| Literature DB >> 21525793 |
Theodora Thays Arruda Cavalcante1, Bruno Anderson Matias da Rocha, Victor Alves Carneiro, Francisco Vassiliepe Sousa Arruda, Antônia Sâmia Fernandes do Nascimento, Nairley Cardoso Sá, Kyria Santiago do Nascimento, Benildo Sousa Cavada, Edson Holanda Teixeira.
Abstract
Surface colonization is an essential step in biofilm development. The ability of oral pathogens to adhere to tooth surfaces is directly linked with the presence of specific molecules at the bacterial surface that can interact with enamel acquired pellicle ligands. In light of this, the aim of this study was to verify inhibitory and antibiofilm action of lectins from the Diocleinaesubtribe against Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus oralis. The inhibitory action against planctonic cells was assessed using lectins from Canavaliaensi formis (ConA), Canavalia brasiliensis (ConBr), Canavalia maritima (ConM), Canavalia gladiata (CGL) and Canavalia boliviana (ConBol). ConBol, ConBr and ConM showed inhibitory activity on S. mutans growth. All lectins, except ConA, stimulated significantly the growth of S. oralis. To evaluate the effect on biofilm formation, clarified saliva was added to 96-well, flat-bottomed polystyrene plates, followed by the addition of solutions containing 100 or 200 µg/mL of the selected lectins. ConBol, ConM and ConA inhibited the S. mutans biofilms. No effects were found on S. oralis biofilms. Structure/function analysis were carried out using bioinformatics tools. The aperture and deepness of the CRD (Carbohydrate Recognition Domain) permit us to distinguish the two groups of Canavalia lectins in accordance to their actions against S. mutans and S. oralis. The results found provide a basis for encouraging the use of plant lectins as biotechnological tools in ecological control and prevention of caries disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21525793 PMCID: PMC6263318 DOI: 10.3390/molecules16053530
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Bar graph of S. mutans at different growth time points under the effect of lectins. (A) ConBol; (B) ConBr; (C) ConM; (D) CGL; (E) ConA.*p < 0.01 related to the 0.9% NaCl.() 0.9% NaCl () Lectin 500 µg/mL.
Figure 2Bar graph of S. oralis at different growth time points under the effect of lectins. (A) ConBol; (B) ConBr; (C) ConM; (D) CGL; (E) ConA.*p <0.01 related to the 0.9% NaCl. () 0.9% NaCl () Lectin 500 µg/mL.
Figure 3Bar graph of S. mutans biofilm content at different growth times under the effect of lectins. The control was Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) 200 µg/mL. (A) ConBol; (B) ConBr; (C) ConM; (D) CGL; (E) ConA.*p < 0.01 related to the BSA 200 µg/mL. Legend: () BSA 200 µg/mL () Lectin 100 µg/mL () Lectin 200 µg/mL.
Figure 4Bar graph of S. oralis biofilm content at different growth times under the effect of lectins.The control was Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) 200 µg/mL. (A) ConBol; (B) ConBr; (C) ConM; (D) CGL; (E) ConA.*p < 0.01 related to the BSA 200 µg/mL Legend: () BSA 200 µg/mL () Lectin 100 µg/mL () Lectin 200 µg/mL.
Figure 5Comparison between CGL (stimulatory lectin for S. mutans - blue) and ConM (inhibitory lectin for S. mutans - green) carbohydrate binding sites. The distances between the amino acids side chains can explain the divergent activity caused by the interaction pattern with surface carbohydrates.