Literature DB >> 21521342

Optimizing glucocorticoid replacement therapy in severely adrenocorticotropin-deficient hypopituitary male patients.

Lucy-Ann Behan1, Bairbre Rogers, Mark J Hannon, Patrick O'Kelly, William Tormey, Diarmuid Smith, Christopher J Thompson, Amar Agha.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal replacement regimen of hydrocortisone in adults with severe ACTH deficiency remains unknown. Management strategies vary from treatment with 15-30 mg or higher in daily divided doses, reflecting the paucity of prospective data on the adequacy of different glucocorticoid regimens.
OBJECTIVE: Primarily to define the hydrocortisone regimen which results in a 24 h cortisol profile that most closely resembles that of healthy controls and secondarily to assess the impact on quality of life (QoL).
DESIGN: Ten male hypopituitary patients with severe ACTH deficiency (basal cortisol <100 nm and peak response to stimulation <400 nm) were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, crossover study of 3 hydrocortisone dose regimens. Following 6 weeks of each regimen patients underwent 24 h serum cortisol sampling and QoL assessment with the Short Form 36 (SF36) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) questionnaires. Free cortisol was calculated using Coolen's equation. All results were compared to those of healthy, matched controls.
RESULTS: Corticosteroid binding globulin (CBG) was significantly lower across all dose regimens compared to controls (P < 0·05). The lower dose regimen C (10 mg mane/5 mg tarde) produced a 24 h free cortisol profile (FCP) which most closely resembled that of controls. Both regimen A(20 mg mane/10 mg tarde) and B(10 mg mane/10 mg tarde) produced supraphysiological post-absorption peaks. There was no significant difference in QoL in patients between the three regimens, however energy level was significantly lower across all dose regimens compared to controls (P < 0·001).
CONCLUSIONS: The lower dose of hydrocortisone (10 mg/5 mg) produces a more physiological cortisol profile, without compromising QoL, compared to higher doses still used in clinical practice. This may have important implications in these patients, known to have excess cardiovascular mortality.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21521342     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04074.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)        ISSN: 0300-0664            Impact factor:   3.478


  4 in total

1.  Adrenal disease: Imitating the cortisol profile improves the immune system.

Authors:  Lisa Müller; Marcus Quinkler
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 2.  Chronopharmacology of glucocorticoids.

Authors:  Megerle L Scherholz; Naomi Schlesinger; Ioannis P Androulakis
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  Plasma, salivary and urinary cortisol levels following physiological and stress doses of hydrocortisone in normal volunteers.

Authors:  Caroline Jung; Santo Greco; Hanh H T Nguyen; Jui T Ho; John G Lewis; David J Torpy; Warrick J Inder
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.763

4.  The contribution of serum cortisone and glucocorticoid metabolites to detrimental bone health in patients receiving hydrocortisone therapy.

Authors:  Rosemary Dineen; Lucy-Ann Behan; Grainne Kelleher; Mark J Hannon; Jennifer J Brady; Bairbre Rogers; Brian G Keevil; William Tormey; Diarmuid Smith; Christopher J Thompson; Malachi J McKenna; Wiebke Arlt; Paul M Stewart; Amar Agha; Mark Sherlock
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 2.763

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.