Literature DB >> 21522351

5-Fluoro-isophthalic acid.

Jin-Ling Mi1, Le Chen, Ming-Yang He.   

Abstract

In the crystal structure of the title compound, C(8)H(5)FO(4), the complete molecule is generated by crystallographic twofold symmetry with two C atoms and the F atom lying on the axis. The mol-ecule is almost planar with the carboxyl group twisted with respect to the mean plane of the benzene ring by a dihedral angle of 2.01 (1)°. In the crystal, inter-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds and C-H⋯F inter-actions connect the mol-ecules into a two-dimensional supra-molecular array.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21522351      PMCID: PMC3052173          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811004004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For isophthalic acid, see: Bhogala et al. (2005 ▶); Derissen (1974 ▶). For the use of the title compound in crystal engin­eering, see: Zhang et al. (2010 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H5FO4 M = 184.12 Monoclinic, a = 3.7736 (8) Å b = 16.292 (4) Å c = 6.2753 (14) Å β = 91.871 (5)° V = 385.60 (14) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.14 mm−1 T = 297 K 0.22 × 0.20 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003 ▶) T min = 0.969, T max = 0.979 2201 measured reflections 743 independent reflections 603 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.018

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.041 wR(F 2) = 0.161 S = 1.04 743 reflections 64 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.16 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2003 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2005 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811004004/go2002sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811004004/go2002Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H5FO4F(000) = 188
Mr = 184.12Dx = 1.586 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/mMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybCell parameters from 1020 reflections
a = 3.7736 (8) Åθ = 2.5–28.0°
b = 16.292 (4) ŵ = 0.14 mm1
c = 6.2753 (14) ÅT = 297 K
β = 91.871 (5)°Block, colourless
V = 385.60 (14) Å30.22 × 0.20 × 0.15 mm
Z = 2
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer743 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube603 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.018
φ and ω scansθmax = 25.5°, θmin = 2.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003)h = −4→4
Tmin = 0.969, Tmax = 0.979k = −17→19
2201 measured reflectionsl = −7→5
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.161H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1244P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
743 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
64 parametersΔρmax = 0.16 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.15 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.6268 (4)0.59855 (9)0.8588 (3)0.0524 (5)
C20.7105 (4)0.67633 (9)0.7484 (2)0.0487 (5)
C30.8602 (4)0.67563 (10)0.5486 (3)0.0529 (5)
H30.91070.62650.48060.063*
C40.9312 (5)0.75000.4549 (3)0.0540 (6)
C50.6370 (5)0.75000.8476 (3)0.0477 (6)
H50.53790.75000.98130.057*
F11.0787 (4)0.75000.2629 (2)0.0744 (6)
O10.7073 (4)0.53205 (8)0.7622 (2)0.0775 (6)
H10.63480.49050.82050.116*
O20.4837 (4)0.60037 (7)1.0328 (2)0.0722 (6)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0490 (9)0.0612 (10)0.0474 (10)−0.0023 (6)0.0088 (7)−0.0080 (7)
C20.0385 (8)0.0652 (11)0.0424 (9)−0.0012 (6)0.0022 (6)−0.0051 (6)
C30.0420 (9)0.0726 (12)0.0441 (10)−0.0006 (6)0.0027 (7)−0.0087 (7)
C40.0426 (11)0.0852 (16)0.0346 (11)0.0000.0069 (9)0.000
C50.0400 (10)0.0642 (14)0.0395 (11)0.0000.0072 (8)0.000
F10.0745 (10)0.1105 (12)0.0393 (8)0.0000.0190 (7)0.000
O10.1022 (11)0.0610 (8)0.0715 (10)−0.0050 (6)0.0359 (8)−0.0121 (6)
O20.0938 (10)0.0622 (9)0.0628 (9)−0.0038 (6)0.0355 (7)−0.0032 (5)
C1—O21.235 (2)C3—H30.9300
C1—O11.2826 (19)C4—F11.343 (2)
C1—C21.483 (2)C4—C3i1.377 (2)
C2—C51.3841 (18)C5—C2i1.3841 (19)
C2—C31.392 (2)C5—H50.9300
C3—C41.377 (2)O1—H10.8201
O2—C1—O1123.73 (15)C2—C3—H3121.1
O2—C1—C2119.91 (13)F1—C4—C3118.37 (11)
O1—C1—C2116.35 (15)F1—C4—C3i118.36 (11)
C5—C2—C3120.34 (15)C3—C4—C3i123.3 (2)
C5—C2—C1118.83 (15)C2—C5—C2i120.3 (2)
C3—C2—C1120.83 (14)C2—C5—H5119.9
C4—C3—C2117.89 (16)C2i—C5—H5119.9
C4—C3—H3121.1C1—O1—H1113.5
O2—C1—C2—C52.3 (3)C1—C2—C3—C4179.97 (14)
O1—C1—C2—C5−178.51 (16)C2—C3—C4—F1179.40 (14)
O2—C1—C2—C3−177.68 (14)C2—C3—C4—C3i−0.3 (3)
O1—C1—C2—C31.5 (3)C3—C2—C5—C2i0.3 (3)
C5—C2—C3—C40.0 (3)C1—C2—C5—C2i−179.72 (12)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O2ii0.821.812.625 (2)174
C5—H5···F1iii0.932.523.404 (2)160
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯O2i0.821.812.625 (2)174
C5—H5⋯F1ii0.932.523.404 (2)160

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  1 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

  1 in total
  1 in total

1.  Experimental, DFT dimeric modeling and AIM study of H-bond-mediated composite vibrational structure of Chelidonic acid.

Authors:  Shivanand S Malaganvi; Jayashree Tonannavar Yenagi; J Tonannavar
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-05-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.