OBJECTIVE: Descending necrotizing mediastinitis (DNM) is a serious form of mediastinitis with a high mortality rate. It is caused by the downward spread of an oropharyngeal or cervicofascial infection. The optimal surgical approach for this often fatal disease is controversial. This article describes the authors' experience and characterizes the surgical strategies and treatment outcomes of patients with DNM. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review. SETTING: A tertiary referral medical center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with deep neck infections treated at a medical center from 1994 to 2007 and identified 29 patients with DNM. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients treated with transcervical drainage alone (group I) and those with both cervical and thoracic drainage (group II). RESULTS: There were 20 patients in group I and 9 patients in group II. The overall mortality rate was 10.3%. The mean duration of the hospital stay was 29.3 ± 15.5 days. There was no statistically significant difference in age, sex distribution, or duration from the appearance of symptoms to hospital admission between the 2 groups. The duration of hospital stay, tracheotomy rate, and mortality rate also did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. However, the numbers of surgeries were significantly higher in group II than in group I. CONCLUSION: Transthoracic mediastinal drainage is not a compulsory therapy, but timely, aggressive, transcervical mediastinal drainage with extensive debridement is very important for a good outcome when treating DNM patients.
OBJECTIVE: Descending necrotizing mediastinitis (DNM) is a serious form of mediastinitis with a high mortality rate. It is caused by the downward spread of an oropharyngeal or cervicofascial infection. The optimal surgical approach for this often fatal disease is controversial. This article describes the authors' experience and characterizes the surgical strategies and treatment outcomes of patients with DNM. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review. SETTING: A tertiary referral medical center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with deep neck infections treated at a medical center from 1994 to 2007 and identified 29 patients with DNM. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients treated with transcervical drainage alone (group I) and those with both cervical and thoracic drainage (group II). RESULTS: There were 20 patients in group I and 9 patients in group II. The overall mortality rate was 10.3%. The mean duration of the hospital stay was 29.3 ± 15.5 days. There was no statistically significant difference in age, sex distribution, or duration from the appearance of symptoms to hospital admission between the 2 groups. The duration of hospital stay, tracheotomy rate, and mortality rate also did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. However, the numbers of surgeries were significantly higher in group II than in group I. CONCLUSION: Transthoracic mediastinal drainage is not a compulsory therapy, but timely, aggressive, transcervical mediastinal drainage with extensive debridement is very important for a good outcome when treating DNMpatients.
Authors: Antonio Mazzella; Mario Santagata; Atirge Cecere; Ettore La Mart; Alfonso Fiorelli; Gianpaolo Tartaro; Domenico Tafuri; Domenico Testa; Edoardo Grella; Fabio Perrotta; Andrea Bianco; Gennaro Mazzarella; Mario Santini Journal: Open Med (Wars) Date: 2016-11-19