Literature DB >> 21524913

Kinetic asymmetry in transfemoral amputees while performing sit to stand and stand to sit movements.

M Jason Highsmith1, Jason T Kahle, Stephanie L Carey, Derek J Lura, Rajiv V Dubey, Kristine R Csavina, William S Quillen.   

Abstract

Transitional movements are a determinant of functional independence and have limited study in amputees. Microprocessor prosthetic knees' abilities to assist transfemoral amputees with sitting and standing have not been studied. Through cross-sectional study, 21 transfemoral amputees, divided into 3 groups of 7 by knee type (power knee, C-leg, Mauch SNS) and 7 non-amputee controls (n=28) performed sit to stand and stand to sit while kinematic and kinetic data were recorded. Transfemoral amputees can stand (1.6-2.0s) and sit (2.1-2.8s) at rates comparable to controls (1.6s). Controls' ground reaction force (GRF) and knee moment production was <7% asymmetric and superior to amputees' during both movements. For sit to stand, amputees' asymmetry for GRF ranged from 53 to 69% and 110 to 124% for knee moments. For stand to sit, amputees' asymmetry for GRF ranged from 32 to 60% and 84 to 114% for knee moments. Hip moment asymmetry for sit to stand was less for control (21%) and power knee (34%) groups than that produced by the Mauch SNS (59%) group. For stand to sit, hip moment production for the Mauch SNS (47%) and C-leg groups (71%) were more asymmetric than controls (19%). In the majority of cases transfemoral amputees do not load their prosthesis extensively for standing up or sitting down. Therefore, this transitional movement is currently a one-legged task, which increases stress on the sound limb. Generally, the prosthetic knees studied did not produce a significant knee moment in either task. Although most differences between knee groups were not statistically significant, differences may be clinically meaningful on an individual basis. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21524913     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  10 in total

1.  Training implications of maximal forces on a computer-controlled and motor-driven leg press by age group, sex, footplate direction, and speed.

Authors:  Brian W Schulz; Stephanie Hart-Hughes; Mark T Gordon; Tatjana Bulat
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.032

2.  Gait Training Interventions for Lower Extremity Amputees: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  M Jason Highsmith; Casey R Andrews; Claire Millman; Ashley Fuller; Jason T Kahle; Tyler D Klenow; Katherine L Lewis; Rachel C Bradley; John J Orriola
Journal:  Technol Innov       Date:  2016-09-01

3.  PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE HILL ASSESSMENT INDEX (HAI) AND STAIR ASSESSMENT INDEX (SAI) IN HIGH-FUNCTIONING TRANSFEMORAL AMPUTEES.

Authors:  M Jason Highsmith; Jason T Kahle; Brian Kaluf; Rebecca M Miro; Larry J Mengelkoch; Tyler D Klenow
Journal:  Technol Innov       Date:  2016-09

Review 4.  Measures and procedures utilized to determine the added value of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joints: a systematic review.

Authors:  Patrick J R Theeven; Bea Hemmen; Peter R G Brink; Rob J E M Smeets; Henk A M Seelen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Influence of time restriction, 20 minutes and 94.6 months, of visual information on angular displacement during the sit-to-stand (STS) task in three planes.

Authors:  Mozhgan Faraji Aylar; Faramarz Firouzi; Mandana Rahnama Araghi
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-12-27

6.  VUB-CYBERLEGs CYBATHLON 2016 Beta-Prosthesis: case study in control of an active two degree of freedom transfemoral prosthesis.

Authors:  Louis L Flynn; Joost Geeroms; Tom van der Hoeven; Bram Vanderborght; Dirk Lefeber
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  The influence of a microprocessor-controlled hydraulic ankle on the kinetic symmetry of trans-tibial amputees during ramp walking: A case series.

Authors:  Michael McGrath; Piotr Laszczak; Saeed Zahedi; David Moser
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2018-10-08

Review 8.  Mechanisms and component design of prosthetic knees: A review from a biomechanical function perspective.

Authors:  Wei Liang; Zhihui Qian; Wei Chen; Hounan Song; Yu Cao; Guowu Wei; Lei Ren; Kunyang Wang; Luquan Ren
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-15

9.  Robot-mediated overground gait training for transfemoral amputees with a powered bilateral hip orthosis: a pilot study.

Authors:  Clara Beatriz Sanz-Morère; Elena Martini; Simona Crea; Raffaele Molino-Lova; Nicola Vitiello; Barbara Meoni; Gabriele Arnetoli; Antonella Giffone; Stefano Doronzio; Chiara Fanciullacci; Andrea Parri; Roberto Conti; Francesco Giovacchini; Þór Friðriksson; Duane Romo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Obtaining Natural Sit-to-Stand Motion with a Biomimetic Controller for Powered Knee Prostheses.

Authors:  Molei Wu; Md Rejwanul Haque; Xiangrong Shen
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.682

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.