Literature DB >> 21523159

2,7-Dimethyl-2,7-diazo-niapyrene bis-(hexa-fluoro-phosphate).

Li Ang1.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(16)H(14)N(2) (2+)·2PF(6) (-), the 2,7-dimethyl-2,7-diaza-pyrenium (DM-diaz) cation lies on a crystallographic twofold rotation axes. The diaz groups are nearly coplanar, with a maximum deviation of 0.008 (3) Å. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked into a two-dimensional lamellar framework parallel to (104) through weak C-H⋯F inter-actions.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21523159      PMCID: PMC3051768          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811001978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background to 2,7-disubstituted diaza­pyrenium dications, see: Ashton et al. (1999 ▶); Yen et al. (2009 ▶); Steuerman et al. (2004 ▶); Lilienthal et al. (1996 ▶); Sindelar et al. (2005 ▶); Lin et al. (2006 ▶). For related structures, see: Blake et al. (1997 ▶); Dinolfo et al. (2004 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C16H14N2 2+·2PF6 − M = 524.23 Monoclinic, a = 6.7654 (14) Å b = 10.653 (2) Å c = 13.422 (3) Å β = 91.03 (3)° V = 967.2 (3) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.35 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.31 × 0.31 × 0.19 mm

Data collection

Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995 ▶) T min = 0.899, T max = 0.937 7699 measured reflections 1756 independent reflections 1439 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.021

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.059 wR(F 2) = 0.182 S = 1.06 1756 reflections 146 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.48 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.34 e Å−3 Data collection: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998 ▶); cell refinement: RAPID-AUTO; data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC, 2004 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811001978/bg2385sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811001978/bg2385Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C16H14N22+·2PF6F(000) = 524
Mr = 524.23Dx = 1.800 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 6424 reflections
a = 6.7654 (14) Åθ = 3.0–27.5°
b = 10.653 (2) ŵ = 0.35 mm1
c = 13.422 (3) ÅT = 293 K
β = 91.03 (3)°Block, yellow
V = 967.2 (3) Å30.31 × 0.31 × 0.19 mm
Z = 2
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer1756 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1439 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.021
Detector resolution: 0 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.4°, θmin = 3.0°
ω scansh = −8→7
Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995)k = −12→12
Tmin = 0.899, Tmax = 0.937l = −16→16
7699 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.059Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.182H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.106P)2 + 0.7563P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1756 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
146 parametersΔρmax = 0.48 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.34 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
P10.73691 (12)0.87716 (8)0.67479 (6)0.0486 (4)
F10.7852 (5)0.9813 (3)0.7544 (3)0.1277 (13)
F20.7768 (4)0.7779 (3)0.7596 (2)0.1015 (10)
F30.5103 (3)0.8793 (2)0.7022 (2)0.0842 (8)
F40.7012 (5)0.9817 (4)0.5943 (3)0.1329 (14)
F50.9644 (3)0.8750 (3)0.6478 (2)0.0953 (10)
F60.6946 (4)0.7712 (3)0.5961 (2)0.1071 (11)
N11.1916 (4)0.2419 (2)0.61997 (19)0.0458 (6)
C11.0682 (4)0.6661 (3)0.4751 (2)0.0399 (7)
C21.2564 (4)0.6724 (3)0.5268 (2)0.0459 (7)
H21.32720.74720.52750.055*
C31.3308 (4)0.5710 (3)0.5740 (2)0.0463 (7)
H31.45270.57650.60680.056*
C41.2250 (4)0.4551 (3)0.5743 (2)0.0390 (7)
C51.0387 (4)0.4467 (2)0.52485 (19)0.0360 (6)
C61.2952 (4)0.3482 (3)0.6213 (2)0.0459 (7)
H61.41700.35050.65450.055*
C71.0142 (4)0.2319 (3)0.5739 (2)0.0448 (7)
H70.94650.15600.57500.054*
C81.2764 (7)0.1282 (3)0.6680 (3)0.0680 (11)
H8A1.17280.08100.69840.102*
H8C1.37210.15260.71800.102*
H8B1.33920.07740.61870.102*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
P10.0456 (6)0.0520 (6)0.0482 (6)−0.0031 (3)−0.0017 (4)−0.0009 (4)
F10.142 (3)0.105 (2)0.136 (3)−0.007 (2)−0.003 (2)−0.068 (2)
F20.097 (2)0.105 (2)0.103 (2)0.0185 (16)−0.0030 (16)0.0420 (17)
F30.0548 (14)0.105 (2)0.0938 (18)0.0116 (12)0.0153 (12)0.0123 (14)
F40.109 (2)0.150 (3)0.140 (3)−0.012 (2)−0.008 (2)0.093 (2)
F50.0494 (13)0.125 (2)0.112 (2)−0.0215 (13)0.0103 (13)−0.0286 (17)
F60.0775 (16)0.143 (3)0.101 (2)−0.0446 (17)0.0222 (15)−0.0672 (19)
N10.0497 (14)0.0464 (14)0.0414 (13)0.0030 (11)0.0029 (11)0.0041 (11)
C10.0359 (14)0.0422 (15)0.0418 (15)−0.0054 (12)0.0052 (12)−0.0036 (12)
C20.0366 (15)0.0449 (17)0.0561 (19)−0.0096 (12)−0.0002 (14)−0.0050 (14)
C30.0322 (14)0.0558 (18)0.0509 (17)−0.0075 (13)−0.0040 (13)−0.0064 (14)
C40.0323 (14)0.0464 (16)0.0381 (14)−0.0014 (11)−0.0005 (11)−0.0040 (12)
C50.0325 (14)0.0415 (15)0.0341 (14)−0.0027 (11)0.0043 (11)−0.0053 (11)
C60.0409 (16)0.0567 (18)0.0399 (16)0.0017 (13)−0.0031 (13)−0.0028 (13)
C70.0461 (17)0.0434 (16)0.0451 (16)−0.0035 (13)0.0076 (14)−0.0001 (13)
C80.078 (3)0.057 (2)0.068 (2)0.0077 (18)−0.015 (2)0.0186 (18)
P1—F41.567 (3)C2—C31.346 (4)
P1—F61.568 (2)C2—H20.9300
P1—F11.570 (3)C3—C41.427 (4)
P1—F21.574 (3)C3—H30.9300
P1—F31.583 (2)C4—C61.382 (4)
P1—F51.587 (2)C4—C51.417 (4)
N1—C61.332 (4)C5—C5i1.413 (5)
N1—C71.344 (4)C6—H60.9300
N1—C81.483 (4)C7—H70.9300
C1—C7i1.382 (4)C8—H8A0.9600
C1—C5i1.402 (4)C8—H8C0.9600
C1—C21.440 (4)C8—H8B0.9600
F4—P1—F691.3 (2)C1—C2—H2119.7
F4—P1—F189.7 (2)C2—C3—C4120.8 (3)
F6—P1—F1178.30 (18)C2—C3—H3119.6
F4—P1—F2176.9 (2)C4—C3—H3119.6
F6—P1—F291.8 (2)C6—C4—C5117.2 (3)
F1—P1—F287.2 (2)C6—C4—C3123.1 (3)
F4—P1—F390.70 (16)C5—C4—C3119.7 (3)
F6—P1—F390.07 (15)C1i—C5—C5i120.2 (3)
F1—P1—F391.28 (17)C1i—C5—C4120.6 (3)
F2—P1—F389.74 (15)C5i—C5—C4119.3 (3)
F4—P1—F589.51 (18)N1—C6—C4121.2 (3)
F6—P1—F590.11 (14)N1—C6—H6119.4
F1—P1—F588.54 (17)C4—C6—H6119.4
F2—P1—F590.04 (17)N1—C7—C1i120.4 (3)
F3—P1—F5179.73 (16)N1—C7—H7119.8
C6—N1—C7122.6 (3)C1i—C7—H7119.8
C6—N1—C8119.3 (3)N1—C8—H8A109.5
C7—N1—C8118.1 (3)N1—C8—H8C109.5
C7i—C1—C5i118.0 (3)H8A—C8—H8C109.5
C7i—C1—C2122.6 (3)N1—C8—H8B109.5
C5i—C1—C2119.4 (3)H8A—C8—H8B109.5
C3—C2—C1120.6 (3)H8C—C8—H8B109.5
C3—C2—H2119.7
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C6—H6···F2ii0.932.483.367 (4)160
C7—H7···F4iii0.932.513.418 (5)167
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
C6—H6⋯F2i0.932.483.367 (4)160
C7—H7⋯F4ii0.932.513.418 (5)167

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  6 in total

1.  Rhenium-based molecular rectangles as frameworks for ligand-centered mixed valency and optical electron transfer.

Authors:  Peter H Dinolfo; Mary Elizabeth Williams; Charlotte L Stern; Joseph T Hupp
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Molecular-mechanical switch-based solid-state electrochromic devices.

Authors:  David W Steuerman; Hsian-Rong Tseng; Andrea J Peters; Amar H Flood; Jan O Jeppesen; Kent A Nielsen; J Fraser Stoddart; James R Heath
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2004-12-03       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Supramolecular assembly of 2,7-dimethyldiazapyrenium and cucurbit[8]uril: a new fluorescent host for detection of catechol and dopamine.

Authors:  Vladimir Sindelar; Mabel A Cejas; Françisco M Raymo; Weizhong Chen; Samantha E Parker; Angel E Kaifer
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 5.236

5.  A molecular cage that selectively complexes three different guests in solution.

Authors:  Ming-Liang Yen; Nai-Chia Chen; Chien-Chen Lai; Yi-Hung Liu; Shie-Ming Peng; Sheng-Hsien Chiu
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 6.005

6.  An extremely stable host-guest complex that functions as a fluorescence probe for calcium ions.

Authors:  Chi-Feng Lin; Yi-Hung Liu; Chien-Chen Lai; Shie-Ming Peng; Sheng-Hsien Chiu
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 5.236

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.