława Kornacewicz-Jach; Krzysztof Safranow; Radosław Kiedrowicz; Barbara Gawrońska-Szklarz; Maria Jastrzębska; Jarosław Gorący
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  The paraoxonase-1 pathway is not a major bioactivation pathway of clopidogrel in vitro.

Authors:  V Ancrenaz; J Desmeules; R James; P Fontana; J-L Reny; P Dayer; Y Daali
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Sepsis Biomarkers.

Authors:  Yachana Kataria; Daniel Remick
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 8.  Monitoring aspirin and clopidogrel response: testing controversies and recommendations.

Authors:  Athanasios Karathanos; Tobias Geisler
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.074

9.  PON1 Q192R genetic variant and response to clopidogrel and prasugrel: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Jessica L Mega; Sandra L Close; Stephen D Wiviott; Michael Man; Suman Duvvuru; Joseph R Walker; Scott S Sundseth; Jean-Philippe Collet; Jessica T Delaney; Jean-Sebastien Hulot; Sabina A Murphy; Guillaume Paré; Matthew J Price; Dirk Sibbing; Tabassome Simon; Dietmar Trenk; Elliott M Antman; Marc S Sabatine
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  Effect of the CYP2C19 2 and 3 genotypes, ABCB1 C3435T and PON1 Q192R alleles on the pharmacodynamics and adverse clinical events of clopidogrel in Chinese people after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Xiao-Fang Tang; Jing Wang; Jia-Hui Zhang; Xian-Min Meng; Bo Xu; Shu-Bin Qiao; Yong-Jian Wu; Jue Chen; Yuan Wu; Ji-Lin Chen; Run-Lin Gao; Jin-Qing Yuan; Yue-Jin Yang
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.