Literature DB >> 21525254

Dietary protein and sugar differentially affect development and metabolic pools in ecologically diverse Drosophila.

Luciano M Matzkin1, Sarah Johnson, Christopher Paight, Goran Bozinovic, Therese A Markow.   

Abstract

We examined the effects of 3 diets differing in their relative levels of sugar and protein on development and metabolic pools (protein, TG, and glycogen) among sets of isofemale lines of 2 ecologically distinct Drosophila species, D. melanogaster and D. mojavensis. Our high protein:sugar ratio diet contained 7.1% protein and 17.9% carbohydrate, the EPS diet was 4.3% protein and 21.2% carbohydrate, and the LPS was only 2.5% protein and 24.6% carbohydrate. Larvae of D. melanogaster, a generalist fruit breeder, were able to survive on all 3 diets, although all 3 metabolic pools responded with significant diet and diet × line interactions. Development was delayed by the diet with the most sugar relative to protein. The other species, D. mojavensis, a cactus breeder ecologically unaccustomed to encountering simple sugars, completely failed to survive when fed the diet with the highest sugar and showed very poor survival even with the diet with equal parts of protein and sugar. Furthermore, the D. mojavensis adult metabolic pools of protein, TG, and glycogen significantly differed from those of D. melanogaster adults fed the identical diet. Thus, considerable within- and between-species differences exist in how diets are metabolized. Given that the genomes of both of these Drosophila species have been sequenced, these differences and their genetic underpinnings hold promise for understanding human responses to nutrition and for developing strategies for dealing with metabolic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21525254     DOI: 10.3945/jn.111.138438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  26 in total

1.  Reproductive Capacity Evolves in Response to Ecology through Common Changes in Cell Number in Hawaiian Drosophila.

Authors:  Didem P Sarikaya; Samuel H Church; Laura P Lagomarsino; Karl N Magnacca; Steven L Montgomery; Donald K Price; Kenneth Y Kaneshiro; Cassandra G Extavour
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Transcriptional responses of ecologically diverse Drosophila species to larval diets differing in relative sugar and protein ratios.

Authors:  Nestor O Nazario-Yepiz; Mariana Ramirez Loustalot-Laclette; Javier Carpinteyro-Ponce; Cei Abreu-Goodger; Therese Ann Markow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Acidic Food pH Increases Palatability and Consumption and Extends Drosophila Lifespan.

Authors:  Sonali A Deshpande; Ryuichi Yamada; Christine M Mak; Brooke Hunter; Alina Soto Obando; Sany Hoxha; William W Ja
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Mitochondrial haplotypes affect metabolic phenotypes in the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel.

Authors:  Roel P J Bevers; Maria Litovchenko; Adamandia Kapopoulou; Virginie S Braman; Matthew R Robinson; Johan Auwerx; Brian Hollis; Bart Deplancke
Journal:  Nat Metab       Date:  2019-12-09

5.  The seesaw of diet restriction and lifespan: lessons from Drosophila studies.

Authors:  Sudhakar Krittika; Pankaj Yadav
Journal:  Biogerontology       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.277

6.  Metagenome-wide association of microbial determinants of host phenotype in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  John M Chaston; Peter D Newell; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 7.867

7.  Impact of the resident microbiota on the nutritional phenotype of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Emma V Ridley; Adam C-N Wong; Stephanie Westmiller; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Preadult parental diet affects offspring development and metabolism in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Luciano M Matzkin; Sarah Johnson; Christopher Paight; Therese A Markow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mondo/ChREBP-Mlx-regulated transcriptional network is essential for dietary sugar tolerance in Drosophila.

Authors:  Essi Havula; Mari Teesalu; Tuulia Hyötyläinen; Heini Seppälä; Kiran Hasygar; Petri Auvinen; Matej Orešič; Thomas Sandmann; Ville Hietakangas
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  A nutritional conditional lethal mutant due to pyridoxine 5'-phosphate oxidase deficiency in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Wanhao Chi; Li Zhang; Wei Du; Xiaoxi Zhuang
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.