Literature DB >> 21527408

Metrics associated with NIH funding: a high-level view.

Kevin W Boyack1, Paul Jordan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To introduce the availability of grant-to-article linkage data associated with National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants and to perform a high-level analysis of the publication outputs and impacts associated with those grants.
DESIGN: Articles were linked to the grants they acknowledge using the grant acknowledgment strings in PubMed using a parsing and matching process as embodied in the NIH Scientific Publication Information Retrieval & Evaluation System system. Additional data from PubMed and citation counts from Scopus were added to the linkage data. The data comprise 2,572,576 records from 1980 to 2009.
RESULTS: The data show that synergies between NIH institutes are increasing over time; 29% of current articles acknowledge grants from multiple institutes. The median time lag to publication for a new grant is 3 years. Each grant contributes to approximately 1.7 articles per year, averaged over all grant types. Articles acknowledging US Public Health Service (PHS, which includes NIH) funding are cited twice as much as US-authored articles acknowledging no funding source. Articles acknowledging both PHS funding and a non-US government funding source receive on average 40% more citations that those acknowledging PHS funding sources alone.
CONCLUSION: The US PHS is effective at funding research with a higher-than-average impact. The data are amenable to further and much more detailed analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21527408      PMCID: PMC3128410          DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  7 in total

1.  International gastroenterology research: subject areas, impact, and funding.

Authors:  G Lewison; J Grant; P Jansen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Gastroenterology research in the United Kingdom: funding sources and impact.

Authors:  G Lewison
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Characterization of the research papers of U.S. medical schools.

Authors:  P R McAllister; F Narin
Journal:  J Am Soc Inf Sci       Date:  1983-03

4.  Mapping knowledge domains: characterizing PNAS.

Authors:  Kevin W Boyack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Bibliometric methods for the evaluation of arthritis research.

Authors:  G Lewison; M E Devey
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.580

6.  The impact of National Institutes of Health funding on U.S. cardiovascular disease research.

Authors:  Radmila Lyubarova; Brandon K Itagaki; Michael W Itagaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A systematic evaluation of payback of publicly funded health and health services research in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Patrick Kwan; Janice Johnston; Anne Y K Fung; Doris S Y Chong; Richard A Collins; Su V Lo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  Using ontology-based annotation to profile disease research.

Authors:  Yi Liu; Adrien Coulet; Paea LePendu; Nigam H Shah
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Automated Research Impact Assessment: A New Bibliometrics Approach.

Authors:  Christina H Drew; Kristianna G Pettibone; Fallis Owen Finch; Douglas Giles; Paul Jordan
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 3.238

3.  Clinical research informatics: a conceptual perspective.

Authors:  Michael G Kahn; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Partnered research experiences for junior faculty at minority-serving institutions enhance professional success.

Authors:  Andrew G Campbell; Michael J Leibowitz; Sandra A Murray; David Burgess; Wilfred F Denetclaw; Franklin A Carrero-Martinez; David J Asai
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Greatest 'HITS': A new tool for tracking impacts at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

Authors:  Christina H Drew; Kristianna G Pettibone; Elizabeth Ruben
Journal:  Res Eval       Date:  2013-12

Review 6.  A narrative review of research impact assessment models and methods.

Authors:  Andrew J Milat; Adrian E Bauman; Sally Redman
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2015-03-18

7.  New forms of checks and balances are needed to improve research integrity.

Authors:  Elizabeth Iorns; Christin Chong
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-05-28

8.  Evaluating the Impact of the U.S. National Toxicology Program: A Case Study on Hexavalent Chromium.

Authors:  Yun Xie; Stephanie Holmgren; Danica M K Andrews; Mary S Wolfe
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Two h-index benchmarks for evaluating the publication performance of medical informatics researchers.

Authors:  Khaled El Emam; Luk Arbuckle; Elizabeth Jonker; Kevin Anderson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Quantifying the economic impact of government and charity funding of medical research on private research and development funding in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Jon Sussex; Yan Feng; Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz; Michele Pistollato; Marco Hafner; Peter Burridge; Jonathan Grant
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.