BACKGROUND: Few hospice and palliative care organizations use health information technology (HIT) for data collection and management; the feasibility and utility of a HIT-based approach in this multi-faceted, interdisciplinary context is unclear. PURPOSE: To develop a HIT-based data infrastructure that serves multiple hospice and palliative care sites, meeting clinical and administrative needs with data, technical, and analytic support. METHODS: Through a multi-site academic/community partnership, a data infrastructure was collaboratively developed, pilot-tested at a community-based site, refined, and demonstrated for data collection and preliminary analysis. Additional sites, which participated in system development, became prepared to contribute data to the growing aggregate database. RESULTS: Electronic data collection proved feasible in community-based hospice and palliative care. The project highlighted "success factors" for implementing HIT in this field: engagement of site-based project "champions" to promote the system from within; involvement of stakeholders at all levels of the organization, to promote culture change and buy-in; attention to local needs (e.g., data for quality reporting) and requirements (e.g., affordable cost, efficiency); consideration of practical factors (e.g., potential to interfere with clinical flow); provision of adequate software, technical, analytic, and statistical support; availability of flexible HIT options (e.g., different data-collection platforms); and adoption of a consortium approach in which sites can support one another, learn from each others' experiences, pool data, and benefit from economies of scale. CONCLUSIONS: In hospice and palliative care, HIT-based data collection/management has potential to generate better understanding of populations and outcomes, support quality assessment/quality improvement, and prepare sites to participate in research.
BACKGROUND: Few hospice and palliative care organizations use health information technology (HIT) for data collection and management; the feasibility and utility of a HIT-based approach in this multi-faceted, interdisciplinary context is unclear. PURPOSE: To develop a HIT-based data infrastructure that serves multiple hospice and palliative care sites, meeting clinical and administrative needs with data, technical, and analytic support. METHODS: Through a multi-site academic/community partnership, a data infrastructure was collaboratively developed, pilot-tested at a community-based site, refined, and demonstrated for data collection and preliminary analysis. Additional sites, which participated in system development, became prepared to contribute data to the growing aggregate database. RESULTS: Electronic data collection proved feasible in community-based hospice and palliative care. The project highlighted "success factors" for implementing HIT in this field: engagement of site-based project "champions" to promote the system from within; involvement of stakeholders at all levels of the organization, to promote culture change and buy-in; attention to local needs (e.g., data for quality reporting) and requirements (e.g., affordable cost, efficiency); consideration of practical factors (e.g., potential to interfere with clinical flow); provision of adequate software, technical, analytic, and statistical support; availability of flexible HIT options (e.g., different data-collection platforms); and adoption of a consortium approach in which sites can support one another, learn from each others' experiences, pool data, and benefit from economies of scale. CONCLUSIONS: In hospice and palliative care, HIT-based data collection/management has potential to generate better understanding of populations and outcomes, support quality assessment/quality improvement, and prepare sites to participate in research.
Authors: Arif H Kamal; Janet Bull; Dio Kavalieratos; Jonathan M Nicolla; Laura Roe; Martha Adams; Amy P Abernethy Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Arif H Kamal; Dio Kavalieratos; Janet Bull; Charles S Stinson; Jonathan Nicolla; Amy P Abernethy Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Dio Kavalieratos; Arif H Kamal; Amy P Abernethy; Andrea K Biddle; Timothy S Carey; Sandesh Dev; Bryce B Reeve; Morris Weinberger Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Bradi B Granger; Janet Prvu-Bettger; Julia Aucoin; Mary Ann Fuchs; Pamela H Mitchell; Diane Holditch-Davis; Deborah Roth; Robert M Califf; Catherine L Gilliss Journal: J Nurs Scholarsh Date: 2012-02-17 Impact factor: 3.176
Authors: M Kay M Judge; Roberta Luedke; Brenda W Dyal; Miriam O Ezenwa; Diana J Wilkie Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 3.359