Literature DB >> 21527387

Let them fall where they may: congruence analysis in massive phylogenetically messy data sets.

Jessica W Leigh1, Klaus Schliep, Philippe Lopez, Eric Bapteste.   

Abstract

Interest in congruence in phylogenetic data has largely focused on issues affecting multicellular organisms, and animals in particular, in which the level of incongruence is expected to be relatively low. In addition, assessment methods developed in the past have been designed for reasonably small numbers of loci and scale poorly for larger data sets. However, there are currently over a thousand complete genome sequences available and of interest to evolutionary biologists, and these sequences are predominantly from microbial organisms, whose molecular evolution is much less frequently tree-like than that of multicellular life forms. As such, the level of incongruence in these data is expected to be high. We present a congruence method that accommodates both very large numbers of genes and high degrees of incongruence. Our method uses clustering algorithms to identify subsets of genes based on similarity of phylogenetic signal. It involves only a single phylogenetic analysis per gene, and therefore, computation time scales nearly linearly with the number of genes in the data set. We show that our method performs very well with sets of sequence alignments simulated under a wide variety of conditions. In addition, we present an analysis of core genes of prokaryotes, often assumed to have been largely vertically inherited, in which we identify two highly incongruent classes of genes. This result is consistent with the complexity hypothesis.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21527387     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msr110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  16 in total

1.  Bacterial proteins pinpoint a single eukaryotic root.

Authors:  Romain Derelle; Guifré Torruella; Vladimír Klimeš; Henner Brinkmann; Eunsoo Kim; Čestmír Vlček; B Franz Lang; Marek Eliáš
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The Public Goods Hypothesis for the evolution of life on Earth.

Authors:  James O McInerney; Davide Pisani; Eric Bapteste; Mary J O'Connell
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 4.540

3.  Robust Analysis of Phylogenetic Tree Space.

Authors:  Martin R Smith
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 9.160

Review 4.  Evaluating phylogenetic congruence in the post-genomic era.

Authors:  Jessica W Leigh; François-Joseph Lapointe; Philippe Lopez; Eric Bapteste
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 5.  Early evolution without a tree of life.

Authors:  William F Martin
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 4.540

6.  Goods-thinking vs. tree-thinking: Finding a place for mobile genetic elements.

Authors:  James McInerney; Carla Cummins; Leanne Haggerty
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2011-11-01

7.  Clustering Genes of Common Evolutionary History.

Authors:  Kevin Gori; Tomasz Suchan; Nadir Alvarez; Nick Goldman; Christophe Dessimoz
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  A congruent phylogenomic signal places eukaryotes within the Archaea.

Authors:  Tom A Williams; Peter G Foster; Tom M W Nye; Cymon J Cox; T Martin Embley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Phylogeny of bacterial and archaeal genomes using conserved genes: supertrees and supermatrices.

Authors:  Jenna Morgan Lang; Aaron E Darling; Jonathan A Eisen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Phylogenetics and the human microbiome.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 15.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.