Literature DB >> 21526750

Probing structural differences between PrP(C) and PrP(Sc) by surface nitration and acetylation: evidence of conformational change in the C-terminus.

Binbin Gong1, Adriana Ramos, Ester Vázquez-Fernández, Christopher J Silva, Jana Alonso, Zengshan Liu, Jesús R Requena.   

Abstract

We used two chemical modifiers, tetranitromethane (TNM) and acetic anhydride (Ac(2)O), which specifically target accessible tyrosine and lysine residues, respectively, to modify recombinant Syrian hamster PrP(90-231) [rSHaPrP(90-231)] and SHaPrP 27-30, the proteinase K-resistant core of PrP(Sc) isolated from brain of scrapie-infected Syrian hamsters. Our aim was to find locations of conformational change. Modified proteins were subjected to in-gel proteolytic digestion with trypsin or chymotrypsin and subsequent analysis by mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF). Several differences in chemical reactivity were observed. With TNM, the most conspicuous reactivity difference seen involves peptide E(221)-R(229) (containing Y(225) and Y(226)), which in rSHaPrP(90-231) was much more extensively modified than in SHaPrP 27-30; peptide H(111)-R(136), containing Y(128), was also more modified in rSHaPrP(90-231). Conversely, peptides Y(149)-R(151), Y(157)-R(164), and R(151)-Y(162) suffered more extensive modification in SHaPrP 27-30. Acetic anhydride modified very extensively peptide G(90)-K(106), containing K(101), K(104), K(106), and the amino terminus, in both rSHaPrP(90-231) and SHaPrP 27-30. These results suggest that (1) SHaPrP 27-30 exhibits important conformational differences in the C-terminal region with respect to rSHaPrP(90-231), resulting in the loss of solvent accessibility of Y(225) and Y(226), very solvent-exposed in the latter conformation; because other results suggest preservation of the two C-terminal helices, this might mean that these are tightly packed in SHaPrP 27-30. (2) On the other hand, tyrosines contained in the stretch spanning approximately Y(149)-R(164) are more accessible in SHaPrP 27-30, suggesting rearrangements in α-helix H1 and the short β-sheet of rSHaPrP(90-231). (3) The amino-terminal region of SHaPrP 27-30 is very accessible. These data should help in the validation and construction of structural models of PrP(Sc).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21526750     DOI: 10.1021/bi102073j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  15 in total

1.  Use of proteinase K nonspecific digestion for selective and comprehensive identification of interpeptide cross-links: application to prion proteins.

Authors:  Evgeniy V Petrotchenko; Jason J Serpa; Darryl B Hardie; Mark Berjanskii; Bow P Suriyamongkol; David S Wishart; Christoph H Borchers
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Selective amplification of classical and atypical prions using modified protein misfolding cyclic amplification.

Authors:  Natallia Makarava; Regina Savtchenko; Ilia V Baskakov
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Biophysical and morphological studies on the dual interaction of non-octarepeat prion protein peptides with copper and nucleic acids.

Authors:  Juliana A P Chaves; Carolina Sanchez-López; Mariana P B Gomes; Tháyna Sisnande; Bruno Macedo; Vanessa End de Oliveira; Carolina A C Braga; Luciana P Rangel; Jerson L Silva; Liliana Quintanar; Yraima Cordeiro
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.358

Review 4.  The diversity and relationship of prion protein self-replicating states.

Authors:  Nina Klimova; Natallia Makarava; Ilia V Baskakov
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.303

Review 5.  Mass Spectrometry-Based Protein Footprinting for Higher-Order Structure Analysis: Fundamentals and Applications.

Authors:  Xiaoran Roger Liu; Mengru Mira Zhang; Michael L Gross
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Structure of prion β-oligomers as determined by short-distance crosslinking constraint-guided discrete molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Jason J Serpa; Konstantin I Popov; Evgeniy V Petrotchenko; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Christoph H Borchers
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 5.393

7.  SAXS structural study of PrP(Sc) reveals ~11 nm diameter of basic double intertwined fibers.

Authors:  Heinz Amenitsch; Federico Benetti; Adriana Ramos; Giuseppe Legname; Jesús R Requena
Journal:  Prion       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.931

8.  Integrity of helix 2-helix 3 domain of the PrP protein is not mandatory for prion replication.

Authors:  Khalid Salamat; Mohammed Moudjou; Jérôme Chapuis; Laetitia Herzog; Emilie Jaumain; Vincent Béringue; Human Rezaei; Annalisa Pastore; Hubert Laude; Michel Dron
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Using small molecule reagents to selectively modify epitopes based on their conformation.

Authors:  Christopher J Silva
Journal:  Prion       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.931

10.  The non-octarepeat copper binding site of the prion protein is a key regulator of prion conversion.

Authors:  Gabriele Giachin; Phuong Thao Mai; Thanh Hoa Tran; Giulia Salzano; Federico Benetti; Valentina Migliorati; Alessandro Arcovito; Stefano Della Longa; Giordano Mancini; Paola D'Angelo; Giuseppe Legname
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.