Literature DB >> 21526435

Micromixing within microfluidic devices.

Lorenzo Capretto1, Wei Cheng, Martyn Hill, Xunli Zhang.   

Abstract

Micromixing is a crucial process within microfluidic systems such as micro total analysis systems (μTAS). A state-of-art review on microstructured mixing devices and their mixing phenomena is given. The review first presents an overview of the characteristics of fluidic behavior at the microscale and their implications in microfluidic mixing processes. According to the two basic principles exploited to induce mixing at the microscale, micromixers are generally classified as being passive or active. Passive mixers solely rely on pumping energy, whereas active mixers rely on an external energy source to achieve mixing. Typical types of passive micromixers are discussed, including T- or Y-shaped, parallel lamination, sequential, focusing enhanced mixers, and droplet micromixers. Examples of active mixers using external forces such as pressure field, electrokinetic, dielectrophoretic, electrowetting, magneto-hydrodynamic, and ultrasound to assist mixing are presented. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of mixing in a microfluidic environment are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21526435     DOI: 10.1007/128_2011_150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Curr Chem        ISSN: 0340-1022


  40 in total

1.  Design of Novel Mixer and Applicator for Two-Component Surgical Adhesives.

Authors:  Kevin Go; Yeong Kim; Andy H Lee; Kelly Staricha; Phillip Messersmith; Matthew Glucksberg
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 0.582

2.  Theory and experiment on resonant frequencies of liquid-air interfaces trapped in microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Chandraprakash Chindam; Nitesh Nama; Michael Ian Lapsley; Francesco Costanzo; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  An acoustofluidic micromixer based on oscillating sidewall sharp-edges.

Authors:  Po-Hsun Huang; Yuliang Xie; Daniel Ahmed; Joseph Rufo; Nitesh Nama; Yuchao Chen; Chung Yu Chan; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Detecting the functional complexities between high-density lipoprotein mimetics.

Authors:  Yoshitaka J Sei; Jungho Ahn; Taeyoung Kim; Eunjung Shin; Angel J Santiago-Lopez; Seung Soon Jang; Noo Li Jeon; Young C Jang; YongTae Kim
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Continuous flow microreactor for protein PEGylation.

Authors:  P Madadkar; P R Selvaganapathy; R Ghosh
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.800

6.  Hyaluronic Acid-Based Nanogels Produced by Microfluidics-Facilitated Self-Assembly Improves the Safety Profile of the Cationic Host Defense Peptide Novicidin.

Authors:  Jorrit J Water; YongTae Kim; Morten J Maltesen; Henrik Franzyk; Camilla Foged; Hanne M Nielsen
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 7.  Advances in microfluidic materials, functions, integration, and applications.

Authors:  Pamela N Nge; Chad I Rogers; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Empirical chemosensitivity testing in a spheroid model of ovarian cancer using a microfluidics-based multiplex platform.

Authors:  Tamal Das; Liliane Meunier; Laurent Barbe; Diane Provencher; Olivier Guenat; Thomas Gervais; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 2.800

9.  Droplet-based microfluidic platform for measurement of rapid erythrocyte water transport.

Authors:  Byung-Ju Jin; Cristina Esteva-Font; A S Verkman
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 10.  Microfluidic technologies for accelerating the clinical translation of nanoparticles.

Authors:  Pedro M Valencia; Omid C Farokhzad; Rohit Karnik; Robert Langer
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 39.213

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.