Literature DB >> 21522882

Bis[2-(hy-droxy-imino-meth-yl)phenolato]nickel(II): a second monoclinic polymorph.

Julia A Rusanova, Elena A Buvaylo, Eduard B Rusanov.   

Abstract

The title compound, [Ni(C(7)H(6)NO(2))(2)], (I), is a second monoclinic polymorph of the compound, (II), reported by Srivastava et al. [Acta Cryst. (1967), 22, 922] and Mereiter [Private communication (2002) CCDC refcode NISALO01]. The bond lengths and angles are similar in both structures. The mol-ecule in both structures lies on a crystallographic inversion center and both have an inter-nal hydrogen bond. The title compound crystallizes in the space group P2(1)/c (Z = 2), whereas compound (II) is in the space group P2(1)/n (Z = 2) with a similar cell volume but different cell parameters. In both polymorphs, mol-ecules are arranged in the layers but in contrast to the previously published compound (II) where the dihedral angle between the layers is 86.3°, in the title polymorph the same dihedral angle is 29.4°. The structure of (I) is stabilized by strong intra-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bonding between the O-H group and the phenolate O atom.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21522882      PMCID: PMC3051639          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811001383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the original monoclinic polymorph, see: Srivastava et al. (1967 ▶); Mereiter (2002 ▶). For background to direct synthesis, see: Nesterov et al. (2004 ▶, 2006 ▶); Kovbasyuk et al. (1998 ▶); Vassilyeva et al. (1997 ▶). For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[Ni(C7H6NO2)2] M = 330.97 Monoclinic, a = 4.9912 (2) Å b = 7.4717 (3) Å c = 17.4152 (7) Å β = 90.653 (3)° V = 649.42 (5) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 1.51 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.53 × 0.36 × 0.11 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEXII diffractometer Absorption correction: numerical (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002 ▶) T min = 0.501, T max = 0.851 4678 measured reflections 1342 independent reflections 1096 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.028

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.030 wR(F 2) = 0.072 S = 1.06 1342 reflections 121 parameters All H-atom parameters refined Δρmax = 0.28 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.26 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811001383/br2156sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811001383/br2156Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Ni(C7H6NO2)2]F(000) = 340
Mr = 330.97Dx = 1.693 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 1800 reflections
a = 4.9912 (2) Åθ = 2.3–26.1°
b = 7.4717 (3) ŵ = 1.51 mm1
c = 17.4152 (7) ÅT = 296 K
β = 90.653 (3)°Prizm, green
V = 649.42 (5) Å30.53 × 0.36 × 0.11 mm
Z = 2
Bruker SMART APEXII diffractometer1342 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1096 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.028
φ and ω scansθmax = 26.4°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: numerical (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)h = −6→6
Tmin = 0.501, Tmax = 0.851k = −9→8
4678 measured reflectionsl = −19→21
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.030Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.072All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.06w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.030P)2 + 0.3216P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1342 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.005
121 parametersΔρmax = 0.28 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.26 e Å3
Experimental. Numerical absorption corrections based on indexed crystal faces were applied using the Crystal Faces plugin in Bruker APEX2 software (Bruker, 2007)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.0820 (4)0.3351 (3)0.41130 (12)0.0363 (5)
C20.0261 (5)0.4911 (3)0.36993 (13)0.0383 (5)
C3−0.1766 (5)0.4888 (4)0.31268 (15)0.0471 (6)
C4−0.3212 (6)0.3375 (4)0.29774 (16)0.0540 (7)
C5−0.2652 (6)0.1845 (4)0.33888 (16)0.0530 (7)
C6−0.0674 (5)0.1815 (4)0.39413 (15)0.0482 (6)
C70.1642 (5)0.6566 (3)0.38506 (14)0.0415 (6)
H3−0.208 (5)0.586 (3)0.2867 (14)0.040 (7)*
H4−0.455 (6)0.342 (4)0.2600 (17)0.071 (9)*
H5−0.369 (6)0.088 (4)0.3311 (16)0.064 (9)*
H6−0.029 (5)0.081 (4)0.4202 (15)0.048 (7)*
H70.106 (5)0.757 (3)0.3582 (13)0.037 (6)*
H20.578 (7)0.828 (5)0.4672 (18)0.074 (11)*
N10.3534 (4)0.6733 (3)0.43480 (11)0.0386 (4)
Ni10.50000.50000.50000.03283 (15)
O10.2671 (3)0.3269 (2)0.46661 (9)0.0413 (4)
O20.4542 (4)0.8474 (3)0.43860 (12)0.0586 (5)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0337 (11)0.0407 (13)0.0346 (12)−0.0023 (10)0.0046 (9)−0.0038 (10)
C20.0372 (11)0.0425 (12)0.0355 (12)0.0022 (11)0.0022 (9)−0.0003 (11)
C30.0458 (14)0.0516 (16)0.0436 (14)0.0049 (14)−0.0054 (11)0.0030 (13)
C40.0467 (15)0.069 (2)0.0457 (15)−0.0028 (15)−0.0113 (12)−0.0060 (15)
C50.0522 (16)0.0531 (17)0.0536 (16)−0.0145 (14)−0.0064 (13)−0.0100 (14)
C60.0537 (16)0.0421 (15)0.0488 (15)−0.0064 (13)−0.0030 (12)−0.0010 (12)
C70.0470 (14)0.0384 (13)0.0391 (13)0.0027 (11)−0.0033 (11)0.0092 (11)
N10.0450 (11)0.0306 (10)0.0401 (10)−0.0052 (9)−0.0023 (9)0.0034 (9)
Ni10.0366 (2)0.0295 (2)0.0324 (2)−0.00221 (19)−0.00104 (15)0.00314 (18)
O10.0474 (10)0.0329 (9)0.0434 (9)−0.0062 (7)−0.0100 (7)0.0056 (7)
O20.0717 (14)0.0338 (10)0.0698 (13)−0.0151 (9)−0.0272 (11)0.0166 (9)
C1—O11.328 (3)C5—C61.371 (4)
C1—C21.397 (3)C5—H50.90 (3)
C1—C61.399 (3)C6—H60.90 (3)
C2—C31.412 (3)C7—N11.280 (3)
C2—C71.439 (3)C7—H70.93 (2)
C3—C41.365 (4)N1—O21.396 (3)
C3—H30.87 (2)N1—Ni11.8661 (19)
C4—C51.376 (4)Ni1—O11.8292 (16)
C4—H40.93 (3)O2—H20.80 (3)
O1—C1—C2123.1 (2)C5—C6—C1121.0 (3)
O1—C1—C6118.8 (2)C5—C6—H6121.2 (17)
C2—C1—C6118.1 (2)C1—C6—H6117.8 (18)
C1—C2—C3119.4 (2)N1—C7—C2123.8 (2)
C1—C2—C7122.0 (2)N1—C7—H7119.1 (15)
C3—C2—C7118.5 (2)C2—C7—H7117.1 (15)
C4—C3—C2121.2 (3)C7—N1—O2112.7 (2)
C4—C3—H3120.3 (17)C7—N1—Ni1128.70 (18)
C2—C3—H3118.6 (17)O2—N1—Ni1118.62 (15)
C3—C4—C5119.0 (3)O1i—Ni1—O1180.0
C3—C4—H4118 (2)O1i—Ni1—N186.92 (8)
C5—C4—H4123 (2)O1—Ni1—N193.08 (8)
C6—C5—C4121.3 (3)N1i—Ni1—N1180.00 (9)
C6—C5—H5120.1 (19)C1—O1—Ni1129.22 (15)
C4—C5—H5118.5 (19)N1—O2—H298 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···O1i0.80 (3)1.80 (3)2.511 (2)146 (4)
N1—Ni11.8661 (19)
Ni1—O11.8292 (16)
O1—Ni1—N193.08 (8)
Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O2—H2⋯O1i0.80 (3)1.80 (3)2.511 (2)146 (4)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Assembling novel heterotrimetallic Cu/Co/Ni and Cu/Co/Cd cores supported by diethanolamine ligand in one-pot reactions of zerovalent copper with metal salts.

Authors:  Dmytro S Nesterov; Valeriya G Makhankova; Olga Yu Vassilyeva; Vladimir N Kokozay; Larisa A Kovbasyuk; Brian W Skelton; Julia Jezierska
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  An unprecedented heterotrimetallic Fe/Cu/Co core for mild and highly efficient catalytic oxidation of cycloalkanes by hydrogen peroxide.

Authors:  Dmytro S Nesterov; Volodymyr N Kokozay; Viktoriya V Dyakonenko; Oleg V Shishkin; Julia Jezierska; Andrew Ozarowski; Alexander M Kirillov; Maximilian N Kopylovich; Armando J L Pombeiro
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 6.222

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Synthesis and characterisation of κ2-N,O-oxazoline-enolate complexes of nickel(ii): explorations in coordination chemistry and metal-mediated polymerisation.

Authors:  Jeanette A Adjei; Alan J Lough; Robert A Gossage
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.036

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.