Literature DB >> 21521597

Development of a health information technology-based data system in community-based hospice and palliative care.

Amy P Abernethy1, Jane L Wheeler, Janet Bull.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few hospice and palliative care organizations use health information technology (HIT) for data collection and management; the feasibility and utility of a HIT-based approach in this multi-faceted, interdisciplinary context is unclear.
PURPOSE: To develop a HIT-based data infrastructure that serves multiple hospice and palliative care sites, meeting clinical and administrative needs with data, technical, and analytic support.
METHODS: Through a multi-site academic/community partnership, a data infrastructure was collaboratively developed, pilot-tested at a community-based site, refined, and demonstrated for data collection and preliminary analysis. Additional sites, which participated in system development, became prepared to contribute data to the growing aggregate database.
RESULTS: Electronic data collection proved feasible in community-based hospice and palliative care. The project highlighted "success factors" for implementing HIT in this field: engagement of site-based project "champions" to promote the system from within; involvement of stakeholders at all levels of the organization, to promote culture change and buy-in; attention to local needs (e.g., data for quality reporting) and requirements (e.g., affordable cost, efficiency); consideration of practical factors (e.g., potential to interfere with clinical flow); provision of adequate software, technical, analytic, and statistical support; availability of flexible HIT options (e.g., different data-collection platforms); and adoption of a consortium approach in which sites can support one another, learn from each others' experiences, pool data, and benefit from economies of scale.
CONCLUSIONS: In hospice and palliative care, HIT-based data collection/management has potential to generate better understanding of populations and outcomes, support quality assessment/quality improvement, and prepare sites to participate in research.
Copyright © 2011 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21521597     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  7 in total

Review 1.  The impact of health information technology on cancer care across the continuum: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Will L Tarver; Nir Menachemi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Development of the Quality Data Collection Tool for Prospective Quality Assessment and Reporting in Palliative Care.

Authors:  Arif H Kamal; Janet Bull; Dio Kavalieratos; Jonathan M Nicolla; Laura Roe; Martha Adams; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Usability and Acceptability of the QDACT-PC, an Electronic Point-of-Care System for Standardized Quality Monitoring in Palliative Care.

Authors:  Arif H Kamal; Dio Kavalieratos; Janet Bull; Charles S Stinson; Jonathan Nicolla; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Comparing unmet needs between community-based palliative care patients with heart failure and patients with cancer.

Authors:  Dio Kavalieratos; Arif H Kamal; Amy P Abernethy; Andrea K Biddle; Timothy S Carey; Sandesh Dev; Bryce B Reeve; Morris Weinberger
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  An academic-health service partnership in nursing: lessons from the field.

Authors:  Bradi B Granger; Janet Prvu-Bettger; Julia Aucoin; Mary Ann Fuchs; Pamela H Mitchell; Diane Holditch-Davis; Deborah Roth; Robert M Califf; Catherine L Gilliss
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.176

6.  Clinical efficacy and implementation issues of an electronic pain reporting device among outpatients with cancer.

Authors:  M Kay M Judge; Roberta Luedke; Brenda W Dyal; Miriam O Ezenwa; Diana J Wilkie
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.359

7.  Information Technology and Medical Technology Personnel's Perception Regarding Segmentation of Medical Devices: A Focus Group Study.

Authors:  David Johansson; Patrik Jönsson; Bodil Ivarsson; Maria Christiansson
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.