Literature DB >> 21524789

Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins.

Li Mei1, Henk J Busscher, Henny C van der Mei, Yijin Ren.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine streptococcal adhesion forces with composite resins with different surface roughness.
METHODS: Polishing and grinding were applied to obtain smooth (roughness 20 nm), moderately rough (150 nm) and rough (350 nm) surfaces of two orthodontic, light-cured composites. Adhesion forces between Streptococcus sanguinis and Streptococcus mutans and the composite surfaces were measured using atomic force microscopy in absence or presence of a salivary conditioning film. Initial adhesion forces were measured as well adhesion after 120 s of contact, as longer contact times are known to result in stronger adhesion forces ("bond-strengthening"). Surface roughness in absence and presence of salivary conditioning films were compared using ANOVA, while adhesion forces were subjected to a Weibull analysis.
RESULTS: Initial adhesion forces in absence of a salivary conditioning film amounted between -0.7 and -0.9 nN for smooth composite resins and increased between -1.0 and -2.0 nN for the roughest surfaces. Streptococcal adhesion forces after bond-strengthening were significantly stronger than upon initial contact, irrespective of the composite type. Salivary conditioning films significantly decreased the surface roughness of the composites, as well as the streptococcal adhesion forces. Yet, also in the presence of a conditioning film, rougher composite surfaces exerted stronger adhesion forces, irrespective of composite type or bacterial strain.
CONCLUSION: Streptococcal adhesion forces to orthodontic composite resins increase with increasing roughness of the composite surfaces. Composite surface roughness less affects adhesion forces with S. mutans than with S. sanguinis.
Copyright © 2011 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21524789     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.03.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  38 in total

1.  Determination of surface roughness and topography of dental resin-based nanocomposites using AFM analysis.

Authors:  Tijana Lainović; Marko Vilotić; Larisa Blažić; Damir Kakaš; Dubravka Marković; Aljoša Ivanišević
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.363

2.  Hydrophilicity of dentin bonding systems influences in vitro Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation.

Authors:  Eugenio Brambilla; Andrei Ionescu; Annalisa Mazzoni; Milena Cadenaro; Massimo Gagliani; Monica Ferraroni; Franklin Tay; David Pashley; Lorenzo Breschi
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 3.  Mechano-bactericidal actions of nanostructured surfaces.

Authors:  Denver P Linklater; Vladimir A Baulin; Saulius Juodkazis; Russell J Crawford; Paul Stoodley; Elena P Ivanova
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Effect of different polishing techniques on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of three glass ionomer-based restorative materials: In vitro study.

Authors:  Hoda S Ismail; Ashraf I Ali; Mohammed A Abo El-Ella; Salah H Mahmoud
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-07-01

5.  Tridimensional surface roughness analysis after resin infiltration of (deproteinized) natural subsurface carious lesions.

Authors:  Ina Ulrich; Jan Mueller; Michael Wolgin; Wilhelm Frank; Andrej M Kielbassa
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Biofilm and cell adhesion strength on dental implant surfaces via the laser spallation technique.

Authors:  J D Boyd; A J Stromberg; C S Miller; M E Grady
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2020-11-15       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  Inhibition of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm by trimethylsilane plasma coating.

Authors:  Yibao Ma; Meng Chen; John E Jones; Andrew C Ritts; Qingsong Yu; Hongmin Sun
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Antimicrobial and fluoride release capacity of orthodontic bonding materials.

Authors:  Érika Machado Caldeira; Amanda Osório; Edna Lúcia Couto Oberosler; Delmo Santiago Vaitsman; Daniela Sales Alviano; Matilde da Cunha Gonçalves Nojima
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 9.  The Relationship of Bacterial Biofilms and Capsular Contracture in Breast Implants.

Authors:  Dragana Ajdic; Yasmina Zoghbi; David Gerth; Zubin J Panthaki; Seth Thaller
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 4.283

10.  Comparative short-term in vitro analysis of mutans streptococci adhesion on esthetic, nickel-titanium, and stainless-steel arch wires.

Authors:  In-Hye Kim; Hyo-Sang Park; Young Kyung Kim; Kyo-Han Kim; Tae-Yub Kwon
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.