Literature DB >> 21527112

Design of a decision support system to help clinicians manage glycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

David Rodbard1, Robert A Vigersky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop a computerized clinical decision support for clinicians treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
METHODS: We designed, developed, and tested a computer-assisted decision support (CADS) system using statistical analyses of self-monitoring of blood glucose data, laboratory data, medical and medication history, and individualized hemoglobin A1c goals. A rule-based expert system generated recommendations for changes in therapy and accompanying explanations.
RESULTS: A clinical decision support system (CADS) was developed that considers 9 classes of medications and 69 regimens with combinations of up to 4 therapeutic agents. The preferred sequences of regimens can be customized. The program is integrated with a "comprehensive diabetes management system," electronic medical record systems, and a method for uploading data from memory glucose meters via telephone without use of a computer or the Internet. The software provides a report to the clinician regarding the overall quality of glycemic control and identifies problems, e.g., hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, glycemic variability, and insufficient data. The program can recommend continuation of current therapy, adjustment of dosages of current medications, or change of regimen and can provide explanations for its recommendations. If the user rejects the recommendations, the program will recommend alternative approaches. The CADS also provides access to Food and Drug Administration-approved prescribing information, guidelines from professional organizations, and selections from the general medical literature. The system has been extensively tested with real and synthetic data and is ready for evaluation in multicenter clinical trials.
CONCLUSION: A clinical decision support system to assist with the management of patients with T2DM was designed, developed, tested, and found to perform well.
© 2011 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21527112      PMCID: PMC3125935          DOI: 10.1177/193229681100500230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  39 in total

1.  Computerized management of chronic anticoagulation: three years of experience.

Authors:  Beatriz H Rocha; Laura H Langford; Steven Towner
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2007

2.  New approaches to display of self-monitoring of blood glucose data.

Authors:  David Rodbard
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-09-01

3.  Use of twice-daily exenatide in Basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  John B Buse; Richard M Bergenstal; Leonard C Glass; Cory R Heilmann; Michelle S Lewis; Anita Y M Kwan; Byron J Hoogwerf; Julio Rosenstock
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Quality of diabetes care in U.S. academic medical centers: low rates of medical regimen change.

Authors:  Richard W Grant; John B Buse; James B Meigs
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Usability test of an internet-based informatics tool for diabetes care providers: the comprehensive diabetes management program.

Authors:  Stephanie J Fonda; Christine A Paulsen; Joan Perkins; Richard J Kedziora; David Rodbard; Sven-Erik Bursell
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Evaluating the performance of a computer-based consultant.

Authors:  V L Yu; B G Buchanan; E H Shortliffe; S M Wraith; R Davis; A C Scott; S N Cohen
Journal:  Comput Programs Biomed       Date:  1979-01

7.  Primary care physicians identify and act upon glycemic abnormalities found in structured, episodic blood glucose monitoring data from non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  William H Polonsky; Zhihong Jelsovsky; Susanne Panzera; Christopher G Parkin; Robin S Wagner
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Characterizing glucose exposure for individuals with normal glucose tolerance using continuous glucose monitoring and ambulatory glucose profile analysis.

Authors:  Roger S Mazze; Ellie Strock; David Wesley; Sarah Borgman; Blaine Morgan; Richard Bergenstal; Robert Cuddihy
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Important differences: Canadian Diabetes Association 2008 clinical practice guidelines and the consensus statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.

Authors:  V Woo
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  A bolus calculator is an effective means of controlling postprandial glycemia in patients on insulin pump therapy.

Authors:  Todd M Gross; David Kayne; Allen King; Carla Rother; Suzanne Juth
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.118

View more
  11 in total

1.  Rapid improvement of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes using weekly intensive multifactorial interventions: structured glucose monitoring, patient education, and adjustment of therapy-a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Augusto Pimazoni-Netto; David Rodbard; Maria Teresa Zanella
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Designing Decision-Support Technologies for Patient-Generated Data in Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Si Sun; Kaitlin L Costello
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

Review 3.  Role of health information technologies in the Patient-centered Medical Home.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kraschnewski; Robert A Gabbay
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

4.  A decision support tool for appropriate glucose-lowering therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  F Javier Ampudia-Blasco; Pierre Yves Benhamou; Guillaume Charpentier; Agostino Consoli; Michaela Diamant; Baptist Gallwitz; Kamlesh Khunti; Chantal Mathieu; Martin Ridderstråle; Jochen Seufert; Cees Tack; Tina Vilsbøll; Tra-Mi Phan; Herman Stoevelaar
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Personalized decision support in type 2 diabetes mellitus: current evidence and future directions.

Authors:  Michael J Wilkinson; Aviva G Nathan; Elbert S Huang
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.810

6.  Translating What Works: A New Approach to Improve Diabetes Management.

Authors:  Lawrence S Phillips; Diana Barb; Chun Yong; Anne M Tomolo; Sandra L Jackson; Darin E Olson; Mary K Rhee; Ingrid M Duva; Qing He; Qi Long
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-09

7.  Shared decision making in type 2 diabetes with a support decision tool that takes into account clinical factors, the intensity of treatment and patient preferences: design of a cluster randomised (OPTIMAL) trial.

Authors:  Henk den Ouden; Rimke C Vos; Carla Reidsma; Guy E H M Rutten
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Person centered prediction of survival in population based screening program by an intelligent clinical decision support system.

Authors:  Reza Safdari; Elham Maserat; Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei; Amir Hossein Javan Amoli; Hamid Mohaghegh Shalmani
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2017

9.  Development of a clinical decision support system for diabetes care: A pilot study.

Authors:  Livvi Li Wei Sim; Kenneth Hon Kim Ban; Tin Wee Tan; Sunil Kumar Sethi; Tze Ping Loh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Personalized therapy algorithms for type 2 diabetes: a phenotype-based approach.

Authors:  Antonio Ceriello; Marco Gallo; Riccardo Candido; Alberto De Micheli; Katherine Esposito; Sandro Gentile; Gerardo Medea
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2014-06-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.