Literature DB >> 21521820

Heifer development systems: dry-lot feeding compared with grazing dormant winter forage.

R N Funston1, D M Larson.   

Abstract

Two hundred ninety-nine Angus-based, nulliparous heifers (253 ± 2 kg initial BW) from 3 production years were utilized to compare traditional postweaning dry lot (DL) development with a more extensive winter grazing system utilizing a combination of corn residue and winter range (EXT). Heifers developed in the DL were offered a common diet after the weaning period for 208 d in yr 1, 194 d in yr 2, and 150 d in yr 3 until breeding. Heifers developed in EXT grazed corn residue for 135 d in yr 1, 106 d in yr 2, and 91 d in yr 3, and then fed in the DL until breeding (yr 1) or grazed dormant winter grass for approximately 60 d before being fed in the DL (yr 2 and 3). All 3 years, heifers were estrus synchronized, with timed AI performed in yr 1. In yr 2 and 3, estrus was detected and those detected in estrus were artificially inseminated approximately 12 h later. Heifers were exposed to bulls 10 d after the last AI for 60 d while grazing summer pasture. During the winter grazing period, EXT heifers gained less (P = 0.01) BW than DL heifers and EXT heifers had lighter (P = 0.02) BW at breeding. Fewer (P < 0.01) EXT heifers reached puberty before breeding. Conception to AI was not different (P = 0.23); however, AI pregnancy rate tended (P = 0.08) to be less in EXT heifers. Final pregnancy rates were not different (P = 0.38) between treatment groups. Although EXT heifers had lighter (P = 0.02) BW at pregnancy diagnosis; however, they did compensate with greater (P = 0.05) ADG after breeding, resulting in similar (P = 0.22) precalving BW. Winter development system did not influence (P > 0.10) percentage of calving in the first 21 d, calf birth date, and calf birth BW, or dystocia score. Pregnancy rate after the second breeding season was not different (P = 0.56) between treatments. Heifer development using extended winter grazing reduced (P < 0.01) the cost of producing a pregnant heifer by $45 compared with DL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21521820     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2010-3095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

1.  Winter grazing of stockpiled native forages during heifer development delays body weight gain without influencing final pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Zachary D McFarlane; Emily R Cope; Jeremy D Hobbs; Renata N Oakes; Ky G Pohler; J Travis Mulliniks
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effect of postweaning heifer development system on average daily gain, pregnancy rates, and subsequent feed efficiency as a pregnant heifer.

Authors:  S A Springman; H R Nielson; T L Meyer; R N Funston
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Developmental and reproductive characteristics of beef heifers classified by pubertal status at time of first breeding.

Authors:  A J Roberts; A Gomes da Silva; A F Summers; T W Geary; R N Funston
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  BEEF SPECIES-RUMINANT NUTRITION CACTUS BEEF SYMPOSIUM: Influence of management decisions during heifer development on enhancing reproductive success and cow longevity1.

Authors:  Adam F Summers; Shelby L Rosasco; Eric J Scholljegerdes
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Effect of heifer frame score on growth, fertility, and economics.

Authors:  S Şentürklü; D G Landblom; G A Perry; T Petry
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Transcriptome profiles in peripheral white blood cells at the time of artificial insemination discriminate beef heifers with different fertility potential.

Authors:  Sarah E Dickinson; Brock A Griffin; Michelle F Elmore; Lisa Kriese-Anderson; Joshua B Elmore; Paul W Dyce; Soren P Rodning; Fernando H Biase
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Evaluation of age, weaning weight, body condition score, and reproductive tract score in pre-selected beef heifers relative to reproductive potential.

Authors:  Sarah E Dickinson; Michelle F Elmore; Lisa Kriese-Anderson; Joshua B Elmore; Bailey N Walker; Paul W Dyce; Soren P Rodning; Fernando H Biase
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2019-02-26

8.  Rewiring of gene expression in circulating white blood cells is associated with pregnancy outcome in heifers (Bos taurus).

Authors:  Sarah E Moorey; Bailey N Walker; Michelle F Elmore; Joshua B Elmore; Soren P Rodning; Fernando H Biase
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Effects of management system on beef heifer growth and reproductive performance.

Authors:  Parker A Henley; Frank A Ireland; Igor F Canisso; J Lannett Edwards; Daniel W Shike
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.