INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to assess the validity and reliability of the SF-12 questionnaire in a sample of Iranian patients undergoing hemodialysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-four hemodialysis patients were included from dialysis centers in Zanjan, Iran, and were asked to complete the SF-12 and SF-36 questionnaires. An initial test-retest reliability evaluation was performed on a sample of 70 patients from the total group, with a retest interval of 14 days. Reliability was estimated by internal consistency and validity was assessed using known-group comparisons and construct validity on the patient group as a whole. A linear regression analysis was used to assess any variation in the physical component summary and mental component summary scores of the SF-36 with the respective component summary scores of the SF-12. In addition, the factor structure of the questionnaire was extracted by performing a confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: Cronbach alpha for physical and mental component summaries were 0.89 and 0.90, respectively. The SF-12 showed a good discriminatory ability between subgroups of patients based on demographic and clinical variables. The confirmatory factor analysis for the original two-factor structure showed a good fit index (chi2 = 23.30, degrees of freedom = 13), goodness-of-fit index = 0.96, and root mean squared error of approximation = 0.079). CONCLUSIONS: In general, the SF-12 has good psychometric properties and can be used as a shorter version of the SF-36 questionnaire in future studies involving Iranian patients undergoing hemodialysis.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to assess the validity and reliability of the SF-12 questionnaire in a sample of Iranian patients undergoing hemodialysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-four hemodialysis patients were included from dialysis centers in Zanjan, Iran, and were asked to complete the SF-12 and SF-36 questionnaires. An initial test-retest reliability evaluation was performed on a sample of 70 patients from the total group, with a retest interval of 14 days. Reliability was estimated by internal consistency and validity was assessed using known-group comparisons and construct validity on the patient group as a whole. A linear regression analysis was used to assess any variation in the physical component summary and mental component summary scores of the SF-36 with the respective component summary scores of the SF-12. In addition, the factor structure of the questionnaire was extracted by performing a confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: Cronbach alpha for physical and mental component summaries were 0.89 and 0.90, respectively. The SF-12 showed a good discriminatory ability between subgroups of patients based on demographic and clinical variables. The confirmatory factor analysis for the original two-factor structure showed a good fit index (chi2 = 23.30, degrees of freedom = 13), goodness-of-fit index = 0.96, and root mean squared error of approximation = 0.079). CONCLUSIONS: In general, the SF-12 has good psychometric properties and can be used as a shorter version of the SF-36 questionnaire in future studies involving Iranian patients undergoing hemodialysis.
Authors: Chung-Ying Lin; Mehdi Yaseri; Amir H Pakpour; Dan Malm; Anders Broström; Bengt Fridlund; Andrea Burri; Thomas L Webb Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Amirhossein Modabbernia; Mohammadhossein Yaghoubidoust; Chung-Ying Lin; Bengt Fridlund; Erin E Michalak; Greg Murray; Amir H Pakpour Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Zahra Sohrabi; Mohammad Hassan Eftekhari; Mohammad Hadi Eskandari; Abbas Rezaeianzadeh; Mohammad Mahdi Sagheb Journal: Nephrourol Mon Date: 2015-05-23
Authors: Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi; Derek Kyte; Paul Cockwell; Tom Marshall; Mary Dutton; Anita Slade; Neil Marklew; Gary Price; Rav Verdi; Judi Waters; Keeley Sharpe; Melanie Calvert Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi; Derek Kyte; Paul Cockwell; Tom Marshall; Adrian Gheorghe; Thomas Keeley; Anita Slade; Melanie Calvert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 3.240