Literature DB >> 21524566

Using different approaches to conducting postal questionnaires affected response rates and cost-efficiency.

Christina Stenhammar1, Pär Bokström, Birgitta Edlund, Anna Sarkadi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare three different approaches for consent in postal questionnaire in terms of response rate, time consumption, and cost-efficiency, and to collect a demographic questionnaire for dropout analyses. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Population survey in Sweden. Mothers and fathers (n=600) of three hundred 3-year olds were divided into three groups. One group was asked to Actively Agree to participate in a cover letter and send consent back to receive the main questionnaire. The second group received the cover letter, the consent, and the main questionnaire in the initial mailings, Direct Delivery. The third group received the cover letter and consent form in which they were asked to Actively Decline participation within 7 days if they did not want to participate. Otherwise, they were sent the main questionnaire. All parents were asked to fill in a demographic questionnaire regardless of whether they wanted to complete the main questionnaire.
RESULTS: The highest response rate was in the Actively Decline mode. The cost-efficiency for this approach was 1.52 compared with Direct Delivery and 1.29 compared with Actively Agree.
CONCLUSION: Researchers can improve the response rate, time consumption, and cost-efficiency and obtain a demographic questionnaire for dropout analysis by using the Actively Decline approach for postal questionnaires.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21524566     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  6 in total

1.  Pre-notification letter type and response rate to a postal survey among women who have recently given birth.

Authors:  Angela L Todd; Maree Porter; Jennifer L Williamson; Jillian A Patterson; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Questionnaire Breakoff and Item Nonresponse in Web-Based Questionnaires: Multilevel Analysis of Person-Level and Item Design Factors in a Birth Cohort.

Authors:  Cauane Blumenberg; Daniela Zugna; Maja Popovic; Costanza Pizzi; Aluisio J D Barros; Lorenzo Richiardi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Effect of stamped reply envelopes and timing of newsletter delivery on response rates of mail survey: a randomised controlled trial in a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chizuko Wakabayashi; Kunihiko Hayashi; Kazue Nagai; Naoko Sakamoto; Yoko Iwasaki
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Prevalence of respiratory symptoms at two time points in a population of children in Manchester--a cohort study.

Authors:  Mary F Linehan; Robert M Niven; David N Baxter; Julie A Morris; Timothy L Frank
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  A UK survey of rehabilitation following critical illness: implementation of NICE Clinical Guidance 83 (CG83) following hospital discharge.

Authors:  Bronwen Connolly; A Douiri; J Steier; J Moxham; L Denehy; N Hart
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Postal recruitment and consent obtainment from index cases of narcolepsy.

Authors:  Gambo Aliyu; Salah M Mahmud
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 2.652

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.