Literature DB >> 21522223

Rehabilitation of Patients Following Autogenic Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone ACL Reconstruction: A 20-Year Perspective.

Mark S De Carlo1, Ryan McDivitt.   

Abstract

Rehabilitation of patients following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has undergone remarkable improvements over the past two decades. During this time, ACL research has been at the forefront of many orthopaedic and sports physical therapy clinics. With over 20 years of ACL rehabilitation experience (senior author) and prior collaboration with accelerated ACL rehabilitation pioneer K. Donald Shelbourne, the authors wish to present a unique perspective on the evolution of ACL rehabilitation.Prior to the classic article by Paulos et al in 1981,(1) literature on ACL rehabilitation was quite sparse. The basis for ACL rehabilitation at this time was founded in basic science studies conducted with animal models. In an effort to protect the graft, emphasis was placed on immobilization, extension limitation, restricted weight bearing, and delayed return to activity. Despite achieving good ligamentous stability, patients often experienced a spectrum of complications.In 1990, Shelbourne and Nitz(2) proposed an accelerated rehabilitation protocol following ACL reconstruction based on clinical experience. Their program emphasized delayed surgery, earlier range of motion and weight bearing, and full extension. As a result, patients experienced better clinical outcomes while maintaining knee stability.The rehabilitation program presented in this paper is still largely based on the principles of the accelerated protocol. As evidence-based practice and the call for prospective, randomized clinical research continues, the continued progress in treating patients with this injury will be enhanced. Furthermore, clinicians are urged not to lose sight of the clinical reasoning that helped evolve the ACL rehabilitation process where it is today.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 21522223      PMCID: PMC2953360     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 1558-6162


  84 in total

1.  Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of programs administered over 2 different time intervals.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Benjamin S Uh; Robert J Johnson; Joseph A Abate; Claude E Nichols; Braden C Fleming; A Robin Poole; Harald Roos
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Strength of the quadriceps femoris muscle and functional recovery after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of electrical stimulation.

Authors:  L Snyder-Mackler; A Delitto; S L Bailey; S W Stralka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Instability of the knee. A long-term experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  J L Marshall; S E Olsson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Prevention of arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the central third patellar tendon autograft.

Authors:  A J Cosgarea; W J Sebastianelli; K E DeHaven
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Effect of surgical timing on recovery and associated injuries after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  S A Wasilewski; D J Covall; S Cohen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Intra-articular cruciate reconstruction. I: Perspectives on graft strength, vascularization, and immediate motion after replacement.

Authors:  F R Noyes; D L Butler; L E Paulos; E S Grood
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Current concepts in anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation.

Authors:  K D Shelbourne; J H Wilckens
Journal:  Orthop Rev       Date:  1990-11

8.  Brace-free rehabilitation, with early return to activity, for knees reconstructed with a double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis graft.

Authors:  S M Howell; M A Taylor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Early knee motion after open and arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  F R Noyes; R E Mangine; S Barber
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Evaluation-based protocols: a new approach to rehabilitation.

Authors:  F R Noyes; M DeMaio; R E Mangine
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  4 in total

1.  Current practice: postoperative and return to play trends after ACL reconstruction by fellowship-trained sports surgeons.

Authors:  N E Marshall; R A Keller; J Dines; C Bush-Joseph; O Limpisvasti
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-10-25

2.  An Ecological Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Part 1: Clinical Tests Do Not Correlate With Return-to-Sport Outcomes.

Authors:  Timothy M McGrath; Gordon Waddington; Jennie M Scarvell; Nick Ball; Rob Creer; Kevin Woods; Damian Smith; Roger Adams
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-11-22

3.  Haptic feedback helps bipedal coordination.

Authors:  Eefje G J Roelofsen; Jurjen Bosga; David A Rosenbaum; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Wim Hullegie; Robert van Cingel; Ruud G J Meulenbroek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Examination of Early Functional Recovery After ACL Reconstruction: Functional Milestone Achievement and Self-Reported Function.

Authors:  Michael C Obermeier; Robby S Sikka; Marc Tompkins; Bradley J Nelson; Abigail Hamilton; Megan Reams; Terese L Chmielewski
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.843

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.