Literature DB >> 21526411

A multi-method evaluation of the Pharmacy First Minor Ailments scheme.

Somying Pumtong1, Helen F Boardman, Claire W Anderson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the Pharmacy First Minor Ailments scheme achieved its objectives in terms of improving access to medicines and reducing doctor workload for minor ailments by enhancing the role of community pharmacists in the management of minor ailments.
SETTING: Nottingham, the United Kingdom.
METHODS: A mixed-methods study was conducted, including semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, a patient survey, and an analysis of the Nottingham City Primary Care Trust data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stakeholders' acceptability of the scheme and scheme users' satisfaction with the scheme.
RESULTS: Most health care professionals were positive about the implementation of the scheme, although they reported some problems, such as the restricted formulary. The majority of stakeholders perceived benefits of the scheme for both patients and health care professionals. The level of patient satisfaction with the scheme was high, particularly in terms of ease of access and convenience. The current structure of the scheme appears to be an acceptable way to run the scheme. Since its commencement the scheme has enabled the transfer of a substantial number of minor ailments consultations from general practices to community pharmacies.
CONCLUSION: It appears that the Nottingham City Primary Care Trust is successful using community pharmacies to improve access to medicines and provide a greater choice in primary care for patients with minor ailments. Thus, the Primary Care Trust should continue the scheme, although there are some important issues (e.g. the restricted formulary, the lack of privacy in some pharmacies) that need to be addressed to improve and develop the service further. The Nottingham City Primary Care Trust should build on this success to further utilise the pharmacy in their primary care service development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21526411     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-011-9513-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  7 in total

1.  The role of community pharmacists in prescribing medication for the treatment of head lice.

Authors:  Z Philips; D Whynes; S Parnham; R Slack; S Earwicker
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2001-06

2.  Community pharmacy as a primary health and self-care resource: a framework for understanding pharmacy utilization.

Authors:  Karen Hassell; Anne Rogers; Peter Noyce
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2000-01

3.  Cross-sectional survey of community pharmacists' views of the electronic Minor Ailment Service in Scotland.

Authors:  Vibhu Paudyal; Denise Hansford; I T Scott Cunningham; Derek Stewart
Journal:  Int J Pharm Pract       Date:  2010-08

4.  Community pharmacy treatment of minor ailments in refugees.

Authors:  H Parmentier; S Golding; M Ashworth; G Rowlands
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 5.  Community pharmacy supply of emergency hormonal contraception: a structured literature review of international evidence.

Authors:  C Anderson; A Blenkinsopp
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Changing patient consultation patterns in primary care: an investigation of uptake of the Minor Ailments Service in Scotland.

Authors:  Andrew Wagner; Peter R Noyce; Darren M Ashcroft
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care.

Authors:  J E Ware; M K Snyder; W R Wright; A R Davies
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  1983
  7 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Paying pharmacists for patient care: A systematic review of remunerated pharmacy clinical care services.

Authors:  Sherilyn K D Houle; Kelly A Grindrod; Trish Chatterley; Ross T Tsuyuki
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2014-07

Review 2.  Are pharmacy-based minor ailment schemes a substitute for other service providers? A systematic review.

Authors:  Vibhu Paudyal; Margaret C Watson; Tracey Sach; Terry Porteous; Christine M Bond; David J Wright; Jennifer Cleland; Garry Barton; Richard Holland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Is the pharmacy profession innovative enough?: meeting the needs of Australian residents with chronic conditions and their carers using the nominal group technique.

Authors:  Sara S McMillan; Adem Sav; Fiona Kelly; Michelle A King; Jennifer A Whitty; Amanda J Wheeler
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Evaluation of a new patient consultation initiative in community pharmacy for ear, nose and throat and eye conditions.

Authors:  Gillian Hall; Tania Cork; Simon White; Hayley Berry; Louise Smith
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Systematic review on the effects of the physical and social aspects of community pharmacy spaces on service users and staff.

Authors:  R Dhital; S Sakulwach; G Robert; C Vasilikou; J Sin
Journal:  Perspect Public Health       Date:  2022-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.