| Literature DB >> 21526095 |
Farshad Amirkhizi1, Fereydoun Siassi, Mahmoud Djalali, Abbas Rahimi Foroushani.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few studies that have investigated hypertension have considered a state of oxidative stress that can contribute to the development of atherosclerosis and other hypertension induced organ damage. The aim of this study was to investigate whether pre-hypertension and hypertension status is associated with activities of erythrocyte antioxidant enzymes in a random sample of cardiovascular disease-free women.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidants; Biocatalysts; High Blood Pressure; Woman
Year: 2010 PMID: 21526095 PMCID: PMC3082824
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Res Med Sci ISSN: 1735-1995 Impact factor: 1.852
Characteristics and dietary intakes of the participants by blood pressure status
| Variables | Normotensive (n = 75) | Pre-hypertensive (n = 53) | Hypertensive (n = 32) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 31 ± 11 | 36 ± 12 | 42 ± 3 | 0.001 |
| Education status (years of school) | 7 ± 4 | 7 ± 3 | 6 ± 3 | 0.321 |
| Physical inactivity (%) | 48 | 47 | 51 | 0.247 |
| Body mass index (Kg/m2) | 24 ± 4 | 26 ± 5 | 29 ± 4 | 0.001 |
| Obesity (%) | 9 | 12 | 16 | 0.002 |
| Waist-to hip ratio | 0.74 ± 0.06 | 0.82 ± 0.08 | 0.91 ± 0.07 | 0.03 |
| Abdominal obesity (%) | 11 | 14 | 19 | 0.002 |
| Number of pregnancies | 3.4 ± 2.1 | 3.8 ± 3.1 | 4.2 ± 3.7 | 0.031 |
| Total energy (kcal/day) | 2078 ± 241 | 2116 ± 341 | 2287 ± 357 | 0.453 |
| Carbohydrate (% total energy) | 54.6 ± 4.1 | 53.7 ± 3.5 | 54.6 ± 5.4 | 0.367 |
| Protein (% total energy) | 14 ± 3.7 | 13 ± 4.1 | 14 ± 3.6 | 0.264 |
| Fat (% total energy) | 31 ± 3.4 | 32 ± 3.9 | 34 ± 34.3 | 0.358 |
P value derived from one-way ANOVA that used to evaluate differences in the investigated variables and blood pressure
P < 0.05 from the post hoc comparisons (Tukey test) of the investigated variables between pre-hypertensive or hypertensive subjects compared to normotensive
P < 0.01 from the post hoc comparisons (Tukey test) of the investigated variables between pre-hypertensive or hypertensive subjects compared to normotensive
Multivariate adjusted means for antioxidant enzyme activities of the participants by blood pressure status†
| Enzyme activities | Normotensive (n = 75) | Pre-hypertensive (n = 53) | Hypertensive (n = 32) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model I | 962 ± 86 | 621 ± 71 | 547 ± 62 | < 0.001 |
| Model II | 976 ± 71 | 618 ± 59 | 552 ± 58 | < 0.001 |
| Model III | 982 ± 76 | 674 ± 61 | 586 ± 51 | < 0.01 |
| Model I | 128.2 ± 56.4 | 74.7 ± 41.8 | 72.8 ± 46.6 | < 0.01 |
| Model II | 131.5 ± 49.3 | 112.4 ± 36.7 | 69.3 ± 39.8 | < 0.01 |
| Model III | 136. ± 52.1 | 116.2 ± 41.3 | 76.3 ± 36.4 | < 0.05 |
| Model I | 367.6 ± 52.6 | 326.6 ± 48.6 | 164.8 ± 40.2 | < 0.001 |
| Model II | 374.3 ± 49.7 | 331.2 ± 51.7 | 198.1 ± 46.8 | < 0.001 |
| Model III | 378.2 ± 56.1 | 269.4 ± 45.6 | 236.6 ± 42.7 | < 0.01 |
Data are mean ± SD
P values are based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA)
Model I, adjusted for age
Model II, adjusted for physical activity (yes or no), number of pregnancies and energy intake (kcal)
Model III, additionally adjusted for BMI and WC
P < 0.01 from the post hoc comparisons (Tukey test) between pre-hypertensive or hypertensive vs normotensive participants
P < 0.001 from the post hoc comparisons (Tukey test) between pre-hypertensive or hypertensive vs normotensive participants
P < 0.01 from the post hoc comparisons (Tukey test) between pre-hypertensive and hypertensive participants
Results from multiple linear regression analysis that evaluated the association between antioxidant enzyme activities (dependent) and hypertension status (independent), after controlling for various potential confounders
| Model for | Beta-coefficient ± SE | P value |
|---|---|---|
| Constant of the model | 52 ± 3 | |
| Pre-hypertension vs. normal | -8.3 ± 2.6 | 0.04 |
| Hypertension vs. normal | -12.7 ± 3.8 | 0.03 |
| Age (year) | -0.62 ± 0.12 | 0.01 |
| Physical activity (yes vs. no) | 0.29 ± 0.06 | N.S |
| Number of pregnancies | -2.1 ± 0.8 | N.S |
| Body mass index (Kg/m2) | -3.6 ± 1.2 | 0.005 |
| Waist-to hip ratio | -2.6 ± 0.4 | 0.002 |
| Adjusted R2 with/without hypertension status | 9.4%/7.3% | |
| Constant of the model | 76 ± 13 | |
| Pre-hypertension vs. normal | -12.8 ± 4.2 | 0.02 |
| Hypertension vs. normal | -14.6 ± 5.2 | 0.004 |
| Age (year) | -0.32 ± 0.06 | N.S |
| Physical activity (yes vs. no) | 3.8 ± 0.2 | N.S |
| Number of pregnancies | -0.72 ± 0.06 | N.S |
| Body mass index (Kg/m2) | -1.54 ± 0.2 | 0.003 |
| Waist-to hip ratio | -2.32 ± 0.4 | 0.001 |
| Adjusted R2 with/without hypertension status | 8.7%/10.4% | |
| Constant of the model | 64 ± 8 | |
| Pre-hypertension vs. normal | -14.6 ± 6.4 | 0.005 |
| Hypertension vs. normal | -17.3 ± 6.6 | 0.001 |
| Age (year) | 0.54 ± 0.07 | N.S |
| Physical activity (yes vs. no) | 4.6 ± 0.4 | N.S |
| Number of pregnancies | -0.52 ± 0.08 | N.S |
| Body mass index (Kg/m2) | 2.68 ± 1.3 | N.S |
| Waist-to hip ratio | 3.46 ± 0.54 | N.S |
| Adjusted R2 with/without hypertension status | 10.2%/8.7% |
Non-significant