Literature DB >> 21522671

4-(1,2,4-Triazol-1-yl)aniline.

Hoong-Kun Fun, Ching Kheng Quah, B Chandrakantha, Arun M Isloor, Prakash Shetty.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(8)H(8)N(4), the dihedral angle between the triazole ring [maximum deviation = 0.003 (1) Å] and the benzene ring is 34.57 (7)°. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked into sheets lying parallel to the ac plane via inter-molecular N-H⋯N and C-H⋯N hydrogen bonds. Aromatic π-π [centroid-centroid distance = 3.6750 (8) Å] stacking and N-H⋯π inter-actions are also observed.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21522671      PMCID: PMC3050328          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810052025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background to and the biological activity of triazole derivatives, see: Isloor et al. (2000 ▶, 2009 ▶); Soliman et al. (2001 ▶); Holla et al. (2000 ▶); Sunil et al. (2009 ▶). For bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶). For a related structure, see: Fun et al. (2010 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H8N4 M = 160.18 Monoclinic, a = 5.5488 (1) Å b = 7.3656 (2) Å c = 19.5477 (5) Å β = 99.416 (2)° V = 788.15 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.09 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.50 × 0.42 × 0.14 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEXII CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009 ▶) T min = 0.957, T max = 0.988 8036 measured reflections 2160 independent reflections 1722 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.030

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.044 wR(F 2) = 0.118 S = 1.05 2160 reflections 110 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.23 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.17 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810052025/hb5764sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810052025/hb5764Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H8N4F(000) = 336
Mr = 160.18Dx = 1.350 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 3245 reflections
a = 5.5488 (1) Åθ = 3.0–29.1°
b = 7.3656 (2) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
c = 19.5477 (5) ÅT = 296 K
β = 99.416 (2)°Block, yellow
V = 788.15 (3) Å30.50 × 0.42 × 0.14 mm
Z = 4
Bruker SMART APEXII CCD diffractometer2160 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1722 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.030
φ and ω scansθmax = 29.4°, θmin = 2.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009)h = −7→7
Tmin = 0.957, Tmax = 0.988k = −10→10
8036 measured reflectionsl = −26→24
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.118w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0509P)2 + 0.1531P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.05(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
2160 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.23 e Å3
110 parametersΔρmin = −0.17 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.042 (5)
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.3298 (2)0.17124 (18)1.08332 (6)0.0542 (3)
N20.58582 (19)0.24895 (17)1.00992 (6)0.0498 (3)
N30.34993 (17)0.26004 (14)0.97774 (5)0.0378 (3)
N40.0895 (3)0.4820 (2)0.70184 (6)0.0597 (4)
C10.2029 (2)0.2126 (2)1.02227 (7)0.0480 (3)
H1A0.03340.20921.01170.058*
C20.5611 (3)0.1960 (2)1.07255 (7)0.0533 (4)
H2A0.69480.17681.10720.064*
C30.2865 (2)0.31773 (16)0.90734 (6)0.0360 (3)
C40.4336 (2)0.27300 (17)0.85909 (6)0.0411 (3)
H4A0.57520.20560.87240.049*
C50.3691 (2)0.32893 (18)0.79107 (6)0.0432 (3)
H5A0.46860.29860.75890.052*
C60.1573 (2)0.43007 (17)0.76988 (6)0.0404 (3)
C70.0123 (2)0.47403 (17)0.81966 (6)0.0434 (3)
H7A−0.12960.54150.80680.052*
C80.0763 (2)0.41891 (17)0.88743 (6)0.0415 (3)
H8A−0.02180.44960.92000.050*
H2N40.171 (3)0.447 (2)0.6697 (8)0.065 (5)*
H1N4−0.029 (3)0.560 (3)0.6921 (9)0.078 (6)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0549 (7)0.0658 (8)0.0435 (6)0.0049 (6)0.0124 (5)0.0063 (5)
N20.0340 (5)0.0681 (8)0.0452 (6)−0.0015 (5)0.0006 (4)0.0051 (5)
N30.0318 (5)0.0448 (5)0.0367 (5)0.0009 (4)0.0052 (4)−0.0009 (4)
N40.0711 (8)0.0683 (9)0.0406 (6)0.0212 (7)0.0116 (6)0.0085 (6)
C10.0392 (6)0.0616 (8)0.0447 (7)0.0024 (6)0.0115 (5)0.0042 (6)
C20.0485 (7)0.0650 (9)0.0439 (7)0.0014 (6)−0.0002 (6)0.0047 (6)
C30.0324 (5)0.0396 (6)0.0355 (6)−0.0019 (4)0.0043 (4)−0.0023 (4)
C40.0313 (5)0.0480 (7)0.0445 (7)0.0041 (5)0.0074 (5)−0.0005 (5)
C50.0388 (6)0.0518 (7)0.0412 (6)0.0008 (5)0.0133 (5)−0.0019 (5)
C60.0427 (6)0.0395 (6)0.0386 (6)−0.0027 (5)0.0051 (5)−0.0006 (5)
C70.0388 (6)0.0453 (7)0.0451 (7)0.0081 (5)0.0042 (5)−0.0005 (5)
C80.0375 (6)0.0468 (7)0.0413 (6)0.0053 (5)0.0096 (5)−0.0049 (5)
N1—C11.3183 (17)C3—C41.3842 (16)
N1—C21.3468 (19)C3—C81.3851 (16)
N2—C21.3134 (18)C4—C51.3821 (17)
N2—N31.3587 (14)C4—H4A0.9300
N3—C11.3332 (16)C5—C61.3957 (17)
N3—C31.4284 (14)C5—H5A0.9300
N4—C61.3758 (16)C6—C71.3987 (17)
N4—H2N40.871 (18)C7—C81.3755 (16)
N4—H1N40.87 (2)C7—H7A0.9300
C1—H1A0.9300C8—H8A0.9300
C2—H2A0.9300
C1—N1—C2102.04 (11)C8—C3—N3119.62 (10)
C2—N2—N3102.11 (11)C5—C4—C3119.72 (11)
C1—N3—N2109.16 (10)C5—C4—H4A120.1
C1—N3—C3128.78 (10)C3—C4—H4A120.1
N2—N3—C3122.06 (10)C4—C5—C6121.17 (11)
C6—N4—H2N4121.5 (11)C4—C5—H5A119.4
C6—N4—H1N4118.2 (12)C6—C5—H5A119.4
H2N4—N4—H1N4120.1 (16)N4—C6—C5121.27 (12)
N1—C1—N3111.01 (12)N4—C6—C7120.72 (12)
N1—C1—H1A124.5C5—C6—C7118.00 (11)
N3—C1—H1A124.5C8—C7—C6120.95 (11)
N2—C2—N1115.69 (12)C8—C7—H7A119.5
N2—C2—H2A122.2C6—C7—H7A119.5
N1—C2—H2A122.2C7—C8—C3120.16 (11)
C4—C3—C8120.00 (11)C7—C8—H8A119.9
C4—C3—N3120.38 (10)C3—C8—H8A119.9
C2—N2—N3—C1−0.42 (15)C8—C3—C4—C5−0.32 (19)
C2—N2—N3—C3178.65 (11)N3—C3—C4—C5179.64 (11)
C2—N1—C1—N3−0.25 (16)C3—C4—C5—C60.0 (2)
N2—N3—C1—N10.44 (16)C4—C5—C6—N4−178.34 (13)
C3—N3—C1—N1−178.55 (12)C4—C5—C6—C70.26 (19)
N3—N2—C2—N10.29 (17)N4—C6—C7—C8178.50 (13)
C1—N1—C2—N2−0.04 (18)C5—C6—C7—C8−0.11 (19)
C1—N3—C3—C4−146.03 (13)C6—C7—C8—C3−0.3 (2)
N2—N3—C3—C435.09 (17)C4—C3—C8—C70.48 (19)
C1—N3—C3—C833.93 (19)N3—C3—C8—C7−179.49 (11)
N2—N3—C3—C8−144.95 (12)
Cg2 is the centroid of the C3–C8 phenyl ring.
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N4—H2N4···N1i0.871 (16)2.208 (16)3.0709 (18)171.1 (15)
C1—H1A···N2ii0.932.503.4035 (16)166
N4—H1N4···Cg2iii0.87 (2)2.58 (2)3.3929 (16)156.0 (17)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Cg2 is the centroid of the C3–C8 phenyl ring.

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N4—H2N4⋯N1i0.871 (16)2.208 (16)3.0709 (18)171.1 (15)
C1—H1A⋯N2ii0.932.503.4035 (16)166
N4—H1N4⋯Cg2iii0.87 (2)2.58 (2)3.3929 (16)156.0 (17)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  6 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Regioselective reaction: synthesis, characterization and pharmacological studies of some new Mannich bases derived from 1,2,4-triazoles.

Authors:  Arun M Isloor; Balakrishna Kalluraya; Prashanth Shetty
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of novel pyrazole, pyrazoline, pyrazolinone and pyrazolidinedione derivatives of benzimidazole.

Authors:  R Soliman; N S Habib; F A Ashour; M el-Taiebi
Journal:  Boll Chim Farm       Date:  2001 May-Jun

4.  Studies on arylfuran derivatives: part X. Synthesis and antibacterial properties of arylfuryl-delta2-pyrazolines.

Authors:  B S Holla; P M Akberali; M K Shivananda
Journal:  Farmaco       Date:  2000-04

5.  3-Ethyl-6-[3-(4-fluoro-phen-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]-1,2,4-triazolo[3,4-b][1,3,4]thia-diazole.

Authors:  Hoong-Kun Fun; Ching Kheng Quah; Shridhar Malladi; Arun M Isloor
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-10-13

6.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Ethyl 5-methyl-1-(4-nitro-phen-yl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxyl-ate.

Authors:  Hoong-Kun Fun; Ching Kheng Quah; Balakrishna Kalluraya
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-08-27

2.  N'-[1-(4-Chloro-phen-yl)ethyl-idene]-5-methyl-1-(4-nitro-phen-yl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carbohydrazide.

Authors:  Hoong-Kun Fun; Ching Kheng Quah; Balakrishna Kalluraya; Shobhitha Shetty
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-06-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.