M Réblová1, W Gams, K A Seifert. 1. Department of Taxonomy, Institute of Botany of the Academy of Sciences, CZ - 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic.
Abstract
We examined the phylogenetic relationships of two species that mimic Chaetosphaeria in teleomorph and anamorph morphologies, Chaetosphaeriatulasneorum with a Cylindrotrichum anamorph and Australiasca queenslandica with a Dischloridium anamorph. Four data sets were analysed: a) the internal transcribed spacer region including ITS1, 5.8S rDNA and ITS2 (ITS), b) nc28S (ncLSU) rDNA, c) nc18S (ncSSU) rDNA, and d) a combined data set of ncLSU-ncSSU-RPB2 (ribosomal polymerase B2). The traditional placement of Ch. tulasneorum in the Microascales based on ncLSU sequences is unsupported and Australiasca does not belong to the Chaetosphaeriaceae. Both holomorph species are nested within the Glomerellales. A new genus, Reticulascus, is introduced for Ch. tulasneorum with associated Cylindrotrichum anamorph; another species of Reticulascus and its anamorph in Cylindrotrichum are described as new. The taxonomic structure of the Glomerellales is clarified and the name is validly published. As delimited here, it includes three families, the Glomerellaceae and the newly described Australiascaceae and Reticulascaceae. Based on ITS and ncLSU rDNA sequence analyses, we confirm the synonymy of the anamorph genera Dischloridium with Monilochaetes. Consequently Dischloridium laeënse, type species of the genus, and three related species are transferred to the older genus Monilochaetes. The teleomorph of D. laeënse is described in Australiasca as a new species. The Plectosphaerellaceae, to which the anamorph genus Stachylidium is added, is basal to the Glomerellales in the three-gene phylogeny. Stilbella annulata also belongs to this family and is newly combined in Acrostalagmus. Phylogenetic analyses based on ncLSU, ncSSU, and combined ncLSU-ncSSU-RPB2 sequences clarify family relationships within the Microascales. The family Ceratocystidaceae is validated as a strongly supported monophyletic group consisting of Ceratocystis, Cornuvesica, Thielaviopsis, and the type species of Ambrosiella. The new family Gondwanamycetaceae, a strongly supported sister clade to the Ceratocystidaceae, is introduced for the teleomorph genus Gondwanamyces and its Custingophora anamorphs. Four families are accepted in the Microascales, namely the Ceratocystidaceae, Gondwanamycetaceae, Halosphaeriaceae, and Microascaceae. Because of a suggested affinity of a Faurelina indica isolate to the Microascales, the phylogenetic position of the Chadefaudiellaceae is reevaluated. Based on the results from a separate ncLSU analysis of the Dothideomycetes, Faurelina is excluded from the Microascales and placed in the Pleosporales.
We examined the phylogenetic relationships of two species that mimic Chaetosphaeria in teleomorph and anamorph morphologies, Chaetosphaeriatulasneorum with a Cylindrotrichum anamorph and Australiasca queenslandica with a Dischloridium anamorph. Four data sets were analysed: a) the internal transcribed spacer region including ITS1, 5.8S rDNA and ITS2 (ITS), b) nc28S (ncLSU) rDNA, c) nc18S (ncSSU) rDNA, and d) a combined data set of ncLSU-ncSSU-RPB2 (ribosomal polymerase B2). The traditional placement of Ch. tulasneorum in the Microascales based on ncLSU sequences is unsupported and Australiasca does not belong to the Chaetosphaeriaceae. Both holomorph species are nested within the Glomerellales. A new genus, Reticulascus, is introduced for Ch. tulasneorum with associated Cylindrotrichum anamorph; another species of Reticulascus and its anamorph in Cylindrotrichum are described as new. The taxonomic structure of the Glomerellales is clarified and the name is validly published. As delimited here, it includes three families, the Glomerellaceae and the newly described Australiascaceae and Reticulascaceae. Based on ITS and ncLSU rDNA sequence analyses, we confirm the synonymy of the anamorph genera Dischloridium with Monilochaetes. Consequently Dischloridium laeënse, type species of the genus, and three related species are transferred to the older genus Monilochaetes. The teleomorph of D. laeënse is described in Australiasca as a new species. The Plectosphaerellaceae, to which the anamorph genus Stachylidium is added, is basal to the Glomerellales in the three-gene phylogeny. Stilbella annulata also belongs to this family and is newly combined in Acrostalagmus. Phylogenetic analyses based on ncLSU, ncSSU, and combined ncLSU-ncSSU-RPB2 sequences clarify family relationships within the Microascales. The family Ceratocystidaceae is validated as a strongly supported monophyletic group consisting of Ceratocystis, Cornuvesica, Thielaviopsis, and the type species of Ambrosiella. The new family Gondwanamycetaceae, a strongly supported sister clade to the Ceratocystidaceae, is introduced for the teleomorph genus Gondwanamyces and its Custingophora anamorphs. Four families are accepted in the Microascales, namely the Ceratocystidaceae, Gondwanamycetaceae, Halosphaeriaceae, and Microascaceae. Because of a suggested affinity of a Faurelina indica isolate to the Microascales, the phylogenetic position of the Chadefaudiellaceae is reevaluated. Based on the results from a separate ncLSU analysis of the Dothideomycetes, Faurelina is excluded from the Microascales and placed in the Pleosporales.
The genus Chaetosphaeria (Chaetosphaeriaceae,
Chaetosphaeriales) is a cosmopolitan genus of nonstromatic, perithecial
ascomycetes (Réblová
2000, Réblová
& Winka 2000,
Fernández ). It is characterised by dark, opaque, usually subglobose to
conical perithecia. The asci are unitunicate, short-stipitate with a distinct,
inamyloid apical ring. The ascospores are hyaline, rarely bicolorous, 1- to
several-septate, ellipsoidal to fusoid, sometimes cylindrical, and rarely
fragment into part-spores. Periphyses and paraphyses are persistent,
cylindrical, seldom branching, septate, and longer than the asci. The genus
has been linked to 13 anamorph genera of phialidic dematiaceous hyphomycetes
(Réblová 2000,
2004).Several distantly related fungi mimic Chaetosphaeria in the
morphology of perithecia, asci, ascospores, and phialidic, dematiaceous,
hyphomycetous anamorphs. Recognising these species as distinct from
Chaetosphaeria is difficult based purely on morphology. In most
cases, their systematic placement can be ascertained by DNA sequence data,
which suggest that the morphological similarities are a result of convergent
evolution.Chaetosphaeria tulasneorum was experimentally linked to its
anamorph Cylindrotrichum oligospermum by Réblová &
Gams (1999). Based on ncLSU
rDNA sequence data, Ch. tulasneorum was separated from the core
species of Chaetosphaeria in the Chaetosphaeriaceae
(Réblová & Winka
2000) and tentatively placed in the Microascales, along
with Cylindrotrichum hennebertii, a non-setose counterpart of C.
oligospermum. Chaetosphaeria tulasneorum colonises decaying wood and
forms minute, black perithecia containing unitunicate, short-stipitate asci
with an inamyloid apical ring, 2–4-celled ellipsoidal to
ellipsoidal-fusoid ascospores, and branching and anastomosing filiform
paraphyses forming a “network” within the centrum. The reticulate
paraphyses and the 1-septate, cylindrical conidia of the
Cylindrotrichum anamorph are the only deviating morphological
characters between Ch. tulasneorum and other core
Chaetosphaeria species.The phialidic, dematiaceous hyphomycete Dischloridium
laeënse, described originally from dead leaves of Musa
paradisiaca in Papua New Guinea
(Matsushima 1971), is common
on dead palm spathes in Australia. In some respects it is similar to species
of Chloridium, a well-established anamorph genus associated with
Chaetosphaeria, but the microscopic structures are much larger. On
material from Australia and England, perithecia of Australiasca
(Sivanesan & Alcorn 2002)
were associated with fertile conidiophores of D. laeënse. This
teleomorph was first reported from England by Kirk
(1986) on stems of
Dicksonia antarctica, but never described or illustrated. Sivanesan
& Alcorn (2002) erected
the monotypic ascomycete genus Australiasca including the type
species, A. queenslandica, and named its anamorph Dischloridium
camelliae. The fungus was isolated from leaves, stems, and branches of
Camellia sinensis and the connection between the morphs was proven
experimentally in vitro. They distinguished D. camelliae
from D. laeënse by longer conidia and larger conidiophores.
Sivanesan & Alcorn (2002)
compared Australiasca with genera in the morphologically similar
families Chaetosphaeriaceae and Lasiosphaeriaceae. At that
time, no molecular data were available to confirm placement in either
family.The Australiasca teleomorph of D. laeënse is
morphologically similar to species of Chaetosphaeria in perithecial
and anamorph characters. Dischloridium laeënse, the type of its
genus, produces effuse colonies of single to fasciculate, macronematous
conidiophores with a stromatic base. The conidiophores are dark brown but
paler towards the apex. The phialidic conidiogenous cells are terminally
integrated bearing an indistinct collarette producing basipetal, broadly
ellipsoidal, hyaline, nonseptate conidia with a slightly obtuse base produced
in slime. Several of the 15 species described in Dischloridium are
remarkably similar to Monilochaetes
(Halsted 1890), recently
revised and delimited from Exochalara and Dischloridium by
Rong & Gams (2000) based
on detailed morphology and cultivation studies.To assess the higher level phylogenetic relationships of Ch.
tulasneorum and related species of Cylindrotrichum, Australiasca,
Dischloridium, and Monilochaetes, we analysed members from 19
orders or families of perithecial ascomycetes. We used DNA sequence data from
the nuclear large (ncLSU rDNA) and small (ncSSU rDNA) subunits in independent
analyses and combined these with the second largest subunit of RNA polymerase
(RPB2) for a multigene analysis.Based on the phylogenies presented here, several new and strongly supported
families and orders are proposed. The order Glomerellales is
phylogenetically well-defined and validated to include three families, the
Glomerellaceae and the newly described Australiascaceae and
Reticulascaceae. The internal transcribed spacer region (ITS
including ITS1, 5.8S and ITS2) was used to further analyse the phylogenetic
relationships among species of Dischloridium and
Monilochaetes. Within the Microascales, we accept four
families, i.e. Ceratocystidaceae, which is validated here, and the
newly described Gondwanamycetaceae, Halosphaeriaceae, and
Microascaceae. We discuss the family and order affinities of
Faurelina attributed to the Chadefaudiellaceae of the
Microascales by von Arx
(1978) and by Tang et
al. (2007). We examined
authentic material, specifically the in vitro ex-type and another
strain of F. indica, and analysed ITS and ncLSU sequence data. Based
on results from a ncLSU analysis of the Dothideomycetes, Faurelina
(Chadefaudiellaceae) is excluded from the Microascales and
placed in the Pleosporales (Dothideomycetes).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Morphological observations
All herbarium specimens examined and cultures studied are listed under each
treated species. Dried specimens were rehydrated in water; material was
examined with an Olympus SZX12 dissecting microscope and centrum material
including asci, ascospores, and paraphyses was mounted in Melzer's reagent or
90 % lactic acid. Hand sections of the perithecial wall were studied. When
present, conidiophores, conidiogenous cells, and conidia were examined in
water, Melzer's reagent, or 90 % lactic acid. All measurements were made in
Melzer's reagent. Means ± standard errors (s.e.) based on 25
measurements are given for ascospore, ascal, and conidial dimensions. Images
were captured using differential interference (DIC) or phase contrast (PC)
microscopy using an Olympus DP70 Camera operated by Imaging Software Cell* on
an Olympus BX51 compound microscope or an Evolution MP digital camera operated
by ImagePro v. 6.0 on an Olympus BX50 compound microscope. Conidia and
conidiogenous cells of Australiasca queenslandica were photographed
in the living state using an FEI Quanta 200 Environmental Scanning Electron
Microscope (ESEM). A ca. 2 × 2 mm cube of agar with mycelium
was observed at 20kV after the sample chamber achieved local thermodynamic
equilibrium: chamber pressure 200 Pa, sample temperature from -15 °C to
-16 °C. A Gaseous Secondary Electron Detector (GSED) was used for signal
detection. Cooling of the specimen in the chamber was achieved using a
PC-controlled Peltier cooling stage with external water chiller (JT
Manufacturing, Hudson, NH, USA). Images were processed with Adobe Photoshop
CS4 Extended or Adobe Photoshop CS2.Single-ascospore isolates were obtained from fresh material with the aid of
a single-spore isolator (Meopta, Prague, Czech Republic). Isolates were grown
on potatocarrotagar (PCA), oatmeal agar (OA), and 2 % malt extract agar
(MEA) (Gams ). Colonies were examined after 7, 21, and 30 d at 25 °C
in the dark and under near-UV light source (12 h light: 12 h dark). Two
strains of Faurelina indica were grown on Blakeslee's malt extract
agar (Gams ) and OA and incubated under ambient room conditions for two
mo to induce the arthroconidial anamorph. Cultures are maintained at BRIP
(Plant Pathology Herbarium, Queensland, Australia), CBS (CBS Fungal
Biodiversity Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands), DAOM (Canadian Collection of
Fungal Cultures, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Canada), and the
Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing
DNA was isolated with an UltraClean Microbial DNA Kit (MoBio Laboratories,
Inc., Canada) using mycelium removed from PCA or MEA cultures following the
manufacturer's protocol for filamentous fungi. All PCR experiments were
carried out using a PTC-200 thermal cycler (MJ Research Inc., Watertown, MA,
USA). PCR reactions containing 2–4 mM MgSO4 were performed
using Platinum Taq DNA polymerase High Fidelity (Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA, USA) in 25 mL volume reactions. PCR conditions were as follows:
for ncSSU 2 min at 94 °C; 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 55
°C and 150–300 s at 68 °C; for ITS and ncLSU 2 min at 94 °C;
35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 55–60 °C, and 165–270
s at 68 °C; and for RPB2 2 min at 94 °C; 35 cycles of 30 s at 94
°C, 30 s at 55–61 °C, and 90–180 s at 68 °C; all
amplifications were concluded by incubation for 10 min at 68 °C. Amplicons
were purified using the UltraClean PCR Clean-up Kit (MoBio Laboratories, Inc.,
Canada) following the manufacturer's directions. All nucleotide sequences were
obtained by the dideoxy chain-terminating method using automated DNA
sequencers ABI PRISM 3100 or ABI PRISM 3130xl (Applied Biosystems, Foster
City, CA, USA). For PCR reactions, the following primers were used: ncSSU,
NSSU131-NS24 (Kauff & Lutzoni
2002, White ); ncLSU, ITS5/NS5/LR0R-LR8
(White ,
Vilgalys unpublished:
www.botany.duke.edu/fungi/mycolab);
ITS NS5/ITS5-ITS4 (White ); RPB2 fRPB2-5F-fRPB2-7cR
(Liu ).
For sequencing reactions, the following primers were used: ncSSU, NSSU131,
SR11R, SR7, SR7R, NSSU897R, NSSU1088, NSSU1088R, NS6, NS24
(White ,
Gargas & Taylor 1992,
Spatafora , Kauff & Lutzoni
2002, Vilgalys unpublished:
www.botany.duke.edu/fungi/mycolab);
ncLSU LR0R, LR3R, LR6, LR7, LR16, LR5
(Vilgalys & Hester 1990,
Rehner & Samuels 1994,
Vilgalys & Sun 1994), JS7
and JS8 (Landvik 1996); ITS,
ITS5 and ITS4 (White ); and RPB2 fRPB2-5F, fRPB2-7cR, RPB2-980R and RPB2-1014F
(Reeb ).
Sequences were edited using Sequencher v. 4.9 software (Gene Codes Corp., Ann
Arbor, MI, USA).
Phylogenetic analyses
Accession numbers and isolate information for new ITS, ncLSU, ncSSU rDNA
and RPB2 sequences are listed in Table
1. The new sequences were aligned with data retrieved from
GenBank, mostly from studies published by Wingfield et al.
(1999), Réblová
& Winka (2000), Spatafora
et al. (2006), and
Zhang et al.
(2006).
Table 1.
Sources and accession numbers of isolates numbers of isolates analysed in
this study. GU1806XX–GU1806YY are sequences newly generated in this
study.
Teleomorph
Anamorph
M
Source*
Substrate and Locality
GenBank accession
numbers**
ITS
LSU
SSU
RPB2
Australiasca laeënsis
Monilochaetes laeënsis
•
DAOM 226788
Australia, dead fronds of a tree fern
GU180623
GU180641
GU180610
–
Monilochaetes laeënsis
•
PRM 915720
UK, stem of Dicksonia antarctica
GU180624
GU180642
–
–
Australiasca queenslandica
Monilochaetes camelliae
•
BRIP 24607a
Australia, branch of Camellia sinensis
HM237327
HM237324
–
–
Monilochaetes camelliae
○
BRIP 24334c
Australia, branch of Camellia sinensis
HM237326
HM237323
–
–
Calosphaeria pulchella
Calosphaeriophora pulchella
•
CBS 115999
France, wood and bark of Prunus avium
–
AY761075**
AY761071**
GU180661
Ceratosphaeria lampadophora
Harpophora-like
•
CBS 117555
France, decayed wood
–
–
GU180618
–
Chaetosphaeria ciliata
Menispora ciliata
•
ICMP 18253
New Zealand, decayed wood
–
GU180637
GU180614
GU180659
Chaetosphaeria curvispora
Chloridium-like
•
ICMP 18255
New Zealand, decayed wood
–
GU180636
AY502933**
GU180655
Faurelina indica
Arthrographis sp.
•
CBS 126.78
India, dung of goat
GU291802
GU180653
–
–
Arthrographis sp.
•
CBS 301.78
India, dung of cow
–
GU180654
–
–
Reticulascus clavatus
Cylindrotrichum clavatum
•
CBS 125296
France, submerged wood of Alnus glutinosa
GU180627
GU180643
GU180622
–
Cylindrotrichum clavatum
○
CBS 125239
France, submerged wood of Platanus sp.
GU180633
GU180649
GU180615
–
Cylindrotrichum clavatum
○
CBS 125297
France, submerged wood of Fraxinus sp.
GU180634
GU180650
–
–
Cylindrotrichum clavatum
○
CBS 428.76
Sweden, decayed wood of Ulmus scabra
GU291799
–
–
–
Reticulascus tulasneorum
Cylindrotrichum oligospermum
○
CBS 561.77
Netherlands, twig of Fraxinus excelsior
GU291801
–
–
–
Reticulascus tulasneorum
Cylindrotrichum oligospermum (as hennebertii)
○
CBS 570.76
Germany, dead twig of Symphoricarpos albus
AF178560**
AF178560**
–
–
Reticulascus tulasneorum
Cylindrotrichum oligospermum
○
CBS 557.74
Czech Republic, wood of Salix purpurea
GU291798
–
–
–
Cylindrotrichum oligospermum
•
CBS 101319
Czech Republic, wood of Sambucus nigra
AF178547**
AF178547**
–
–
Togniniella acerosa
Phaeocrella acerosa
•
ICMP 18256
New Zealand, decayed wood of Nothofagus sp.
–
AY761076**
AY761073**
GU180660
CBS 125298
tu
Acrostalagmus annulatus
○
DAOM 212126
Germany, soil and roots
GU180632
GU180646
GU180611
GU180662
tu
Cylindrotrichum gorii
○
CBS 879.85
Sweden, dead stem of Urtica dioica
HM237328
HM237322
–
–
tu
Cylindrotrichum setosum
○
DAOM 229246
Australia, wood and bark mulch on the ground
GU180635
GU180652
GU180617
–
tu
Custingophora olivacea
○
CBS 335.68
Germany, compost
–
–
–
GU180665
tu
Kylindria peruamazonensis
○
CBS 838.91
Cuba, leaf litter of Bucida palustris
GU180628
GU180638
GU180609
GU180656
tu
Kylindria peruamazonensis
○
CBS 421.95
Cuba, leaf of Bucida palustris
GU291800
HM237325
–
–
tu
Gibellulopsis nigrescens
○
DAOM 226890
Canada, Ontario, soil
GU180631
GU180648
GU180613
GU180664
tu
Monilochaetes guadalcanalensis
○
CBS 346.76
Solomon Islands, leaf of Musa
GU180625
GU180640
–
–
tu
Monilochaetes infuscans
○
CBS 379.77
New Zealand, Ipomoea batatas
–
GU180645
GU180619
GU180658
tu
Monilochaetes infuscans
○
CBS 869.96
South Africa, Ipomoea batatas
GU180626
GU180639
GU180620
GU180657
tu
Monilochaetes infuscans
○
CBS 870.96
South Africa, Ipomoea batatas
–
GU180644
GU180621
–
tu
Plectosporium tabacinum
○
DAOM 229828
Canada, Ontario, soil
GU180630
GU180647
GU180612
GU180663
tu
Stachylidium bicolor
○
DAOM 226658
straw of Oryza sativa imported from India into Canada
–
GU180651
GU180616
–
M: morph of material available: • = teleomorph, ○ = anamorph.
tu = teleomorph unknown
BRIP = Plant Pathology Herbarium, Queensland, Australia; CBS =
Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, the Netherlands; DAOM =
Canadian Collection of Fungal Cultures, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada,
Ottawa.
These sequences were published elsewhere (Réblová & Winka
1999, Réblová & Seifert 2004, Réblová et
al. 2004).
Sources and accession numbers of isolates numbers of isolates analysed in
this study. GU1806XX–GU1806YY are sequences newly generated in this
study.M: morph of material available: • = teleomorph, ○ = anamorph.tu = teleomorph unknownBRIP = Plant Pathology Herbarium, Queensland, Australia; CBS =
Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, the Netherlands; DAOM =
Canadian Collection of Fungal Cultures, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada,
Ottawa.These sequences were published elsewhere (Réblová & Winka
1999, Réblová & Seifert 2004, Réblová et
al. 2004).All sequences were manually aligned in BioEdit v. 7.0.9.0
(Hall 1999). Predicted models
of the secondary structure of the ncLSU and ncSSU molecules of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Gutell
1993, Gutell ) were used to improve decisions on homologous characters. To
assist with decisions on homologous characters in the ITS alignment, we used
the predicted models of the secondary structure designed for species of
Chaetosphaeria
(Réblová & Winka
2000). They included a model for the whole ITS2 region and a model
for long duplex structures located in the middle of the ITS1 region. The long
duplex represents the most variable part of the ITS1 alignment because of its
variable lengths and irregular occurrence of internal asymmetrical loops.Phylogenetic relationships were examined using ncLSU, ncSSU, ITS rDNA, and
RPB2 sequences of species from 19 orders or families of the
Sordariomycetes. For all analyses rooting was accomplished by the
outgroup method (Nixon & Carpenter
1993). Two outgroup taxa, Leotia lubrica and
Microglossum rufum (Leotiaceae, Helotiales, Leotiomycetes),
were used in the ncLSU, ncSSU, and the three-gene (ncLSU-ncSSU-RPB2) analyses
of the Sordariomycetes; two outgroup taxa, Vanderwaltozyma
polyspora and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Saccharomycetaceae,
Saccharomycetales, Saccharomycetes), were used for the ncLSU phylogeny of
Faurelina in the Dothideomycetes; two
Chaetosphaeria species (Chaetosphaeriaceae, Chaetosphaeriales,
Sordariomycetes) were used as outgroups for the ITS phylogeny.Maximum parsimony and Bayesian analyses were used to estimate phylogenetic
relationships. Four alignments for ITS, ncLSU, ncSSU, and the combined set
were constructed. The lengths of the alignments were determined after
introduction of gaps. All characters in the ITS alignment were included. Bases
1–75 were excluded from analyses of the ncLSU and ncSSU alignments and
bases 1–59 were excluded from the analysis of the RPB2 alignment,
because of the incompleteness of the 5′-end of the majority of the
available sequences. An additional 69 bases in the RPB2 part of the alignment,
which were difficult to identify as homologous, were also excluded. All
alignments are deposited in TreeBase (10538).The three genes for the combined analysis (ncLSU-ncSSU-RPB2) were tested
for heterogeneity among data partitions before combining them for the total
evidence analysis. We used the partition homogeneity/incongruence-length
difference test implemented in PAUP
(Swofford 2002) to determine
if different partitions of the data gave significantly different signals.
Because combining data with value P > 0.01 generally improves phylogenetic
accuracy (Cunningham 1997) and
our data did not show significant heterogeneity (P = 0.01), the sequences were
combined for further analysis.Maximum parsimony analyses were conducted with PAUP v. 4.0b10
(Swofford 2002). A heuristic
search was performed with the stepwise-addition option with 1 000 random taxon
addition replicates and TBR branch swapping. All characters were unordered and
given equal weight. Gaps were treated as missing data. Branch support was
estimated on the recovered topologies by performing a heuristic search of 1
000 bootstrap replicates consisting of ten random-addition replicates for each
bootstrap replicate.Bayesian analysis was performed in a likelihood framework, as implemented
by the MrBayes v. 3.0b4 software package, to reconstruct phylogenetic trees
(Huelsenbeck & Ronquist
2001). The program MrModeltest2 v. 2.3.
(Nylander 2008) was used to
infer the appropriate substitution model that would best fit the model of DNA
evolution for our sequence data sets. Bayesian searches using
Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling were conducted. One cold
and three heated Markov chains were used in the analysis. Bayesian analyses
were run for 5 M generations with trees sampled every 1 000 generations. The
first 20 000 trees representing the “burn-in” phase were
discarded. To estimate posterior probabilities (PP) of recovered branches
(Larget & Simon 1999), 50
% majority rule consensus trees were produced from the remaining trees using
PAUP.
PHYLOGENETIC RESULTS
The first analysis was restricted to the ncLSU. The alignment consisted of
the two first thirds of the ncLSU region for 99 sequences representing 91
species in 19 ascomycetous families and orders and 1 283 total characters: 615
constant, 140 not parsimony-informative, and 453 parsimony-informative. A
maximum parsimony (MP) heuristic search produced 16 most parsimonious trees
(MPTs) with a length of 3 303 steps (CI = 0.303, RI = 0.665, HI = 0.696). One
of these trees is shown in Fig.
1. The GTR+I+G substitution model was selected for the Bayesian
analysis. The order Glomerellales forms a monophyletic clade (82 %
bootstrap support /0.7 posterior probability) with three families recognised,
the Australiascaceae (90/1.0), Glomerellaceae (85/0.83), and
Reticulascaceae (97/1.0). Within the Reticulascaceae,
Cylindrotrichum setosum is sister to the Reticulascus clavatus
clade (95/1.0), R. tulasneorum forms a well-supported clade (75/1.0),
and Kylindria peruamazonensis and Porosphaerellopsis are
nested at the base of the Reticulascaceae (97/1.0). The order
Microascales as presently conceived appears to be polyphyletic. The
monophyletic Ceratocystidaceae (100/1.0) and
Gondwanamycetaceae (100/1.0) form a clade (92/1.0) as a sister to the
Plectosphaerellaceae (100/1.0). The other two families of the
Microascales form a separate clade (82/1.0) containing the
Microascaceae (97/1.0) and the Halosphaeriaceae (88/1.0).
The second analysis was restricted to the ncSSU. The alignment consisted of
the whole gene for ncSSU for 71 sequences representing 67 species in 19
ascomycetous orders and families and 1 777 total characters: 1 102 constant,
195 not parsimony-informative, and 405 parsimony-informative. A maximum
parsimony heuristic search produced 14 MPTs with a length of 2 267 steps (CI =
0.390, RI = 0.697, HI = 0.609), one of which is shown in
Fig. 2. For the Bayesian
analysis, the GTR+I+G substitution model was inferred. The
Glomerellales form a monophyletic, strongly supported clade (81/0.98)
containing representatives of three families, the Australiascaceae
(78/1.0), Glomerellaceae (100/1.0), and Reticulascaceae
(94/1.0). The Plectosphaerellaceae form a separate, strongly
supported clade (100/1.0) basal to the Microascales. The
Microascales appear as a monophyletic clade (100/1.0) including two
strongly supported subclades. The first subclade (78/1.0) contains the
Halosphaeriaceae (65/-) and Microascaceae (81/1.0) and the
second subclade (83/1.0) contains the Ceratocystidaceae (80/1.0) and
Gondwanamycetaceae (100/1.0).
Fig. 1.
One of 16 most parsimonious trees from a heuristic analysis of ncLSU rDNA
sequences. Thickened branches indicate posterior probability values = 1.0 PP
and 100 % bootstrap support. Bootstrap support values ≥ 50 % and Posterior
probability values ≥ 0.5 are included at the nodes. Branch lengths are
drawn to scale. An asterisk above or below a branch marks branches that
collapse in the strict consensus tree.
Fig. 2.
One of the 14 most parsimonious trees from a heuristic analysis of ncSSU
rDNA sequences. Details as in Fig.
1.
One of 16 most parsimonious trees from a heuristic analysis of ncLSU rDNA
sequences. Thickened branches indicate posterior probability values = 1.0 PP
and 100 % bootstrap support. Bootstrap support values ≥ 50 % and Posterior
probability values ≥ 0.5 are included at the nodes. Branch lengths are
drawn to scale. An asterisk above or below a branch marks branches that
collapse in the strict consensus tree.One of the 14 most parsimonious trees from a heuristic analysis of ncSSU
rDNA sequences. Details as in Fig.
1.In the third analysis, a combination of the ncLSU and ncSSU data sets plus
RPB2 sequences was assessed for 54 taxa representing 52 species in 18
ascomycetous orders and families. The alignment of the combined set of
ncLSU-ncSSU-RPB2 DNA sequences consisted of 4 224 total characters: 2 148
constant, 314 not parsimony-informative, and 1 484 parsimony-informative. A
maximum parsimony heuristic search produced two MPTs with a length of 11 688
steps (CI = 0.278, RI = 0.476, HI = 0.722); one is shown in
Fig. 3. For the Bayesian
analysis the GTR+I+G substitution model was selected. The
Glomerellales are a monophyletic, well-supported clade (100/0.81)
with the Plectosphaerellaceae as a sister group (100/1.0). The
Microascales appear as a monophyletic, strongly supported clade
(88/1.0), again with two subclades; the first (87/1.0) contains the
Halosphaeriaceae (94/1.0) and Microascaceae (88/1.0) while
the other (100/1.0) comprises the Ceratocystidaceae (100/1.0) and
Gondwanamycetaceae (99/1.0).
Fig. 3.
One of the two most parsimonious trees from a heuristic analysis of the
three-gene combined data set (ncLSU-ncSSU-RPB2). Details as in
Fig. 1. The GenBank accession
numbers given after the names are those of ncLSU/ncSSU/RPB2 genes. Missing
sequences are indicated by “–“.
The fourth analysis included ITS1, 5.8S, and ITS2 regions of species of the
Glomerellales and Plectosphaerellaceae. The alignment
consisted of 38 sequences representing 29 species in five families and 574
total characters: 277 constant, 75 not parsimony-informative, and 222
parsimony-informative. A maximum parsimony heuristic search produced nine MPTs
with a length of 786 steps (CI = 0.592, RI = 0.821, HI = 0.407). One is shown
in Fig. 4. The GTR+G
substitution model was inferred for the Bayesian analysis. Following the
results of our other analyses, two Chaetosphaeria species
(Chaetosphaeriales) were used as outgroups. The order
Glomerellales is a strongly supported monophylum (95/0.99) containing
three strongly supported families, the Australiascaceae (99/1.0),
Glomerellaceae (99/0.97), and Reticulascaceae (96/1.0). The
Plectosphaerellaceae (100/1.0) appears as a strongly supported sister
clade to the Glomerellales. Six strains represent the
Australiascaceae in the analysis: two strains of Australiasca
queenslandica, two strains of A. laeënsis, and one strain
each of Monilochaetes infuscans and M. guadalcanalensis. The
Reticulascaceae are represented by four strains of Reticulascus
clavatus (anamorph C. clavatum), four strains of R.
tulasneorum (anamorph Cylindrotrichum oligospermum), C.
setosum, C. gorii, and two strains of Kylindria peruamazonensis.
The two conidial (CBS
125239, CBS
125297) and single ascospore (ex-type strain
CBS 125296)
isolates of freshwaterR. clavatus plus one terrestrial isolate
(CBS 428.76) formed
a strongly supported monophylum (100/1.0). Another strongly supported
monophyletic clade (97/1.0) included one ascospore-(ex-type strain
CBS 101319) and
three conidial isolates of R. tulasneorum
(CBS 557.74,
CBS 561.77, ex-type
strain of C. hennebertiiCBS 570.76). The
anamorphic C. setosum (ex-type strain DAOM 229246), C. gorii
(CBS 879.85), and
K. peruamazonensis
(CBS 421.95,
CBS 838.91) were
basal to the rest of the clade on separate branches.
Fig. 4.
One of the nine most parsimonious trees from a heuristic analysis of ITS
rDNA operon of the Glomerellales and the
Plectosphaerellaceae. The accession numbers of strains of the newly
described Australiascaceae and Reticulascaceae are
indicated. Details as in Fig.
1.
A fifth analysis of the ncLSU rDNA sequences was run to determine the
relationship of two strains of Faurelina indica with members of the
Dothideomycetes and Eurotiomycetes. The alignment consisted
of the first two thirds of the ncLSU for 68 sequences representing 66 species
in 11 orders and families and 1 229 total characters: 716 constant, 76 not
parsimony-informative, and 362 parsimony-informative. A maximum parsimony
heuristic search produced 66 MPTs with a length of 1 593 steps (CI = 0.433, RI
= 0.760, HI = 0.567). One is shown in Fig.
5. The GTR+I+G substitution model was selected for the Bayesian
analysis. The two strains of Faurelina form a monophyletic clade
(88/0.9), which is a sister to the Didymellaceae (96/1.0). The
suggested relationship of Faurelina with the Eremomycetaceae
and Testudinaceae could not be confirmed; the families grouped on
separate branches with no close relationship to each other. Faurelina
appears to be a member of the Pleosporales within the
Dothideomycetes unrelated to the Microascales.
Fig. 5.
One of 66 most parsimonious trees from a heuristic analysis of ncLSU rDNA
of Faurelina indica and Dothideomycetes. Details as in
Fig. 1.
TAXONOMY
Glomerellales
Chadefaud (1960) proposed
the order “Glomérellales” for a group of endophytic fungi
and parasites of living plants with ascomata varying from endostromatal to
apostromatal and ascospores that are often unicellular and hyaline. No Latin
diagnosis was provided for the order. Within the order he suggested an
evolution of the apical apparatus from an initial condition of the periocular
thickening of the apical dome lacking a pronounced chitinoid or amyloid ring
to derived conditions of either the apical thickening converted into an apical
cushion reduced to a simple lens-shaped disc or with the initial of a
chitinoid ring developing in the periocular thickening. According to the
texture and pigmentation of the ascomata, he further divided the order into
two groups: a) “Eu-Glomérellales”, which included
genera with a non-fleshy black stroma i.e. Gibellina, Glomerella,
Phyllachora, and Physalospora; and b)
“Polystigmatales” as “Glomérellales
nectrioïdes”, which comprised one genus, Polystigma, with
a orange to red, fleshy stroma. After this invalid introduction of the name
Glomerellales, the order was also cited by Lanier et al.
(1978) and later by Locquin
(1984), when he listed the
Glomerellales and Polystigmatales as separate orders, again
without a Latin diagnosis. After the validation of the Glomerellaceae
in Zhang et al.
(2006), we validate here the
phylogenetically delimited order Glomerellales, excluding the earlier
validated but unrelated Phyllachorales.Three families are accepted in the Glomerellales, namely the
Glomerellaceae, Australiascaceae, and Reticulascaceae. The
latter two families are newly described below based on cultural studies,
detailed morphological comparisons of the holomorphs, and newly generated ITS,
ncLSU, ncSSU, and RPB2 sequences.One of the two most parsimonious trees from a heuristic analysis of the
three-gene combined data set (ncLSU-ncSSU-RPB2). Details as in
Fig. 1. The GenBank accession
numbers given after the names are those of ncLSU/ncSSU/RPB2 genes. Missing
sequences are indicated by “–“.Chadef. ex Réblová, W. Gams
& Seifert, ord. nov. MycoBank
MB515429.Glomerellales Chadef., Traité de botanique
systématique. Tome I, p. 613. 1960 (also in Lanier et al.,
Mycol. Pathol. Forest. I: 292.
1978; Locquin, Mycol.
Gén. Struct., p. 170.
1984) nom. inval., Art.
36.Ascomata perithecia, brunnea usque nigra, nonnumquam sclerotioidea,
ostiolum periphysatum. Pariete ascomatum 2-3-stratoso. Hamathecium paraphyses
verae. Asci unitunicati, brevi-stipitati, parte apicali iodo non reagente.
Ascosporae hyalinae vel pallide pigmentatae, 0-pluri-cellulares. Anamorphe:
conidia modo phialidico orientia.Typus: Glomerellaceae Locq. ex Seifert & W. Gams,
Mycologia 98: 1083. 2007 [2006].Perithecia darkly pigmented, sometimes becoming ±
sclerotial. Perithecial wall 2–3-layered, ostiolum periphysate.
Interascal tissue of thin-walled, tapering paraphyses. Asci
unitunicate, thin-walled, ascal apex thickened without visible discharge
mechanism or thin-walled with a distinct apical annulus, inamyloid, 8-spored.
Ascospores hyaline or pigmented, 0–several-septate. Anamorphs
with phialidic conidiogenesis.One of the nine most parsimonious trees from a heuristic analysis of ITS
rDNA operon of the Glomerellales and the
Plectosphaerellaceae. The accession numbers of strains of the newly
described Australiascaceae and Reticulascaceae are
indicated. Details as in Fig.
1.Families: Australiascaceae Réblová & W.
Gams, Glomerellaceae Locq. ex Seifert & W. Gams, and
Reticulascaceae Réblová & W. Gams.This order is phylogenetically distinct from the Phyllachorales,
in which its members were formerly classified. The original classification
proposed by Chadefaud (1960),
who included Phyllachora in this order, is untenable based on our
molecular data (Fig. 2). In the
ncSSU phylogeny, the Phyllachorales represented by Phyllachora
graminis (ncSSU rDNA sequence: AF064051,
Winka & Eriksson 2000) are
clearly separated from the Glomerellales; the former is nested within
a clade (91/1.0) sister to the Chaetosphaeriales (100/1.0).
Glomerellaceae
This family accommodates the teleomorph genus Glomerella and its
Colletotrichum anamorphs. For discussion and description refer to
Zhang et al.
(2006).Glomerellaceae Locq. ex Seifert & W. Gams in Zhang et
al., Mycologia 98: 1083. 2007. [2006].Réblová & W. Gams,
fam. nov. MycoBank
MB515430.Stromata absentia. Ascomata perithecia, brunnea usque nigra, ostiolum
periphysatum. Pariete ascomatum fragili, 2-stratoso. Hamathecium paraphyses
verae. Asci unitunicati, 8-spori, cylindraceo-clavati, annulo apicali iodo non
reagente. Ascosporae hyalinae, septatae. Anamorphe Monilochaetes;
conidiis 0(–3)-septatis, hyalinis modo phialidico orientibus.Typus: Australiasca Sivan. & Alcorn, Aust. Syst. Bot.
15: 742. 2002.Stroma absent. Perithecia brown to black, ostiolum
periphysate. Perithecial wall 2-layered, fragile. Interascal
tissue of thin-walled, tapering paraphyses. Asci unitunicate,
8-spored, cylindrical-clavate, apical ring distinct, inamyloid.
Ascospores hyaline, septate. Anamorph: Monilochaetes;
conidiogenesis phialidic, with hyaline 0(–3)-septate conidia, aggregated
in slime or in chains.The Australiascaceae accommodates the holomorphic genus
Australiasca and anamorphic Monilochaetes. The molecular
data for Australiasca (Figs
1,
2,
3) confirm that the genus is
unrelated to the Chaetosphaeriaceae or Lasiosphaeriaceae as
suggested by Sivanesan & Alcorn
(2002). However, the
Australiascaceae, like the Reticulascaceae, accommodates
teleomorphs that mimic Chaetosphaeria and which are almost
indistinguishable from its perithecia on morphological grounds. The anamorphs
are phialidic, dematiaceous hyphomycetes with hyaline, slimy conidia, which
are also similar to anamorphs of Chaetosphaeria.One of 66 most parsimonious trees from a heuristic analysis of ncLSU rDNA
of Faurelina indica and Dothideomycetes. Details as in
Fig. 1.The dematiaceous hyphomycete genus Monilochaetes was described and
illustrated for a single species, M. infuscans
(Halsted 1890,
Harter 1916), which causes
scurf disease or soil stain of Ipomoea batatas (sweet-potato).
Another saprobic species, M. guadalcanalensis, collected on leaves of
Musa sp., originally described in Catenularia, was recently
added (Rong & Gams 2000)
and this classification is confirmed here by molecular data.
Monilochaetes includes species with solitary, erect, sometimes curved
or geniculate, macronematous conidiophores, darker near the base, becoming
paler towards the apex, with prominently darkened septa, terminal, wide
monophialides with a shallow collarette, and aseptate, rarely septate, hyaline
conidia adhering in basipetal chains or heads. Rong & Gams
(2000) distinguished
Monilochaetes from the other two similar dematiaceous hyphomycete
genera Dischloridium (Sutton
1976) and Exochalara
(Gams & Holubová-Jechová
1976) by aspects of conidiophore branching and fasciculation and
conidial shapes and dimensions. The present ITS and ncLSU phylogenies confirm
that Dischloridium and the morphologically similar older genus
Monilochaetes, which up to now was only known as asexual, are
congeneric. Therefore, Dischloridium laeënse, type of the genus,
is transferred to Monilochaetes and Dischloridium becomes a
generic synonym of Monilochaetes.The teleomorph-anamorph connections of Australiasca queenslandica,
type species of the genus, with M. camelliae and of the newly
described A. laeënsis with M. laeënsis were
experimentally established (Sivanesan
& Alcorn 2002, this study). The other four species accepted in
Monilochaetes are presently only known to be anamorphic. A further
species of Monilochaetes is described by Réblová et
al. (2011)
KEY TO THE SPECIES OF AUSTRALIASCA AND
MONILOCHAETES IN THE AUSTRALIASCACEAE
1. Conidia hyaline, ellipsoidal, aseptate, rarely 1–3-septate, longer
than 26
μm..........................................................................................
2
1. Conidia hyaline, ellipsoidal, aseptate, rarely 1-septate, shorter than
26
μm.............................................................................................
32. Conidia ellipsoidal with an obtuse base, sometimes with laterally
displaced hilum, aseptate, rarely 1–3-septate at maturity, 18–35
× 8–13 μm in vitro; 20.5–24(–26.5) ×
(10–)11–12(–13) μm on PCA; asci 65–140 ×
12.5–17.5 μm; ascospores 18–31 × 7.5–10.5
μm..................................................................................................
A. camelliae (anamorph M. camelliae)
2. Conidia
cylindrical to ellipsoidal with an obtuse base, 25–38 ×
12–16 μm in vivo; teleomorph unknown
............................ M. regenerans3. Conidia aseptate, ellipsoidal to oblong, usually in small clusters,
aggregated in slimy
droplets...............................................................
4
3. Conidia 0–1-septate, rhomboid–ellipsoidal to obovoidal,
usually forming
chains.....................................................................................
54. Conidia oblong, apically rounded, with an obtuse base, 9–25
× 3.5–6(–7) μm; teleomorph
unknown............................... M. basicurvata
4. Conidia
ellipsoidal to oblong with an obtuse base, 22–26 × 10–12
μm in vivo, (15.5–)18–22.5(–23.5) ×
7.5–9(–10) μm in vitro (PCA); asci 130–148
× 12.5–17.5 μm; ascospores
(20–)24.5–31.5(–33) × (7.5–)9–9.5
μm......................... A. laeënsis (anamorph M.
laeënsis)5. Conidia rhomboid–ellipsoidal to obovoidal on host, rarely
1-septate, ellipsoidal with an obtuse base in culture, 15–20 ×
4–6
μm......................................................................................................................................................................
M. infuscans
5. Conidia ellipsoidal with an obtuse base in
culture, 18–21 × 6–9
μm..........................................................................
M. guadalcanalensisRéblová & W.
Gams, sp. nov. MycoBank
MB518384,
Fig. 6A–K.
Fig. 6.
A–K. Australiasca laeënsis. A. Perithecium. B.
Ascospores. C. Asci with ascospores, some ascospores with a developed median
septum. D, E. Conidia and F–K. Conidiophores of the Monilochaetes
laeënsis anamorph, in culture. A–C from PRM 915720; D–K
DAOM 226788 (PCA, 14 d old). Scale bars: A = 100 μm; B, D–K = 10
μm; C = 50 μm. DIC: A, D, G–K; PC: B, C, E, F.
Anamorph: (Matsush.)
Réblová, W. Gams & Seifert, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515431.
Basionym:
Chloridium laeënse Matsush., Bull. Natl. Sci. Mus. Tokyo 14:
462. 1971.≡ Dischloridium laeënse (Matsush) B. Sutton, Kavaka 4:
47. 1976.Etymology: Epithet from the anamorph species, originally derived
from the type locality, Lae in Papua-New Guinea
(Matsushima 1971).Stromata absentia. Perithecia superficialia, gregaria vel solitaria, atra,
conica usque obpyriformia, 200–320 μm diam, 340–450 μm alta,
ostiolum periphysatum. Paries ascomatum fragilis, 2-stratosus. Paraphyses
septatae, hyalinae, sursum angustatae, ascos superantes. Asci unitunicati,
cylindraceo-clavati, 130–148 × 18–20 μm (in medio
± s.e. = 137.6 ± 5.3 × 19.3 ± 0.6
μm), 8-spori, brevi-stipitati, apice truncato. Ascosporae ellipsoideae
usque ovoideae, 24.5–31.5(–33) × (8–)9–9.5 μm
(in medio ± s.e. = 15.7 ± 0.2 × 4.4 ±
0.04 μm), hyalinae, 0–1-septatae. Anamorphe Monilochaetes
laeënsis.Perithecia 200–320 μm diam, 340–450 μm high,
gregarious to solitary among conidiophores, superficial, base slightly
immersed, conical to obpyriform, with a short beak, black, glabrous or with
setae. Setae scanty, acute, thick-walled, septate, dark brown, paler to
subhyaline towards apex, sometimes on upper half of perithecium, 90–155
× 5–7 μm; longer, thicker-walled setae, arising from base of
perithecium, 300–420 × 10–11 μm. Perithecial
wall 18–22 μm thick, becoming 45–54 μm thick towards
base, fragile, 2-layered: outer layer of textura prismatica
consisting of thick-walled, brick-like cells, cells becoming polyhedral
towards base; inner layer of hyaline, compressed cells. Paraphyses
ca. 2.5–3 μm wide, persistent, hyaline, septate, branching,
longer than asci. Asci 130–148 × 18–20 μm (mean
± s.e. = 137.6 ± 5.3 × 19.3 ± 0.6
μm), unitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, short-stipitate, apex truncate, with
a distinct, shallow annulus, ca. 6 μm wide, 1–1.5 μm
high, 8-spored. Ascospores 24.5–31.5(–33) ×
(8–)9–9.5 μm (mean ± s.e. = 28.4 ± 0.6
× 8.9 ± 0.1 μm), ellipsoidal to oblong, apiculate at both
ends, 1-celled, becoming transversely 1–3-septate after discharge,
smooth, germinating with germ tubes at both ends, hyaline, irregularly
2-seriate in ascus.A–K. Australiasca laeënsis. A. Perithecium. B.
Ascospores. C. Asci with ascospores, some ascospores with a developed median
septum. D, E. Conidia and F–K. Conidiophores of the Monilochaetes
laeënsis anamorph, in culture. A–C from PRM 915720; D–K
DAOM 226788 (PCA, 14 d old). Scale bars: A = 100 μm; B, D–K = 10
μm; C = 50 μm. DIC: A, D, G–K; PC: B, C, E, F.Colonies in vivo dark, hairy, effuse. Conidiophores
200–600 μm long, 6.5–9 μm wide, arising in small fascicles
or small loose groups of 2–6 or solitary from a minute stromata,
macronematous, percurrently proliferating, dark brown, 5–15-septate;
base occasionally bulbous with smaller, thick-walled, adjacent
pseudoparenchymatous cells forming stromatic tissue in substratum.
Conidiogenous cells monophialidic, 50–70 ×
4.5–8(–10) μm, terminal, cylindrical, hardly tapering at apex,
subhyaline; collarette ca. 1–2 μm high, minute,
conidiogenous locus located at base of collarette. Conidia
22–26 × 10–12 μm (mean ± s.e. = 23.2
± 0.2 × 10.8 ± 0.2 μm), ellipsoidal to
cylindrical-ellipsoidal, broadly rounded, sometimes obtuse at base, hyaline,
basal scar 3.5–4 μm diam, smooth-walled.Colonies in vitro after 14 d on PCA at 25 °C 15–20 mm
diam, felty, stromatic tissue absent, aerial mycelium olive-brown, margin
entire; reverse pale greyish-brown. Colonies readily sporulating, beginning
after 5 d on PCA at 25 °C under near-UV light (12 h light: 12 h dark).
Conidiophores, phialides, and conidia morphologically identical to those on
natural substratum. Conidiophores 40–160 × 7–8
μm, pale brown throughout, with none or 1 percurrent proliferation,
2–5-septate; in about 28 d, longer conidiophores developing,
ca. 160-280 μm long, dark brown, subhyaline towards apex, with
1–4 percurrent proliferations, up to 2–15-septate.
Conidiogenous cells monophialides 31–58 ×
(6–)7–9 μm, tapering to 4–6.5 μm just below
collarette; collarette ca. 1.5 μm high and (5.5–)6–8
μm wide. Conidia (15.5–)18–22.5(–23.5) ×
7.5–9(–10) μm (mean ± s.e. = 20.9 ± 1
× 8.2 ± 0.3 μm), ellipsoidal to cylindrical-ellipsoidal,
broadly rounded, sometimes obtuse at base, hyaline, basal scar 2–3.5
μm diam, smooth-walled.Specimens examined (anamorph and teleomorph): Australia,
New South Wales, Blue Mountains, Mt. Tomah Botanical Garden, S 33 32.4, E 150
25.4, 1197 m alt., on dead stipes and spathes of a tree fern in a rain forest,
17 Aug. 1999, K.A. Seifert no. 884 and G.J. Samuels, DAOM 226788. UK,
England, West Cornwall, Penjerrick House Gardens, 22 June 2000, dead stipes of
Dicksonia antarctica, B. Candy, PRM 915720, holotype of
A. laeënsis.Notes: Based on the results from ITS and LSU rDNA phylogenies,
Australiasca laeënsis and A. queenslandica are distinct
species, although they are morphologically similar. Australiasca
queenslandica and its M. camelliae anamorph were originally
described and isolated into culture from leaves, stems and branches of
Camellia sinensis; perithecia containing mature asci and ascospores
formed in vitro (Sivanesan &
Alcorn 2002). The ascospores released by A. queenslandica
were often observed to be 1–3-septate, becoming dictyoseptate, and some
produced phialides with hyaline microconidia in vitro. The recently
collected material of A. laeënsis from England and Australia
documents perithecia produced on the host associated with the conidiophores of
its M. laeënsis anamorph. The ascospores were observed to be
transversely 1–3-septate after discharge, but never became dictyoseptate
or exhibited phialidic germination. Australiasca laeënsis is
described here based on our observations on the host and the anamorph in
culture.The range of conidial lengths of M. camelliae and M.
laeënsis overlap, but those of the former species are usually
longer. Monilochaetes camelliae produces conidia 18–35 ×
8–13 μm in culture on Sachs agar + maize leaves
(Sivanesan & Alcorn 2002)
or 20.5–24(–26.5) × (10–)11–12(–13) μm
on PCA (this study). The conidia of M. laeënsis are 22–26
× 10–12 μm on the host and
(15.5–)18–22.5(–23.5) × 7.5–9(–10) μm
on PCA (this study). Therefore, the conidia of M. camelliae from
Sachs agar overlap in length with conidia of M. laeënsis, but
exceed its upper range by nearly 10 μm, while on PCA the conidia of M.
camelliae are only slightly longer than those of M.
laeënsis. The conidial dimensions for M. laeënsis from
our collections correspond with measurements of the type and other specimens
on host substrata from different localities, e.g. Sutton
(1976, conidia 15–20
× 8–10 μm), Matsushima
(1971, 17–26 ×
8–12 μm), and Holubová-Jechová
(1982, 14.5–24 ×
6.5–10 μm). The conidia of M. laeënsis are hyaline,
aseptate, and arise singly from the conidiogenous locus, usually in slimy
heads. The conidia of M. camelliae were described as occasionally
1–3-septate, produced in heads or chains
(Sivanesan & Alcorn 2002).
The conidiophores of M. camelliae are also slightly longer, often
swollen subapically (Sivanesan &
Alcorn 2002).Monilochaetes laeënsis has been collected on dead leaves in
Papua New Guinea (Matsushima
1971), Sri Lanka (Sutton
1976, Bhat & Sutton
1985), and Cuba
(Holubová-Jechová
1982), dead leaves or twigs and dead palm spathes in Australia,
Ethiopia, India and Malaysia (Bhat &
Sutton 1985), and dead fern stipes in the United Kingdom
(Kirk 1986). Only the European
and recent Australian material contained perithecia with mature asci and
ascospores. Kirk (1986) noted
that Dischloridium does not occur naturally in the British Isles but
was probably introduced into gardens where it was found along with its host
Dicksonia antarctica. He also suggested that the prevailing colder
temperatures may have triggered sexual reproduction in nature; our own
teleomorph specimen was collected in a cool, humid valley in the Australian
winter.Sivan. & Alcorn, Aust. Syst.
Bot. 15: 742. 2002. Figs
7A–R,
8A–G.
Fig. 7.
A–R. Monilochaetes camelliae anamorph of Australiasca
queenslandica. A–D. Conidiogenous cells. E. Conidiophores.
F–J. Conidia. K–M. Microconidia. N–R. Minute conidiophores
that produce microconidia. A–J from BRIP 24607 (PCA, 14 d old),
K–R from BRIP 24334c (PCA, 6 mo old). Scale bars: A–D, F–J,
K–R = 10 μm; E = 50 μm. A–R: DIC.
Fig. 8.
A–G. Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy photographs of
Monilochaetes camelliae anamorph of Australiasca
queenslandica. A, B, F, G. Chains of conidia; arrow indicates the tip
with a porus of the conidiogenous cell after the liberation of the conidial
chain. C. Conidiogenous cells with collarette. D. Conidium with laterally
displaced hilum. E. Conidiogenous cell with conidia. A–G from BRIP 24607
(PCA, 14 d old). A, B, E, G = 20 μm; C, D = 10 μm; F = 50 μm.
Anamorph: (Alcorn &
Sivan.) Réblová, W. Gams & Seifert, comb. nov.
MycoBank
MB518385.
Basionym:
Dischloridium camelliae Sivan. & Alcorn, Aust. Syst. Bot. 15:
743. 2002.Colonies in vitro on MEA after 14 d at 25 °C with 22–25
mm radial growth, more or less planar, surface dark brown, covered with
abundant, pale grey, lanose to cottony aerial mycelium, margin smooth and
entire, reverse grey, sterile. Colonies on PCA after 14 d at 25 °C with
23–25 mm radial growth, planar, surface brown, covered with pale grey,
lanose to cottony aerial mycelium, margin smooth and entire, reverse dark
grey, sterile.Colonies in vitro on PCA sporulating in 14 d at 25 °C in
darkness. Setae absent. Conidiophores 200–720 μm long,
9–10(–10.5) μm wide near base and 6.5–7.5(–8.5)
μm wide in middle, pale to dark brown, subhyaline towards apex, with none
or 1 percurrent proliferation, up to 20-septate. Conidiogenous cells
monophialidic, subhyaline, paler towards collarette, ampulliform to
cylindrical, slightly swollen, 36–45(–60) μm long,
6.5–8(–9) μm wide at widest part, tapering to ca.
3–4 μm just below collarette; collarette 4.5–5.5 μm wide and
ca. 1.5–2 μm high. Conidia
20.5–24(–26.5) × (10–)11–12 μm (mean ±
s.e. 22.5 ± 0.3 × 11.8 ± 0.1),
0–1-septate, ellipsoidal to cylindrical-ellipsoidal, broadly rounded at
end, obtuse at base, basal scar 3–3.5 μm diam, some conidia with a
laterally displaced hilum, hyaline, smooth-walled.After 6 mo on PCA at 25 °C in darkness, producing minute conidiophores
with microconidia. Setae absent. Conidiophores more or less erect,
arising from aerial mycelium, simple or sparingly branched, pale brown to
subhyaline, 40–60 μm long and 2–2.5 μm wide, with terminally
integrated or intercalary conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells
monophialidic, subhyaline to pale brown, usually paler towards apex,
ampulliform to cylindrical, 8–20 μm long, 2.5–3.5 μm wide at
widest part, tapering to ca. 1.5 μm just below collarette;
collarette 2.5–3 wide, ca. 2 μm high. Conidia
4–5.5 × 3–3.5 μm (mean ± s.e. 4.5
± 0.1 × 3.2 ± 0.1), aseptate, thick-walled, broadly
ellipsoidal to subglobose, rounded at ends, base slightly tapering, obtuse
with a minute abscission scar, accumulating in small, clear to whitish
droplets, hyaline, smooth-walled. Chlamydospores not observed.Specimens examined (anamorph only): Australia, Queensland,
Malanda, isolated from branch of Camellia sinensis, 19 Feb. 1997, D.
Steel M. 8982c, BRIP 24334c; Queensland, Brisbane, S 27 30, E 152 58, isolated
from branch of Camellia sinensis, 10 July 1997, J.L. Alcorn, BRIP
24607a).Notes: Two isolates of M. camelliae were examined and ITS
and ncLSU sequences were generated (Table
1). One of these is an authentic, single-ascospore isolate listed
among specimens examined in the protologue of Dischloridium camelliae
(Sivanesan & Alcorn
2002).The ESEM photographs of conidia of M. camelliae
(Fig. 8A, B, F, G) demonstrate
well that there is a continuum between conidial chains and slimy heads on the
phialides. The osmolarity of the medium may influence the relative proportion
of chains and slimy heads as seen particularly in Chloridium, where
chains, cirrhi, and slimy heads are all observed in one genus or even one
species (W. Gams, unpubl. data). The conidial chains of M. camelliae
were difficult to observe in squash mounts from agar, but were visible
directly in the Petri dish by light microscopy.A–R. Monilochaetes camelliae anamorph of Australiasca
queenslandica. A–D. Conidiogenous cells. E. Conidiophores.
F–J. Conidia. K–M. Microconidia. N–R. Minute conidiophores
that produce microconidia. A–J from BRIP 24607 (PCA, 14 d old),
K–R from BRIP 24334c (PCA, 6 mo old). Scale bars: A–D, F–J,
K–R = 10 μm; E = 50 μm. A–R: DIC.
Additional species of Monilochaetes
Since its description the original generic concept of
Dischloridium has been expanded with the addition of fifteen species
having variable morphology of conidia and conidiophores including several
species with brown, distoseptate conidia. To be consistent with the
morphological delimitation of Monilochaetes indicated by phylogeny,
we accept only two of the fourteen remaining species previously included in
Dischloridium for transfer to Monilochaetes, namely D.
basicurvatum and D. regenerans. Other species are newly
transferred to or accepted in other hyphomycete genera, such as
Craspedodidymum, Hyalocylindrophora, or Paradischloridium,
and a few cannot presently be reassigned.After revising type material, cultivation studies, and molecular data of
Exochalara longissima, the type species of that genus, we confirm
that the species is unrelated to Monilochaetes (material and isolates
examined: IMI 18047 holotype of Chalara longissima; IMI 167413
holotype of Catenularia piceae;
CBS 980.73, cited
as the only strain in the description of E. longissima by
Gams & Holubová-Jechová
1976, and CBS
393.82). The true relationship of the genus Exochalara
lies with the Helotiales of the Leotiomycetes
(Réblová ). The strain studied by Rong & Gams
(2000),
CBS 662.82, with
pronounced branching of the short conidiophores, is not conspecific with or
related to E. longissima.A–G. Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy photographs of
Monilochaetes camelliae anamorph of Australiasca
queenslandica. A, B, F, G. Chains of conidia; arrow indicates the tip
with a porus of the conidiogenous cell after the liberation of the conidial
chain. C. Conidiogenous cells with collarette. D. Conidium with laterally
displaced hilum. E. Conidiogenous cell with conidia. A–G from BRIP 24607
(PCA, 14 d old). A, B, E, G = 20 μm; C, D = 10 μm; F = 50 μm.Halst., New Jersey Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 76:
27. 1890.= Dischloridium B. Sutton, Kavaka 4: 47. 1976.(Matsush.) Réblová
& Seifert, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515432.
Basionym:
Dischloridium basicurvatum Matsuh., Matsush. Mycol. Mem. 8: 18. 1995.(Matsush.) I.H. Rong &
W. Gams, Mycotaxon 76: 455. 2000.
Basionym: Catenularia
guadalcanalensis Matsush., Microfungi of the Salomon Islands and Papua
New Guinea, Kobe, p. 10. 1971.≡ Exochalara guadalcanalensis (Matsush.) W. Gams &
Hol.-Jech., Stud. Mycol. 13: 58. 1976.Ellis & Halst., New Jersey
Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 76: 27. 1890. Fig.
9A–I.
Fig. 9.
A–I. Monilochaetes infuscans. A–F. Conidiophores;
arrow indicates a percurrent regeneration of the conidiophore. G–I.
Conidia. A–I from CBS
379.77 (PCA, 14 d old). Scale bars: A = 25 μm; B–I = 10
μm. DIC: A, C–I. PC: B.
= Dischloridium cylindrospermum S.K. Srivast., Sydowia 39: 217.
1986.(Bhat & W.B. Kendr.)
Réblová & Seifert, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515433.
Basionym:
Dischloridium regenerans Bhat & W.B. Kendr., Mycotaxon 49: 48.
1993.A–I. Monilochaetes infuscans. A–F. Conidiophores;
arrow indicates a percurrent regeneration of the conidiophore. G–I.
Conidia. A–I from CBS
379.77 (PCA, 14 d old). Scale bars: A = 25 μm; B–I = 10
μm. DIC: A, C–I. PC: B.
Species excluded from Dischloridium and
Monilochaetes, but not reclassified
Accepted names are printed in bold.Dischloridium keniense P.M. Kirk, Mycotaxon 23: 30.
1985.
Basionym: Craspedodidymum keniense (P.M. Kirk) Bhat
& W.B. Kendr., Mycotaxon 49: 37. 1993.Dischloridium roseum (Petch) Seifert & W. Gams, Mycotaxon 24:
459. 1985.
Basionym: Acremonium roseum Petch, Ann. Royal
Bot. Gard. Peradeniya 7: 317. 1922.≡ (Petch)
Réblová & W. Gams, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515434= Hyalocylindrophora venezuelensis J.L. Crane & Dumont, Canad.
J. Bot. 56: 2616. 1978.≡ Dischloridium venezuelense (J.L. Crane & Dumont) Bhat
& B. Sutton, Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 84: 725. 1985.Notes: With this new combination the combining authors accept the
argument by Holubová-Jechová
(1990) that this hyaline
species should not be considered congeneric with similar pigmented species.
The species has not been cultured or sequenced.Dischloridium triseptatum Hol.-Jech, Česká Mykol.
41: 110. 1987. Fig.
10A–J.
Fig. 10.
A–J. Paradischloridium ychaffrei. A–H. Conidiophores.
I. Conidia. J. Base of the conidiophore. K–T. Dischloridium
tenuisporum. K–P. Conidiophores with conidia. Q. Conidia.
R–T. Stromatic spots erumpent through the epidermis of the host bearing
clusters of conidiophores. A–J from PRM 842733 (holotype of
Dischloridium triseptatum), on the host; K–T from PRM 842727
(holotype), on the host. Scale bars: A–J, Q = 10 μm; K–P = 25
μm; R, T = 50 μm; S = 250 μm. DIC: A–J.
= Bhat & B. Sutton, Trans.
Brit. Mycol. Soc. 84: 723. 1985.Specimens examined: Cuba, Oriente, Gran Piedra Mts., Nature
Reserve Isabelica Norte, near Santiago de Cuba, on dead branches of an
unidentified tree, 22 May 1985, V. Holubová-Jechová, PRM 842733,
holotype of D. triseptatum.Dischloridium venezuelense (J.L. Crane & Dumont) Bhat & B.
Sutton, Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 84: 725. 1985.= (Petch) Réblová
& W. Gams (see above).Dischloridium ychaffrei (Bhat & B. Sutton) Hol.-Jech.,
Česká Mykol. 42: 204. 1988.
Basionym:
Bhat & B. Sutton, Trans. Brit.
Mycol. Soc. 84: 723. 1985. Fig.
10A–J.= Dischloridium triseptatum Hol.-Jech, Česká Mykol.
41: 110. 1987.Notes: Paradischloridium was erected for phialidic
dematiaceous hyphomycetes reminiscent of Dischloridium, but with
conidiophores that are not fasciculate and do not arise from stromatic tissue.
The phialides lack even remnants of a collarette and conidia are brown with
3-distosepta (Bhat & Sutton
1985). The conidiogenesis of P. ychaffrei is particularly
interesting. Fig. 10C–F
show the conidiogenous locus sitting deeper in the venter of the cylindrical
phialide than is typical for M. laeënsis or other
Monilochaetes species; it is located more towards the bottom of the
conidiogenous cells. Fig. 10C,
D show young, hyaline conidia formed within the venter. In
Fig. 10B, F, the top of a new
phialide appears to be proliferating through the old phialide and collarette
to form a new functional phialide. Similar phialidic structures and conidium
ontogeny were described, for example, in species of Catenularia,
Chloridium, and Sporoschismopsis
(Holubová-Jechová &
Hennebert 1972). No living culture of P. ychaffrei was
available to further assess the phylogenetic relationships of this genus.A–J. Paradischloridium ychaffrei. A–H. Conidiophores.
I. Conidia. J. Base of the conidiophore. K–T. Dischloridium
tenuisporum. K–P. Conidiophores with conidia. Q. Conidia.
R–T. Stromatic spots erumpent through the epidermis of the host bearing
clusters of conidiophores. A–J from PRM 842733 (holotype of
Dischloridium triseptatum), on the host; K–T from PRM 842727
(holotype), on the host. Scale bars: A–J, Q = 10 μm; K–P = 25
μm; R, T = 50 μm; S = 250 μm. DIC: A–J.
Dischloridium species of uncertain status
A few Dischloridium species remain that cannot be transferred to
Monilochaetes or other genera. Three of these form a group of
morphologically similar taxa with features intermediate between
Monilochaetes and Colletotrichum, viz. Dischloridiumgloeosporioides, D. livistoniae, and D. tenuisporum. The
former two species were transferred into Dischloridium from
Cladosporium and Fusicladium when Schubert & Braun
(2005) observed terminal,
monophialidic conidiogenous cells, stromata, and brown fasciculate
conidiophores with paler tips. Dischloridiumgloeosporioides was
described from living stems and leaves, while the other two species were
collected on dead leaves or petioles. All three produce well-delimited,
subcircular to irregular spots, caused by emerging stromatic tissue that
ruptures the epidermis (Fig.
10R–T), unlike the effuse colonies of D.
laeënse. Conidia of D. gloeosporioides and D.
livistoniae are obovoidal or ellipsoid-ovoidal, whereas conidia of D.
tenuisporum are ellipsoidal to elongate-ellipsoidal, sometimes with a
basal papilla. The single conidiogenous locus is at the base of the indistinct
collarette. Although characters such as discrete stromatic tissue, fasciculate
conidiophores, and terminal monophialides with hyaline conidia match the
profile of dematiaceous hyphomycetes associated with the
Glomerellales, transferring them to Monilochaetes or
describing a new genus for them seems ill-advised until cultures and molecular
data are available. Therefore, these species remain as incertae
sedis.Dischloridiumgloeosporioides (G.F. Atk.) U. Braun & K.
Schub., Fung. Diversity 20: 189. 2005.
Basionym: Cladosporium
gloeosporioides G.F. Atk., Cornell Univ. Sci. Bull. 3: 39. 1897.Dischloridium inaequiseptatum (Matsush.) Hol.-Jech.,
Česká Mykol. 41: 111. 1987.
Basionym:
Endophragmia inaequiseptata Matsush., Icones Microfungorum a
Matsushima lectorum, Kobe, p. 69. 1975.Notes: This species is not accepted in Monilochaetes
because of its 3-septate, cylindrical, slightly curved conidia with a
subhyaline basal cell and the remainder of the conidial cells dark brown.
Conidiophores are fasciculate without stromatic tissue; a collarette is absent
or very indistinct.Dischloridium livistoniae (P. Karst.) U. Braun & K. Schub.,
Fung. Diversity 20: 192. 2005.
Basionym: Fusicladium
livistoniae P. Karst., Hedwigia 30: 302. 1891.Dischloridium microsporum R.F. Castañeda & W.B. Kendr.,
Univ. Waterloo Biol. Ser. 35: 50 (fig. 29). 1991.Specimen examined: Cuba, La Estrella, Buey Arriba, Granma,
on dead leaves of Trophis racemosa, 14 Mar. 1991, R.F.
Castañeda, INIFAT C91/98-2, holotype, ex-type strain
CBS 498.92.Notes: The ex-type strain
(CBS 498.92) looks
Acremonium-like; it formed a Nectria-like teleomorph in
vitro (W. Gams, unpubl. data).Dischloridium tenuisporum Hol.-Jech., Česká Mykol.
41: 31. 1987. Fig.
10K–T.Specimen examined: Cuba, Habana province, Jaruco, Loma de
la Coca, south from Campo Florido, 142 m a. s. l., on dead leaves of
Clusia rosea, 13 Feb. 1981, V. Holubová-Jechová, PRM
842727, holotype.
Reticulascaceae
This family contains two holomorph genera, Reticulascus and
Porosphaerellopsis. Although these genera differ morphologically,
ontogeny and morphology of the centrum and interthecial filaments unite them
and partially define the family. The interthecial tissue is formed of filiform
branching and anastomosing filaments, forming a “network” among
the asci. They are attached to the hymenium and to the top of the ascomatal
wall. This structure was first described and illustrated by Samuels &
Müller (1978) for
Porosphaerellopsis sporoschismophora and is documented here for
Reticulascus tulasneorum and R. clavatus. The second species
in the genus Porosphaerellopsis, P. bipolaris
(Ranghoo ), collected on submerged wood in a stream in China, does not
form this “network”, and has paraphyses that are wider and simple.
The link between P. bipolaris and a Sporoschismopsis
anamorph suggested by Ranghoo et al.
(2001) has not been
established convincingly.Réblová & W. Gams,
fam. nov. MycoBank
MB515435.Stromata minuta nonnumquam formata. Ascomata perithecia, fusca usque nigra,
ostiolum periphysatum. Pariete ascomatum 2-stratoso. Hamathecium paraphyses
verae; paraphyses septatae, hyalinae, ramosae, anastomosantes, sursum
angustatae, ascos superantes. Asci unitunicati, cylindraceo-clavati, 8-spori,
annulo apicali iodo non reagente. Ascosporae hyalinae vel atrobrunneae,
ellipsoideae usque fusiformes, septatae, nonnumquam utrinque poro praeditae.
Anamorphae: Cylindrotrichum, Sporoschismopsis; conidia modo
phialidico formata.Typus: Reticulascus Réblová & W.
Gams.Stromata minute, sometimes present. Perithecia brown to
black. Ostiolum periphysate. Perithecial wall 2-layered. Interascal
tissue of thin-walled, tapering, branching and anastomosing paraphyses.
Asci unitunicate, 8-spored, cylindrical-clavate, apical ring
inamyloid. Ascospores hyaline or dark brown, ellipsoid to fusiform,
sometimes with end pores. Anamorphs: Cylindrotrichum,
Sporoschismopsis; conidiogenesis phialidic.Réblová & W. Gams, gen.
nov. MycoBank
MB515436.Etymology: from the Latin ascus and reticulum,
referring to the network of interthecial filaments.Stromata absentia. Perithecia superficialia, solitaria vel aggregata,
fusca, venter subglobosus usque conicus, ostiolum periphysatum. Paries
perithecii fragilis, bistratosus. Paraphyses septatae, hyalinae, filiformes,
ramosae, anastomosantes, reticulum formantes, sursum angustatae, ascos
superantes. Asci unitunicati, cylindraceo-clavati, 8-spori, brevi-stipitati.
Ascosporae ellipsoideae usque fusiformes, hyalinae, septatae. Anamorphe
Cylindrotrichum.Typus: Reticulascus tulasneorum
(Réblová & W. Gams) Réblová & W. Gams.Stroma absent. Perithecia superficial, solitary, or
gregarious, brown, venter subglobose to conical. Ostiolum periphysate.
Perithecial wall fragile, 2-layered. Paraphyses septate,
hyaline, filiform, forming a branching and anastomosing “network”.
Asci unitunicate, cylindrical-clavate, 8-spored, short-stipitate.
Ascospores ellipsoidal to fusiform, hyaline, septate. Anamorph
Cylindrotrichum.Notes: Based on the results of our ITS, ncLSU, ncSSU analyses, and
the combined three-gene phylogeny, the new holomorph genus
Reticulascus is introduced below for two holomorph species.
Chaetosphaeria tulasneorum with the anamorph Cylindrotrichum
oligospermum including C. hennebertii as a synonym, is
recombined as the type of Reticulascus; the second species, R.
clavatus, is introduced as a new species with C. clavatum as its
anamorph.Several anamorphic species are related to this clade. The delimitation of
Cylindrotrichum, typified by C. oligosporum, and
morphologically similar genera of dematiaceous hyphomyces has been
controversial, with varying concepts proposed by Gams &
Holubová-Jechová
(1976), DiCosmo et
al. (1983), Rambelli
& Onofri (1987), Arambarri
& Cabello (1989), and
Holubová-Jechová
(1990). The
Cylindrotrichum anamorphs of Reticulascus species generally
resemble the dematiaceous, phialidic hyphomycetous anamorphs linked with
Chaetosphaeria (Réblová
2000,
2004), but the presence of
cylindrical, 1-septate conidia seems to be a deviating character. The conidia
are formed from conspicuously sympodially proliferating, terminally integrated
phialides within shallow collarettes (Gams
& Holubová-Jechová 1976: 48, figs 23, 24;
Réblová & Gams
1999: 34, fig. 16). Based on a ncLSU phylogeny,
Réblová & Winka
(2000) showed that several
species included in Cylindrotrichum by Gams &
Holubová-Jechová
(1976) belong to the
Chaetosphaeriaceae (Chaetosphaeriales), but others are
phylogenetically unrelated with a possible affinity with the
Microascales. Our molecular analyses of ITS, ncLSU, ncSSU, and the
combined data set of three genes (Figs
1,
2,
3,
4) confirm that
Reticulascus tulasneorum/C. oligospermum, R. clavatus/C. clavatum,
the newly described anamorphic C. setosum, previously known species
C. gorii, Kylindria peruamazonensis, and Porosphaerellopsis
(anamorph Sporoschismopsis) group outside the
Chaetosphaeriales and Microascales. They form a monophyletic
group that we recognise as a new family within the Glomerellales.The dematiaceous hyphomycete genera Cylindrotrichum, Kylindria,
and Sporoschismopsis, linked as anamorphs with the
Reticulascaceae, possess conidia that vary in shape, colour, and
size, and, although conidiogenesis is phialidic, the position of the
conidiogenous locus within the collarette also varies. In
Sporoschismopsis, the first and a few subsequent conidia arise
endogenously and are formed in basipetal succession from the apical portion of
the phialide from deep-set conidiogenous loci within a deep collarette. After
formation of several conidia, the phialide proliferates through the collarette
to form a new functional phialide
(Holubová-Jechová &
Hennebert 1972: 385, fig. 1). Similar conidium ontogeny also
occurs in Catenularia and Chloridium anamorphs of
Chaetosphaeria species and in species of Cadophora or
Phialophora.The remaining 18 species previously classified in Cylindrotrichum,
including those transferred to Kylindria (13 species) and
Xenokylindria (3 species) by DiCosmo et al.
(1983), are putative members
of the Chaetosphaeriales for which the name Kylindria was
given preference by Réblová
(2000). In fact, the
Cylindrotrichum-like anamorphs linked with Chaetosphaeria
are variations on the Chloridium theme and do not represent a unique
or unusual pattern within the Chaetosphaeriaceae. If future analyses
confirm the placement of K. triseptata in the Reticulascaceae,
Kylindria will be excluded from the anamorphs linked with
Chaetosphaeria and separated from Xenokylindria.Kylindria peruamazonensis did not group in the same clade as the
four Cylindrotrichum species, rather it formed a poorly supported
branch with Porosphaerellopsis at the base of the
Reticulascus/Cylindrotrichum clade (Figs
1,
4). This species is discussed
and illustrated below and is the only typical representative of the genus
Kylindria included in our analysis. Unlike Cylindrotrichum
species of Kylindria have oblong, longer, and wider,
1-several-septate, often asymmetrical conidia and wider and shorter
conidiophores terminating with a monophialide swollen in its upper part with
or without a collarette. The phialides occasionally elongate above the
collarette with several percurrent extensions. These characters contrast with
Cylindrotrichum having 1-septate, symmetrical, cylindrical conidia
and narrower, longer, and often seta-like conidiophores with cylindrical mono-
or polyphialides that never elongate above the collarette. Because of the
morphological characters distinguishing Kylindria and
Cylindrotrichum and results from the ITS and ncLSU phylogenetic
analyses, we prefer to keep these anamorph genera separate.(Réblová & W.
Gams) Réblová & W. Gams, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB515437.
Fig. 11.
Basionym:
Chaetosphaeria tulasneorum Réblová & W. Gams, Czech
Mycol. 51: 32. 1999.
Fig. 11.
A–E. Reticulascus tulasneorum. A, B. Asci containing
ascospores. C. Ascospores. D. Interthecial filaments. E. Perithecia on the
host. F–M. Reticulascus clavatus. F, L. Asci with ascospores.
G. Vertical section of the perithecial wall. H–J. Perithecia with
conidiophores of the anamorph on the host. K. Interthecial filaments. M.
Ascospores. A–E from PRM 842978 (holotype); F–M from PRM 915717
(holotype). Scale bars: A = A–D, F, K–M = 10 μm; E, H–J =
250 μm; G = 50 μm. DIC: A–C, E–J, L, M; PC: D, K.
Anamorph: Cylindrotrichum oligospermum (Corda) Bonord.,
Handb. Allg. Mykol. p. 88. 1851.= Cylindrotrichum hennebertii W. Gams & Hol.-Jech., Stud.
Mycol. 13: 50. 1976.For a full description and more information, refer to Réblová
& Gams (1999).Specimen examined: Czech Republic, South-western Bohemia,
Javornická hornatina Mts., Strašín near Sušice, on
dead branch of Sambucus nigra, 21 Oct. 1997, M. Svrček, PRM
842978, holotype of Chaetosphaeria tulasneorum, ex-type strain
CBS 101319.Notes: Reticulascus tulasneorum produces minute, black,
nonstromatic ascomata growing on decaying wood. The ascospores are hyaline,
narrowly ellipsoidal, 1- to rarely 3-septate, and glabrous at maturity,
similar to those of R. clavatus having slightly verruculose
ascospores. In the features of asci, interthecial filaments, and perithecial
wall, these species are indistinguishable. The morphological characters of the
associated anamorphs are diagnostic. The teleomorph is known from only one
locality (Réblová & Gams
1999).Cylindrotrichum hennebertii (ex-type strain
CBS 570.76) groups
with R. tulasneorum including its anamorph C. oligospermum.
The former taxon was described for specimens with only a short layer of
conidiophores (Gams &
Holubová-Jechová 1976: 50, fig. 24), contrasting
with the development of two strata of conidiophores for the latter species.
The layering of the conidiophores described in the protologue of C.
hennebertii seems to be quite variable depending on substrate and age of
the material. With the further evidence of their identical ITS sequences,
C. hennebertii is now regarded as a synonym of C.
oligospermum, the anamorph of Reticulascus tulasneorum.Réblová & Fournier,
sp. nov. MycoBank
MB515652. Figs
11F–M,
12A–F.
Fig. 12.
A–F. Cylindrotrichum clavatum anamorph of Reticulascus
clavatus. A. Conidia. B–D. Conidiophores of the lower layer
(shorter conidiophores) with sympodially extending sporiferous apices, in
culture. E–F. Conidiophores ending into a monophialide on the host.
A–C from ex–type strain
CBS 125296 (PCA, 14
d old), E–F from PRM 915717 (holotype). G–M. Cylindrotrichum
gorii. G, H. Conidiophores, in culture. I. Conidia, in culture.
J–L. Conidiophores, on the host. M. Conidia, on the host. G–M from
CBS 879.85 (PCA, 14
d old). Scale bars: A = 10 μm; B–F = 20 μm; G, H, J–L = 20
μm; I, M = 10 μm. DIC: A–F, G–M.
Anamorph: Cylindrotrichum clavatum W. Gams &
Hol.-Jech., Stud. Mycol. 43: 54. 1976.Etymology: Epithet taken from that of the anamorph species,
derived from the shape of conidia.Perithecia 150–170 μm alta, 120–200 μm diam,
superficialia, solitaria, subglobosa vel conica, minute papillata, ostiolata,
glabra. Canalis ostiolaris periphysatus. Paries perithecii fragilis, ad latus
et apicem sclerotialis, deorsum attenuatus; paries lateralis 15 μm crassus,
bistratosus. Paraphyses copiosae, filiformes, septatae, ramosae,
anastomosantes, reticulum formantes, hyalinae, 1.5 μm latae, ultra ascorum
apices protrudentes. Asci 87–108 × 7–8.5 μm (in medio
± s.e. = 95.5 ± 0.2 × 7.5 ± 0.2 μm),
cylindrici vel clavati, breviter stipitati. Ascosporae 14–18(–19)
× 4–4.5 μm (in medio ± s.e. = 15.7 ±
0.2 × 4.4 ± 0.04 μm), fusiformes, bi- vel quadri-cellulares,
verruculosae, hyalinae, 1–2-seriatae in asco.Perithecia 150–170 μm high, 120–200 μm diam,
scattered among conidiophores, superficial, solitary, subglobose to conical,
with minute papilla, glabrous, ostiolum lined with periphyses. Perithecial
wall brittle, heavily sclerotised in upper part, sclerotisation weakens
towards base. Lateral wall ca. 15 μm thick, 2-layered: outer layer
of thin-walled, dark brown, brick-like cells; inner layer of flattened,
elongated hyaline cells. Paraphyses ca. 1.5 μm wide, copious,
filiform, sparsely septate, not constricted at septa, forming a network,
hyaline, longer than asci. Asci 87–108 × 7–8.5
μm (mean ± s.e. = 95.5 ± 0.2 × 7.5 ±
0.2 μm), cylindrical to clavate, slightly truncate to broadly rounded at
apex, short–stipitate, ascal apex with inamyloid apical annulus,
3–3.5 μm wide, 1–1.5 μm deep, 8-spored. Ascospores
14–18(–19) × 4–4.5 μm (mean ±
s.e. = 15.7 ± 0.2 × 4.4 ± 0.04 μm),
fusiform, 2–4-celled, with a delayed formation of second and third
septa, slightly constricted at septa, mature ascospores finely verruculose,
1–2-seriate in ascus.A–E. Reticulascus tulasneorum. A, B. Asci containing
ascospores. C. Ascospores. D. Interthecial filaments. E. Perithecia on the
host. F–M. Reticulascus clavatus. F, L. Asci with ascospores.
G. Vertical section of the perithecial wall. H–J. Perithecia with
conidiophores of the anamorph on the host. K. Interthecial filaments. M.
Ascospores. A–E from PRM 842978 (holotype); F–M from PRM 915717
(holotype). Scale bars: A = A–D, F, K–M = 10 μm; E, H–J =
250 μm; G = 50 μm. DIC: A–C, E–J, L, M; PC: D, K.A–F. Cylindrotrichum clavatum anamorph of Reticulascus
clavatus. A. Conidia. B–D. Conidiophores of the lower layer
(shorter conidiophores) with sympodially extending sporiferous apices, in
culture. E–F. Conidiophores ending into a monophialide on the host.
A–C from ex–type strain
CBS 125296 (PCA, 14
d old), E–F from PRM 915717 (holotype). G–M. Cylindrotrichum
gorii. G, H. Conidiophores, in culture. I. Conidia, in culture.
J–L. Conidiophores, on the host. M. Conidia, on the host. G–M from
CBS 879.85 (PCA, 14
d old). Scale bars: A = 10 μm; B–F = 20 μm; G, H, J–L = 20
μm; I, M = 10 μm. DIC: A–F, G–M.A–L. Cylindrotrichum setosum. A–C. Conidiophores with
setae and polyphialidic conidiogenous cells. D, F–I. Polyphialides. E.
Seta with unbranched basal conidiogenous cells. J, K. Macroconidia. L.
Microconidia. A–L from ex-type strain DAOM 229246 (OA, 3wk old). Scale
bars: A–C = 20 μm; D–I = 10 μm. DIC: all PC except E,
DIC.Colonies in vivo brown to black, hairy, effuse. Setae absent.
Conidiophores macronematous, mononematous, cylindrical, straight,
forming two layers. Conidiophores of lower layer shorter,
60–135 × 4.5–5 μm, pale brown, subhyaline towards apex,
2–5-septate; longer conidiophores forming an upper layer, 200–360
× 5–5.5 μm, mid to dark brown, subhyaline towards apex, up to
10-septate; conidiophores of both layers ending in a monophialide or
polyphialide. Conidiogenous cells 25–37 × 3.5–5
μm, usually monophialidic, rarely polyphialidic with up to two lateral
openings; collarette hyaline to subhyaline, 1.5–2 μm wide,
ca. 1.5 μm high. Conidia 10.5–11 ×
4–4.5 μm (mean ± s.e. = 10.2 ± 0.2 ×
4.2 ± 0.04 μm), cylindrical, rounded at apex, slightly tapering,
obtuse at base, 1-septate, not constricted at septum, hyaline, smooth.Colonies in vitro after 14 d on PCA at 25 °C 14–17 mm
diam, cushion–like, aerial mycelium greyish brown, margin entire,
reverse dark brown. Colonies sporulating after 7–10 d on PCA at 25
°C in darkness. Conidiophores macronematous, mononematous,
solitary, erect, forming two layers: conidiophores of lower layer 50–100
× 2.5–3 μm, cylindrical, straight or slightly flexuous,
2–10-septate, pale brown, subhyaline to hyaline towards apex;
conidiophores of upper layer up to 260 μm long, 3.5–4 μm wide, mid
brown, subhyaline towards apex. Conidiogenous cells integrated,
terminal or intercalary, with up to 30 lateral phialidic openings arising from
sympodial elongation, fertile apices 15–70 μm long; collarettes
hyaline to subhyaline, 1–1.5 μm wide, ca. 1.5 μm high.
Conidia 9–12.5(–13.5) × 2.5–3 μm (mean
± s.e. = 11.6 ± 0.3 × 2.7 ± 0.05 μm),
cylindrical, rounded at apex, slightly tapering, obtuse at base, 1-septate,
not constricted at septum, hyaline, smooth. In PDA culture, conidia slightly
smaller, 8.5–10.5 × 2.5(–3) μm (mean ±
s.e. = 9.3 ± 0.1 × 2.6 ± 0.03 μm).Specimens examined: France, Haute Garonne, Mancioux, along
road D635 on the way to Frechet, on submerged wood of Alnus
glutinosa, 28 Feb. 2009, J. Fournier no. J.F. 09009, PRM 915717,
holotype, ex-type strain
CBS 125296; Rimont,
Le Baup, on submerged wood of Fraxinus sp., 12 June 2009, J. Fournier
no. J.F. 09154, PRM 915718, living culture
CBS 125297;
Ariège, Rimont, road D18, 1.5 km south of the village, Le Baup, 500 m
a. s. l., on submerged wood of Platanus sp., associated with
Achroceratosphaeria potamia, Cosmospora sp., Savoryella
limnetica, 23 May 2008, J. Fournier & M. Delpont no. J.F. 08139, PRM
915719, living culture CBS
125239.Notes: Reticulascus clavatus is a common dweller of
submerged wood in lotic sites in France. The anamorph does not always occur on
freshly collected material, although fertile conidiophores usually appear
after incubation in a moist chamber for 1–2 wk (J. Fournier, unpubl.
data).Reticulascus clavatus differs from the closely related R.
tulasneorum and its C. oligospermum anamorph by verruculose
mature ascospores, absence of setae among the conidiophores, which terminate
with a monophialide in vivo and only rarely a polyphialide. In axenic
culture (PCA, PDA) of R. clavatus, the lower layer of conidiophores
terminates in polyphialides with up to 30 lateral openings
(Fig. 12C, D).Seifert, sp. nov. MycoBank
MB515589.
Fig. 13A–L.
Fig. 13.
A–L. Cylindrotrichum setosum. A–C. Conidiophores with
setae and polyphialidic conidiogenous cells. D, F–I. Polyphialides. E.
Seta with unbranched basal conidiogenous cells. J, K. Macroconidia. L.
Microconidia. A–L from ex-type strain DAOM 229246 (OA, 3wk old). Scale
bars: A–C = 20 μm; D–I = 10 μm. DIC: all PC except E,
DIC.
Coloniae in agaro farina avenae confecto post 20 dies radium 6–7 mm
attingentes, in agaro maltoso 4–5 mm. Conidiophora simplicia vel raro
ramosa, stipite subhyalino vel dilute brunneo ad 200 μm longo,
1.5–2.5 μm lato, vel cellulae conidiogenae ex hyphis fasciculatis
dilute brunneis, 3.5–8.5 μm latis singulae vel acervatae oriundae;
setae seu conidiophora superantes seu ex hyphis aggregatis perpendiculariter
oriundae, 45–80 μm longae, simplices, brunneae vel fuscae,
aciculares, in parte inferiore 3.5–4 μm latae, sursum acutatae.
Cellulae conidiogenae mono- vel polyphialides, subhyalinae vel dilute
brunneae, ampulliformes vel subulatae, 6–13 μm longae, parte
inferiore ellipsoidea, 3.5–7 × 2–4 μm, rachide recta vel
geniculata ad 7 × 1.5–2.5 μm, 1–6 foramina conidiogena
sessilia vel < 3 μm longa ferente, collare inconspicuum, vix
periclinaliter inspissatum. Conidia cylindrica, 1-septata, 12–16.5
× 1.5–2.5 μm; microconidia rara, continua, ellipsoidea vel
oblonge ellipsoidea, 3.5–5 × 1.5–2.5 μm. Colonies on OA
after 3 wk about 6–7 mm radial growth, more or less planar, surface pale
yellow, with little aerial mycelium but diffusely hirsute because of setae and
conidiophores, margin smooth, entire, reverse unpigmented, lacking soluble
pigments. Colonies on Blakeslee's malt-peptoneagar after 3 wk 4–5 mm
radial growth, convex, surface dark brown to black, covered with pale grey,
lanose to cottony aerial mycelium that gives the central part of the colony a
greyish aspect, with embedded small droplets of black exudates, with some
sporulation but setae not seen, reverse grey, margin somewhat uneven.Conidiophores on OA more or less erect, usually undulating,
unbranched or sparingly branched, subhyaline to pale brown with stipes up to
200 μm long, 1.5–2.5 μm wide, or conidiogenous cells directly on
erect or lax fascicles of pale brown hyphae 3.5–8.5 μm wide, more or
less at right angles, single, in pairs or clusters, sometimes on a metula,
with setae either terminating conidiophores or emerging from fascicles more or
less at right angles. Setae 45–80 μm long, unbranched, brown to dark
brown, acicular, 3.5–4 μm wide at base, slightly thick-walled, with
3–7 septa and acute apex, sometimes terminating with a monophialide.
Conidiogenous cells monophialidic or polyphialidic, subhyaline to
pale brown, concolourous with subtending hypha or conidiophore, usually
ampulliform, sometimes subulate, 6–13 μm long, with an ellipsoidal
base about 3.5–7 × 2–4 μm, slightly thick-walled, and
then a narrower neck 1.5–2.5 μm wide, up to 7 μm long, straight or
becoming geniculate with proliferation; lateral conidiogenous apertures
usually sessile, but sometimes up to 3 μm long, with 1–6
conidiogenous openings about 1 μm wide with minute frills and inconspicuous
periclinal thickening. Conidia 12–16.5 × 1.5–2.5
μm (mean ± s.e. 14.4 ± 0.2 × 2.1 ±
0.1), L/W 5.5–8, 1-septate, cylindrical, straight or rarely slightly
bent, with rounded ends, base sometimes with an inconspicuous papilla-like
abscission scar, accumulating in small, clear to whitish droplets.
Microconidia rare, less than 1 % abundance, 3.5–5 × 1.5–2.5
μm, l/w ∼1.7–3, aseptate, ellipsoidal to oblong-ellipsoidal, with
a minute basal papilla, hyaline, with no obvious abscission scar.Specimen examined: Australia, New South Wales, Mt. Annan
Botanical Garden, S 34° 05.118', E 150° 45.438', 315 m alt., on wood
and bark mulch on the ground, 26 Aug. 1999, K.A. Seifert no. 1228, DAOM 229246
holotype, ex-type strain in CCFC.Notes: Cylindrotrichum setosum is unique in the genus
because of the physical separation of the conidiogenous cells and the setae.
In other species, the conidiophores are seta-like and have a terminal phialide
or polyphialide at the apex. In C. setosum, the conidiogenous cells
tend to be clustered at the base of the setae in a manner reminiscent of
species of Circinotrichum or Gyrothrix. However, the
proliferation of the conidiogenous cells and the morphology of the 1-septate
conidia resemble other species of Cylindrotrichum. Unlike C.
setosum, microconidia have not been reported in other
Cylindrotrichum species.
KEY TO ACCEPTED SPECIES OF CYLINDROTRICHUM
1. Conidia cylindrical to slightly clavate, usually wider than 2.5 μm;
conidiophores seta–like but sterile setae
absent................................ 2
1. Conidia cylindrical, not wider
than 2.5 μm, usually 1.5–2.5 μm in vivo; setae present or
absent.............................................................. 32. Conidia longer than 9 μm; 8.5–13 × 3–4 μm in
vivo and 9–12.5(–13.5) × 2.5–3 μm in
vitro; teleomorph R. clavatus............. C.
clavatum
2. Conidia shorter than 9 μm;
(5–)5.5–7.5(–9) × 3–3.5 in vivo and
7–9(–9.5) × 3–3.5 μm in vitro; teleomorph
unknown.............................................................................................................................................
C. gorii (Lunghini
1979)3. Setae sterile, pointed, distinct from the ampulliform to subulate
conidiogenous cells; teleomorph unknown........................... C.
setosum
3. Conidiophores often seta-like, with a terminal mono- or
polyphialide at the apex; teleomorph R. tulasneorum..............
C. oligospermum
Species phylogenetically related to cylindrotrichum
A–P. Kylindria peruamazonensis. A–I. Conidiophores, in
culture. J–P. Conidia, in culture. A–D, G–K, M, N, P from
CBS 421.95 (PCA, 14
d old); E, F, L, O from CBS
838.91 (PCA, 3 wk old). Scale bars: A–D, G–K, M, N, P
= 10 μm; E, F, L, O = 15 μm. DIC: A–D, G–K, M, N, P; PC: E,
F, L, O.
Specimens examined: Cuba, Ciénaga de Zapata
Matanzas, on leaf litter of Bucida palustris, Dec. 1991, R.F.
Castañeda, INIFAT C91/111, living culture
CBS 838.91; Sancti
Spiritus. Las V, on leaf of B. palustris, 25 Aug. 1994, R.F.
Castañeda, INIFAT C94/84R, living culture
CBS 421.95.Notes: Two strains identified as Kylindria triseptata
were analysed (CBS
838.91,
421.95), but
neither matches the fungus described by Matsushima
(1975) as Cylindrotrichum
triseptatum Matsush. in the morphology of conidiogenous cells and
conidial dimensions. Our cultural observations suggest that the conidiophores,
conidiogenous cells, and conidia of these strains match the description of
Kylindria peruamazonensis. The apex of the phialide terminates with a
funnel-shaped collarette unlike that of C. triseptatum, in which the
monophialides lack a collarette and may elongate slightly and possess apical
densely annellate proliferations. Previously such proliferations were observed
in Cacumisporium capitulatum, the anamorph of Chaetosphaeria
decastyla, and in the so-called Cylindrotrichum anamorph of
Ch. acutata
(Réblová & Gams
1999); these were considered a diagnostic character of
Xenokylindria (DiCosmo ). Kylindria ellisii also has 3-septate
hyaline conidia, but differs from K. peruamazonensis by a hardly
visible collarette and symmetrical, 3-septate conidia rounded at both ends,
without an apiculus.Unlike K. peruamazonensis, cylindrical to oblong, septate conidia
with a tapering, obtuse to papillate base with a laterally displaced hilum are
typical of several Kylindria species, namely K. excentrica, K.
pluriseptata, and K. triseptata. Kylindria excentrica has
3-septate conidia, but differs from K. peruamazonensis in absence of
a collarette and much larger conidia (27.5–35 × 7.5–8 μm;
Bhat & Sutton 1985).
Kylindria peruamazonensis is probably the species morphologically
most similar to K. triseptata; it differs from the latter by the
presence of a collarette, either lacking or with a very short elongation of
the phialides above the collarette, with several percurrent proliferations,
the unusual formation of imbricate conidial chains, and production of a
microconidial form in vitro (macroconidia 12.5–23 ×
4–7.5 μm; Matsushima
1993). Sympodial proliferation of the apex of the conidiogenous
cell was not observed in cultures of K. peruamazonensis and K.
triseptata (Matsushima
1975,
1993). Unlike K.
peruamazonensis, K. pluriseptata has 6–8-septate and much longer
conidia (35–40 × 5–6 μm;
Castañeda 1987).
Additional anamorph species affiliated with the
Plectosphaerellaceae
Our phylogenetic analyses place the anamorph species Stachylidium
bicolor (DAOM 226658) in a basal position in the family
Plectosphaerellaceae (Figs
1,
2,
3). Several anamorph genera in
this family have verticillate conidiophores such as Acrostalagmus and
Verticillium. Stachylidium bicolor, the type of its genus, produces
erect, roughened, verticillate conidiophores, often with additional
verticillate axes emerging from the main stipe; this results in a more complex
conidiophore than in other similar genera. As with the species of the other
genera, the conidiogenous cells are phialidic but taper strongly near the tip,
and the conidia are oblong-ellipsoidal and accumulate in slime. We consider
S. bicolor sufficiently distinct both morphologically and
phylogenetically from Acrostalagmus and Verticillium to
continue to be recognised as a distinct genus.The phylogenetic analyses demonstrate that the common tropical hyphomycete
described and illustrated by Seifert
(1985) as Stilbella
annulata is a member of the Plectosphaerellaceae and a sister
species to Acrostalagmus luteoalbus, the type of the genus. Both
S. annulata and A. luteoalbus produce ameroconidia in bright
orange to reddish slimy masses; in both species the reddish pigmentation
sometimes also colours the phialides. The conidiophore branching of S.
annulata lacks the regular verticillate aspect of A. luteoalbus,
being intermediate between verticillate and penicillate. The synnemata of
S. annulata and their conspicuously lobed marginal hyphae are also
deviating characters from the present generic concept of
Acrostalagmus. Given the well-supported phylogenetic relationship
between these two species, it seems preferable to focus on the similarities
between these species rather than the differences and to transfer S.
annulata to Acrostalagmus rather than propose a new genus. This
modifies the generic concept of Acrostalagmus to include synnematous
species:(Berk. & Broome) Seifert,
comb. nov. MycoBank
MB518663.
Basionym:
Stilbum annulatum Berk. & Broome, Grevillea 3: 63. 1874.
(holotype: no. 6045, on Brassica sp., Car. Inf., herb. Berkeley, 1879, K.≡ Stilbella annulata (Berk. & Broome) Seifert, Stud.
Mycol. 27: 58. 1985Note: For full synonymy and examined material, refer to Seifert
(1985).
MICROASCALES
Kirk et al. (2008)
and Cannon & Kirk (2007)
included four families in the Microascales, i.e. Ceratocystidaceae,
Chadefaudiellaceae, Halosphaeriaceae, and Microascaceae,
although the Ceratocystidaceae is not validly published and was not
listed among accepted fungal families by Hawksworth & David
(1988). On the basis of our
results from ncSSU rDNA and three-gene phylogenies (Figs
2,
3), the following families are
accepted in the order, Microascaceae, Halosphaeriaceae,
Ceratocystidaceae, which is validated here, and
Gondwanamycetaceae fam. nov. We accept the Halosphaeriaceae
as a family of the Microascales
(Kirk ),
although they are often placed separately in their own order
(Spatafora ).Recent studies by Spatafora et al.
(1998), Kong et al.
(2000), and Zhang et
al. (2006) suggested that
the Microascales may prove to be paraphyletic or polyphyletic. In our
study, the cladogram based on ncLSU rDNA sequences
(Fig. 1) provided no support
for any of the backbone branches of the four families that we accept in the
order. In the phylogenies based on ncSSU rDNA and the combined
ncLSU-ncSSU-RPB2 data sets (Figs
2,
3), the Microascales
appear as a monophyletic grouping of four families, all with high branch
support. In both phylogenies the Microascales are divided into two
major subclades, one containing the Halosphaeriaceae and
Microascaceae and a second subclade with the
Ceratocystidaceae and Gondwanamycetaceae. The ncSSU and the
three-gene phylogeny did not support the putative para- or polyphyly of the
Microascales.The family Microascaceae and order Microascales were
introduced by Luttrell (1951)
and were later validated with Latin descriptions by Malloch
(1970) and Benny &
Kimbrough (1980), respectively.
Luttrell (1951) described the
Microascaceae for taxa with beaked ascomata and evanescent,
nonstipitate asci disposed irregularly throughout the filamentous centrum.
Corlett (1963,
1966) confirmed the
observations of Luttrell
(1951) and described the asci
of Microascus and Petriella as developing directly from the
cells of the ascogenous hyphae and not from croziers. Members of the
Microascaceae appear to have evolved away from a hymenial
configuration; in the microascaceous centrum a peripheral layer of
paraphysoidal elements develops that grows inward towards the ascogenous
hyphae (Benny & Kimbrough
1980). Malloch
(1970) redefined the
Microascaceae to include both ostiolate and nonostiolate taxa;
ascocarps are darkly pigmented, usually hairy, rarely glabrous; asci arise
singly or in chains, without croziers, evanescent, irregularly disposed
throughout the centrum; ascospores are reddish brown to copper-coloured with
germ pores, dextrinoid when young and smooth. The genera of the
Microascaceae differ in the manner of ramification of ascogenous
hyphae and the formation of asci among the interthecial elements. The
associated anamorphs are of the annellidic type, e.g. Cephalotrichum
and Scopulariopsis. Aleurioconidia as in Petriella and
arthroconidia as in Kernia also occur (Malloch
1970,
1971).A–P. Kylindria peruamazonensis. A–I. Conidiophores, in
culture. J–P. Conidia, in culture. A–D, G–K, M, N, P from
CBS 421.95 (PCA, 14
d old); E, F, L, O from CBS
838.91 (PCA, 3 wk old). Scale bars: A–D, G–K, M, N, P
= 10 μm; E, F, L, O = 15 μm. DIC: A–D, G–K, M, N, P; PC: E,
F, L, O.
Ceratocystidaceae
The family level classification of Ceratocystis has been discussed
since the genus was removed from the Ophiostomatales
(Barr 1990,
Samuels 1993). In recent
literature the genus has sometimes been placed in the
Chadefaudiellaceae, while other authors placed it in its own family,
the Ceratocystidaceae, as proposed by Locquin
(1972, as
“Ceratocystaceae”). The name Chadefaudiellaceae
predates the Ceratocystidaceae, but these families are
phylogenetically distinct (see below). The Ceratocystis clade is a
monophyletic group centred on species of Ceratocystis or anamorphic
species of the Chalara-like genus Thielaviopsis. Ambrosiella
xylebori, type of this anamorph genus, occurs in a monophyletic clade
together with Ceratocystis, now separated from similar anamorphs of
the Ophiostomatales that are classified in Raffaelea
(Cassar & Blackwell 1996,
Jones & Blackwell 1998,
Harrington ).The teleomorph genus Cornuvesica shares similar characters of
centrum ontogeny, ascospore morphology, evanescent asci, and associated
anamorphs with Ceratocystis, and may belong to the same clade.
Because there are no available ncLSU sequences for Cornuvesica, its
relationship to Ceratocystis and A. xylebori could only be
explored with the ncSSU rDNA phylogeny
(Fig. 2). Cornuvesica
falcata, with a Chalara-like anamorph
(Viljoen ), falls in a basal position with these taxa in a monophyletic
clade.These four genera, Ambrosiella, Ceratocystis, Cornuvesica, and
Thielaviopsis, constitute a family of their own, which has no valid
name. The family name Ceratocystidaceae (as
“Ceratocystaceae”) proposed by Locquin
(1972) was never validly
published. It is phylogenetically well-established and is validated here.Locq. ex Réblová, W. Gams
& Seifert, fam. nov. MycoBank
MB515438.Ceratocystaceae Locq., Rev. Mycol., Supplément, 1 Table.
1972, nom. inval., Art. 36.Stromata absentia. Ascomata perithecia, fusca usque nigra, saepe aggregata,
collo longo angustato et hyphis ostiolaribus protrudentibus, divergentibus
praedita. Paries tenuis. Structura interascalis nulla. Asci unitunicati,
catenati, saccati, evanescentes, 8-spori. Ascosporae hyalinae, forma
variabiles, 0–1-septatae, saepe pariete partim inspissato vel lamina
superficiali circumdatae. Anamorphe: aleurioconidia vel conidia modo
phialidico orientia; Thielaviopsis vel Chalara similia.Typus: Ceratocystis Ellis & Halst., New Jersey Agric.
Coll. Exp. Sta. Bull. 76: 14. 1890.Stromata absent. Perithecia dark brown to black, often
aggregated, long-necked, usually with divergent ostiolar setae.
Perithecial wall thin. Interascal tissue absent.
Asci unitunicate, formed in chains, saccate, evanescent, 8-spored.
Ascospores hyaline, varied in shape, 0–1-septate, often with
eccentric wall thickening or sheaths. Anamorphs with phialidic conidiogenesis
and aleurioconidia; Thielaviopsis and Chalara-like.The holomorph taxa of the Ceratocystidaceae share common
diagnostic characters of centrum ontogeny, evanescent catenate asci,
ascospores, and associated anamorphs that are referred to
Thielaviopsis (Fig. 1)
or as Chalara-like, producing ameroconidia from phialides and in some
cases also aleurioconidia. Ascospores are hyaline, often with eccentric wall
thickening or sheaths, aseptate or 1-septate, hat-shaped in
Ceratocystis or acicular in face view and falcate in side view with a
hyaline sheath in Cornuvesica. Parguey-Leduc
(1977) described the ontogeny
of asci of this group with the examples of Ceratocystis, Faurelina,
and Sphaeronaemella, Asci arise from the basal hymenium and, as the
ascogenous hyphae ramify upward, asci differentiate, dissolve basally from the
ascogenous hyphae, and become free within the centrum. Interascal tissue is
lacking.Faurelina and Chadefaudiella
(Chadefaudiellaceae) are discussed below.
Gondwanamycetaceae
Species of Gondwanamyces and their Custingophora
anamorphs form a strongly supported monophyletic clade (Figs
1,
2,
3) that is sister to the
Ceratocystidaceae. The diagnostic characters of this clade include
the apparent absence of interascal filaments in the ascomatal centrum and
hyaline, allantoid ascospores with a hyaline sheath giving the spore a falcate
to lunate appearance. The teleomorphs, described either from infructescences
of Protea (Wingfield , Marais ) or from sapwood associated with Scolytidae
(bark beetles) (Bright & Torres
2006, Kolařík
& Hulcr 2008), produce dark, globose perithecia with a long,
filiform neck, evanescent asci, and hyaline, fusiform ascospores with or
without a gelatinous sheath.Detailed observations on the ontogeny of asci and centrum of
Gondwanamyces are lacking. Based on the phylogenetic position of the
genus, it is likely to be similar to that of the Ceratocystidaceae.
The morphology of the anamorphs of Gondwanamyces is distinctive. The
conidiophores are erect, darkly pigmented, paler towards the apex, and either
monoverticillate, sometimes with a terminal vesicle or divergently penicillate
with whorls of phialides producing hyaline conidia. The conidiogenous locus is
located at the base of the shallow collarette. The terminal vesicle was not
observed in the anamorph of Gondwanamyces scolytodis and
Custingophora cecropiae, both associated with bark beetles in
Cecropia (Kolařík
& Hulcr 2008). The conidiogenesis of Custingophora
(as Knoxdaviesia proteae), the anamorph of Gondwanamyces
proteae, observed with fluorescence microscopy, TEM, and SEM, was
illustrated by Mouton et al.
(1993). After discharge,
conidia adhere in slimy droplets on the phialide apices. In contrast, the
phialidic conidia of species of the Ceratocystidaceae are formed in
long chains deep within the venter of the cylindrical phialide.The taxonomic relationships of the anamorph genera Knoxdaviesia
and Custingophora, both phylogenetically related to this family, have
been discussed by others, e.g. Viljoen et al.
(1999), Kolařík
& Hulcr (2008). Although
the genera appear morphologically identical as originally described, they
differ in their ecological behaviour. Species of Custingophora occur
in compost, whereas species of Knoxdaviesia associated with
Gondwanamyces were first observed in infructescences of
Protea spp. infested by insects
(Wingfield , Marais ). The fact that some recently described species of
Gondwanamyces and Custingophora are associated with
Scolytidae (bark beetles) (Bright
& Torres 2006,
Kolařík & Hulcr
2008) raises the possibility that the originally reported
ecological distinction might have been an artifact of intense sampling of
Protea in a relatively narrow geographical area in the Western Cape
Province of South Africa. Based on molecular and morphological features,
Kolařík & Hulcr
(2008) considered
Knoxdaviesia and Goidanichiella to be synonyms of
Custingophora. We prefer to recognise Goidanichiella as
distinct because of the Aspergillus-like vesicles on the
conidiophores of the only species, G. barronii.We recognise this clade as a distinct family in the Microascales,
proposed here as the Gondwanamycetaceae.Réblová, W. Gams &
Seifert, fam. nov. MycoBank
MB515439.Stromata absentia. Ascomata perithecia, nigra, collo comparate longo
praedita, apicem versus angustata, ostiolum hyphis divergentibus praeditum.
Paries ascomatum fragilis. Filamenta interthecialia nulla. Asci unitunicati,
evanescentes. Ascosporae hyalinae, aseptatae, fusiformes, lunatae vel
falcatae, vagina gelatinosa praesens vel absens. Anamorphe
Custingophora; conidiophora monoverticillata vel penicillata, fusca,
conidiis aseptatis modo phialidico orientibus, in massa mucida aggregatis.Typus: Gondwanamyces G.J. Marais & M.J. Wingf.,
Mycologia 90: 139. 1998.Stromata absent. Ascomata perithecioid, black, necks
relatively long, tapered toward apex; ostiolar hyphae present. Perithecial
wall fragile, thin-walled. Interascal tissue absent.
Asci evanescent. Ascospores hyaline, aseptate, fusiform to
lunate to falcate, with or without a gelatinous sheath. Anamorph:
Custingophora; conidiophores monoverticillate or penicillate, brown,
conidiogenesis phialidic, conidia aseptate, slimy.
Chadefaudiellaceae
Chadefaudiellaceae was described and validly published by Benny
& Kimbrough (1980) for the
coprophilous genus Chadefaudiella. Cannon & Kirk
(2007) added a second genus to
the family, Faurelina
(Locquin-Linard 1975).
Locquin-Linard (1973) and
Parguey-Leduc (1977) placed
the Chadefaudiella in the Microascales because of its
perithecial acomata, catenate asci, and characteristic centrum structures,
i.e. asci arising from a fertile layer lining the bottom of the
cavity, ascogenous hyphae ramifying upwards, asci differentiated without
croziers and liberated by basal dissolution to float free in the centrum
(Benny & Kimbrough 1980).
Ascospores are 1-celled, nondextrinoid, striate, and lack germ pores. No
anamorph has been reported. Faurelina was described for coprophilous,
cleistothecial fungi, otherwise reminiscent of Chadefaudiella, but
differing by dextrinoid ascospores, and the absence of apical anastomosing
setae on its ascomata. The ascomatal wall of Faurelina is
cephalothecoid and the asci are catenate, irregularly disposed in the centrum
at maturity, characters reminiscent of Chadefaudiella
(Udagawa & Furuya 1973,
Furuya 1978,
von Arx ).
Von Arx (1978) and von Arx
et al. (1981) regarded
the anamorph of Faurelina as similar to the Arthrographis
anamorph of Pithoascus langeronii, producing arthroconidia and
secondary small blastoconidia in axenic culture
(CBS 126.78).The classification of Faurelina has been problematic. Despite the
similarities with Chadefaudiella noted by Locquin-Linard
(1975), Parguey-Leduc &
Locquin-Linard (1976)
concluded that Faurelina should be placed in the
Loculoascomycetes. Faurelina was later transferred by von Arx
(1978) to the
Microascaceae because of its dextrinoid ascospores, which lack germ
pores. He speculated on a relationship with Neurospora in the
Sordariaceae (Sordariomycetes), which is characterised by
elongate, striate ascospores with apical germ pores, and an anamorph with
1-celled, inflated arthroconidia or perhaps even with the
Testudinaceae (Dothideomycetes). Benny & Kimbrough
(1980) accepted
Faurelina in the Pithoascaceae (= Microascaceae
fide Kirk ), a family erected for members of the Microascales
with arthroconidial anamorphs and narrowly fusoid or naviculate ascospores.
Recently both genera were placed in the Chadefaudiellaceae,
Microascales (Cannon & Kirk
2007). This was in part based on the conclusions of Tang et
al. (2007), who sequenced
a single strain of Faurelina indica
(CBS 126.78) and
obtained ncLSU, ncSSU, and RPB2 sequences identical to those of
Ceratocystis fimbriata, the type species of
Ceratocystis.We studied two authentic strains of Faurelina indica, the ex-type
strain CBS 126.78
and CBS 301.78.
They both grew slowly and mature ascomata did not develop on OA after 2 mo,
but an arthroconidial anamorph with 0–1-septate conidia was observed
similar to that illustrated by von Arx et al.
(1981). No structures
resembling phialides or Ceratocystis-type ascomata were produced. We
generated new ITS and ncLSU sequences (ITS: GU291802; ncLSU: GU180653,
GU180654) for these two strains. Phylogenetic analysis of ncLSU sequences
(Fig. 5) suggests a
relationship with the Didymellaceae (Pleosporales,
Dothideomycetes). ITS sequences (phylogeny not shown) were similar to
those of Eremomyces and Arthrographis species (90–91 %
overall similarity), which also have arthroconidial anamorphs. We are
confident that our sequences represent the fungus described by von Arx et
al. (1981); those reported
by Tang et al. (2007)
were based on a different fungus. Our morphological and molecular studies fail
to support the phylogenetic relationship of Faurelina with
Ceratocystis suggested by Tang et al.
(2007).Based on these results, we confirm the hypothesis originally proposed by
Parguey-Leduc & Locquin-Linard
(1976) that Faurelina
originated in the group of fungi with ascolocular development. Based on ncLSU
sequences, we cannot confirm a close relationship of Faurelina with
the Testudinaceae (von Arx
1978) or the Eremomycetaceae; the latter includes the
morphologically similar Arthrographis
(Fig. 5).This phylogenetic reevaluation eliminates the Chadefaudiellaceae
as an appropriate family name for the Ceratocystis clade.
Chadefaudiella is morphologically slightly different from
Faurelina. A further molecular analysis may lead to a
re-establishment of the Chadefaudiellaceae in the
Microascales, but with the exclusion of Faurelina from the
family and distinct from the Ceratocystidaceae.
Authors: Joseph W Spatafora; Gi-Ho Sung; Desiree Johnson; Cedar Hesse; Benjamin O'Rourke; Maryna Serdani; Robert Spotts; François Lutzoni; Valérie Hofstetter; Jolanta Miadlikowska; Valérie Reeb; Cécile Gueidan; Emily Fraker; Thorsten Lumbsch; Robert Lücking; Imke Schmitt; Kentaro Hosaka; André Aptroot; Claude Roux; Andrew N Miller; David M Geiser; Josef Hafellner; Geir Hestmark; A Elizabeth Arnold; Burkhard Büdel; Alexandra Rauhut; David Hewitt; Wendy A Untereiner; Mariette S Cole; Christoph Scheidegger; Matthias Schultz; Harrie Sipman; Conrad L Schoch Journal: Mycologia Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Ning Zhang; Lisa A Castlebury; Andrew N Miller; Sabine M Huhndorf; Conrad L Schoch; Keith A Seifert; Amy Y Rossman; Jack D Rogers; Jan Kohlmeyer; Brigitte Volkmann-Kohlmeyer; Gi-Ho Sung Journal: Mycologia Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: P W Crous; M J Wingfield; J Guarro; R Cheewangkoon; M van der Bank; W J Swart; A M Stchigel; J F Cano-Lira; J Roux; H Madrid; U Damm; A R Wood; L A Shuttleworth; C S Hodges; M Munster; M de Jesús Yáñez-Morales; L Zúñiga-Estrada; E M Cruywagen; G S de Hoog; C Silvera; J Najafzadeh; E M Davison; P J N Davison; M D Barrett; R L Barrett; D S Manamgoda; A M Minnis; N M Kleczewski; S L Flory; L A Castlebury; K Clay; K D Hyde; S N D Maússe-Sitoe; Shuaifei Chen; C Lechat; M Hairaud; L Lesage-Meessen; J Pawłowska; M Wilk; A Sliwińska-Wyrzychowska; M Mętrak; M Wrzosek; D Pavlic-Zupanc; H M Maleme; B Slippers; W P Mac Cormack; D I Archuby; N J Grünwald; M T Tellería; M Dueñas; M P Martín; S Marincowitz; Z W de Beer; C A Perez; J Gené; Y Marin-Felix; J Z Groenewald Journal: Persoonia Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 11.051
Authors: L Lombard; J Houbraken; C Decock; R A Samson; M Meijer; M Réblová; J Z Groenewald; P W Crous Journal: Persoonia Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 11.051
Authors: P W Crous; J J Luangsa-Ard; M J Wingfield; A J Carnegie; M Hernández-Restrepo; L Lombard; J Roux; R W Barreto; I G Baseia; J F Cano-Lira; M P Martín; O V Morozova; A M Stchigel; B A Summerell; T E Brandrud; B Dima; D García; A Giraldo; J Guarro; L F P Gusmão; P Khamsuntorn; M E Noordeloos; S Nuankaew; U Pinruan; E Rodríguez-Andrade; C M Souza-Motta; R Thangavel; A L van Iperen; V P Abreu; T Accioly; J L Alves; J P Andrade; M Bahram; H-O Baral; E Barbier; C W Barnes; E Bendiksen; E Bernard; J D P Bezerra; J L Bezerra; E Bizio; J E Blair; T M Bulyonkova; T S Cabral; M V Caiafa; T Cantillo; A A Colmán; L B Conceição; S Cruz; A O B Cunha; B A Darveaux; A L da Silva; G A da Silva; G M da Silva; R M F da Silva; R J V de Oliveira; R L Oliveira; J T De Souza; M Dueñas; H C Evans; F Epifani; M T C Felipe; J Fernández-López; B W Ferreira; C N Figueiredo; N V Filippova; J A Flores; J Gené; G Ghorbani; T B Gibertoni; A M Glushakova; R Healy; S M Huhndorf; I Iturrieta-González; M Javan-Nikkhah; R F Juciano; Ž Jurjević; A V Kachalkin; K Keochanpheng; I Krisai-Greilhuber; Y-C Li; A A Lima; A R Machado; H Madrid; O M C Magalhães; P A S Marbach; G C S Melanda; A N Miller; S Mongkolsamrit; R P Nascimento; T G L Oliveira; M E Ordoñez; R Orzes; M A Palma; C J Pearce; O L Pereira; G Perrone; S W Peterson; T H G Pham; E Piontelli; A Pordel; L Quijada; H A Raja; E Rosas de Paz; L Ryvarden; A Saitta; S S Salcedo; M Sandoval-Denis; T A B Santos; K A Seifert; B D B Silva; M E Smith; A M Soares; S Sommai; J O Sousa; S Suetrong; A Susca; L Tedersoo; M T Telleria; D Thanakitpipattana; N Valenzuela-Lopez; C M Visagie; M Zapata; J Z Groenewald Journal: Persoonia Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 11.051
Authors: P W Crous; M J Wingfield; D M Richardson; J J Le Roux; D Strasberg; J Edwards; F Roets; V Hubka; P W J Taylor; M Heykoop; M P Martín; G Moreno; D A Sutton; N P Wiederhold; C W Barnes; J R Carlavilla; J Gené; A Giraldo; V Guarnaccia; J Guarro; M Hernández-Restrepo; M Kolařík; J L Manjón; I G Pascoe; E S Popov; M Sandoval-Denis; J H C Woudenberg; K Acharya; A V Alexandrova; P Alvarado; R N Barbosa; I G Baseia; R A Blanchette; T Boekhout; T I Burgess; J F Cano-Lira; A Čmoková; R A Dimitrov; M Yu Dyakov; M Dueñas; A K Dutta; F Esteve-Raventós; A G Fedosova; J Fournier; P Gamboa; D E Gouliamova; T Grebenc; M Groenewald; B Hanse; G E St J Hardy; B W Held; Ž Jurjević; T Kaewgrajang; K P D Latha; L Lombard; J J Luangsa-Ard; P Lysková; N Mallátová; P Manimohan; A N Miller; M Mirabolfathy; O V Morozova; M Obodai; N T Oliveira; M E Ordóñez; E C Otto; S Paloi; S W Peterson; C Phosri; J Roux; W A Salazar; A Sánchez; G A Sarria; H-D Shin; B D B Silva; G A Silva; M Th Smith; C M Souza-Motta; A M Stchigel; M M Stoilova-Disheva; M A Sulzbacher; M T Telleria; C Toapanta; J M Traba; N Valenzuela-Lopez; R Watling; J Z Groenewald Journal: Persoonia Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 11.051
Authors: Samuel Mm Prudence; Jake T Newitt; Sarah F Worsley; Michael C Macey; J Colin Murrell; Laura E Lehtovirta-Morley; Matthew I Hutchings Journal: Environ Microbiome Date: 2021-06-21