Literature DB >> 21524065

Coupling multi-criteria decision analysis, life-cycle assessment, and risk assessment for emerging threats.

Igor Linkov1, Thomas P Seager.   

Abstract

Emerging environmental threats such as novel chemical compounds, biological agents, and nanomaterials present serious challenges to traditional models of risk analysis and regulatory risk management processes. Even a massive expansion of risk and life-cycle assessment research efforts is unlikely to keep pace with rapid technological change resulting in new and modified materials with changing properties. Therefore, it is essential to have a framework for interpreting available information in the context of high uncertainty and a strategy for prioritizing research efforts to reduce those uncertainties that are most critical. We discuss how integrating the three analytic approaches of risk assessment, life-cycle assessment, and multicriteria decision analysis into a framework permits understanding uncertainty and prioritizes needs for scientific research. Our approach is illustrated with two separate cases: nanomaterials and contaminated sediment remediation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21524065     DOI: 10.1021/es100959q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Integrate life-cycle assessment and risk analysis results, not methods.

Authors:  Igor Linkov; Benjamin D Trump; Ben A Wender; Thomas P Seager; Alan J Kennedy; Jeffrey M Keisler
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 39.213

2.  Evaluating nanotechnology opportunities and risks through integration of life-cycle and risk assessment.

Authors:  Michael P Tsang; Emi Kikuchi-Uehara; Guido W Sonnemann; Cyril Aymonier; Masahiko Hirao
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  Coupled dynamics of energy budget and population growth of tilapia in response to pulsed waterborne copper.

Authors:  Wei-Yu Chen; Chia-Jung Lin; Yun-Ru Ju; Jeng-Wei Tsai; Chung-Min Liao
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Product carbon footprints and their uncertainties in comparative decision contexts.

Authors:  Patrik J G Henriksson; Reinout Heijungs; Hai M Dao; Lam T Phan; Geert R de Snoo; Jeroen B Guinée
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Needs and challenges for assessing the environmental impacts of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs).

Authors:  Michelle Romero-Franco; Hilary A Godwin; Muhammad Bilal; Yoram Cohen
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.649

6.  Comprehensive environmental assessment: a meta-assessment approach.

Authors:  Christina M Powers; Genya Dana; Patricia Gillespie; Maureen R Gwinn; Christine Ogilvie Hendren; Thomas C Long; Amy Wang; J Michael Davis
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 9.028

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.