Literature DB >> 21523528

A broader discussion of authorship.

Dena Plemmons1.   

Abstract

While it may be useful to consider the development of new topics in teaching the responsible conduct of research (RCR), it is perhaps equally important to reconsider the traditionally taught core topic areas in both more nuanced and broader ways. This paper takes the topic of authorship as an example. Through the description of two specific cases from sociocultural anthropology, ideas about credit and responsibility are examined. It is suggested that placing more focus on the array of meanings found in the act of authoring might help students see themselves as part of a wider community both of scientists and beyond science.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21523528     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-011-9271-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  3 in total

1.  Teaching authorship and publication practices in the biomedical and life sciences.

Authors:  Francis L Macrina
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Overview: underserved areas of education in the responsible conduct of research: authorship.

Authors:  Michael W Kalichman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 3.  A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines.

Authors:  Ana Marušić; Lana Bošnjak; Ana Jerončić
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.